• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:47
CEST 21:47
KST 04:47
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists14[ASL21] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Fresh Flow9[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy21
Community News
2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers11Maestros of the Game 2 announced32026 GSL Tour plans announced13Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail1MaNa leaves Team Liquid22
StarCraft 2
General
Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool 2026 GSL Tour plans announced MaNa leaves Team Liquid Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists Weekly Cups (April 6-12): herO doubles, "Villains" prevail
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding 2026 GSL Season 1 Qualifiers Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) SEL Doubles (SC Evo Bimonthly)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 522 Flip My Base The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 521 Memorable Boss Mutation # 520 Moving Fees
Brood War
General
Data needed RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site Gypsy to Korea ASL21 General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro16 Group A [ASL21] Ro16 Group B
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Reappraising The Situation T…
TrAiDoS
lurker extra damage testi…
StaticNine
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2692 users

Israel Bombs Palestine; Kills Hamas Leader - Page 58

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 56 57 58 59 60 94 Next
Goozen
Profile Joined February 2012
Israel701 Posts
November 17 2012 19:50 GMT
#1141
On November 18 2012 04:42 Jockmcplop wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 04:37 Goozen wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:31 Jockmcplop wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:29 Goozen wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:24 Housemd wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:09 Goozen wrote:
On November 18 2012 03:58 Jockmcplop wrote:
On November 18 2012 03:57 reincremate wrote:
Civilians in Gaza and the West Bank should seek refugee status in North America or Europe or elsewhere. It's much easier said than done to uproot yourself and start a new life, but it's better than just waiting for the Israelis to wipe them all out. Most countries would probably turn them away, but it's worth a shot.


If there is a solution to the problem this would be something like what it would look like. Unfortunately i don't think Hamas will allow that. They are invested in this war, and i think they will remain so until the bitter end. Even thinking about the number of civilian casualties that they will suffer because of this makes me shudder.

Israel does have a history of deliberately targeting civilians who are doing no harm to them (the flotilla - no we haven't forgotten). To think they will shy away form it when they believe that they are justified in it because of war (ie if they have to begin a ground operation) is just wrong.

Although the flotilla had mostly human rights activists (who even as we speak are clearly outraged at the 40k deaths in Syria and have sent massive amounts of aids and flotillas there...) those who were killed were members of the IHH who were not human rights activists and came to cause trouble (watch the BBC show about it).
So if you want to claim Israel targets civilians, link some proof please, and yes i am aware it has happend that soldiers have done it on purpose but they get trialed and its not Israeli policy.


Stop thinking Israel is a white light that does not target civilians. 2008-2009 Gaza War, white phosphorus was dropped on crowded civilian residential areas. The BBC published a photograph of two shells exploding over a densely populated area on January 11. Heck, they have used white phosphorous on numerous refugee camps in Gaza City. Numerous agencies included Human Rights Organizations and news media outlets have confirmed this, even Israel has as well. Now, I understand if this happened once but it has happened numerous times in the span of one year.

Additionally, Israel blocked basic provisions from entering the Gaza Strip to help civilians, against what the United Nations instructed them to do.

So yes, they have targeted civilians.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_phosphorus#Gaza_War_.282008.E2.80.932009.29

Hit and killed civilians? yes. regrettable? yes. However it was dropped to cover the soldiers movement and its effects were underestimated, so were they targeted? no.
Targeting implies having the intention of killing civilians.



Its a completely redundant argument because intentions are very difficult to prove.

Not really, i dont think anyone would argue about the intentions of firing inaccurate rockets in to cities.


How about boarding a boat and killing a whole bunch of unarmed people?
Can you prove the intentions there?
The case we are talking about, how do you prove intentions?

Listen you have to concede some ground somewhere. The Israeli government is not the absolute perfect human representation of good morality. It has done bad things. You admit that, but whenever a specific case gets talked about, you rush to their defense. Its almost as if you are brainwashed.

What you will do now is probably shout PROOF PLEASE. As if it possible to prove an intention.

Can you prove to me with real proof and documentation that Hamas isn't targeting Israeli military figures with every single rocket they fired?


What i would like to see from you is to name one incident where the Israeli government acted deplorably, where innocent civilians were deliberately killed. It has happened many times. If you can't do that, your crediblity is zero.

