• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:14
CEST 12:14
KST 19:14
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27
Community News
Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.7Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1
StarCraft 2
General
Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2) Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey. Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson." Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Best crypto recovery experts in the world Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 35218 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4774

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4772 4773 4774 4775 4776 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9111 Posts
August 18 2016 18:32 GMT
#95461
On August 19 2016 03:25 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2016 03:18 Liquid`Drone wrote:
While I certainly agree with the sentiment that rich people should not have more justice than poor people, I'm kinda willing to not care all that much about this principle when it rids us of gawker.


Gawker shutting down is a plus for human civilization

Now if we could only get rid of Buzzfeed, HuffPost, and Salon

I notice a distinct lack of Breitbart and Drudge Report on your list, sites with journalistic standards that are at least as shitty but you have no problem regularly quoting
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States5493 Posts
August 18 2016 18:35 GMT
#95462
On August 19 2016 03:32 Plansix wrote:
Love the new freedom of the press in this modern era. But it is a violation of someone’s right to freedom of speech to ban them from twitter, reddit or shut down comments on news sites.

Press is still completely free to try and bring in the money by leaking celebrity sextapes and destroying reputations, they just have to own up to the consequences.
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-18 18:38:05
August 18 2016 18:37 GMT
#95463
On August 19 2016 03:35 oBlade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2016 03:32 Plansix wrote:
Love the new freedom of the press in this modern era. But it is a violation of someone’s right to freedom of speech to ban them from twitter, reddit or shut down comments on news sites.

Press is still completely free to try and bring in the money by leaking celebrity sextapes and destroying reputations, they just have to own up to the consequences.

Once again, that case was dismissed by several courts for not having merit. They kept bringing the case and would still be doing so if the last one had been dismissed.

On August 19 2016 03:32 Dan HH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2016 03:25 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On August 19 2016 03:18 Liquid`Drone wrote:
While I certainly agree with the sentiment that rich people should not have more justice than poor people, I'm kinda willing to not care all that much about this principle when it rids us of gawker.


Gawker shutting down is a plus for human civilization

Now if we could only get rid of Buzzfeed, HuffPost, and Salon

I notice a distinct lack of Breitbart and Drudge Report on your list, sites with journalistic standards that are at least as shitty but you have no problem regularly quoting

Freedom of the Press to agree with the rich and in power.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28626 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-18 18:40:22
August 18 2016 18:37 GMT
#95464
On August 19 2016 03:25 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2016 03:18 Liquid`Drone wrote:
While I certainly agree with the sentiment that rich people should not have more justice than poor people, I'm kinda willing to not care all that much about this principle when it rids us of gawker.


Gawker shutting down is a plus for human civilization

Now if we could only get rid of Buzzfeed, HuffPost, and Salon


Oh, I think breitbart and drudgereport are both worse than any of those three- or gawker. National review looks much better though, thanks whoever tipped me of that.
Moderator
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28626 Posts
August 18 2016 18:39 GMT
#95465
On August 19 2016 03:32 Plansix wrote:
Love the new freedom of the press in this modern era. But it is a violation of someone’s right to freedom of speech to ban them from twitter, reddit or shut down comments on news sites.

Show nested quote +
On August 19 2016 03:30 oBlade wrote:
On August 19 2016 02:29 Plansix wrote:
Gawker is shutting down, the rest of the sites owned by Gawker media will remain active. It appears Peter Thiel won is battle for freedom of speech, A/k/a, freedom for Peter Thiel and no one else.

To be clear, I have no love for Gawker and think much of their reporting was garbage. But billionaires using the court system to attack publications they don't like is garbage. Especially when they also talk about free speech and the free market as great things that should be protected.

On November 21 2015 00:24 Plansix wrote:
Freedom of expression is not freedom from social consequences.



Are you silly enough to be confused by that? I’m talking about someone telling you to shut up or your are an asshole. Not someone filing lawsuits against you until you go bankruptcy. Do you think its cool if a rich person keeps filing frivolously lawsuits against someone else because they were mean once?


'were mean once' is not a good euphemism for 'posted sex tapes'.
Moderator
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States5493 Posts
August 18 2016 18:45 GMT
#95466
On August 19 2016 03:32 Plansix wrote:
Love the new freedom of the press in this modern era. But it is a violation of someone’s right to freedom of speech to ban them from twitter, reddit or shut down comments on news sites.

