|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On March 22 2017 06:20 Gahlo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 22 2017 06:18 GreenHorizons wrote:On March 22 2017 05:18 Nevuk wrote:Just wanted to check in with the thread on a few favorable ratings 61 days after inauguration Opinions on certain individuals/organizations. If no opinion, do not vote. + Show Spoiler +Poll: Donald TrumpUnfavorable (36) 95% Favorable (2) 5% 38 total votes Your vote: Donald Trump (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: Hillary ClintonUnfavorable (18) 55% Favorable (15) 45% 33 total votes Your vote: Hillary Clinton (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: Bernie SandersFavorable (25) 74% Unfavorable (9) 26% 34 total votes Your vote: Bernie Sanders (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
+ Show Spoiler +Poll: DNCUnfavorable (20) 71% Favorable (8) 29% 28 total votes Your vote: DNC (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: RNCUnfavorable (24) 89% Favorable (3) 11% 27 total votes Your vote: RNC (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: SenateUnfavorable (24) 92% Favorable (2) 8% 26 total votes Your vote: Senate (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: House of RepresentativesUnfavorable (23) 96% Favorable (1) 4% 24 total votes Your vote: House of Representatives (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
lol, if not Bernie, who is it that Democrats should be rallying around? If I can't vote for Bernie or Warren, I'd be willing to vote for Biden. If we are dumb enough to nominate Warren for a nationwide race, we deserve to lose. I’ve voted for her in every election, but she will not make it nationally. Lets just keep her in the senate and find anyone else. There is plenty of time between here and 2020.
|
On March 22 2017 06:18 LegalLord wrote:Show nested quote +On March 22 2017 06:18 GreenHorizons wrote:On March 22 2017 05:18 Nevuk wrote:Just wanted to check in with the thread on a few favorable ratings 61 days after inauguration Opinions on certain individuals/organizations. If no opinion, do not vote. Poll: Donald TrumpUnfavorable (36) 95% Favorable (2) 5% 38 total votes Your vote: Donald Trump (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: Hillary ClintonUnfavorable (18) 55% Favorable (15) 45% 33 total votes Your vote: Hillary Clinton (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: Bernie SandersFavorable (25) 74% Unfavorable (9) 26% 34 total votes Your vote: Bernie Sanders (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: DNCUnfavorable (20) 71% Favorable (8) 29% 28 total votes Your vote: DNC (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: RNCUnfavorable (24) 89% Favorable (3) 11% 27 total votes Your vote: RNC (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: SenateUnfavorable (24) 92% Favorable (2) 8% 26 total votes Your vote: Senate (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: House of RepresentativesUnfavorable (23) 96% Favorable (1) 4% 24 total votes Your vote: House of Representatives (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
lol, if not Bernie, who is it that Democrats should be rallying around? Surely by now you should know the answer to that... We need someone with a long history of being around and doing a mediocre job, of course, The last time it was mentioned Bernie was popular in the polls, someone with incredible wisdom pointed out he's just popular because he's not being reported on and isn't active on the political stage.
For a presidential campaign, however, I'm not sure if Sanders is the right person. You'd need someone with exactly the same message though. That's really all that matters. And how do you get someone with that message? Take away their billionaire/corporate funding.
|
I like Warren but know nothing about her to comment on how she'd do nationally or how good of a campaigner she is.
rather than answer seriously I just go with saying Ige 2020.
|
What I want ot know is, with the 40 or so other democrat senators, and the 16-ish democrat governors, and some of the more notable Representatives; what makes each of them a bad choice for president? surely some of them must be decent enough. I can get that some might have issues, be ineligible, or just be a bit thin on experience (not that that seems ot matter), but surely some of them must be suitable enough. I wish there was a workup covering each of them.
ooh, non-serious answers? I'll add one: me for president!
|
On March 22 2017 06:22 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 22 2017 06:20 Mohdoo wrote:On March 22 2017 06:19 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:On March 22 2017 06:18 GreenHorizons wrote:On March 22 2017 05:18 Nevuk wrote:Just wanted to check in with the thread on a few favorable ratings 61 days after inauguration Opinions on certain individuals/organizations. If no opinion, do not vote. Poll: Donald TrumpUnfavorable (36) 95% Favorable (2) 5% 38 total votes Your vote: Donald Trump (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: Hillary ClintonUnfavorable (18) 55% Favorable (15) 45% 33 total votes Your vote: Hillary Clinton (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: Bernie SandersFavorable (25) 74% Unfavorable (9) 26% 34 total votes Your vote: Bernie Sanders (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: DNCUnfavorable (20) 71% Favorable (8) 29% 28 total votes Your vote: DNC (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: RNCUnfavorable (24) 89% Favorable (3) 11% 27 total votes Your vote: RNC (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: SenateUnfavorable (24) 92% Favorable (2) 8% 26 total votes Your vote: Senate (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
Poll: House of RepresentativesUnfavorable (23) 96% Favorable (1) 4% 24 total votes Your vote: House of Representatives (Vote): Favorable (Vote): Unfavorable
lol, if not Bernie, who is it that Democrats should be rallying around? Biden maybe, if he's interested. personally I like Franken (ridiculously smart and pro single payer) but he'd need someone like Bernie to kind of be the face of the party. Biden will be 78 4 years from now. I dunno man. well obviously I'm not saying Biden 2020. I'm just saying he's popular and I don't think anyone really has anything bad to say about him. Won't Bernie be 77 in 2020 anyway? He's popular right now but it is true that he benefits from being out of the spotlight. I would vote for him and not with the disgust that characterized voting for Hillary but let's not go so far as to say he's got nothing bad to his name.