Simple, if you fire a rocket that you know is only accurate to several hundred meters and they dont all fall near army bases, then yes that proves intent.
And no, the use of white phosphorus was a mistake, the blocking of certain goods from gaza was also a mistake. "Unit 101" was also deplorable. Israel is not perfect by any means but were a hell of a lot better then Hamas.
Jockmcplop
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom9831 Posts
November 17 2012 19:54 GMT
#1142
On November 18 2012 04:50 Goozen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 04:42 Jockmcplop wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:37 Goozen wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:31 Jockmcplop wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:29 Goozen wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:24 Housemd wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:09 Goozen wrote:
On November 18 2012 03:58 Jockmcplop wrote:
On November 18 2012 03:57 reincremate wrote:
Civilians in Gaza and the West Bank should seek refugee status in North America or Europe or elsewhere. It's much easier said than done to uproot yourself and start a new life, but it's better than just waiting for the Israelis to wipe them all out. Most countries would probably turn them away, but it's worth a shot.


If there is a solution to the problem this would be something like what it would look like. Unfortunately i don't think Hamas will allow that. They are invested in this war, and i think they will remain so until the bitter end. Even thinking about the number of civilian casualties that they will suffer because of this makes me shudder.

Israel does have a history of deliberately targeting civilians who are doing no harm to them (the flotilla - no we haven't forgotten). To think they will shy away form it when they believe that they are justified in it because of war (ie if they have to begin a ground operation) is just wrong.

Although the flotilla had mostly human rights activists (who even as we speak are clearly outraged at the 40k deaths in Syria and have sent massive amounts of aids and flotillas there...) those who were killed were members of the IHH who were not human rights activists and came to cause trouble (watch the BBC show about it).
So if you want to claim Israel targets civilians, link some proof please, and yes i am aware it has happend that soldiers have done it on purpose but they get trialed and its not Israeli policy.


Stop thinking Israel is a white light that does not target civilians. 2008-2009 Gaza War, white phosphorus was dropped on crowded civilian residential areas. The BBC published a photograph of two shells exploding over a densely populated area on January 11. Heck, they have used white phosphorous on numerous refugee camps in Gaza City. Numerous agencies included Human Rights Organizations and news media outlets have confirmed this, even Israel has as well. Now, I understand if this happened once but it has happened numerous times in the span of one year.

Additionally, Israel blocked basic provisions from entering the Gaza Strip to help civilians, against what the United Nations instructed them to do.

So yes, they have targeted civilians.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_phosphorus#Gaza_War_.282008.E2.80.932009.29

Hit and killed civilians? yes. regrettable? yes. However it was dropped to cover the soldiers movement and its effects were underestimated, so were they targeted? no.
Targeting implies having the intention of killing civilians.



Its a completely redundant argument because intentions are very difficult to prove.

Not really, i dont think anyone would argue about the intentions of firing inaccurate rockets in to cities.


How about boarding a boat and killing a whole bunch of unarmed people?
Can you prove the intentions there?
The case we are talking about, how do you prove intentions?

Listen you have to concede some ground somewhere. The Israeli government is not the absolute perfect human representation of good morality. It has done bad things. You admit that, but whenever a specific case gets talked about, you rush to their defense. Its almost as if you are brainwashed.

What you will do now is probably shout PROOF PLEASE. As if it possible to prove an intention.

Can you prove to me with real proof and documentation that Hamas isn't targeting Israeli military figures with every single rocket they fired?


What i would like to see from you is to name one incident where the Israeli government acted deplorably, where innocent civilians were deliberately killed. It has happened many times. If you can't do that, your crediblity is zero.

Simple, if you fire a rocket that you know is only accurate to several hundred meters and they dont all fall near army bases, then yes that proves intent.
And no, the use of white phosphorus was a mistake, the blocking of certain goods from gaza was also a mistake. "Unit 101" was also deplorable. Israel is not perfect by any means but were a hell of a lot better then Hamas.



OK good...
Like i said, i am actually fairly impressed with the restraint Israel has shown more recently, they seem to want international support badly enough to not target civilians, and that is good enough for me.

I take your point about Hamas, i was just trying to make a point.
My point still stands that it is hard to prove Israeli intentions in most of their actions, as we are not present at the meetings where these actions are decided.
RIP Meatloaf <3
m4inbrain
Profile Joined November 2011
1505 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-17 20:02:21
November 17 2012 20:01 GMT
#1143
On November 18 2012 04:49 Finrod1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 04:41 m4inbrain wrote:
It's simply not the same if i would critisize israel (or the goverment) or if someone from the us does it. History and context matter in this debate.