Show nested quote +
On August 19 2016 03:30 oBlade wrote:
On August 19 2016 02:29 Plansix wrote:
Gawker is shutting down, the rest of the sites owned by Gawker media will remain active. It appears Peter Thiel won is battle for freedom of speech, A/k/a, freedom for Peter Thiel and no one else.

To be clear, I have no love for Gawker and think much of their reporting was garbage. But billionaires using the court system to attack publications they don't like is garbage. Especially when they also talk about free speech and the free market as great things that should be protected.

On November 21 2015 00:24 Plansix wrote:
Freedom of expression is not freedom from social consequences.



Are you silly enough to be confused by that? I’m talking about someone telling you to shut up or your are an asshole. Not someone filing lawsuits against you until you go bankruptcy. Do you think its cool if a rich person keeps filing frivolously lawsuits against someone else because they were mean once?

You have it backwards, Gawker was the rich one. They went into bankruptcy because they lost the case and got completely creamed in the judgment of the "frivolous" lawsuit. Not from running out of money defending themselves.
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
August 18 2016 18:46 GMT
#95467
On August 19 2016 03:01 Simberto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2016 02:43 Plansix wrote:
If you look at the history of the Hulk’s lawsuit against Gawker, they shopped around the courts and went through special effort to make sure the lawsuit didn’t trigger Gawkers liability insurance. The case was dismissed several time and they just moved on to a new court and filed a new case. His efforts to put them under was a matter of attrition. And he will do it to the next news media site he disapproves of.


I hope that will make people realize that you can buy justice in the american court system. Not like anyone didn't know about that before. "I can't afford the legal costs of sueing x" "The legal costs will ruin you" were not really unknown statements in the US beforehands. Rich people shouldn't be able to ruin companies by using the legal system just because they want to, and rich companies shouldn't be able to ruin people or smaller competitors by using the legal system just because they want to. And yet they still can, because if you keep putting money into the legal system, the other party has to match or lose the case. It is really silly.

Not just the rich, but government agencies and private individuals and groups of individuals. If you want to challenge something new that's blatantly unconstitutional or beyond the limits of laws, it's a very expensive and time consuming proposition. Canada too had a couple high profile cases (free speech) where the individual won their case but the expense of prosecuting it meant the next time they self-censored knowing the price tag.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-18 18:49:42
August 18 2016 18:49 GMT
#95468
On August 19 2016 03:32 Dan HH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2016 03:25 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
On August 19 2016 03:18 Liquid`Drone wrote:
While I certainly agree with the sentiment that rich people should not have more justice than poor people, I'm kinda willing to not care all that much about this principle when it rids us of gawker.


Gawker shutting down is a plus for human civilization

Now if we could only get rid of Buzzfeed, HuffPost, and Salon

I notice a distinct lack of Breitbart and Drudge Report on your list, sites with journalistic standards that are at least as shitty but you have no problem regularly quoting


I don't regularly quote either of those you are confusing me with someone else

And they can get rid of Breitbart too

I don't know enough about Drudge to comment on that one
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-18 18:57:59
August 18 2016 18:54 GMT
#95469
On August 19 2016 03:39 Liquid`Drone wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2016 03:32 Plansix wrote:
Love the new freedom of the press in this modern era. But it is a violation of someone’s right to freedom of speech to ban them from twitter, reddit or shut down comments on news sites.

On August 19 2016 03:30 oBlade wrote:
On August 19 2016 02:29 Plansix wrote:
Gawker is shutting down, the rest of the sites owned by Gawker media will remain active. It appears Peter Thiel won is battle for freedom of speech, A/k/a, freedom for Peter Thiel and no one else.

To be clear, I have no love for Gawker and think much of their reporting was garbage. But billionaires using the court system to attack publications they don't like is garbage. Especially when they also talk about free speech and the free market as great things that should be protected.

On November 21 2015 00:24 Plansix wrote:
Freedom of expression is not freedom from social consequences.



Are you silly enough to be confused by that? I’m talking about someone telling you to shut up or your are an asshole. Not someone filing lawsuits against you until you go bankruptcy. Do you think its cool if a rich person keeps filing frivolously lawsuits against someone else because they were mean once?


'were mean once' is not a good euphemism for 'posted sex tapes'.

And that justifies frivolously lawsuits until bankruptcy? Because he tried in federal court and dismissed the case once it became clear the judge was going to rule against him.

