there's a big difference between a town hall and actually winning an election.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7146
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
there's a big difference between a town hall and actually winning an election. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
In the suburbs of Minneapolis–St Paul, friends gather around a backyard campfire to discuss how to turn their Donald Trump anger into action. In San Francisco, California, an all-female crew eats Middle Eastern food and reads the constitution. In Decatur, Georgia, a silver bell gets rung if anyone in the group of mainly suburban moms starts speaking off-topic during their monthly get-togethers. Political “salons” are popping up in living rooms, bars and backyards in response to the 2016 election of Donald Trump. Some have wine; some have a set agenda; all are scheming how to fight against this presidency. Salons first gained fame in France during the Enlightenment, with citizens gathering to engage in political conversations and arguments; they acted as a place to plan revolution and discuss philosophy. The concept has continued ever since, with the author Gertrude Stein and the former secretary of state Madeleine Albright both known to have hosted them. “I used the term salon to evoke old gatherings of artists and intellectuals in a hostess’s home,” said Mary Huber, founder of the Progressive Salon of Decatur. “Yep, Paris in the 1920s, recreated here in Decatur, Georgia,” she quipped. The 2017 salon is more often marked by groups of friends and neighbors organizing specific political actions, from raising money to educating each other about the refugee ban, while hanging out and making new friendships. “I used to meet friends at the gym; now I meet them in brainstorming sessions,” said Huber. At 7pm on a Sunday night once a month, a crowd of about 20 people pile into the semi-retired attorney’s lounge room, with the dining chairs set up around the couches in a semi-circle. “We are not here to sit around around and complain,” explained Huber. The group is a mixture of people from the middle-class neighborhood of Chelsea Heights, including folk musicians, stay-at-home moms, lawyers and a former nun. They are focused on three key topics: the repeal of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the April special election for the sixth congressional district in Georgia (vacant after Tom Price became head of health and human Services in the Trump administration), and the 2018 midterm elections (the governor of Georgia is up for re-election). At their last meeting, a woman gave a presentation on refugee work in the area. Another presented on training she’d received about the ACA, popularly known as Obamacare. Two members had attended town hall meetings and met with local senators’ staffers. Their official group mascot is the mosquito. “We need to be like mosquitoes, and literally bug the hell out of them,” said Huber. It’s enormous fun, says Huber, although it’s not a party. “I am not letting people sit around and get buzzed – they will not get anything done,” she said. “Maybe I should add snacks,” she laughed. Source | ||
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Regina Feltner, a retired nurse, was recovering from side effects of radiation therapy when she got the notice that her heat would be cut off. It was a bone-cold January day. The snow was so high that her daughter had to come over to take the dog out. “I have lung cancer and it’s the dead of winter,” she remembers thinking. “What am I going to do?” Help came in the form of a heating subsidy: money from the federal government, delivered by the Highland County Community Action Organization, a small nonprofit in rural southern Ohio, where Ms. Feltner lives. Now, that program is on the chopping block. It is one of many cuts in President Trump’s new budget proposal that would inflict the deepest pain on the most vulnerable Americans — a great number of whom voted for him. “I understand what he’s trying to do, but I think he’s just not stopping to think that there are people caught in the middle he is really going to hurt,” said Ms. Feltner, 57, who was a nurse for 25 years and voted for Mr. Trump. “He needs to make some concessions for that. I was a productive citizen. Don’t make me feel worthless now.” As news of Mr. Trump’s budget begins to sink in across the country, Americans are trying to parse what the changes to the government’s spending plan might mean for them. It is only a proposal, an opening bid in what is likely to be a protracted public argument over national priorities. But it is important because it signals what the new president is thinking, his wish list for the size and shape of government. In two days of interviews with beneficiaries of programs at risk in 11 states, many people said they did not see themselves reflected in Mr. Trump’s vision for the government. And some felt surprise at what has been left out. Ms. Feltner said that without the heating subsidy she would probably have to move in with her daughter and two teenage grandchildren. “I’d