• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:14
CEST 03:14
KST 10:14
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3
Community News
Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.1Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)11BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9
StarCraft 2
General
Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey. The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2) feardragon: Blizzards biggest blunder with SC was… TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group A [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group B SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games BW General Discussion FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 26203 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4050

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4048 4049 4050 4051 4052 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-15 00:21:48
June 15 2016 00:18 GMT
#80981
On June 15 2016 08:56 IgnE wrote:
And personal liability involving their obscene bonuses is a good thing. Sending them to jail when they could theoretically be productive members of society is just punitive with no upside.

id be okay with some jail time if it is possible to specify a standard of action the breach of which is necessary and sufficient for various forms of harm. i think the law is not very suitable for the various forms of harmful interactions produced by finance. you are looking at regulation which mostly does not reach the individual execs.

finance is too big of a sector anyway but an effort to restrict its influence has to be international in scope.

disruptors of retail level finance already are dissembling the system somewhat. the areas with high size premium/reputation power are going to remain but should also suffer lower margins as the financial technology gets cheaper and more widespread
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18821 Posts
June 15 2016 00:23 GMT
#80982
On June 15 2016 09:13 IgnE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 15 2016 09:11 farvacola wrote:
While we move towards dissembling the system, I think a healthy mix of pecuniary and personal liability is in order relative to financial institutions


Pecuniary and personal aren't opposites.

They don't have to be.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19573 Posts
June 15 2016 00:28 GMT
#80983
On June 15 2016 09:15 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 15 2016 08:34 xDaunt wrote:
On June 15 2016 08:20 Mohdoo wrote:
Do people who intend to vote for Donald trump think his Muslim ban is a good idea?

It's an idea that is at least worthy of serious discussion as opposed to being summarily dismissed by the left. Like I have said previously, the US -- or any other Western nation for that matter -- should not import peoples who are unwilling/unable to assimilate into Western culture.

Many in the left are unwilling to properly acknowledge the existence of a Muslim problem, and are willing to ignore some remarkably bad actions by Muslims that are a direct result of poorly thought out immigration policies. Not all Muslims are bad, and probably not most, but many more than are being acknowledged by the American and European left. Between doing what the left does and an outright ban, the latter is probably better.

I don't know why it has to be a travel ban or religious test. Just practically speaking it appears to be that 2nd gen immigrants are a bigger issue (also true for crime among Central American immigrants, which is interesting), not travelers. And we already restrict travel on a country of origin basis, no practical reasons exist for not expanding that.
Freeeeeeedom
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15536 Posts
June 15 2016 00:30 GMT
#80984
DC is a great way for this primary to end.
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
June 15 2016 00:31 GMT
#80985
id focus on personal liability in the west for corruption and the more brutal forms of government looting from the developing world
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15536 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-15 00:44:02
June 15 2016 00:43 GMT
#80986
I hereby nominate African Americans for MVP of this election. Their unwavering support for Clinton has been crucial. Without them, this may have gone totally differently.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23085 Posts
June 15 2016 00:45 GMT
#80987
On June 15 2016 09:43 Mohdoo wrote:
This is my last time I will have the opportunity, so I am enjoying the live results thread in the Bernie subreddit. After the long, drawn out kicking and screaming, a crushing defeat.

This is bitter sweet. The grand finale will be watching the subreddit implode when he endorses her, but for now, this is the last live results that I will be able to devour. Props to Bernie for winning 22 states.


About 20 more than anyone expected, and that's despite several states having several significant problems and investigations in several states he didn't win.

Hell, he's still winning back counties in California.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15536 Posts
June 15 2016 00:47 GMT
#80988
On June 15 2016 09:45 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 15 2016 09:43 Mohdoo wrote:
This is my last time I will have the opportunity, so I am enjoying the live results thread in the Bernie subreddit. After the long, drawn out kicking and screaming, a crushing defeat.

This is bitter sweet. The grand finale will be watching the subreddit implode when he endorses her, but for now, this is the last live results that I will be able to devour. Props to Bernie for winning 22 states.


About 20 more than anyone expected, and that's despite several states having several significant problems and investigations in several states he didn't win.

Hell, he's still winning back counties in California.