And then there were other lawsuits being against gawker by the same attorney.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/business/dealbook/gawker-founder-suspects-a-common-financer-behind-lawsuits.html?_r=

Like all funded by Peter Thiel. Why? Because Gawker reported he was gay. Which is fact, the man is gay. But he is angry that Gawker was able to do that and have any power of him.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/26/business/dealbook/peter-thiel-tech-billionaire-reveals-secret-war-with-gawker.html

Edit: Oblade, you need to catch up on that case.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
August 18 2016 19:06 GMT
#95470
wait, if i'm getting this straight, thiel/hogan avoided double jeopardy by ditching the case before a judgement could be made?
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-18 19:09:45
August 18 2016 19:07 GMT
#95471
Gawker also lost the case because they handled their defence like they handle their reporting.

Again, Peter Thiel is very much a red herring to this whole thing. "They only got sued because they could pay for an attorney" is terrible reasoning. The financial barrier should be lower, the bar for lawsuits moving forward needs to be substantially higher, and the court where cases are held should be much more clearcut instead of being wherever the plaintiff wants.

And if you botch your defence like idiots, then there really is no excuse when you don't like the verdict.

On August 19 2016 04:06 ticklishmusic wrote:
wait, if i'm getting this straight, thiel/hogan avoided double jeopardy by ditching the case before a judgement could be made?

Double Jeopardy doesn't apply to most civil cases, IIRC. Your case can be dismissed with prejudice, but that depends on the case and the decision.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
August 18 2016 19:09 GMT
#95472
The photograph, a still image drawn from video footage captured by a security camera, shows a mass of cylindrical shapes squashed together in a box and wrapped in what appears to be silver foil, their surfaces glistening like sardines in a tin.

The shapes are not sardines, however, but human beings. And they are wrapped not in foil but in emergency blankets, handed out to them as they were put into a cramped detention center at the US border, courtesy of the federal agency, Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

The image, and several others like it released on Thursday at the order of a federal judge, gives the most damning evidence yet seen of the exceptionally harsh and some say abusive conditions to which immigrants are subjected when detained at the southern US border with Mexico.

Previously held under seal in a federal lawsuit in which the CBP is being sued for allegedly degrading and unconstitutional treatment of its charges, the photos offer a window into a world that until now has been rarely seen.

The shapes disclose that about 15 immigrant detainees were packed into a single cell at the Border Patrol’s facility in Tucson, Arizona. They are wrapped from head to toe in Mylar aluminium sheets for warmth, and appear to be lying directly on top of the concrete floor with no mattressing or other bedding of any sort.

The image – timed and dated as 5.16am on 19 August 2015 – shows detainees so tightly squashed together that there is no room for them to move.

Groups working with immigrant detainees at the border have long complained that the inmates are treated inhumanely, kept in bare concrete cells that are freezing in temperature as a form of punishment. The colloquial word for the cells is “hieleras”, or ice boxes.

The CBP has consistently denied that it subjects those it has picked up at the border attempting to enter the country illegally inappropriately, and has also denied that it keeps its cells unacceptably cold. But the litigants in the lawsuit say that the newly released images prove that their concerns were justified.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States5493 Posts
August 18 2016 19:10 GMT
#95473
On August 19 2016 04:07 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Gawker also lost the case because they handled their defence like they handle their reporting.

Again, Peter Thiel is very much a red herring to this whole thing. "They only got sued because they could pay for an attorney" is terrible reasoning. The financial barrier should be lower, the bar for lawsuits moving forward needs to be substantially higher, and the court where cases are held should be much more clearcut instead of being wherever the plaintiff wants.

And if you botch your defence like idiots, then there really is no excuse when you don't like the verdict.

Exactly, Hogan could have gotten the money from GoFundMe for all we care, that has no relationship to the jury's verdict.
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28626 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-18 19:16:49
August 18 2016 19:15 GMT
#95474
I'm not really saying it justifies anything from a legal pov, just that I'm not gonna shed a tear over gawker. It's a garbage webpage contributing to the poisoning of the media climate/political climate. I still find it completely outrageous that rich people and poor people are not completely equal in terms of justice - but I also find it completely outrageous that webpages posing as news post private sextapes. This is imo one instance of injustice having a kinda, at least on a guttural level, just outcome.

I also don't really care about peter thiel at all, nor about hulk hogan. I just really wish that media would have a higher standard, and to some degree, I care more about 'leftist' (even if just posing as such) media having a high standard.
Moderator
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
August 18 2016 19:18 GMT
#95475
On August 19 2016 04:10 oBlade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2016 04:07 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Gawker also lost the case because they handled their defence like they handle their reporting.

