|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On February 19 2015 23:14 Velr wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2015 17:54 Yoav wrote: Roman Law of course is important for English common law, though to nowhere near the same extent as it was important to the various civil codes of Europe. A history curriculum that doesn't at least cover the fundamentals of Roman law (12 tables, some property law, and the patrician/plebeian conflict that spawned the whole thing) is indeed quite lacking.
Of course, it should go without saying that at least a basic study of the Bible (Hebrew Bible and Christian Testament) is necessary for any educated person, at the very least due to their nature as the source of our form of morality. Their important to literature, philosophy, and religion are important secondary reasons. Sigh.. The Bible and all the other Holy Books were written AFTER big societies developed, to develop and hold together bigger societies you have to have certain rules which most probably will follow a very obvious moral code. The basic rules for societies developed pretty similar among just about all cultures, sure there are diffrences but overall the baselines are very similar.
That's not true at all. Societies under different religions look vastly different. The idea of nation states in the Islamic world pretty much didn't exist until 150 years ago. Islam was politics and law, while the Christian churches although powerful always co-existed with the state and their rulers. The idea of secularism actually only makes sense because the distinction already always existed.
So it makes definitely sense to educate people about the fact that many of our Western values/culture are indeed uniquely Christian, but it should better happen in a serious way. Letting them recite bible passages and Reagan speeches sounds like something out of a satirical film.
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
'uniquely christian' is cart before the horse backwards or confused about sense of unique.
either, what is uniquely christian is not unique but only a product of underlying human cognitive and social facts or. unique is understood as histrically contingent, and within this particular development story that is humanity, the way christianity came to be has real explanatory detail. esp its humanistic universalist elements. like life arising on earth is a unique event, but only for earth
|
By unique I was referring to the way in which Christian countries combined the idea of social security and community with at least some degree of personal liberty. (by historical standards obviously). In almost any other region of the world you either had some kind of all encompassing theocracy or non religion at all but instead some kind of despotic ruler.
|
On February 20 2015 00:45 Nyxisto wrote: By unique I was referring to the way how in Christian countries the idea of social security and community was combined with at least some degree of personal liberty. (by historical standards obviously). In almost any other region of the world you either had some kind of all encompassing theocracy or non religion at all but instead some kind of despotic ruler. But it still missplaced it as "christian". You know how it came about that europe had this seperation. Christianity was a foreign minority religion, slowly establishing itself in greek mediteranean colonies and rome. Places with a long standing foundation of rule of law and secular politics.
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On February 20 2015 00:45 Nyxisto wrote: By unique I was referring to the way in which Christian countries combined the idea of social security and community with at least some degree of personal liberty. (by historical standards obviously). In almost any other region of the world you either had some kind of all encompassing theocracy or non religion at all but instead some kind of despotic ruler. that doesnt really touch on the clarification i made. whatever particular detail of the christian ideology, unique is still defined within this particular timeline, relative to other religions in your case. the other guy's idea of unique is more along the lines of religion as a unique bearer of value apart from the human nature etc htat gave rise to it.
|
On February 20 2015 00:22 Nyxisto wrote:Show nested quote +On February 19 2015 23:14 Velr wrote:On February 19 2015 17:54 Yoav wrote: Roman Law of course is important for English common law, though to nowhere near the same extent as it was important to the various civil codes of Europe. A history curriculum that doesn't at least cover the fundamentals of Roman law (12 tables, some property law, and the patrician/plebeian conflict that spawned the whole thing) is indeed quite lacking.
Of course, it should go without saying that at least a basic study of the Bible (Hebrew Bible and Christian Testament) is necessary for any educated person, at the very least due to their nature as the source of our form of morality. Their important to literature, philosophy, and religion are important secondary reasons. Sigh.. The Bible and all the other Holy Books were written AFTER big societies developed, to develop and hold together bigger societies you have to have certain rules which most probably will follow a very obvious moral code. The basic rules for societies developed pretty similar among just about all cultures, sure there are diffrences but overall the baselines are very similar. That's not true at all. Societies under different religions look vastly different. The idea of nation states in the Islamic world pretty much didn't exist until 150 years ago. Islam was politics and law, while the Christian churches although powerful always co-existed with the state and their rulers. The idea of secularism actually only makes sense because the distinction already always existed. So it makes definitely sense to educate people about the fact that many of our Western values/culture are indeed uniquely Christian, but it should better happen in a serious way. Letting them recite bible passages and Reagan speeches sounds like something out of a satirical film.
