• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 03:18
CET 09:18
KST 17:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info3herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational14SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 19-25): Bunny, Trigger, MaxPax win3Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)38
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft 2 not at the Esports World Cup 2026 Weekly Cups (Jan 19-25): Bunny, Trigger, MaxPax win Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey!
Tourneys
$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) OSC Season 13 World Championship $70 Prize Pool Ladder Legends Academy Weekly Open! SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 510 Safety Violation Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained
Brood War
General
Bleak Future After Failed ProGaming Career BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates Gypsy to Korea
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2 [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10
Strategy
Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Esports Advertising Shap…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1227 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4231

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4229 4230 4231 4232 4233 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-09 23:51:13
July 09 2016 23:50 GMT
#84601
On July 10 2016 08:34 NukeD wrote:


Media at its finest.


What a circus rofl
biology]major
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2253 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-10 00:04:09
July 10 2016 00:03 GMT
#84602
He had a pretty solid temperament to repeatedly keep answering those irritating character assassination questions. Still though, he's a racist. Not because there's any evidence for it but because I want him to be one in my mind
Question.?
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-10 04:47:29
July 10 2016 04:45 GMT
#84603
This is going on all over the country




More in spoiler

+ Show Spoiler +
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751990695100084225












GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23608 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-10 05:18:31
July 10 2016 04:48 GMT
#84604
For anyone keeping up, Philando's tail light wasn't out, which was the excuse the cop gave for pulling him over. As plansix pointed out this is a common lie cops use to provide false probable cause for a stop.

That cop should already be in jail.

On July 10 2016 13:45 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
This is going on all over the country

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751921361195499520
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751924662624481280

More in spoiler

+ Show Spoiler +
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751990695100084225
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751987008562749440
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751986324870164480
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751982522297360384
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751971306418102272
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751969627496939520
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751968953312874496
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751963109242376192
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751959834313064448
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751957549239439360
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751954175056023553
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751952724682481664
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751951248203603969


What's a shame is that people waited till some cops got shot before they decided to come correct to the conversation. I love the (peaceful) protests, as for the shotguns, kind of makes ya rethink open carry doesn't it? Black people using a right has a strange effect of making people second guess whether people should have it.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Slaughter
Profile Blog Joined November 2003
United States20254 Posts
July 10 2016 05:16 GMT
#84605
On July 10 2016 13:48 GreenHorizons wrote:
For anyone keeping up, Philando's tail light wasn't out, which was the excuse the cop gave for pulling him over. As plansix pointed out this is a common lie cops use to provide false probable cause for a stop.

That cop should already be in jail.

Show nested quote +
On July 10 2016 13:45 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
This is going on all over the country

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751921361195499520
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751924662624481280

More in spoiler

+ Show Spoiler +
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751990695100084225
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751987008562749440
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751986324870164480
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751982522297360384
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751971306418102272
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751969627496939520
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751968953312874496
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751963109242376192
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751959834313064448
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751957549239439360
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751954175056023553
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751952724682481664
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/751951248203603969


What's a shame is that people waited till some cops got shot before they decided to come correct to the conversation. I love the protests, as for the shotguns, kind of makes ya rethink open carry doesn't it? Black people using a right has a strange effect of making people second guess whether people should have it.


Reminds me of that video where they compared reactions of a white guy and a black guy walking around open carrying.
Never Knows Best.
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States5853 Posts
July 10 2016 05:29 GMT
#84606
I don't think their skin color or exercise of open carry are key in why those Baton Rouge tweets would be unsettling and why there might be police in riot gear. Rather, what jumps out is the brazen racialism.
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
bardtown
Profile Joined June 2011
England2313 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-10 05:45:50
July 10 2016 05:43 GMT
#84607
On July 10 2016 14:29 oBlade wrote:
I don't think their skin color or exercise of open carry are key in why those Baton Rouge tweets would be unsettling and why there might be police in riot gear. Rather, what jumps out is the brazen racialism.


Nah, you can't be racist to white people. This is what a large number of young Americans actually believe. They preach it on MTV and on college campuses.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23608 Posts
July 10 2016 05:55 GMT
#84608
On July 10 2016 14:29 oBlade wrote:
I don't think their skin color or exercise of open carry are key in why those Baton Rouge tweets would be unsettling and why there might be police in riot gear. Rather, what jumps out is the brazen racialism.