Again, Peter Thiel is very much a red herring to this whole thing. "They only got sued because they could pay for an attorney" is terrible reasoning. The financial barrier should be lower, the bar for lawsuits moving forward needs to be substantially higher, and the court where cases are held should be much more clearcut instead of being wherever the plaintiff wants.

And if you botch your defence like idiots, then there really is no excuse when you don't like the verdict.

Exactly, Hogan could have gotten the money from GoFundMe for all we care, that has no relationship to the jury's verdict.

Except the rulings by the Florida court judge are being called into question, including if the case should ever had been allowed to go to trial. That case is far from clean on a lot of levels and the final verdict is not likely to survive appeal.

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-03-21/sorry-hulk-hogan-the-first-amendment-is-on-gawker-s-side
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
August 18 2016 19:23 GMT
#95476
I dunno I have a hard time feeling sympathy for a site who testified under oath that they were willing to post sex tapes of five year old children.
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
August 18 2016 19:24 GMT
#95477
On August 19 2016 04:23 Nevuk wrote:
I dunno I have a hard time feeling sympathy for a site who testified under oath that they were willing to post sex tapes of five year old children.


Wtf?

That happened?
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States5493 Posts
August 18 2016 19:29 GMT
#95478
On August 19 2016 04:18 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2016 04:10 oBlade wrote:
On August 19 2016 04:07 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Gawker also lost the case because they handled their defence like they handle their reporting.

Again, Peter Thiel is very much a red herring to this whole thing. "They only got sued because they could pay for an attorney" is terrible reasoning. The financial barrier should be lower, the bar for lawsuits moving forward needs to be substantially higher, and the court where cases are held should be much more clearcut instead of being wherever the plaintiff wants.

And if you botch your defence like idiots, then there really is no excuse when you don't like the verdict.

Exactly, Hogan could have gotten the money from GoFundMe for all we care, that has no relationship to the jury's verdict.

Except the rulings by the Florida court judge are being called into question, including if the case should ever had been allowed to go to trial. That case is far from clean on a lot of levels and the final verdict is not likely to survive appeal.

https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-03-21/sorry-hulk-hogan-the-first-amendment-is-on-gawker-s-side

I understand that you think the judge was biased, but Thiel financially backing the case wouldn't have caused that, do you follow?
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
August 18 2016 19:29 GMT
#95479
On August 19 2016 04:24 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 19 2016 04:23 Nevuk wrote:
I dunno I have a hard time feeling sympathy for a site who testified under oath that they were willing to post sex tapes of five year old children.


Wtf?

That happened?

There was a gawker witness that was called and they asked when it would be unacceptable to publish a sex tape. He gave a glib response “If they were 5” or something along those lines.

Terrible witness.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28626 Posts
August 18 2016 19:30 GMT
#95480
ah, nevuk is wrong then though. they actually said they wouldn't publish a sex tape of 5 year olds.
Moderator
Prev 1 4772 4773 4774 4775 4776 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10:00
Weekly #94
CranKy Ducklings62
LiquipediaDiscussion
GSL Code S
08:00
Semi-Finals & Finals
Rogue vs Classic
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .138
Rex 0
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 3521
Calm 2883
Bisu 1316
Horang2 692
Larva 661
Pusan 597
BeSt 237
Killer 220
Mini 219
Leta 119
[ Show more ]
hero 105
Hyun 102
EffOrt 84
Soulkey 64
ToSsGirL 48
sSak 48
Aegong 38
Last 38
Barracks 34
Shinee 31
JulyZerg 17
ZerO 14
HiyA 11
Movie 9
Noble 7
SilentControl 6
ivOry 6
Hm[arnc] 5
eros_byul 1
Dota 2
XaKoH 586
XcaliburYe477
Fuzer 136
Pyrionflax40
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1051
flusha461
edward93
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0393
Mew2King120
Westballz27
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor289
Other Games
singsing1299
ZerO(Twitch)4
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream13420
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream4791
Other Games
gamesdonequick632
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 9
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 36
• Adnapsc2 33
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2127
League of Legends
• Stunt616
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Qualifier
5h 46m
BSL: ProLeague
7h 46m
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
Replay Cast
13h 46m
Wardi Open
1d
Replay Cast
1d 13h
Replay Cast
1d 23h
RSL Revival
1d 23h
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
2 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
SC Evo League
6 days
Circuito Brasileiro de…
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-11
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.