Dang, ya got me before I could edit out my less than constructive post.
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
June 15 2016 00:47 GMT
#80989
Who won more Democrat/swing states?
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-15 01:17:42
June 15 2016 01:14 GMT
#80990
On June 15 2016 09:28 cLutZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 15 2016 09:15 LegalLord wrote:
On June 15 2016 08:34 xDaunt wrote:
On June 15 2016 08:20 Mohdoo wrote:
Do people who intend to vote for Donald trump think his Muslim ban is a good idea?

It's an idea that is at least worthy of serious discussion as opposed to being summarily dismissed by the left. Like I have said previously, the US -- or any other Western nation for that matter -- should not import peoples who are unwilling/unable to assimilate into Western culture.

Many in the left are unwilling to properly acknowledge the existence of a Muslim problem, and are willing to ignore some remarkably bad actions by Muslims that are a direct result of poorly thought out immigration policies. Not all Muslims are bad, and probably not most, but many more than are being acknowledged by the American and European left. Between doing what the left does and an outright ban, the latter is probably better.

I don't know why it has to be a travel ban or religious test. Just practically speaking it appears to be that 2nd gen immigrants are a bigger issue (also true for crime among Central American immigrants, which is interesting), not travelers. And we already restrict travel on a country of origin basis, no practical reasons exist for not expanding that.

A full ban on travel and immigration, certainly not the best outcome. But the point is that if the choice is between "do what the left has been doing" and "enforce a ban on all Muslims from entering the country" then the latter is the better option.

On June 15 2016 09:47 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 15 2016 09:45 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 15 2016 09:43 Mohdoo wrote:
This is my last time I will have the opportunity, so I am enjoying the live results thread in the Bernie subreddit. After the long, drawn out kicking and screaming, a crushing defeat.

This is bitter sweet. The grand finale will be watching the subreddit implode when he endorses her, but for now, this is the last live results that I will be able to devour. Props to Bernie for winning 22 states.


About 20 more than anyone expected, and that's despite several states having several significant problems and investigations in several states he didn't win.

Hell, he's still winning back counties in California.


Dang, ya got me before I could edit out my less than constructive post.

You really ought to control your impulse to make shitposts like those.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23085 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-15 01:19:48
June 15 2016 01:18 GMT
#80991
On June 15 2016 10:14 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 15 2016 09:28 cLutZ wrote:
On June 15 2016 09:15 LegalLord wrote:
On June 15 2016 08:34 xDaunt wrote:
On June 15 2016 08:20 Mohdoo wrote:
Do people who intend to vote for Donald trump think his Muslim ban is a good idea?

It's an idea that is at least worthy of serious discussion as opposed to being summarily dismissed by the left. Like I have said previously, the US -- or any other Western nation for that matter -- should not import peoples who are unwilling/unable to assimilate into Western culture.

Many in the left are unwilling to properly acknowledge the existence of a Muslim problem, and are willing to ignore some remarkably bad actions by Muslims that are a direct result of poorly thought out immigration policies. Not all Muslims are bad, and probably not most, but many more than are being acknowledged by the American and European left. Between doing what the left does and an outright ban, the latter is probably better.

I don't know why it has to be a travel ban or religious test. Just practically speaking it appears to be that 2nd gen immigrants are a bigger issue (also true for crime among Central American immigrants, which is interesting), not travelers. And we already restrict travel on a country of origin basis, no practical reasons exist for not expanding that.

A full ban on travel and immigration, certainly not the best outcome. But the point is that if the choice is between "do what the left has been doing" and "enforce a ban on all Muslims from entering the country" then the latter is the better option.


Yeah I can imagine that going a long way to prove to the Muslim world that we aren't fighting a war against their religion. No way ISIS and other groups could use that as propaganda to show the US hates them because they are Muslim not because they are radical. (though that's not to say the left isn't screwing up plenty)
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
On_Slaught
Profile Joined August 2008
United States12190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-15 01:53:04
June 15 2016 01:52 GMT
#80992
Still wondering what the religious test is going to look like to prove people are Muslim. Are we going to continue to monitor every dark skinned person who enters the country after they get in to make sure they aren't Muslim, like they told us they weren't in the interview?
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
June 15 2016 01:58 GMT
#80993
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
cLutZ
Profile Joined November 2010
United States19573 Posts
June 15 2016 01:59 GMT
#80994
On June 15 2016 10:52 On_Slaught wrote:
Still wondering what the religious test is going to look like to prove people are Muslim. Are we going to continue to monitor every dark skinned person who enters the country after they get in to make sure they aren't Muslim, like they told us they weren't in the interview?