Wrong. Plain wrong.

Edit: maybe you would be right in 1950. But not anymore.


Nope. I assume you are german? i recommend to you the heitmeyer study. here are some parts listed: http://www.bpb.de/politik/extremismus/antisemitismus/37967/traditioneller-und-moderner-antisemitismus?p=all


Guess so, when i say "as a fellow german".

Your source is quite stupid, starting with the picture of a banner in german, with not one german guy in the picture itself. Further, as you may know, we have quite a big arabic population, which does not help the case in terms of your polls.

One of which btw calls someone "anti-semit", if he's tired of hearing again and again that we germans were bad people. That's not anti-semitism. Maybe start watching news and see the shitstorm that happens (including public outcry) if someone like Günther Grass is writing a critical poem on Israel. Which again, was NOT antisemitic, even jewish historians will tell you that. Overly critical, maybe. But not anti-semitic in any way.

So stop fucking around with germans even AS a german, to tell me that i NEED to feel guilty for Israel. I frikkin don't. I did not burn anyone, i did not do anything wrong. I learned over and over again how bad germany was in 1945, which is quite a time back. None of my family actually lived in that period of time, they all died to this point. So yeah. I'm tired being called "nazi", or pointed at me for the sins of my ancestors. I did nothing wrong (actually, i pay helluva lot of money in reparations), so i have the right to criticise a jewish or whatever government if i think they screwed up. As i criticised the american government in many other threads for their "warmongering". That doesn't make me KKK or Taliban either.
reincremate
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
China2216 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-17 20:05:59
November 17 2012 20:02 GMT
#1144
On November 18 2012 04:50 Goozen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 04:42 Jockmcplop wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:37 Goozen wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:31 Jockmcplop wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:29 Goozen wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:24 Housemd wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:09 Goozen wrote:
On November 18 2012 03:58 Jockmcplop wrote:
On November 18 2012 03:57 reincremate wrote:
Civilians in Gaza and the West Bank should seek refugee status in North America or Europe or elsewhere. It's much easier said than done to uproot yourself and start a new life, but it's better than just waiting for the Israelis to wipe them all out. Most countries would probably turn them away, but it's worth a shot.


If there is a solution to the problem this would be something like what it would look like. Unfortunately i don't think Hamas will allow that. They are invested in this war, and i think they will remain so until the bitter end. Even thinking about the number of civilian casualties that they will suffer because of this makes me shudder.

Israel does have a history of deliberately targeting civilians who are doing no harm to them (the flotilla - no we haven't forgotten). To think they will shy away form it when they believe that they are justified in it because of war (ie if they have to begin a ground operation) is just wrong.

Although the flotilla had mostly human rights activists (who even as we speak are clearly outraged at the 40k deaths in Syria and have sent massive amounts of aids and flotillas there...) those who were killed were members of the IHH who were not human rights activists and came to cause trouble (watch the BBC show about it).
So if you want to claim Israel targets civilians, link some proof please, and yes i am aware it has happend that soldiers have done it on purpose but they get trialed and its not Israeli policy.


Stop thinking Israel is a white light that does not target civilians. 2008-2009 Gaza War, white phosphorus was dropped on crowded civilian residential areas. The BBC published a photograph of two shells exploding over a densely populated area on January 11. Heck, they have used white phosphorous on numerous refugee camps in Gaza City. Numerous agencies included Human Rights Organizations and news media outlets have confirmed this, even Israel has as well. Now, I understand if this happened once but it has happened numerous times in the span of one year.

Additionally, Israel blocked basic provisions from entering the Gaza Strip to help civilians, against what the United Nations instructed them to do.

So yes, they have targeted civilians.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_phosphorus#Gaza_War_.282008.E2.80.932009.29

Hit and killed civilians? yes. regrettable? yes. However it was dropped to cover the soldiers movement and its effects were underestimated, so were they targeted? no.
Targeting implies having the intention of killing civilians.



Its a completely redundant argument because intentions are very difficult to prove.

Not really, i dont think anyone would argue about the intentions of firing inaccurate rockets in to cities.


