US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3599
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On April 14 2016 02:01 puerk wrote: have you ever heard of the concept of a "control"? yeah get to the point? | ||
Nyxisto
Germany6287 Posts
| ||
SpiritoftheTunA
United States20903 Posts
medicine didnt come from nowhere the fact that common mass-produced nonfda approved herbal remedies or whatever are overwhelmingly found to be hoaxes doesnt invalidate the whole idea of the thing | ||
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On April 14 2016 01:24 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: To clarify, you mean your right to pick a treatment *for your own disease*, right? Because if *I* want to pick a silly method to treat *your* disease (whether I'm your relative or your friend or your governor or your senator or your president or a complete stranger), then that might be a problem. It's a up to a person, given they are of sound mind, how they want to be treated. I support that 100%. If they want to do something insanely stupid, that's fine... as long as it doesn't impact others which would be where public health concerns like vaccines and herd immunity come into play | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21689 Posts
On April 14 2016 02:10 SpiritoftheTunA wrote: u know not every herbal remedy has been clinically evaluated medicine didnt come from nowhere that common mass-produced nonfda approved herbal remedies or whatever are likely hoaxes doesnt invalidate the whole idea of the thing Your right, medicine didn't come from nowhere. Natural remedies have existed for millennia, and then we tested them and those that actually worked became medicine. | ||
hunts
United States2113 Posts
Stephan said his son started to show real improvement thanks to the herbal medications they were giving him right up until the day he went to hospital. He also had his father come in the night before to give him a blessing. “We prayed over him the night before,” said Stephan. He and his wife received a grim prognosis when Ezekiel was examined at the Alberta Children’s Hospital in Calgary. An examination showed the child had undergone seizures and that there was very little brain activity. “It was fairly bleak and (the doctor) said it was rare that a child would come out of a situation like this. They didn’t completely shatter our hope. She said there was always hope,” Stephan said. “Even if there was an inkling of hope we were going to hold on to that.” The Crown says the couple didn’t do enough to make sure Ezekiel received the treatment he required. The trial in Lethbridge has already heard that the boy had been sick for about 2 1/2 weeks, and his parents gave him natural remedies and homemade smoothies containing hot pepper, ginger root, horseradish and onion. After being taken to a local facility, Ezekiel was rushed to the Calgary hospital, where he died a week later from bacterial meningitis and a lung infection. In earlier testimony, a pediatrician said Ezekiel had less than a one per cent chance of surviving by the time he was taken to hospital and was probably already brain dead. source: http://edmontonjournal.com/storyline/were-not-abusive-parentsmans-whose-son-died-of-meningitis-testifies-at-trial | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44347 Posts
On April 14 2016 01:58 travis wrote: Good, I am glad he supports alternative medicine. Fuck people who think they know everything, and science doesn't even shut down a lot of what alternative medicine has to offer at the moment. But this is an argument that has been had on this website a thousand times and every time it involves a bunch of people throwing up strawmen and ripping them apart. Furthermore, what science says doesn't really mean jack shit in the face of results. My sister is a naturopathic doctor and the results she gets from many of her treatments (particularly acupuncture) really make what science says irrelevant, because results are results. Results can come from the placebo effect, which can be an issue if the "results" are only temporary/ unreliable/ just masking the underlying problem. Science is 100% about results. And repeatability and falsifiability and other important considerations... On April 14 2016 02:12 Gorsameth wrote: Your right, medicine didn't come from nowhere. Natural remedies have existed for millennia, and then we tested them and those that actually worked became medicine. Basically a quote from Tim Minchin's storm... "By definition, I begin Alternative Medicine, I continue, Has either not been proved to work, Or been proved not to work. Do you know what they call alternative medicine That's been proved to work? Medicine." | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On April 14 2016 02:07 Nyxisto wrote: the point is your sister is ripping people off, naturopathy isn't a thing A stradivarius violin sounds identical to any well made violin of similar quality, but people still prize them as sounding richer and deep than other violins. It takes a special level of arrogance to pontificate on a treatment that someone else considers valuable. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42695 Posts
On April 14 2016 01:58 travis wrote: Good, I am glad he supports alternative medicine. Fuck people who think they know everything, and science doesn't even shut down a lot of what alternative medicine has to offer at the moment. But this is an argument that has been had on this website a thousand times and every time it involves a bunch of people throwing up strawmen and ripping them apart. Furthermore, what science says doesn't really mean jack shit in the face of results. My sister is a naturopathic doctor and the results she gets from many of her treatments (particularly acupuncture) really make what science says irrelevant, because results are results. Does she have an MD? | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On April 14 2016 02:12 Gorsameth wrote: Your right, medicine didn't come from nowhere. Natural remedies have existed for millennia, and then we tested them and those that actually worked became medicine. That’s right, we got all them. Every single one. Science is perfect and has never, ever made a mistake or declared something to be true when it was not. Especially medical science. Never happened. | ||
Velr
Switzerland10716 Posts
On April 14 2016 02:18 Plansix wrote: A stradivarius violin sounds identical to any well made violin of similar quality, but people still prize them as sounding richer and deep than other violins. It takes a special level of arrogance to pontificate on a treatment that someone else considers valuable. considering something valuable is not the same as it being working or valuable. Your Stradivari argument falls flat, because stradivaris work and much of the "nature" medicine stuff just does nothing (not everything probably, or it makes you feel better... But if it would be half as good as it "fans" make it out to be, it would be "medecine"). Sometimes people take it over actual medicine and die for their "evaluation". | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21689 Posts