still like to have a little dignity left, and not have to move in with someone else,” she said. “I used to be the one packing up the food in the food pantry for people,” she said. “Now I’m the one in line.” Another proposed cut would defund the Appalachian Regional Commission, which was founded in 1965 to strengthen economic growth in a 13-state swath of the country. Of the 420 counties in the commission’s footprint, 399 voted for Mr. Trump. “I hate to see him cut us,” said Chris Farley, 32, of Delbarton, W.Va., who was laid off from his job operating a drill at a surface coal mine in 2015 and is now in a jobs and education program partially funded by the commission. Mr. Farley worked in coal for 11 years. When he was 18, his father, a miner, helped get him a job driving a truck that carried rocks. The pay was good: He was making $20 an hour when he was laid off — a punch he did not see coming. The only work he found afterward paid minimum wage. With a wife and 3-year-old daughter, he struggled to pay the bills. “I tried everywhere to get a job,” he said. “I mowed lawns. I cut weeds. I hauled trash.” Last year, his mother texted him about a job in farming through a local nonprofit called the Coalfield Development Corporation, which is partially supported by the Appalachian Regional Commission. It pays him $11.50 an hour for 33 hours a week growing cucumbers and raising chickens and pigs. It also pays for him to attend community college six hours a week where he working toward an associate degree. His grade point average is 4.0. “I never dreamed I’d be going back to school,” he said. “I love it. It’s amazing. College is totally different than high school. Back then I was young and I didn’t care.” The farm had its first full year last year: a good cucumber harvest, a lot of eggs sold. Mr. Farley was reminded of eating beans and tomatoes at his grandparents’ farm as a boy. “I blew up the mountains,” he said, “and now I’m reclaiming the mountains.” Another worker in the Coalfield Development jobs program is Tracy Spaulding, 19, the son of a longtime miner. When his father was laid off after nearly 30 years, he made ends meet by buying an industrial saw and cutting lumber. The younger Mr. Spaulding has skipped the mine altogether: He works in a wood shop making things like TV stands, cabinets and headboards for beds. In November, Mr. Spaulding cast his first vote for president. He chose Mr. Trump, something he tries not to talk about with his friends who didn’t. “They get really sore about it,” he said. “Honestly, I like Donald Trump. That’s just how I feel, I like him. A lot of people don’t and I understand that.” When asked what he thought about the proposed cut to the commission, he thought for a bit. “He ain’t pulled nothing on us yet,” he said. He thought more. “I believe I’d be a little bit mad about it if he made that cut and I lost my job and schooling, you know? But things happen. People get laid off every day. I’ll make it one way or another.” In Staten Island, N.Y., Raymond DeNozzo, 53, a carpenter who has lived in Sutton, W.Va., for 28 years, was back home visiting his father on Friday. He, too, voted for Mr. Trump. He believes his adopted state’s coal industry was decimated under President Barack Obama. He supports increased spending on veterans and on the military, and, at least in theory, cuts to some social programs. He thinks that welfare discourages people from working, for instance. “We need to teach our children to work and go out and be independent,” he said. But his wife is a schoolteacher, their health insurance is through her job, and Mr. DeNozzo worries about the potential cuts to schools that could result from Mr. Trump’s budget. School consolidations are already overburdening teachers, he said. And they can also harm students, he said. “That’s a concern,” Mr. DeNozzo said. “Will he keep the little schools open?” Some of the programs in Mr. Trump’s sights are like unloved stepchildren, with alphabet soup acronyms unfamiliar to anyone except fiercely dedicated do-gooders. But they can have outsize effects on people’s lives. Money from a Community Development Block Grant helped pay to remodel Shantell Swenson’s bathroom and kitchen in Salt Lake City, making it easier for her to use a wheelchair in her home and allowing her to cook on a stove for the first time. There have been other benefits, too. “Now instead of spitting my toothpaste into a cup I can roll under the sink,” said Ms. Swenson, 33, who has cerebral palsy. Tired of lifting her legs into and out of a standard bathtub and begging landlords to change it, she scraped together her savings to buy a small house last May. The bathroom was finished in September, and the kitchen is on track for April. She calls the work life changing. “I would be old and gray and partially retired before I could have been able to afford this on my own,” she said. Ms. Swenson said she did not “rage toward” Mr. Trump “like some people I know.” But when she heard about his proposed budget cuts, she said, she was “boiling with anger.” One of those proposed cuts would kill the Legal Service Corporation, which