They're pretty much always in riot gear at these protests, and there's never not been brazen racialism coming from the police. Maybe you missed it, but people have had enough and they aren't going to take it anymore.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
bardtown
Profile Joined June 2011
England2313 Posts
July 10 2016 06:20 GMT
#84609
On July 10 2016 14:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 10 2016 14:29 oBlade wrote:
I don't think their skin color or exercise of open carry are key in why those Baton Rouge tweets would be unsettling and why there might be police in riot gear. Rather, what jumps out is the brazen racialism.



They're pretty much always in riot gear at these protests, and there's never not been brazen racialism coming from the police. Maybe you missed it, but people have had enough and they aren't going to take it anymore.


You are part of the problem. You cannot make these sweeping generalisations without qualification.

What are the facts? Black people make up 25% of police shooting victims and only 13% of the population. It's disproportionate. But black people also account for over 50% of most violent crimes in the US. Disproportionate. The majority of people who open fire on police are black. Disproportionate. Black neighbourhoods are disproportionately dangerous to police while simultaneously requiring more active policing. Black gangster culture encourages hatred of the police, and violence towards police officers. It is very easy to see how these factors would result in a disproportionate number of black victims of police shootings without any requirement for racism.

3% of black victims of police shootings are unarmed. 3% of white victims of police shootings are unarmed. Proportionate.

What happens when an unarmed white victim is shot by the police? Very little, because it doesn't fit the media narrative. The majority of these incidents demonstrate incompetence, anxiety and a massive over reliance on firearms by police, but I think you have some serious work to do to demonstrate that they are racist.
Orcasgt24
Profile Joined August 2011
Canada3238 Posts
July 10 2016 06:24 GMT
#84610
On July 10 2016 14:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 10 2016 14:29 oBlade wrote:
I don't think their skin color or exercise of open carry are key in why those Baton Rouge tweets would be unsettling and why there might be police in riot gear. Rather, what jumps out is the brazen racialism.



They're pretty much always in riot gear at these protests, and there's never not been brazen racialism coming from the police. Maybe you missed it, but people have had enough and they aren't going to take it anymore.

Imma give you a rundown on why cops come to protests in riot gear.
They sometimes turn into riots. Its best to have a weapon/protection and not need it than need it and not have it.

BTW these black lives matter protestors are accomplishing fuck all by blocking a road. So small minded. Want your message heard? Block a airport or shipping dock.
In Hearthstone we pray to RNGesus. When Yogg-Saron hits the field, RNGod gets to work
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23608 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-10 06:48:27
July 10 2016 06:44 GMT
#84611
On July 10 2016 15:20 bardtown wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 10 2016 14:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
On July 10 2016 14:29 oBlade wrote:
I don't think their skin color or exercise of open carry are key in why those Baton Rouge tweets would be unsettling and why there might be police in riot gear. Rather, what jumps out is the brazen racialism.



They're pretty much always in riot gear at these protests, and there's never not been brazen racialism coming from the police. Maybe you missed it, but people have had enough and they aren't going to take it anymore.


You are part of the problem. You cannot make these sweeping generalisations without qualification.

What are the facts? Black people make up 25% of police shooting victims and only 13% of the population. It's disproportionate. But black people also account for over 50% of most violent crimes in the US. Disproportionate. The majority of people who open fire on police are black. Disproportionate. Black neighbourhoods are disproportionately dangerous to police while simultaneously requiring more active policing. Black gangster culture encourages hatred of the police, and violence towards police officers. It is very easy to see how these factors would result in a disproportionate number of black victims of police shootings without any requirement for racism.

3% of black victims of police shootings are unarmed. 3% of white victims of police shootings are unarmed. Proportionate.

What happens when an unarmed white victim is shot by the police? Very little, because it doesn't fit the media narrative. The majority of these incidents demonstrate incompetence, anxiety and a massive over reliance on firearms by police, but I think you have some serious work to do to demonstrate that they are racist.


You might want to drop a source in for all that. Somehow I'm guessing it's using FBI data or something if anything. People seem to mistake "people caught, prosecuted, and convicted" with "crime committed".