Baseline rules aren't nation states or social security? wtf?
Don't kill/steal/rape your neighbour/other members of your society. Name me a culture that plain allows this withing their own society. For Arabs/Africans their Tribe was their society, for europeans their state... It doesn't matter one bit. Other rules are very diffrent, but BASIC and BASIC morals are similar. We are a pack animal, we form societies, societies create rules. Not killing/stealing/pissing everyone in your own society off is probably the most important rule there is and i don't see how anyone could nail this on "christianity, or any religion, did it!"... Even Apes and other Pack animals follow some of the 10 commandments... And i highly doubt they are christian...
And social security and all that stuff are still "new" things, what they have to do with christianity is totally beyond me.
|
Sure, "don't kill each" other is pretty much widely accepted at least within most cultures, but every six year old understands that and school usually tends to go a little further. Especially cultural differences are pretty big. Almost every second piece of literature draws heavily from the bible. Just for that reason alone a certain amount of education about the book and the religion is pretty much necessary.
|
On February 20 2015 01:37 Nyxisto wrote: Sure, "don't kill each" other is pretty much widely accepted at least within most cultures, but every six year old understands that and school usually tends to go a little further. Especially cultural differences are pretty big. Almost every second piece of literature draws heavily from the bible. Just for that reason alone a certain amount of education about the book and the religion is pretty much necessary.
The Bible is one of the most influential pieces of literature in history, but that influence is really far back in history. It's not something that you shoehorn into a U.S. history curriculum, but rather something that you cover in a world/ancient history curriculum.
Writings by individuals like Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, and J.S. Mill would definitely take precedence over an in-depth study of the Bible if we wanted to talk about Western history and political thought. While these were all influenced by the Bible, they are much more relevant in message and essence to our political discourse, whereas the Bible is an extremely old foundation that doesn't directly contribute to political discourse in very many ways today.
Even then, writings by these individuals shouldn't be in a U.S. history curriculum; they should be in a curriculum that teaches political/social philosophy or the origin and history of American political thought.
|
Well there's the whole "Manifest Destiny" and "City upon a Hill" stuff, too. I feel like US history, especially American exceptionalism has heavily utilized a pretty twisted version of Christianity, which is still relevant and used today. For that reason I think dealing with Christianity in a critical way might even be more important than in most other countries.
|
On February 20 2015 01:54 Nyxisto wrote: Well there's the whole "Manifest Destiny" and "City upon a Hill" stuff, too. I feel like US history, especially American exceptionalism has heavily utilized a pretty twisted version of Christianity, which is still relevant and used today. For that reason I think dealing with Christianity in a critical way might be more important than in most other countries.
Yes but there's a difference between teaching the influence of Christianity on our culture (which is absolutely everywhere) vs. teaching an in-depth course about Christianity.
|
WASHINGTON -- In a move that could alter the minimum wage debate and improve the image of the world's largest retailer, Walmart announced it will raise the baseline wage of its current store employees to $10 per hour, bringing pay hikes to an estimated 500,000 workers.
The company said in an announcement on Thursday that it would raise its wage floor to $9 in April, followed by a second boost to $10 by next February.
The decision follows similar moves by other major retailers such as Gap and IKEA, but the sheer size of Walmart sets the company apart. The Arkansas-based retailer is the largest private-sector employer in the U.S., with an estimated 1.4 million employees, and it is largely seen as a trend-setter in the retail industry.
On a quarterly earnings call aligned with the announcement, Doug McMillon, the company's CEO, said raising wages would be good for both employees and customers.
