• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:11
CEST 16:11
KST 23:11
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt2: All Star10Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists16[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow9[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0
Community News
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers17Maestros of the Game 2 announced92026 GSL Tour plans announced15Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail1MaNa leaves Team Liquid24
StarCraft 2
General
Maestros of the Game 2 announced 2026 GSL Tour plans announced Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists MaNa leaves Team Liquid Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool
Tourneys
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers INu's Battles#14 <BO.9 2Matches> Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 522 Flip My Base The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss Mutation # 520 Moving Fees
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion Data needed ASL21 Strategy, Pimpest Plays Discussions Pros React To: ASL S21, Ro.16 Group C BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro16 Group C Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [ASL21] Ro16 Group D Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Dawn of War IV Diablo IV Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Sexual Health Of Gamers
TrAiDoS
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1679 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 3390

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 3388 3389 3390 3391 3392 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
Soularion
Profile Blog Joined January 2014
Canada2764 Posts
March 18 2016 11:27 GMT
#67781
On March 18 2016 20:23 Simberto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 18 2016 20:15 Soularion wrote:
On March 18 2016 20:11 Simberto wrote:
Independent-Vermont

Also, i find it very weird to assume that wall street would give loads of money to Hillary and not expect anything in return. Usually, if a bank pays someone a lot of money, they do expect to get their moneys worth back in some way.

The whole 'wall street donation' thing, to me - which doesn't mean much, as I'm not even from america! - just means she'll be more in Obama's vein than Bernie Sanders. Still, I think people way overrate how bad 'Obama-tier' is, and overall Hillary Clintons's domestic policy is quite great. The only big problem I have with her is tone and how sketchy she is and how many ugh-sounding things she said..

But really, she's still a million times better than anyone from the right (other than Rubio) in that regard.


Well, yes, it goes without saying that the complete republican lineup is just a bunch of complete lunatics, and i am still utterly confused how a single person is still voting for any of these people. So i guess if your choice is "hillary or republican", Hillary is obviously the better choice. I can't think of many people who would be a worse choice than the republican candidates.

The only interesting question is "Hillary vs Sanders", and here Sanders does look a lot better than Hillary, mostly because he has a lot of policies that are common sense to Europeans, but which are for some reason "completely impossible" in America. Like public Healthcare or affordable education.

I'm sure there's other arguments for Hillary > Sanders (which I respectfully disagree with, I'm for Sanders!) but the best argument I can come up with is.. Well, Hillary has more time in the spotlight- so she's less likely to be screwed over by republicans attacking her, because they've always attacked her, and she also takes a more 'cautious' step forward instead of the massive leap forward that Sanders is proposing. I'm sure the fear of Trump galvanizes the 'oh god stay with the status quo please' vote, which is most likely to go towards Hillary.

Most of the reason why Hillary beat Sanders is just out of pure name recognition and some pretty poor planning from Sanders. He ran a good campaign, but in order to beat Hillary he would've had to run a beyond amazing campaign- which just didn't happen.
Writermaru pls
OtherWorld
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
France17333 Posts
March 18 2016 11:50 GMT
#67782
On March 18 2016 20:27 Soularion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 18 2016 20:23 Simberto wrote:
On March 18 2016 20:15 Soularion wrote:
On March 18 2016 20:11 Simberto wrote:
Independent-Vermont

Also, i find it very weird to assume that wall street would give loads of money to Hillary and not expect anything in return. Usually, if a bank pays someone a lot of money, they do expect to get their moneys worth back in some way.

The whole 'wall street donation' thing, to me - which doesn't mean much, as I'm not even from america! - just means she'll be more in Obama's vein than Bernie Sanders. Still, I think people way overrate how bad 'Obama-tier' is, and overall Hillary Clintons's domestic policy is quite great. The only big problem I have with her is tone and how sketchy she is and how many ugh-sounding things she said..

But really, she's still a million times better than anyone from the right (other than Rubio) in that regard.


Well, yes, it goes without saying that the complete republican lineup is just a bunch of complete lunatics, and i am still utterly confused how a single person is still voting for any of these people. So i guess if your choice is "hillary or republican", Hillary is obviously the better choice. I can't think of many people who would be a worse choice than the republican candidates.