Which is why rhetoric and policy prescriptions are not the same thing. When promoting the PPACA they didn't talk about mandates, penalties, and minimum required coverage, but that is what the policy is in practice. Similarly, this would likely be a country of origin system, in practice. Which we already have and historically have had.

Honestly, it feels like intentional feigning of naivety when people ask this question. And I don't even particularly think its a good solution (just think this question is incredibly disingenuous).
Freeeeeeedom
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
June 15 2016 02:09 GMT
#80995
or maybe trump consistently says shit that is racial and identity focused. that or he is actually advancing a nuanced policy position by bashing nuance.

you can say he wont do what he says but to dispute the obvious interpretation of what he has said is just denial
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
TMagpie
Profile Joined June 2015
265 Posts
June 15 2016 02:12 GMT
#80996
On June 15 2016 09:47 IgnE wrote:
Who won more Democrat/swing states?


Iirc, Hilary won the states where voters showed up, Bernie won the states where voters didn't.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-15 02:21:46
June 15 2016 02:21 GMT
#80997
On June 15 2016 10:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 15 2016 10:14 LegalLord wrote:
On June 15 2016 09:28 cLutZ wrote:
On June 15 2016 09:15 LegalLord wrote:
On June 15 2016 08:34 xDaunt wrote:
On June 15 2016 08:20 Mohdoo wrote:
Do people who intend to vote for Donald trump think his Muslim ban is a good idea?

It's an idea that is at least worthy of serious discussion as opposed to being summarily dismissed by the left. Like I have said previously, the US -- or any other Western nation for that matter -- should not import peoples who are unwilling/unable to assimilate into Western culture.

Many in the left are unwilling to properly acknowledge the existence of a Muslim problem, and are willing to ignore some remarkably bad actions by Muslims that are a direct result of poorly thought out immigration policies. Not all Muslims are bad, and probably not most, but many more than are being acknowledged by the American and European left. Between doing what the left does and an outright ban, the latter is probably better.

I don't know why it has to be a travel ban or religious test. Just practically speaking it appears to be that 2nd gen immigrants are a bigger issue (also true for crime among Central American immigrants, which is interesting), not travelers. And we already restrict travel on a country of origin basis, no practical reasons exist for not expanding that.

A full ban on travel and immigration, certainly not the best outcome. But the point is that if the choice is between "do what the left has been doing" and "enforce a ban on all Muslims from entering the country" then the latter is the better option.


Yeah I can imagine that going a long way to prove to the Muslim world that we aren't fighting a war against their religion. No way ISIS and other groups could use that as propaganda to show the US hates them because they are Muslim not because they are radical. (though that's not to say the left isn't screwing up plenty)

I mean, there are definitely better plans than banning all Muslims, but you're not right either. I'm pretty sure most people who would be able to be radicalized don't really care all that much about the border policy of a nation on the other side of the world. More significant would be US meddling in their actual homes.

Though ISIS isn't going to be beat with magical thinking along the lines of "we is gunna convince dem ppls that USA good guys and ISIS bad guys and all the bad people are gonna go away." This was the idea of the Iraq war and I think we all know how well that turned out. To kill the organization, you have to do what you do to put down guerilla movements: cut off their supplies, bomb them indiscriminately enough that they can't just hide behind the population or so-called "moderate rebels," then support a stable government which will keep them from coming back. Saying that strong policies against malicious immigrants who are Muslims is helping ISIS, is just wrong.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15536 Posts
June 15 2016 02:32 GMT
#80998
On June 15 2016 11:12 TMagpie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 15 2016 09:47 IgnE wrote:
Who won more Democrat/swing states?


Iirc, Hilary won the states where voters showed up, Bernie won the states where voters didn't.


Not to mention the whole caucus nonsense that is somehow still around.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
June 15 2016 02:33 GMT
#80999
On June 15 2016 11:21 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 15 2016 10:18 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 15 2016 10:14 LegalLord wrote:
On June 15 2016 09:28 cLutZ wrote:
On June 15 2016 09:15 LegalLord wrote:
On June 15 2016 08:34 xDaunt wrote:
On June 15 2016 08:20 Mohdoo wrote:
Do people who intend to vote for Donald trump think his Muslim ban is a good idea?