Just curious when you think racism stopped coming from the police? A year or decade should work fine.

On July 10 2016 15:24 Orcasgt24 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 10 2016 14:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
On July 10 2016 14:29 oBlade wrote:
I don't think their skin color or exercise of open carry are key in why those Baton Rouge tweets would be unsettling and why there might be police in riot gear. Rather, what jumps out is the brazen racialism.



They're pretty much always in riot gear at these protests, and there's never not been brazen racialism coming from the police. Maybe you missed it, but people have had enough and they aren't going to take it anymore.

Imma give you a rundown on why cops come to protests in riot gear.
They sometimes turn into riots. Its best to have a weapon/protection and not need it than need it and not have it.

BTW these black lives matter protestors are accomplishing fuck all by blocking a road. So small minded. Want your message heard? Block a airport or shipping dock.


Yeah, I mean there's something to the psychological influence of costumes but I'd think just doing their job would be a hell of a lot easier than dealing with these protests. Arresting Philando's killer would be a good start.

Also airports have military protection, and docks have dock workers, you're right it would draw more attention but it's a risk reward thing.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-10 07:04:28
July 10 2016 07:03 GMT
#84612
It's not like great civil rights leaders of the past ever blocked traffic during a protest. Especially bridges /s
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
bardtown
Profile Joined June 2011
England2313 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-10 07:15:57
July 10 2016 07:14 GMT
#84613
On July 10 2016 15:44 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 10 2016 15:20 bardtown wrote:
On July 10 2016 14:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
On July 10 2016 14:29 oBlade wrote:
I don't think their skin color or exercise of open carry are key in why those Baton Rouge tweets would be unsettling and why there might be police in riot gear. Rather, what jumps out is the brazen racialism.



They're pretty much always in riot gear at these protests, and there's never not been brazen racialism coming from the police. Maybe you missed it, but people have had enough and they aren't going to take it anymore.


You are part of the problem. You cannot make these sweeping generalisations without qualification.

What are the facts? Black people make up 25% of police shooting victims and only 13% of the population. It's disproportionate. But black people also account for over 50% of most violent crimes in the US. Disproportionate. The majority of people who open fire on police are black. Disproportionate. Black neighbourhoods are disproportionately dangerous to police while simultaneously requiring more active policing. Black gangster culture encourages hatred of the police, and violence towards police officers. It is very easy to see how these factors would result in a disproportionate number of black victims of police shootings without any requirement for racism.

3% of black victims of police shootings are unarmed. 3% of white victims of police shootings are unarmed. Proportionate.

What happens when an unarmed white victim is shot by the police? Very little, because it doesn't fit the media narrative. The majority of these incidents demonstrate incompetence, anxiety and a massive over reliance on firearms by police, but I think you have some serious work to do to demonstrate that they are racist.


You might want to drop a source in for all that. Somehow I'm guessing it's using FBI data or something if anything. People seem to mistake "people caught, prosecuted, and convicted" with "crime committed".

Just curious when you think racism stopped coming from the police? A year or decade should work fine.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings-2016/

[image loading]

I'm not saying individual police officers are never racist. Of course they are. I'm saying you don't get to just call the police racist because there are a disproportionate number of black victims when there are also a disproportionate number of black criminals.

Making this a racial issue as opposed to a general issue of police conduct is a mistake. It only serves to heighten divisive tensions. The real issues at hand are not racial, they are:

1. Police incompetence/arrogance. For example in the Eric Garner case.
2. Police unaccountability. Make bodycams mandatory and actually punish police officers when they do wrong.
3. Using firearms as anything other than a last resort. This is common sense in the rest of the western world, but apparently not in the US. For example I saw a video of an officer - who had a taser - shooting dead a man holding a screwdriver at some distance.

Let's be honest. When you have things like this (see video) and people shooting cops across the country, the only thing you are going to achieve is a galvinsation of the police force which will likely result in more anxiety and more innocent deaths.



On July 10 2016 16:03 Plansix wrote:
It's not like great civil rights leaders of the past ever blocked traffic during a protest. Especially bridges /s


They didn't throw bricks, molotov cocktails and fireworks, though, did they? They probably didn't dance in front of police and mock them while their colleagues were being murdered, either.
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4381 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-10 07:29:51
July 10 2016 07:22 GMT
#84614
Yup.The real tragedy is gang violence in Chicago (Detroit, Baltimore...)
Headed for a record year of shootings.I heard 64 shootings in Chicago last weekend alone.Very little media reporting compared to these other incidents.