The only interesting question is "Hillary vs Sanders", and here Sanders does look a lot better than Hillary, mostly because he has a lot of policies that are common sense to Europeans, but which are for some reason "completely impossible" in America. Like public Healthcare or affordable education.

I'm sure there's other arguments for Hillary > Sanders (which I respectfully disagree with, I'm for Sanders!) but the best argument I can come up with is.. Well, Hillary has more time in the spotlight- so she's less likely to be screwed over by republicans attacking her, because they've always attacked her, and she also takes a more 'cautious' step forward instead of the massive leap forward that Sanders is proposing. I'm sure the fear of Trump galvanizes the 'oh god stay with the status quo please' vote, which is most likely to go towards Hillary.

Most of the reason why Hillary beat Sanders is just out of pure name recognition and some pretty poor planning from Sanders. He ran a good campaign, but in order to beat Hillary he would've had to run a beyond amazing campaign- which just didn't happen.

I think Sanders has the merit of showing to the world the fact that all Democrats don't think the same and don't support the establishment, and that there is room for support for socialist policies in the US. I mean if Sanders doesn't abandon before the Convention, the delegates (superdelegates excluded) count will probably be something like 60% to 40% in favor of Clinton. It means 40% of the Democratic electorate is not afeared by socialist policies, and that's pretty huge.
Used Sigs - New Sigs - Cheap Sigs - Buy the Best Cheap Sig near You at www.cheapsigforsale.com
Soularion
Profile Blog Joined January 2014
Canada2764 Posts
March 18 2016 12:00 GMT
#67783
On March 18 2016 20:50 OtherWorld wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 18 2016 20:27 Soularion wrote:
On March 18 2016 20:23 Simberto wrote:
On March 18 2016 20:15 Soularion wrote:
On March 18 2016 20:11 Simberto wrote:
Independent-Vermont

Also, i find it very weird to assume that wall street would give loads of money to Hillary and not expect anything in return. Usually, if a bank pays someone a lot of money, they do expect to get their moneys worth back in some way.

The whole 'wall street donation' thing, to me - which doesn't mean much, as I'm not even from america! - just means she'll be more in Obama's vein than Bernie Sanders. Still, I think people way overrate how bad 'Obama-tier' is, and overall Hillary Clintons's domestic policy is quite great. The only big problem I have with her is tone and how sketchy she is and how many ugh-sounding things she said..

But really, she's still a million times better than anyone from the right (other than Rubio) in that regard.


Well, yes, it goes without saying that the complete republican lineup is just a bunch of complete lunatics, and i am still utterly confused how a single person is still voting for any of these people. So i guess if your choice is "hillary or republican", Hillary is obviously the better choice. I can't think of many people who would be a worse choice than the republican candidates.

The only interesting question is "Hillary vs Sanders", and here Sanders does look a lot better than Hillary, mostly because he has a lot of policies that are common sense to Europeans, but which are for some reason "completely impossible" in America. Like public Healthcare or affordable education.

I'm sure there's other arguments for Hillary > Sanders (which I respectfully disagree with, I'm for Sanders!) but the best argument I can come up with is.. Well, Hillary has more time in the spotlight- so she's less likely to be screwed over by republicans attacking her, because they've always attacked her, and she also takes a more 'cautious' step forward instead of the massive leap forward that Sanders is proposing. I'm sure the fear of Trump galvanizes the 'oh god stay with the status quo please' vote, which is most likely to go towards Hillary.

Most of the reason why Hillary beat Sanders is just out of pure name recognition and some pretty poor planning from Sanders. He ran a good campaign, but in order to beat Hillary he would've had to run a beyond amazing campaign- which just didn't happen.

I think Sanders has the merit of showing to the world the fact that all Democrats don't think the same and don't support the establishment, and that there is room for support for socialist policies in the US. I mean if Sanders doesn't abandon before the Convention, the delegates (superdelegates excluded) count will probably be something like 60% to 40% in favor of Clinton. It means 40% of the Democratic electorate is not afeared by socialist policies, and that's pretty huge.

Of course! He's a very good 'message' type of candidate, and he's done almost impossibly well in that regard. His goal was never to win the presidency, but rather to expose as many people as possible to new ideas and to pull Clinton to the left, both of which were immensely successful
Writermaru pls
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14107 Posts
March 18 2016 13:34 GMT
#67784
538 is updated and the 110% is from the 3/15 primaries. I don't think you read the link to it or just don't understand part of it. But nothing about what you said makes sense if you understand it.