It's an idea that is at least worthy of serious discussion as opposed to being summarily dismissed by the left. Like I have said previously, the US -- or any other Western nation for that matter -- should not import peoples who are unwilling/unable to assimilate into Western culture.

Many in the left are unwilling to properly acknowledge the existence of a Muslim problem, and are willing to ignore some remarkably bad actions by Muslims that are a direct result of poorly thought out immigration policies. Not all Muslims are bad, and probably not most, but many more than are being acknowledged by the American and European left. Between doing what the left does and an outright ban, the latter is probably better.

I don't know why it has to be a travel ban or religious test. Just practically speaking it appears to be that 2nd gen immigrants are a bigger issue (also true for crime among Central American immigrants, which is interesting), not travelers. And we already restrict travel on a country of origin basis, no practical reasons exist for not expanding that.

A full ban on travel and immigration, certainly not the best outcome. But the point is that if the choice is between "do what the left has been doing" and "enforce a ban on all Muslims from entering the country" then the latter is the better option.


Yeah I can imagine that going a long way to prove to the Muslim world that we aren't fighting a war against their religion. No way ISIS and other groups could use that as propaganda to show the US hates them because they are Muslim not because they are radical. (though that's not to say the left isn't screwing up plenty)

I mean, there are definitely better plans than banning all Muslims, but you're not right either. I'm pretty sure most people who would be able to be radicalized don't really care all that much about the border policy of a nation on the other side of the world. More significant would be US meddling in their actual homes.

Though ISIS isn't going to be beat with magical thinking along the lines of "we is gunna convince dem ppls that USA good guys and ISIS bad guys and all the bad people are gonna go away." This was the idea of the Iraq war and I think we all know how well that turned out. To kill the organization, you have to do what you do to put down guerilla movements: cut off their supplies, bomb them indiscriminately enough that they can't just hide behind the population or so-called "moderate rebels," then support a stable government which will keep them from coming back. Saying that strong policies against malicious immigrants who are Muslims is helping ISIS, is just wrong.


ISIS gets recruits off the notion it is representing Islam against the West. And yes, those people hate the US. A total Muslim ban bolsters the pitch used by ISIS. But hopefully you don't really support the Muslim ban - you just dream up a dichotomy and then say you'd prefer the Muslim ban. I guess that is one way of pseudo-supporting Trump without saying it explicitly - couch your statement as an alternative to the other extreme.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-15 02:41:14
June 15 2016 02:36 GMT
#81000
On June 15 2016 10:59 cLutZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 15 2016 10:52 On_Slaught wrote:
Still wondering what the religious test is going to look like to prove people are Muslim. Are we going to continue to monitor every dark skinned person who enters the country after they get in to make sure they aren't Muslim, like they told us they weren't in the interview?

Which is why rhetoric and policy prescriptions are not the same thing. When promoting the PPACA they didn't talk about mandates, penalties, and minimum required coverage, but that is what the policy is in practice. Similarly, this would likely be a country of origin system, in practice. Which we already have and historically have had.

Honestly, it feels like intentional feigning of naivety when people ask this question. And I don't even particularly think its a good solution (just think this question is incredibly disingenuous).


Yes, asking Trump and his supporters for a basic, initial detail on how his stated plan would be carried out is naive and disingenuous.

Your analogy is way off because this detail we're requesting from Trump's supporters is fundamental. A religion ban and a country of origin ban are two very different things.
Prev 1 4048 4049 4050 4051 4052 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 46m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft430
RuFF_SC2 119
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 19203
Icarus 2
Dota 2
monkeys_forever610
Counter-Strike
Foxcn262
Other Games
summit1g9389
C9.Mang01015
shahzam828
ViBE210
Trikslyr62
FunKaTv 19
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick842
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• gosughost_ 3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5866
Other Games
• Scarra590
Upcoming Events
Korean StarCraft League
1h 46m
SOOP
7h 46m
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
8h 46m
WardiTV Invitational
9h 46m
ByuN vs MaNa
MaxPax vs Solar
Reynor vs Creator
Gerald vs Spirit
Cheesadelphia
13h 46m
CSO Cup
15h 46m
BSL: ProLeague
16h 46m
Hawk vs UltrA
Sziky vs spx
TerrOr vs JDConan
GSL Code S
1d 6h
Rogue vs herO
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 8h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 16h
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
1d 22h
Wardi Open
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
4 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.