I assume the government is provoking a race war as an excuse to expand the police state.Black v black shootings in Chicago doesn't help the racial narrative so it's hardly reported.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-12-dead-at-least-41-hurt-in-weekend-shootings-20160620-story.html

1800 people shot in Chicago up to late June.Over 200 dead from these shootings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23608 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-10 07:30:24
July 10 2016 07:22 GMT
#84615
On July 10 2016 16:14 bardtown wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On July 10 2016 15:44 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 10 2016 15:20 bardtown wrote:
On July 10 2016 14:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
On July 10 2016 14:29 oBlade wrote:
I don't think their skin color or exercise of open carry are key in why those Baton Rouge tweets would be unsettling and why there might be police in riot gear. Rather, what jumps out is the brazen racialism.



They're pretty much always in riot gear at these protests, and there's never not been brazen racialism coming from the police. Maybe you missed it, but people have had enough and they aren't going to take it anymore.


You are part of the problem. You cannot make these sweeping generalisations without qualification.

What are the facts? Black people make up 25% of police shooting victims and only 13% of the population. It's disproportionate. But black people also account for over 50% of most violent crimes in the US. Disproportionate. The majority of people who open fire on police are black. Disproportionate. Black neighbourhoods are disproportionately dangerous to police while simultaneously requiring more active policing. Black gangster culture encourages hatred of the police, and violence towards police officers. It is very easy to see how these factors would result in a disproportionate number of black victims of police shootings without any requirement for racism.

3% of black victims of police shootings are unarmed. 3% of white victims of police shootings are unarmed. Proportionate.

What happens when an unarmed white victim is shot by the police? Very little, because it doesn't fit the media narrative. The majority of these incidents demonstrate incompetence, anxiety and a massive over reliance on firearms by police, but I think you have some serious work to do to demonstrate that they are racist.


You might want to drop a source in for all that. Somehow I'm guessing it's using FBI data or something if anything. People seem to mistake "people caught, prosecuted, and convicted" with "crime committed".

Just curious when you think racism stopped coming from the police? A year or decade should work fine.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings-2016/

[image loading]

I'm not saying individual police officers are never racist. Of course they are. I'm saying you don't get to just call the police racist because there are a disproportionate number of black victims when there are also a disproportionate number of black criminals.

Making this a racial issue as opposed to a general issue of police conduct is a mistake. It only serves to heighten divisive tensions. The real issues at hand are not racial, they are:

1. Police incompetence/arrogance. For example in the Eric Garner case.
2. Police unaccountability. Make bodycams mandatory and actually punish police officers when they do wrong.
3. Using firearms as anything other than a last resort. This is common sense in the rest of the western world, but apparently not in the US. For example I saw a video of an officer - who had a taser - shooting dead a man holding a screwdriver at some distance.

Let's be honest. When you have things like this (see video) and people shooting cops across the country, the only thing you are going to achieve is a galvinsation of the police force which will likely result in more anxiety and more innocent deaths.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dj4ARsxrZh8

On July 10 2016 16:03 Plansix wrote:
It's not like great civil rights leaders of the past ever blocked traffic during a protest. Especially bridges /s


They didn't throw bricks, molotov cocktails and fireworks, though, did they? They probably didn't dance in front of police and mock them while their colleagues were being murdered, either.



That doesn't show any of the statistics you said?

Race is most definitely a part of this no matter how much people want to pretend it isn't.

Yes, I remember how MLK Jr.'s peaceful protests worked so well he just got to stop and retire on all his civil rights money. One NYC video posted over and over represents all of BLM but KKK police chiefs, racist messages in departments across the country, the stopping of more young black men in NYC then there are young black men in NYC, etc... and it's just individual racists sure, but this isn't a race issue.

Give me a break.

On July 10 2016 16:22 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Yup.The real tragedy is gang violence in Chicago (Detroit, Baltimore...)
Headed for a record year of shootings.I heard 64 shootings in Chicago last weekend alone.