"Overall, these are strategic investments in our people to reignite the sense of ownership they have in our stores," McMillon said. "As a result, we firmly believe that our customers will benefit from a better store experience, which can drive higher sales and returns for our shareholders over time."
According to a Walmart spokesman, the new wage floors will apply to current employees. New hires next year will be earning at least $9, but will be bumped up to at least $10 per hour after roughly six months of training.
Source
|
DALLAS — Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) accused Jeb Bush of hypocrisy after The Boston Globe reported the former Florida governor was a heavy marijuana smoker while at an elite prep school.
Bush opposed a Florida medical marijuana ballot initiative last year even though he partook liberally of the herb while in high school.
“You would think he’d have a little more understanding then,” Paul told The Hill while en route to a political event in Texas. “He was even opposed to medical marijuana,” Paul said of Bush, a potential rival in the 2016 Republican presidential primary. “This is a guy who now admits he smoked marijuana but he wants to put people in jail who do.
“I think that’s the real hypocrisy, is that people on our side, which include a lot of people who made mistakes growing up, admit their mistakes but now still want to put people in jail for that,” he said.
“Had he been caught at Andover, he’d have never been governor, he’d probably never have a chance to run for the presidency,” he added.
Bush told The Globe in a recent interview about his four years at Phillips Academy in Andover, one of the nation’s most prestigious prep schools, “I drank and I smoked marijuana when I was at Andover,” explaining the behavior was “pretty common.”
The Globe cited a former classmate, Peter Tibbetts, who said he first smoked marijuana with Bush and also consumed cannabis, a concentration of the plant’s resin, in Bush’s dorm room.
Tibbetts recalled Bush cranking up Steppenwolf’s “Magic Carpet Ride” on the stereo while he and his classmates got stoned.
Source
You know, I think if Paul spent the next 6 years distancing himself from both parties, he could win a 3 way election? I think he would get gobbled up by big money and wouldn't be half as good a president as he might be a candidate, but it's possible.
I'm interested to see what the RNC does about him on the debate stage.
Side note: + Show Spoiler +It's funny how reports about illegal substances are usually so ignorant sounding about the substance. You know some one thought to themselves "Wait what? cannabis isn't a concentrated form of marijuana?" but they didn't want to sound like a pot-head, so they just stayed quiet and let them run the story.
|
On February 20 2015 01:58 Stratos_speAr wrote:Show nested quote +On February 20 2015 01:54 Nyxisto wrote: Well there's the whole "Manifest Destiny" and "City upon a Hill" stuff, too. I feel like US history, especially American exceptionalism has heavily utilized a pretty twisted version of Christianity, which is still relevant and used today. For that reason I think dealing with Christianity in a critical way might be more important than in most other countries. Yes but there's a difference between teaching the influence of Christianity on our culture (which is absolutely everywhere) vs. teaching an in-depth course about Christianity.
Any half-decent world history curriculum had better touch on Christianity, Islam, Confucianism, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Zoroastrianism and at least some concepts in Animisms. Some ordering of most to least influential in the modern world is probably in order (the above is a rough cut), for length of time devoted, but generally, yes, all these things should be basically familiar to a high-school educated person. You have been failed by your education if you can't give a reasonable accounting of the ten commandments, five pillars, beatitudes, key analects, and so on. Of course Locke and the like are crucial too. But to try to understand Locke without understanding that he could not have come out of any other tradition is to miss the point.
On February 20 2015 00:51 puerk wrote:Show nested quote +On February 20 2015 00:45 Nyxisto wrote: By unique I was referring to the way how in Christian countries the idea of social security and community was combined with at least some degree of personal liberty. (by historical standards obviously). In almost any other region of the world you either had some kind of all encompassing theocracy or non religion at all but instead some kind of despotic ruler. But it still missplaced it as "christian". You know how it came about that europe had this seperation. Christianity was a foreign minority religion, slowly establishing itself in greek mediteranean colonies and rome. Places with a long standing foundation of rule of law and secular politics.
Islam was a foreign minority religion that worked out in a remarkably different way.