The target delegates comes from where the candidate wants to be to be on track to win the nomination with a majority. currently Hillary is on pace to win 110% of the delegates she needs to win with pledged delegates. I think the confusion comes from the superdelegatets that are in hillaries camp already. 538 doesn't take into account those beacuse they have no statistical basis to account for.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/bernie-sanders-doesnt-need-momentum-he-needs-to-win-these-states/

this is a good article if people want to keep up on how the race is going. I don't think an 8 point margin is really large of a gap. I'm not saying I think its going to happen but I don't see how you can dismiss how it can go the other way Expecialy from where Sanders was at the start of the campaign.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23894 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-03-18 14:33:24
March 18 2016 13:34 GMT
#67785
Well then...



+ Show Spoiler +
EDIT: In case it's not clear this isn't the email but some reasons why overthrowing Assad was/is a bad idea right now.

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard said, “Here are 10 reasons the U.S. must end its war to overthrow the Syrian government of Assad:

1. Because if we succeed in overthrowing the Syrian government of Assad, it will open the door for ISIS, al-Qaeda, and other Islamic extremists to take over all of Syria. There will be genocide and suffering on a scale beyond our imagination. These Islamic extremists will take over all the weaponry, infrastructure, and military hardware of the Syrian army and be more dangerous than ever before.
2. Because overthrowing the Syrian government of Assad is the goal of ISIS, al-Qaeda, and other Islamic extremist groups. We should not be allying ourselves with these Islamic extremists by helping them achieve their goal because it is against the security interests of the United States and all of civilization.
3. Because the money and weapons the CIA is providing to overthrow the Syrian government of Assad are going directly or indirectly into the hands of the Islamic extremist groups, including al-Qaeda affiliates, al-Nusra, Ahrar al-Sham, and others who are the actual enemies of the United States. These groups make up close to 90 percent of the so-called opposition forces, and are the most dominant fighters on the ground.
4. Because our efforts to overthrow Assad have increased and will continue to increase the strength of ISIS and other Islamic extremists, thus making them a bigger regional and global threat.
5. Because this war has exacerbated the chaos and carnage in Syria and, along with the terror inflicted by ISIS and other Islamic extremist groups fighting to take over Syria, continues to increase the number of Syrians forced to flee their country.
6. Because we should learn from our past mistakes in Iraq and Libya that U.S. wars to overthrow secular dictators (Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi) cause even more chaos and human suffering and open the door for Islamic extremists to take over in those countries.
7. Because the U.S. has no credible government or government leader ready to bring order, security, and freedom to the people of Syria.
8. Because even the ‘best case’ scenario—that the U.S. successfully overthrows the Syrian government of Assad—would obligate the United States to spend trillions of dollars and the lives of American service members in the futile effort to create a new Syria. This is what we have been trying to do in Iraq for twelve years, and we still have not succeeded. The situation in Syria will be much more difficult than in Iraq.
9. Because our war against the Syrian government of Assad is interfering with our being one-pointedly focused on the war to defeat ISIS, al-Qaeda, and the other Islamic extremists who are our actual enemy.
10. Because our war to overthrow the Assad government puts us in direct conflict with Russia and increases the likelihood of war between the United States and Russia and the possibility of another world war.”

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard said, “To destroy ISIS will take international alliances. If we are serious about defeating ISIS and solving the refugee problem, we’ll work in partnership with Russia, France, and anyone else who is serious about destroying ISIS and affiliated Islamic extremist organizations worldwide.

“The problem is, because the U.S. is trying to overthrow the Syrian government of Assad and Russia is supporting the government of Assad, it is impossible for us to have an effective, cooperative relationship with Russia in our mutual fight against ISIS. Our focus on overthrowing Assad is interfering with our ability to destroy ISIS.”

“We must immediately end the illegal, counter-productive war to overthrow the Syrian government of Assad and ally ourselves with any countries willing to focus on destroying the Islamic extremists who pose a genuine threat to civilization,” Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard concluded.

Source


This feels like one of those types of emails that would be "retroactively classified".