While it is a tragedy, we aren't paying those gang members to protect the citizens in that city, police kidnapping people and taking them to black sites is a bit more of a relevant issue.

Bring the drug trade above the table and you could have wealthy black owned corporations instead of gangs. You all believe in personal freedom and responsibility anyway.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
bardtown
Profile Joined June 2011
England2313 Posts
July 10 2016 07:31 GMT
#84616
On July 10 2016 16:22 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 10 2016 16:14 bardtown wrote:
On July 10 2016 15:44 GreenHorizons wrote:
On July 10 2016 15:20 bardtown wrote:
On July 10 2016 14:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
On July 10 2016 14:29 oBlade wrote:
I don't think their skin color or exercise of open carry are key in why those Baton Rouge tweets would be unsettling and why there might be police in riot gear. Rather, what jumps out is the brazen racialism.



They're pretty much always in riot gear at these protests, and there's never not been brazen racialism coming from the police. Maybe you missed it, but people have had enough and they aren't going to take it anymore.


You are part of the problem. You cannot make these sweeping generalisations without qualification.

What are the facts? Black people make up 25% of police shooting victims and only 13% of the population. It's disproportionate. But black people also account for over 50% of most violent crimes in the US. Disproportionate. The majority of people who open fire on police are black. Disproportionate. Black neighbourhoods are disproportionately dangerous to police while simultaneously requiring more active policing. Black gangster culture encourages hatred of the police, and violence towards police officers. It is very easy to see how these factors would result in a disproportionate number of black victims of police shootings without any requirement for racism.

3% of black victims of police shootings are unarmed. 3% of white victims of police shootings are unarmed. Proportionate.

What happens when an unarmed white victim is shot by the police? Very little, because it doesn't fit the media narrative. The majority of these incidents demonstrate incompetence, anxiety and a massive over reliance on firearms by police, but I think you have some serious work to do to demonstrate that they are racist.


You might want to drop a source in for all that. Somehow I'm guessing it's using FBI data or something if anything. People seem to mistake "people caught, prosecuted, and convicted" with "crime committed".

Just curious when you think racism stopped coming from the police? A year or decade should work fine.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings-2016/

[image loading]

I'm not saying individual police officers are never racist. Of course they are. I'm saying you don't get to just call the police racist because there are a disproportionate number of black victims when there are also a disproportionate number of black criminals.

Making this a racial issue as opposed to a general issue of police conduct is a mistake. It only serves to heighten divisive tensions. The real issues at hand are not racial, they are:

1. Police incompetence/arrogance. For example in the Eric Garner case.
2. Police unaccountability. Make bodycams mandatory and actually punish police officers when they do wrong.
3. Using firearms as anything other than a last resort. This is common sense in the rest of the western world, but apparently not in the US. For example I saw a video of an officer - who had a taser - shooting dead a man holding a screwdriver at some distance.

Let's be honest. When you have things like this (see video) and people shooting cops across the country, the only thing you are going to achieve is a galvinsation of the police force which will likely result in more anxiety and more innocent deaths.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dj4ARsxrZh8

On July 10 2016 16:03 Plansix wrote:
It's not like great civil rights leaders of the past ever blocked traffic during a protest. Especially bridges /s


They didn't throw bricks, molotov cocktails and fireworks, though, did they? They probably didn't dance in front of police and mock them while their colleagues were being murdered, either.



That doesn't show any of the statistics you said?

Race is most definitely a part of this no matter how much people want to pretend it isn't.

Yes, I remember how MLK Jr.'s peaceful protests worked so well he just got to stop and retire on all his civil rights money. One NYC video posted over and over represents all of BLM but KKK police chiefs, racist messages in departments across the country, the stopping of more young black men in NYC then there are young black men in NYC, etc... and it's just individual racists sure, but this isn't a race issue.

Give me a break.

Show nested quote +
On July 10 2016 16:22 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Yup.The real tragedy is gang violence in Chicago (Detroit, Baltimore...)
Headed for a record year of shootings.I heard 64 shootings in Chicago last weekend alone.


While it is a tragedy, we aren't paying those gang members to protect the citizens in that city, police kidnapping people and taking them to black sites is a bit more of a relevant issue.

Bring the drug trade above the table and you could have wealthy black owned corporations instead of gangs. You all believe in personal freedom and responsibility anyway.