On February 20 2015 01:08 Velr wrote: Not killing/stealing/pissing everyone in your own society off is probably the most important rule there is and i don't see how anyone could nail this on "christianity, or any religion, did it!"... Even Apes and other Pack animals follow some of the 10 commandments... And i highly doubt they are christian...
This is a straw man. I'm not saying Christianity invented "morality." I'm saying our humanist morality comes from Christianity. The very root concepts of basing society on the individual and their choices, the notion of separation of church and state, the idea of charity given to the poor to make things more fair, basically the entire debate we have around state violence, the idea of the civil disobedient, the ideas of Romanticism and modern Pragmatism, indeed, modernism itself... all this has root in the tradition of Christianity. Hell, while we're keeping score, rationalist Atheism is basically a Christian development.
The point is that other cultures have had very different moralities. We inherited ours both directly from the Christian tradition, and the Enlightenment humanists (both secular and religious) who were a part of it.
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
i can see some reasonable presentation of both velr and nyxisto's points, but "humanist morality comes from christianity" is just bull.
|
On February 20 2015 02:25 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +DALLAS — Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) accused Jeb Bush of hypocrisy after The Boston Globe reported the former Florida governor was a heavy marijuana smoker while at an elite prep school.
Bush opposed a Florida medical marijuana ballot initiative last year even though he partook liberally of the herb while in high school.
“You would think he’d have a little more understanding then,” Paul told The Hill while en route to a political event in Texas. “He was even opposed to medical marijuana,” Paul said of Bush, a potential rival in the 2016 Republican presidential primary. “This is a guy who now admits he smoked marijuana but he wants to put people in jail who do.
“I think that’s the real hypocrisy, is that people on our side, which include a lot of people who made mistakes growing up, admit their mistakes but now still want to put people in jail for that,” he said.
“Had he been caught at Andover, he’d have never been governor, he’d probably never have a chance to run for the presidency,” he added.
Bush told The Globe in a recent interview about his four years at Phillips Academy in Andover, one of the nation’s most prestigious prep schools, “I drank and I smoked marijuana when I was at Andover,” explaining the behavior was “pretty common.”
The Globe cited a former classmate, Peter Tibbetts, who said he first smoked marijuana with Bush and also consumed cannabis, a concentration of the plant’s resin, in Bush’s dorm room.
Tibbetts recalled Bush cranking up Steppenwolf’s “Magic Carpet Ride” on the stereo while he and his classmates got stoned. SourceYou know, I think if Paul spent the next 6 years distancing himself from both parties, he could win a 3 way election? I think he would get gobbled up by big money and wouldn't be half as good a president as he might be a candidate, but it's possible. I'm interested to see what the RNC does about him on the debate stage. Side note: + Show Spoiler +It's funny how reports about illegal substances are usually so ignorant sounding about the substance. You know some one thought to themselves "Wait what? cannabis isn't a concentrated form of marijuana?" but they didn't want to sound like a pot-head, so they just stayed quiet and let them run the story. No he wouldnt. And its not all about big money. Just because he has some reasonable stances doesnt absolve him of not understanding money or banking or wanting to close the Fed.
|
On February 20 2015 03:21 oneofthem wrote: i can see some reasonable presentation of both velr and nyxisto's points, but "humanist morality comes from christianity" is just bull.
Not sure about the whole idea of humanist morality but social justice definitely is heavily influenced if not founded by Christianity (on the European and American continent). Especially in the US religious people seem to be the only group on the conservative spectrum who promote the idea of social equality.
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
that's not the same as saying it 'comes from' christianity. at best christianity is an incidental representation of ... \
|
On February 20 2015 03:21 oneofthem wrote: i can see some reasonable presentation of both velr and nyxisto's points, but "humanist morality comes from christianity" is just bull. The ideas can be supported without Christianity, but it's unlikely their progenitors would've come up with them without it.
Locke and the other big humanists were pretty heavily influenced by Christianity.
Humanism stands on it's own; you don't need any religion to be moral. But to say that religion has nothing to do with our morality is naive at best. Christianity was at least some of the inspiration of western morals.
|
MIAMI — Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s interest in running for U.S. Senate has encountered strong resistance from a traditional ally of her party: medical marijuana activists.