The target delegates comes from where the candidate wants to be to be on track to win the nomination with a majority. currently Hillary is on pace to win 110%


She fell from 113% before Mar 15, not sure if people noticed that.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
March 18 2016 13:41 GMT
#67786
The last part where she talks about another world war with Russia makes me really wonder if talked to anyone at all before forming this opinion. Or what defeating ISIS looks like. We put Assad back in power and then he beats ISIS, even though every other power in the Middle East is like “Nah, son, we good.” That putting him back in power doesn’t really make the powers that created ISIS go away, they will just move to another unstable region.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
March 18 2016 13:47 GMT
#67787
wikileaks is basically working for mother russia at this point. good for google though
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-03-18 13:53:42
March 18 2016 13:53 GMT
#67788
I was always amazed at how much unearned creditability wikileaks received. They would dump stolen information and people would just assume it wasn’t cherry picked or that they didn’t hold anything back. But I guess that is really the fault of the news agencies and other groups tone when they reported on the leaks.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23894 Posts
March 18 2016 14:00 GMT
#67789
I suppose that's one way to react to finding out about this particular email. Not sure what they could be holding back that would make this look better?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
DickMcFanny
Profile Blog Joined September 2015
Ireland1076 Posts
March 18 2016 14:00 GMT
#67790
On March 18 2016 22:53 Plansix wrote:
I was always amazed at how much unearned creditability wikileaks received. They would dump stolen information and people would just assume it wasn’t cherry picked or that they didn’t hold anything back. But I guess that is really the fault of the news agencies and other groups tone when they reported on the leaks.


I think a lot of the trust for conventional media was lost when Snowden released 45 or so slides about the NSA domestic spy programme, and Washington Post and NYT published only two of those slides.
| (• ◡•)|╯ ╰(❍ᴥ❍ʋ)
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
March 18 2016 14:18 GMT
#67791
On March 18 2016 23:00 GreenHorizons wrote:
I suppose that's one way to react to finding out about this particular email. Not sure what they could be holding back that would make this look better?

There isn’t a lot to say about that email. It’s from a random member of the junior member House of Representatives and she is expressing her views on the war in Syria. Some of her views seem pretty surface level or poorly informed. I am sure Hilary gets a lot of emails.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23894 Posts
March 18 2016 14:32 GMT
#67792
On March 18 2016 23:18 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 18 2016 23:00 GreenHorizons wrote:
I suppose that's one way to react to finding out about this particular email. Not sure what they could be holding back that would make this look better?

There isn’t a lot to say about that email. It’s from a random member of the junior member House of Representatives and she is expressing her views on the war in Syria. Some of her views seem pretty surface level or poorly informed. I am sure Hilary gets a lot of emails.


I guess you didn't actually read the email and you just read Gabbard's list of why overthrowing Assad wouldn't be helpful?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15743 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-03-18 14:34:09
March 18 2016 14:33 GMT
#67793
Cool thing is that if Clinton isn't indicted now, we know for sure she won't be during the general. And really, even disregarding the fact that she's clearly safe, she's a Clinton. You think a Clinton is going to jail? It's not possible. Guilty or not, sadly but actually thankfully in this specific case lolol. Especially at her age, especially being the presidential frontrunner. It just ain't happenin.
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
March 18 2016 14:34 GMT
#67794
these emails should actually be good publicity at large. it shows hillary works really hard and also the united states does care about human rights and so on at a basic level
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 18 2016 14:39 GMT
#67795
California's insurance exchange is threatening to cut hospitals from its networks for poor performance or high costs, a novel proposal that is drawing heavy fire from medical providers and insurers.

The goal is to boost the overall quality of patient care and make coverage more affordable, said Peter Lee, executive director of the Covered California exchange.

"The first few years were about getting people in the door for coverage," said Lee, a key figure in the rollout of the federal health law. "We are now shifting our attention to changing the underlying delivery system to make it more cost effective and higher quality. We don't want to throw anyone out, but we don't want to pay for bad quality care either."

It appears to be the first proposal of its kind in the country. The exchange's five-member board is slated to vote on it next month. If approved, insurers would need to identify hospital "outliers" on cost and quality starting in 2018. Medical groups and doctors would be rated after that.

Providers who don't measure up stand to lose insured patients and suffer a black eye that could sully their reputations with employers and other big customers.