You have to select the filters you want to see. For race, choose black. For weapon, choose unarmed. See the percentage. Then do the same with white and unarmed. The statistics have actually changed. It's now 2% for blacks and 4% for whites.

When black people commit crimes at the same rates as whites and the police are still disproportionately stopping black men we can say it's a race issue. For now, it's common sense. You police neighbourhoods with more crime more actively, and the neighbourhoods with the most crime are the neighbourhoods with the highest proportion of black people.
RolleMcKnolle
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Germany1054 Posts
July 10 2016 07:56 GMT
#84617
But black people also account for over 50% of most violent crimes in the US. Disproportionate. The majority of people who open fire on police are black. Disproportionate. Black neighbourhoods are disproportionately dangerous to police while simultaneously requiring more active policing. Black gangster culture encourages hatred of the police, and violence towards police officers. It is very easy to see how these factors would result in a disproportionate number of black victims of police shootings without any requirement for racism.

3% of black victims of police shootings are unarmed. 3% of white victims of police shootings are unarmed. Proportionate.


The only "fact" you gave any sources for are the 3%. And even there it shows that a higher percentage of black people were unarmed while being shot by the police. You didn't produce evidence for the other claims. Especially the bolded part. The rest are assumptions anyway.
NukeD
Profile Joined October 2010
Croatia1612 Posts
July 10 2016 07:57 GMT
#84618
On July 10 2016 16:22 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 10 2016 16:14 bardtown wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On July 10 2016 15:44 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 10 2016 15:20 bardtown wrote:
On July 10 2016 14:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
On July 10 2016 14:29 oBlade wrote:
I don't think their skin color or exercise of open carry are key in why those Baton Rouge tweets would be unsettling and why there might be police in riot gear. Rather, what jumps out is the brazen racialism.



They're pretty much always in riot gear at these protests, and there's never not been brazen racialism coming from the police. Maybe you missed it, but people have had enough and they aren't going to take it anymore.


You are part of the problem. You cannot make these sweeping generalisations without qualification.

What are the facts? Black people make up 25% of police shooting victims and only 13% of the population. It's disproportionate. But black people also account for over 50% of most violent crimes in the US. Disproportionate. The majority of people who open fire on police are black. Disproportionate. Black neighbourhoods are disproportionately dangerous to police while simultaneously requiring more active policing. Black gangster culture encourages hatred of the police, and violence towards police officers. It is very easy to see how these factors would result in a disproportionate number of black victims of police shootings without any requirement for racism.

3% of black victims of police shootings are unarmed. 3% of white victims of police shootings are unarmed. Proportionate.

What happens when an unarmed white victim is shot by the police? Very little, because it doesn't fit the media narrative. The majority of these incidents demonstrate incompetence, anxiety and a massive over reliance on firearms by police, but I think you have some serious work to do to demonstrate that they are racist.


You might want to drop a source in for all that. Somehow I'm guessing it's using FBI data or something if anything. People seem to mistake "people caught, prosecuted, and convicted" with "crime committed".

Just curious when you think racism stopped coming from the police? A year or decade should work fine.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings-2016/

[image loading]

I'm not saying individual police officers are never racist. Of course they are. I'm saying you don't get to just call the police racist because there are a disproportionate number of black victims when there are also a disproportionate number of black criminals.

Making this a racial issue as opposed to a general issue of police conduct is a mistake. It only serves to heighten divisive tensions. The real issues at hand are not racial, they are:

1. Police incompetence/arrogance. For example in the Eric Garner case.
2. Police unaccountability. Make bodycams mandatory and actually punish police officers when they do wrong.
3. Using firearms as anything other than a last resort. This is common sense in the rest of the western world, but apparently not in the US. For example I saw a video of an officer - who had a taser - shooting dead a man holding a screwdriver at some distance.

Let's be honest. When you have things like this (see video) and people shooting cops across the country, the only thing you are going to achieve is a galvinsation of the police force which will likely result in more anxiety and more innocent deaths.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dj4ARsxrZh8

On July 10 2016 16:03 Plansix wrote:
It's not like great civil rights leaders of the past ever blocked traffic during a protest. Especially bridges /s


They didn't throw bricks, molotov cocktails and fireworks, though, did they? They probably didn't dance in front of police and mock them while their colleagues were being murdered, either.