funds 133 civil legal aid programs in the 50 states at a cost of $385 million. That funding stream makes up 40 percent of the budget for Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma, whose lawyers saved Paula and Joe Frye from losing their nine-acre home. The Fryes, who live in Warner, had missed a $14 tax payment four years earlier. They learned that their property had been put up for auction only when a man pulled up to their home and Mr. Frye asked him what he wanted. “The man said he wanted to look at the land for sale,” said Mrs. Frye, a retired turkey hatchery worker. They were unable to resolve the unpaid bill themselves, but the land was sold at a county auction for $5,000. The Fryes could not match that, or afford a lawyer. Only when they turned to Legal Aid did a lawyer there discover a technical flaw in the county’s handling of the tax arrears and the Fryes got their home back. “This is all we had,” Mrs. Frye said. “If it hadn’t been for Legal Aid, I guess we’d just live in our car.” The Fryes, who did not vote, said they were reserving judgment on Mr. Trump. Some things are probably beyond the president’s control, Mr. Frye said. Mrs. Frye said they would be watching. “I guess until we see exactly what he does do, then I’ll know if I like him or wish he had lost,” she said. Source | ||
Gahlo
United States35154 Posts
On March 19 2017 02:45 IgnE wrote: given that woman's comments at the trump rally about how her son's healthcare subsidies were a blessing from god, it seems like most republican voters actually just want cheap healthcare along with other government services for themselves AND low taxes. not much thought there Even so, it's further signs of many people's ignorance on the state of healthcare, even on a fundamental level - which for many voters is a determining policy. | ||
Simberto
Germany11521 Posts
On March 19 2017 02:45 IgnE wrote: given that woman's comments at the trump rally about how her son's healthcare subsidies were a blessing from god, it seems like most republican voters actually just want cheap healthcare along with other government services for themselves AND low taxes. not much thought there A lot of people suck at generalizing concepts and thinking things through. I have also observed people having major problems of comparing themselves to others. This often comes in the form of believing that they personally deserve x/y is unfair to them personally, and absolutely not understanding how that would also mean that other people also deserve x, or that y would be unfair to other people to. But in that case, apparently someone just found a very stupid person, and wrote down what she said. There are a lot of very stupid people, and i don't think we should reward the "find the stupidest person who supports the other viewpoint" game. You will find stupid Trump supporters. You will also find stupid supporters of basically anything at all, saying ridiculous things. The reason for that is that there are billions of people on the planet. If one million people believe in something, chances are that a few of them are deeply stupid. If your point is "The people on the other side are stupid", don't bring the anecdotal evidence of that one stupid person on that side you found. Either bring relevant statistics, or don't make that point. Otherwise you have right-wing people debating some utterly insane drugged out hippie who claims that we need positive ion crystals to solve our problems, while left-wing people find some random nazi who thinks that the global jew conspiracy is the reason for all evil. None of that is productive, unless you can prove that a significant amount of people believe that, not just a few random loonies. | ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On March 19 2017 02:45 IgnE wrote: given that woman's comments at the trump rally about how her son's healthcare subsidies were a blessing from god, it seems like most republican voters actually just want cheap healthcare along with other government services for themselves AND low taxes. not much thought there The GOP jumped the ideological shark once it decided that access to healthcare trumped all other considerations. They've already decided that "Medicare for all" or some other form of universal/single payer coverage is the way to go, but they just don't know it yet. | ||
farvacola
United States18828 Posts
![]() | ||
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
farvacola
United States18828 Posts
On March 19 2017 03:32 IgnE wrote: im just saying that most voters (ie enough to win landslide elections regardless of party affiliation) only seem to care about having affordable lives. This is why all the talk of "are American leftists right of European leftists? Don't lose the center!" totally misses the point of effective contemporary politics. Trump is proof that there are significant numbers of American voters who can be convinced to vote in ways that seem incommensurate with their stated political identification, and igne's post gets at the heart of what an effective political message must implicate in one way or another. That said, whether or not this fading stickiness of political labels is enough to warrant a true push towards third way politics is another question. | ||
