| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
On March 07 2016 11:51 Ghanburighan wrote: There isn't a single serious analysis that supports this within the time frame of the next presidential term, or even 2. You realize that many policies happen over a time period of 10-20 years right? It doesn't have to happen within their term. Many of Obama's policies happen over a period of 20 years. | ||
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
On March 07 2016 11:51 kwizach wrote: It's just so obvious in this debate that Sanders is all about making promises and telling people that he'll achieve what they want to see happen regardless of how unrealistic those promises are, while Hillary is about detailing realistic plans and concrete solutions to the issues raised. Really? Doesn't look like that to me. | ||
|
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
Edit: This is a stupid question but Hillary is bsing as hard as she can lmao. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18476 Posts
| ||
|
Slaughter
United States20255 Posts
On March 07 2016 11:52 oneofthem wrote: problem is bernie policies are plain bad I wouldn't say they were bad if the US as a country was committed to pivoting to the kind of changes at the cultural level he is pushing. | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
On March 07 2016 11:56 Acrofales wrote: wtf is this bullshit about religion. how is this still a thing? Should definitely be kept out of politics. I think Sanders' answer here is better but he got a less insane question, so hard to tell. | ||
|
Slaughter
United States20255 Posts
On March 07 2016 11:56 Acrofales wrote: wtf is this bullshit section about religion. how is this still a thing? It's the US. It will be relevant for a long time. Much less so for the Democrat side though. | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On March 07 2016 11:57 The_Templar wrote: Should definitely be kept out of politics. I think Sanders' answer here is better but he got a less insane question, so hard to tell. He got a more answerable question. "Who do you pray for" is an absurd thing to ask in a debate. | ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32755 Posts
On March 07 2016 11:56 Acrofales wrote: wtf is this bullshit section about religion. how is this still a thing? One more reason why questions from the crowd aren't a great idea. | ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
| ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States24419 Posts
| ||
|
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
Bernie lives another day. | ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
| ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
On March 07 2016 11:57 jcarlsoniv wrote: He got a more answerable question. "Who do you pray for" is an absurd thing to ask in a debate. Exactly. His question was actually somewhat sane in comparison as I said. | ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4458 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On March 07 2016 11:56 Slaughter wrote: I wouldn't say they were bad if the US as a country was committed to pivoting to the kind of changes at the cultural level he is pushing. would be disastrous if put into practice | ||
|
Souma
2nd Worst City in CA8938 Posts
You're such a drama queen. I would love to see an anime called Trade Wars though. | ||
|
Nyxisto
Germany6287 Posts
the trade deals are still irrelevant. Tariffs are down so much anyway that the net benefit is miniscule. If anything the developed economies are demand starved. | ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
On March 07 2016 11:52 Souma wrote: You realize that many policies happen over a time period of 10-20 years right? It doesn't have to happen within their term. Many of Obama's policies happen over a period of 20 years. Now that the debate is over and before I head to bed, here's a quick recap of why this is seen as problematic: Sanders said he doesn't support fracking, i.e., he'd ban it within 4 or 8 years. The issue with this is that it would triple fuel prices assuming no other country does anything (i.e., OPEC doesn't enact its production quotas). The nice fantasy land response is that oil will be replaced by alternative sources of fuel. But this won't happen in 4 or 8 years, so either Sanders will raise oil prices until alternative fuel sources appear sometime in the future, or he does in fact have to support fracking. It's very annoying that the moderators didn't press them on the economic and foreign policy effects of this response, as it might be single most important indicator for the global economy and it has a major effect on Russia, China and the ME. Good night. | ||
|
darthfoley
United States8004 Posts
On March 07 2016 11:51 kwizach wrote: It's just so obvious in this debate that Sanders is all about making promises and telling people that he'll achieve what they want to see happen regardless of how unrealistic those promises are, while Hillary is about detailing realistic plans and concrete solutions to the issues raised. if you aim for a full loaf, you might get half a loaf | ||
| ||
The PiG Daily
Best Games of SC
Serral vs Neeb
Reynor vs Clem
Maru vs GgMaChine
[ Submit Event ] |
|
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
|
FEL
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
IntoTheTV X SOOP
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
Kung Fu Cup
IntoTheTV X SOOP
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
WardiTV Invitational
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