That doesn't show any of the statistics you said?

Race is most definitely a part of this no matter how much people want to pretend it isn't.

Yes, I remember how MLK Jr.'s peaceful protests worked so well he just got to stop and retire on all his civil rights money. One NYC video posted over and over represents all of BLM but KKK police chiefs, racist messages in departments across the country, the stopping of more young black men in NYC then there are young black men in NYC, etc... and it's just individual racists sure, but this isn't a race issue.

Give me a break.

Show nested quote +
On July 10 2016 16:22 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Yup.The real tragedy is gang violence in Chicago (Detroit, Baltimore...)
Headed for a record year of shootings.I heard 64 shootings in Chicago last weekend alone.


While it is a tragedy, we aren't paying those gang members to protect the citizens in that city, police kidnapping people and taking them to black sites is a bit more of a relevant issue.

Bring the drug trade above the table and you could have wealthy black owned corporations instead of gangs. You all believe in personal freedom and responsibility anyway.

You are tunel visioning on the race issue. You let your emotions take over your reason too much and dont give other opinions proper credit.

Some research also suggest that cops are more hesistant to shooting blacks ( m.washingtontimes.com ). Ive also never heard of any numbers that show the opossite picture of what some of us here suggest. You have all dismissed our sources of these numbers but you have not provided any numbers that favor your case. You actually dismiss them based on emotion and on a basis of dozen of videos where cops do indeed "missbehave"
sorry for dem one liners
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23608 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-07-10 07:59:39
July 10 2016 07:58 GMT
#84619
On July 10 2016 16:31 bardtown wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 10 2016 16:22 GreenHorizons wrote:
On July 10 2016 16:14 bardtown wrote:
On July 10 2016 15:44 GreenHorizons wrote:
On July 10 2016 15:20 bardtown wrote:
On July 10 2016 14:55 GreenHorizons wrote:
On July 10 2016 14:29 oBlade wrote:
I don't think their skin color or exercise of open carry are key in why those Baton Rouge tweets would be unsettling and why there might be police in riot gear. Rather, what jumps out is the brazen racialism.



They're pretty much always in riot gear at these protests, and there's never not been brazen racialism coming from the police. Maybe you missed it, but people have had enough and they aren't going to take it anymore.


You are part of the problem. You cannot make these sweeping generalisations without qualification.

What are the facts? Black people make up 25% of police shooting victims and only 13% of the population. It's disproportionate. But black people also account for over 50% of most violent crimes in the US. Disproportionate. The majority of people who open fire on police are black. Disproportionate. Black neighbourhoods are disproportionately dangerous to police while simultaneously requiring more active policing. Black gangster culture encourages hatred of the police, and violence towards police officers. It is very easy to see how these factors would result in a disproportionate number of black victims of police shootings without any requirement for racism.

3% of black victims of police shootings are unarmed. 3% of white victims of police shootings are unarmed. Proportionate.

What happens when an unarmed white victim is shot by the police? Very little, because it doesn't fit the media narrative. The majority of these incidents demonstrate incompetence, anxiety and a massive over reliance on firearms by police, but I think you have some serious work to do to demonstrate that they are racist.


You might want to drop a source in for all that. Somehow I'm guessing it's using FBI data or something if anything. People seem to mistake "people caught, prosecuted, and convicted" with "crime committed".

Just curious when you think racism stopped coming from the police? A year or decade should work fine.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings-2016/

[image loading]

I'm not saying individual police officers are never racist. Of course they are. I'm saying you don't get to just call the police racist because there are a disproportionate number of black victims when there are also a disproportionate number of black criminals.

Making this a racial issue as opposed to a general issue of police conduct is a mistake. It only serves to heighten divisive tensions. The real issues at hand are not racial, they are:

1. Police incompetence/arrogance. For example in the Eric Garner case.
2. Police unaccountability. Make bodycams mandatory and actually punish police officers when they do wrong.
3. Using firearms as anything other than a last resort. This is common sense in the rest of the western world, but apparently not in the US. For example I saw a video of an officer - who had a taser - shooting dead a man holding a screwdriver at some distance.