Ghostcom
Denmark4782 Posts
On March 18 2017 21:16 m4ini wrote: That's the dumbest "excuse" in that regard i've heard so far, i think. Especially considering that i live in the UK and actually talk to people on a daily basis. That has nothing to with victim complex, or do you think i personally feel bad for what happened under the nazis? I don't give a shit. I, and no one from my generation, has done wrong. I don't feel like a victim because some backwards morons didn't get the memo as to what year it is. Sidenote, the "german victim complex" as you call it really looks retarded as an argument considering that every fucking time germany does something others don't like, some certain buzzwords and pictures pop up. It's not germany not letting go of the past, and trying to argue otherwise makes you an idiot - literally any media outlet proves you wrong constantly. May it be hitler merkel in greece, turkey, poland - it's not the germans trying to victimise themselves, it's exactly as i said. Other countries can't let go of the past. Feel free to quote the sentence Nicholas Ridley said which led to him resigning. Hell, even your own country just recently came to the conclusion that we should redraw the borders in Schleswig, which didn't really go down to well anywhere. Now imagine germany would've said "we should get North Schleswig back into germany", and what international/danish reactions would've been. When you are done throwing temper tantrums and lying we can take this discussion in PMs. If you are actually interested in a discussion that is. | ||
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
On March 19 2017 02:45 IgnE wrote: given that woman's comments at the trump rally about how her son's healthcare subsidies were a blessing from god, it seems like most republican voters actually just want cheap healthcare along with other government services for themselves AND low taxes. not much thought there Good coverage. Low cost. Doesn't have the appearance of socialism. Pick two. | ||
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
| ||
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
| ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On March 19 2017 06:02 LegalLord wrote: Honestly I think that the past few years has seen the "fuck socialism" sentiment slowly but surely recede. It was prominent in 08, slightly less so in '12, and it was only kind of relevant to Sanders in '16. Sooner or later people will actually realize that healthcare isn't best when it's run for profit. Only when much later people forget the health plans they were able to pick and pay for before Obamacare. And that will be more of a mis-remembrance than an actual realization. | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21707 Posts
On March 19 2017 07:07 Danglars wrote: Only when much later people forget the health plans they were able to pick and pay for before Obamacare. And that will be more of a mis-remembrance than an actual realization. You mean all the plans that didn't do much because the insurance company could drop you the moment you actually got seriously ill and you couldn't sign up somewhere else because you now have a pre-existing condition? | ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On March 19 2017 07:11 Gorsameth wrote: You mean all the plans that didn't do much because the insurance company could drop you the moment you actually got seriously ill and you couldn't sign up somewhere else because you now have a pre-existing condition? You mean plans that people chose and liked? Yeah, those ones. I also liked the ones that Obamacare regulated out of existence and you couldn't do a damn thing about it. We could do this all day. | ||
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
On March 19 2017 07:07 Danglars wrote: Only when much later people forget the health plans they were able to pick and pay for before Obamacare. And that will be more of a mis-remembrance than an actual realization. Most of those were great if they were supplied by your employer, but utter trash unless your employer provided them. | ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On March 19 2017 07:07 Danglars wrote: Only when much later people forget the health plans they were able to pick and pay for before Obamacare. And that will be more of a mis-remembrance than an actual realization. it'll probably be a fairly even mix of people thinking it was better before and better after; the data generally indicates that people's memory on such things is terrible, and more likely to be a reconstruction based on beliefs and rationalization. the rationalization will cause it to largely skew based on party and other group affiliations, with some omdest correlation to actual reality. some plans are better off, some worse. it's not like pre-obamacare was markedly better on average, that's just a different kind of mis-rememberance and lack of understanding, and/or only looking at a certain subset of cases. | ||
| ||