|
On March 22 2017 06:25 zlefin wrote: What I want ot know is, with the 40 or so other democrat senators, and the 16-ish democrat governors, and some of the more notable Representatives; what makes each of them a bad choice for president? surely some of them must be decent enough. I can get that some might have issues, be ineligible, or just be a bit thin on experience (not that that seems ot matter), but surely some of them must be suitable enough. I wish there was a workup covering each of them.
you're starting to see that. Washington govs getting some notice. Colarado gov getting a ton of talk. I've seen Bullock floated as an idea. Brown's too old. Don't know enough about Edward's of Louisiana to comment but I think he's not super popular and he was more a reaction to Jindal. I love Ige but don't see america getting behind an Asian dude from Hawaii. Cumo's too corporate to be loved. Oregon gov is too progressive. Can't think of any others which isn't a good sign for their chances. McAuliffe isn't super popular and has connections with Clinton so that prob wouldn't go well. The NC gov has enough problems right now and was literally just inaugurated.
I'm not saying Biden's perfect just that if he was going to be a de facto leader/person they send to do interviews and the like nobodies going to look at him and think of how much thy hate him. Obviously he's not the future of the party or anything but as a temporary guy to rally behind he seems good. If he was running for president of course stuff would come out but there's nothing too glaring I think for just going on shows and stuff.
If you want go crazy there's always Cuban 2020. He hasn't ruled it out. (or of course other celebrities Oprah, Clooney, or my pick Michael Jordan).
|
On March 22 2017 06:24 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote: I like Warren but know nothing about her to comment on how she'd do nationally or how good of a campaigner she is.
rather than answer seriously I just go with saying Ige 2020. Do not run liberals from Massachusetts for president. Just don’t do it. This state does not elect people who can compete on the national stage. We don’t understand how the middle of the country works and excel at talking down to people.
|
Anyone have thoughts on Tester from Montana? Apparently conservative Review rates him as more progressive than Bernie.
I I see good stuff about Warren too. Unions like her and she's got 3 brothers who are veterans. but yeah if she can't transcend the liberal tag like Bernie kind of did she'd have no shot probably.
|
He's a good example of where the Democratic Party needs to go.
|
From my quick review, he does seem like someone I would vote for. Way more national appeal than Warren, that is for sure.
Edit: New England is a toxic wasteland for national candidates. Bernie is super popular and maybe the best bet in recent years. But I still haven't recovered from running John Kerry against Bush.
|
The thing with the Democratic primary is that the way delegates are apportioned (proportionally) makes the kind of absurd chicken games the candidates in the Republican primary played much less likely to happen and much less potentially profitable for the people involved (these let Trump net so many delegates with a relatively low vote share early on).
It will be interesting to see how it goes, though. It's a shame truly proportional setups can give you an EC disadvantage because the preferred Democrat in Georgia/Alabama/New York/California doesn't mean diddly-squat.
|
I like Franken quite a lot. I feel like the democratic establishment will be pushing Manchin as a compromise candidate in 2020.
Sanders is in better health than most his age due to his history of running, but certain types of degeneration are very unpredictable to actually be president in 2020. Great as a figurehead though.
|
There is no way the establishment is going to push Manchin. If they want to bleed third party votes a second time around for a candidate that most of them are not wild about, he would be the perfect pick.
|
If the dems push Manchin I'm moving to Ireland. Might be okay with him as a VP if the main candidate is sufficiently progressive to balance it out. But they'd need to be like Bernie progressive at least.
|
Some folks in this thread have a weird obsession with him. He is the typical red state democrat with no national appeal that just exists in WV. The DNC is pretty dumb, but that shit just won't happen. Maybe the fucker will run for some dumb reason, but no one is backing his ass over someone like Tester or Booker.
|
It would be entertaining to try to see him try to appeal to the south in Democratic primaries. Or Washington, Oregon or Hawaii. I'd bet he would get a record low percentage in the Hawaii primary.
I expect the DNC to be extremely hands off in 2020. Also unlikely we'd have 1 candidate getting all the endorsements
In other news Russia just threw a lawyer out of a 4th story window.
|
I dunno, at this point I picture the DNC as literal mustache twirling villains from the silent film era tying people onto train tracks and cackling maniacally. It's either that or incompetence on a scale I dislike imagining. Or some combination of both (most likely)
Like I can imagine them pushing Manchin, and having DWS go on stage and literally say "What are you going to do? Vote republican?" and vanish in a poof of smoke and flames, with only her laugh and Donna Brazille lingering behind.
|
The mother fucker voted to defund PP. How the fuck is that dude going to win the nomination?
Though I would pay to see SNL do that skit about the DNC.
|
I'd love to see a Wyden Manchin debate. that would be entertaining.
other people who could maybe run. Henrich from NM, Merkely from Oregon. of course it's 99 percent speculation at this point. Heck maybe Casey will end up running and winning. I'm going to stop listing candidates now before I list every US senator (other than Hirono for obvious reasons even though she might be my favorite senator.)
I like Heinrich a lot (despite the A from the NRA) feel he would have a good shot at taking Arizona.
|
2018 is the prize right now. The political climate could be anything in 4 years. But one year from now people are going to have to start thinking about running for the House and Senate. And they are going to have plenty of ammunition.
|
|
|
|
|
|