Let's be honest. When you have things like this (see video) and people shooting cops across the country, the only thing you are going to achieve is a galvinsation of the police force which will likely result in more anxiety and more innocent deaths.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dj4ARsxrZh8

On July 10 2016 16:03 Plansix wrote:
It's not like great civil rights leaders of the past ever blocked traffic during a protest. Especially bridges /s


They didn't throw bricks, molotov cocktails and fireworks, though, did they? They probably didn't dance in front of police and mock them while their colleagues were being murdered, either.



That doesn't show any of the statistics you said?

Race is most definitely a part of this no matter how much people want to pretend it isn't.

Yes, I remember how MLK Jr.'s peaceful protests worked so well he just got to stop and retire on all his civil rights money. One NYC video posted over and over represents all of BLM but KKK police chiefs, racist messages in departments across the country, the stopping of more young black men in NYC then there are young black men in NYC, etc... and it's just individual racists sure, but this isn't a race issue.

Give me a break.

On July 10 2016 16:22 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Yup.The real tragedy is gang violence in Chicago (Detroit, Baltimore...)
Headed for a record year of shootings.I heard 64 shootings in Chicago last weekend alone.


While it is a tragedy, we aren't paying those gang members to protect the citizens in that city, police kidnapping people and taking them to black sites is a bit more of a relevant issue.

Bring the drug trade above the table and you could have wealthy black owned corporations instead of gangs. You all believe in personal freedom and responsibility anyway.


You have to select the filters you want to see. For race, choose black. For weapon, choose unarmed. See the percentage. Then do the same with white and unarmed. The statistics have actually changed. It's now 2% for blacks and 4% for whites.

When black people commit crimes at the same rates as whites and the police are still disproportionately stopping black men we can say it's a race issue. For now, it's common sense. You police neighbourhoods with more crime more actively, and the neighbourhoods with the most crime are the neighbourhoods with the highest proportion of black people.


Again, you seem not to understand the relationship between policing and crime. If you put more police, looking for more crime, you find it. Doesn't matter where you put it. Otherwise you would think there is little or no cocaine in the Hollywood hills or other ridiculous things like that.

What we need to do is 1. get cops to do their jobs 2. adopt a sensible drug policy 3. address the underlying motivations for crime, and we need to do it yesterday.

EDIT: I said I was standing down for some other people to step up, I'm going to hold myself to that.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
NukeD
Profile Joined October 2010
Croatia1612 Posts
July 10 2016 07:59 GMT
#84620
On July 10 2016 16:56 RolleMcKnolle wrote:
Show nested quote +
But black people also account for over 50% of most violent crimes in the US. Disproportionate. The majority of people who open fire on police are black. Disproportionate. Black neighbourhoods are disproportionately dangerous to police while simultaneously requiring more active policing. Black gangster culture encourages hatred of the police, and violence towards police officers. It is very easy to see how these factors would result in a disproportionate number of black victims of police shootings without any requirement for racism.

3% of black victims of police shootings are unarmed. 3% of white victims of police shootings are unarmed. Proportionate.


The only "fact" you gave any sources for are the 3%. And even there it shows that a higher percentage of black people were unarmed while being shot by the police. You didn't produce evidence for the other claims. Especially the bolded part. The rest are assumptions anyway.

Well the mayor of NY says the same thing as him. I posted a interview of him few pages back. Is he racist too? Do you think you are more informed than him on the issue?
sorry for dem one liners
Prev 1 4229 4230 4231 4232 4233 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 42m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SortOf 202
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 3344
Mong 222
Larva 143
Hyun 132
ToSsGirL 63
Shuttle 58
910 30
GoRush 28
Bale 28
NotJumperer 10
Dota 2
XaKoH 560
NeuroSwarm97
League of Legends
JimRising 730
C9.Mang0369
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor96
Other Games
WinterStarcraft595
Liquid`RaSZi446
Mew2King211
KnowMe195
Happy145
febbydoto33
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick911
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH134
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos517
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
1h 42m
HomeStory Cup
1d 3h
Korean StarCraft League
1d 18h
HomeStory Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
HomeStory Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-27
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Acropolis #4 - TS4
Rongyi Cup S3
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W6
Escore Tournament S1: W7
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
HSC XXVIII
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.