EPTHe's young enough, she isn't.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4546
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
He's young enough, she isn't. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
| ||
|
acker
United States2958 Posts
On July 28 2016 12:30 CosmicSpiral wrote: Is Obama the first person to directly address the rural, white population? That would be Bill from yesterday. | ||
CosmicSpiral
United States15275 Posts
Ah, I only saw the end of his speech. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On July 28 2016 12:30 ShoCkeyy wrote: I think plenty of people would like Obama to run again. He has said that he would win a third term if he could run again. While I have plenty of problems with him and his presidency, I would vote for him again and I think he would win again. | ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On July 28 2016 12:31 GGTeMpLaR wrote: He should have let Hillary have 08/12 and ran this year it would almost certainly result in 16 years of democrats in office. He's young enough, she isn't. Did you really just make a Hillary's too old argument | ||
|
acker
United States2958 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On July 28 2016 12:31 GGTeMpLaR wrote: He should have let Hillary have 08/12 and ran this year it would almost certainly result in 16 years of democrats in office. He's young enough, she isn't. Alternatively, Hillary may have burned out the Dem party's goodwill and led to 2012-2020 Republican presidency. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On July 28 2016 12:32 Doodsmack wrote: Did you really just make a Hillary's too old argument If Clinton does not win this election she is done. She will be too old in 2020 to run again. Even if she does win, keeping it the full 8 years will be very difficult. So yes, Hillary is older than Obama by a significant amount. That is a fact On July 28 2016 12:33 LegalLord wrote: Alternatively, Hillary may have burned out the Dem party's goodwill and led to 2012-2020 Republican presidency. It's possible, who knows? | ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On July 28 2016 12:34 GGTeMpLaR wrote: She will be too old in 2020 to run again. Even if she does win, keeping it the full 8 years will be very difficult. Why don't you type out two numbers - Trump's age and Hillary's age, then see the result. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On July 28 2016 12:36 Doodsmack wrote: Why don't you type out two numbers - Trump's age and Hillary's age, then see the result. I would apply my same argument to Trump so you're arguing against no one here. | ||
|
acker
United States2958 Posts
To be honest, it might be better for Democrats to throw this election so they can win the 2020 election and control redistricting. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
I can't think of a single policy issue that Obama faced that Hillary would have done better. Most of the bad parts of his presidency are the parts that Hillary would have doubled down on. Most of the good, well there isn't much improvement because what Obama did well he did well. Only one major issue I could see that Hillary might have done better on was NASA. Obama bungled the future of NASA pretty badly by canceling the Space Shuttle and Constellation with no real follow up. I have no idea if Hillary would do it better but I have no reason to think she would have done it worse. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
Falling
Canada11369 Posts
2020 election and control redistricting. Isn't that all at the state level? | ||
|
CorsairHero
Canada9491 Posts
On July 28 2016 12:37 acker wrote: I don't see either candidate staying in office for two terms. To be honest, it might be better for Democrats to throw this election so they can win the 2020 election and control redistricting. When i look at who ran in 2012 on the democrats side, I dont see anyone having a chance of taking the primary. Everyone that had a chance declined to run. Why would 2020 be any different? | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On July 28 2016 12:37 acker wrote: I don't see either candidate staying in office for two terms. To be honest, it might be better for Democrats to throw this election so they can win the 2020 election and control redistricting. Redistricting or the Supreme Court, which matters more? | ||
|
acker
United States2958 Posts
Winning the presidency typically has positive effects for the party down the ballot. On July 28 2016 12:40 LegalLord wrote: Redistricting or the Supreme Court, which matters more? In either case, the president would have four years to elect justices that retire. | ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On July 28 2016 12:39 xDaunt wrote: but given how good he still looks, Check again. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
| ||