On April 14 2016 02:17 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Results can come from the placebo effect, which can be an issue if the "results" are only temporary/ unreliable/ just masking the underlying problem. Science is 100% about results. And repeatability and falsifiability and other important considerations... Basically a quote from Tim Minchin's storm... "By definition, I begin Alternative Medicine, I continue, Has either not been proved to work, Or been proved not to work. Do you know what they call alternative medicine That's been proved to work? Medicine." Hehe mine based on a piece by Dara O'briain :p | ||
oBlade
United States5590 Posts
Obviously nobody likes the Deepak Chopras of the world, and you can't cure cancer with homeopathy (or water as I call it). But beyond that there are huge grey areas and it's not usually public business whether someone cracks their knuckles in an attempt to feel better. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42695 Posts
On April 14 2016 02:23 Plansix wrote: That’s right, we got all them. Every single one. Science is perfect and has never, ever made a mistake or declared something to be true when it was not. Especially medical science. Never happened. And there could be a teapot orbiting the sun. You don't have to verify a negative in order to prove a positive. This idea that there are known treatments that you can get off the shelf at a quack shop but that big medicine isn't interested in is absurd. There is a huge amount of money to be made in finding new treatments, yes, there could be some unique combination that exists deep in the Amazonian jungle with unknown properties but that doesn't disprove the argument that if green tea cured cancer we would fucking know about it. There are an awful lot of crazy claims. Some of them turned out to be true, some mold will kill bacteria for example. The ones that turned out to be true are what we like to term medicine. The ones that weren't, go to Travis's sister for some, that'll be $500. | ||
farvacola
United States18828 Posts
On April 14 2016 02:28 oBlade wrote: There is no financial incentive in our systems to do research about whether eating a certain leaf gives you personally marginally more comfortable bowel movements. And rightly so - it would usually be a waste of professional time and resources. That's why hands-off is good. Is it okay if someone does yoga but not chiropractic or acupuncture? I can eat a bunch of tangerines but not buy some kind of ground extract? As long as people aren't selling poison as a cure, the FDA is serving its purpose. Obviously nobody likes the Deepak Chopras of the world, and you can't cure cancer with homeopathy (or water as I call it). But beyond that there are huge grey areas and it's not usually public business whether someone cracks their knuckles in an attempt to feel better. The opacity of medical information relative to consumer decision making counsels otherwise. | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21689 Posts
On April 14 2016 02:23 Plansix wrote: That’s right, we got all them. Every single one. Science is perfect and has never, ever made a mistake or declared something to be true when it was not. Especially medical science. Never happened. Science isnt perfect no, and no scientists don't know everything, if they did they would stop(because there would be no point). If your alternative methods work and are real then have them tested under proper medical conditions and establish scientifically that they are genuine and you to can call yourself medicine. Until then your no different from any other quack. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On April 14 2016 02:25 Velr wrote: considering something valuable is not the same as it being working or valuable. Your Stradivari argument falls flat, because stradivaris work and much of the "nature" medicine stuff just does nothing (not everything probably, or it makes you feel better... But if it would be half as good as it "fans" make it out to be, it would be "medecine"). Sometimes people take it over actual medicine and die for their "evaluation". What if they don’t want to take any medical because they don’t want to fight any more? Or the treatment is to harsh and they don’t want to go through it again and seek out alternative treatment? Once again, it takes a special level of arrogance to dictate how someone else should deal with their crippling disease. The same level of arrogance that leads people dictate who can fuck who and when. | ||
![]()
KwarK
United States42695 Posts
On April 14 2016 02:28 oBlade wrote: There is no financial incentive in our systems to do research about whether eating a certain leaf gives you personally marginally more comfortable bowel movements. And rightly so - it would usually be a waste of professional time and resources. That's why hands-off is good. Is it okay if someone does yoga but not chiropractic or acupuncture? I can eat a bunch of tangerines but not buy some kind of ground extract? As long as people aren't selling poison as a cure, the FDA is serving its purpose. Obviously nobody likes the Deepak Chopras of the world, and you can't cure cancer with homeopathy (or water as I call it). But beyond that there are huge grey areas and it's not usually public business whether someone cracks their knuckles in an attempt to feel better. Incidentally the FDA isn't allowed to check whether something is poison or not until it starts killing people. There have been numerous instances of dangerous health supplements being marketed, poisoning a bunch of people and then, after a lengthy battle, being taken off the market. Actual medicine isn't perfect but nutrition supplements and alternative medicine manage to occupy a regulatory sweet spot where it's nobody's job to police it's neither medicine nor food. | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21689 Posts
On April 14 2016 02:30 Plansix wrote: What if they don’t want to take any medical because they don’t want to fight any more? Or the treatment is to harsh and they don’t want to go through it again and seek out alternative treatment? Once again, it takes a special level of arrogance to dictate how someone else should deal with their crippling disease. The same level of arrogance that leads people dictate who can fuck who and when. No one here argues that a person cannot give up, or want to try something different. What we argue is people claiming "this will cure X" when that is unproven and using it to con people out of money. | ||
| ||