By 2019, health plans would be expected to expel poor performers from their exchange networks.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
March 18 2016 14:41 GMT
#67796
On March 18 2016 23:33 Mohdoo wrote:
Cool thing is that if Clinton isn't indicted now, we know for sure she won't be during the general. And really, even disregarding the fact that she's clearly safe, she's a Clinton. You think a Clinton is going to jail? It's not possible. Guilty or not, sadly but actually thankfully in this specific case lolol. Especially at her age, especially being the presidential frontrunner. It just ain't happenin.

If David Petraeus didn’t get jail time, there is no chance Clinton will. And I don’t even know if they will charge her. I don’t think they can charge her alone. Other people would need to be charged. And I don’t really see much of a gain for the FBI or justice department beyond creating a political football.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
March 18 2016 14:45 GMT
#67797
it's a really serious breach of procedures and incredibly dumb of her. but there is always some discretion with prosecution. it is a case of the political too big to fail lol.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-03-18 14:55:03
March 18 2016 14:53 GMT
#67798
Yes, but the case allows her to raise defenses like proving that the issue was wide spread, that she isn’t the only one using private email for government business and so on. That the people sending her the classified information have sent it to other government members that they know are using unsecured data storage or unsafe practices.

IT and data security has been notoriously bad in Washington for a long time now. There is no way she is the only official in Washington dodging security practices in the hopes they didn’t get caught.

I get that it was bad, but this is not the hill I am going to die on when I read stories about Bush administration storing things on external hardrives, rather than updating the office PCs.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-03-18 15:02:43
March 18 2016 14:58 GMT
#67799
No one bothered enforcing IT protocols.

Clinton asked the NSA for a Blackberry-like device because she didn't want to drag a laptop around the world as SoS and got denied (somehow they were ok with Obama using Blackberry, and they gave previous SoS's waivers). Anyways, she continued using it, the NSA never stopped her and pretty much everyone knew (there was even a short-lived meme about it for crying out loud)... but it never became an issue until now.

Also personally, I think Google being able to track what's going on on the ground in Syria is super cool. Having these big companies be able to use people's data is something we need to figure out, but this is a pretty benign application of it.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
March 18 2016 15:14 GMT
#67800
Here's a crucial piece of info from 538: primary turnout doesn't predict the general election.

[image loading]

People in this thread have been pushing ideas such as bringing new people to vote, or enthusiasm, etc. But it seems to only indicate how competitive the race is at the primary level. Once it's not competitive, people stop turning up (such as when Dems showed up to vote for Kasich in Ohio).
Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
Prev 1 3388 3389 3390 3391 3392 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
INu's Battles
11:00
INu's Battles#14
ByuN vs RogueLIVE!
IntoTheiNu 1245
LiquipediaDiscussion
Escore
10:00
Week 4
escodisco4183
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
LamboSC2 224
Railgan 99
herO (SOOP) 11
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 28206
EffOrt 959
Soma 917
Mini 674
Stork 392
ggaemo 387
firebathero 378
Snow 318
Soulkey 206
hero 106
[ Show more ]
Dewaltoss 95
sorry 95
Pusan 84
Hyun 79
Barracks 66
JYJ 57
[sc1f]eonzerg 52
soO 45
sSak 44
ToSsGirL 34
Shine 31
Free 26
scan(afreeca) 24
Sexy 24
Rock 20
Movie 13
Terrorterran 10
GoRush 10
Sacsri 8
Icarus 6
Dota 2
Gorgc5738
qojqva1249
Counter-Strike
byalli837
allub420
kRYSTAL_50
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King56
Heroes of the Storm
Trikslyr32
Other Games
singsing2180
B2W.Neo1079
DeMusliM382
crisheroes328
Lowko322
Sick255
QueenE150
ArmadaUGS107
RotterdaM1
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream17581
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 88
• iHatsuTV 17
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix2
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis2505
• Jankos1658
Other Games
• WagamamaTV207
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
2h 49m
Big Brain Bouts
2h 49m
PiG vs DeMusliM
Reynor vs Bunny
Replay Cast
9h 49m
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
20h 49m
Classic vs SHIN
MaxPax vs Percival
herO vs Clem
ByuN vs Rogue
Ladder Legends
1d
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d
BSL
1d 4h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 19h
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
1d 20h
Ladder Legends
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Soma vs hero
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Leta vs YSC
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
KCM Race Survival
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Escore
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-04-22
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Escore Tournament S2: W4
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W5
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.