Because of her congressional votes and her criticisms of a Florida medical marijuana initiative last year, four political groups that advocate prescription cannabis and drug decriminalization vowed to campaign against the Florida representative if she were to seek a Senate seat in 2016.
“She’s voted repeatedly to send terminally ill patients to prison. And we’re certainly going to make sure Floridians know that — not to mince words,” said Bill Piper, national affairs director with the Washington-based Drug Policy Alliance, which has received funding from liberal luminaries such as George Soros.
"This issue is evolving very quickly, and hopefully she will evolve,” Piper said. “But if she doesn’t, you can expect medical marijuana patients and supporters to dog her on the campaign trail.”
Wasserman Schultz’s office declined to comment.
Source
|
On February 20 2015 03:18 Yoav wrote:Show nested quote +On February 20 2015 01:58 Stratos_speAr wrote:On February 20 2015 01:54 Nyxisto wrote: Well there's the whole "Manifest Destiny" and "City upon a Hill" stuff, too. I feel like US history, especially American exceptionalism has heavily utilized a pretty twisted version of Christianity, which is still relevant and used today. For that reason I think dealing with Christianity in a critical way might be more important than in most other countries. Yes but there's a difference between teaching the influence of Christianity on our culture (which is absolutely everywhere) vs. teaching an in-depth course about Christianity. Any half-decent world history curriculum had better touch on Christianity, Islam, Confucianism, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Zoroastrianism and at least some concepts in Animisms. Some ordering of most to least influential in the modern world is probably in order (the above is a rough cut), for length of time devoted, but generally, yes, all these things should be basically familiar to a high-school educated person. You have been failed by your education if you can't give a reasonable accounting of the ten commandments, five pillars, beatitudes, key analects, and so on. Of course Locke and the like are crucial too. But to try to understand Locke without understanding that he could not have come out of any other tradition is to miss the point. Show nested quote +On February 20 2015 00:51 puerk wrote:On February 20 2015 00:45 Nyxisto wrote: By unique I was referring to the way how in Christian countries the idea of social security and community was combined with at least some degree of personal liberty. (by historical standards obviously). In almost any other region of the world you either had some kind of all encompassing theocracy or non religion at all but instead some kind of despotic ruler. But it still missplaced it as "christian". You know how it came about that europe had this seperation. Christianity was a foreign minority religion, slowly establishing itself in greek mediteranean colonies and rome. Places with a long standing foundation of rule of law and secular politics. Islam was a foreign minority religion that worked out in a remarkably different way. Show nested quote +On February 20 2015 01:08 Velr wrote: Not killing/stealing/pissing everyone in your own society off is probably the most important rule there is and i don't see how anyone could nail this on "christianity, or any religion, did it!"... Even Apes and other Pack animals follow some of the 10 commandments... And i highly doubt they are christian... This is a straw man. I'm not saying Christianity invented "morality." I'm saying our humanist morality comes from Christianity. The very root concepts of basing society on the individual and their choices, the notion of separation of church and state, the idea of charity given to the poor to make things more fair, basically the entire debate we have around state violence, the idea of the civil disobedient, the ideas of Romanticism and modern Pragmatism, indeed, modernism itself... all this has root in the tradition of Christianity. Hell, while we're keeping score, rationalist Atheism is basically a Christian development. The point is that other cultures have had very different moralities. We inherited ours both directly from the Christian tradition, and the Enlightenment humanists (both secular and religious) who were a part of it.
No Islam did not evolve as a minority religion in secular states like greek colonies and rome, but it instead developed in its indigenous habitat, and therefore could establish that link from tribal societal structure to a religious council type.
And no: humansim does not come from christianity but from the opposition and emanzipation against christianity. You have to take into account the state of christianity when humanism came into being, and it was a far cry from being humanist. It was authoritarian, dogmatic and violently fighting to remain the thought-authority.
Its like saying thanks to the plagues we developed modern hygine practices.... hurray plagues!
|
|
|
|