How about boarding a boat and killing a whole bunch of unarmed people?
Can you prove the intentions there?
The case we are talking about, how do you prove intentions?

Listen you have to concede some ground somewhere. The Israeli government is not the absolute perfect human representation of good morality. It has done bad things. You admit that, but whenever a specific case gets talked about, you rush to their defense. Its almost as if you are brainwashed.

What you will do now is probably shout PROOF PLEASE. As if it possible to prove an intention.

Can you prove to me with real proof and documentation that Hamas isn't targeting Israeli military figures with every single rocket they fired?


What i would like to see from you is to name one incident where the Israeli government acted deplorably, where innocent civilians were deliberately killed. It has happened many times. If you can't do that, your crediblity is zero.

Simple, if you fire a rocket that you know is only accurate to several hundred meters and they dont all fall near army bases, then yes that proves intent.
And no, the use of white phosphorus was a mistake, the blocking of certain goods from gaza was also a mistake. "Unit 101" was also deplorable. Israel is not perfect by any means but were a hell of a lot better then Hamas.

Maybe it was a mistake. In that case the IDF must be grossly incompetent. "Oops we fired lethal chemical weapons into civilian centres...again."

http://www.hrw.org/news/2009/03/25/israel-white-phosphorus-use-evidence-war-crimes

I guess you could argue that all of Gaza is a legitimate target, because terrorists can be hiding literally anywhere-- in random people's houses, in the middle of the street, inside United Nations Relief and Welfare Agency buildings where medical supplies are stored, etc.
Feartheguru
Profile Joined August 2011
Canada1334 Posts
November 17 2012 20:05 GMT
#1145
On November 18 2012 04:27 Cuce wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 04:21 Goozen wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:18 Cuce wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:13 Goozen wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:08 Cuce wrote:
On November 18 2012 02:46 Feartheguru wrote:
On November 18 2012 02:42 NesquiKGG wrote:
On November 18 2012 01:18 sgfightmaster wrote:
On November 18 2012 00:41 NesquiKGG wrote:
just as i mentioned before... Israel is good at telling lies and manipulating people .. these people who are tryin to defend what Israel did to Palastine the few years are the best example of brainwashed brats who got manipluated .... You can turn your head away and stop looking at the facts but Israel and America did kill Millions of People for "defending" theirselfs ... good example 9/11 and Alqaida ... they used this to kill Millions of Iraqis and Afghans.. Israel uses hamas to keep on their projects getting their "land" back (LOLZ) by killing more and more innocent people .. and dont ever EVER EVER try to tell me they are not innocent or hamas is to blame for their death.... i cant run arround and kill every single American just because their Soldiers (i call them Terrorists) messed up my Country...


a cursory search on google/wiki reveals your figures of "millions of people" are off the mark by orders of magnitudes. this is literally a fact. also, many of the civilian casualties are caused by explosive devices of the insurgents themselves. would you stop hurting the discussion with these mistaken claims?

unless of course, you've "seen things", in which case do go right ahead and quote your sources


google huh? I lost 2 Uncles 4 cousins 1 aunt and my Grandfather .. you know how? Americans randomly shooted at a supermarket just for fun ... you know what the News published? It was a suicide mission of one of the terrorists ... now let me ask you one thing.. you remember the last attack from Israel against Gaza when they killed like hundres of innocent people at the Beach? when the Turkish President asked that moron how people try to defend him while he did this thing everybody tried to shut him up ... why? why do people who try to tell the truth always get cut off? Answer me some Questions and i gonna stop hatin on Israel.

How do you feel as a neutral Person about what happened the last time when Israel attacked Gaza? (the Beach story and so on) + Show Spoiler +


How do you react when people kill a member of your Family or the whole Family? ( im sure you cant answer this cause you didnt go trough something like that and i wish you and the others here never gonna live through a hell like this )


You chose Hamas over peace, you face the consequences.


yeah but.. peace is quite shitty, with limited living space, razed down infrastructure, no mean on production, and ambargos both from sea and land.
Sorry, I honestly can not ask palestinians to sit down and accept everything getting worse.


It is not a choice of peace or killing all the jews! for most people its a choice of survival.

And firing rockets at civilians or organizing terror attack helps them..... how? Also remember they have a border with Egypt, and the gaza strip was always that size.


when did war helped anybody?
I never said targeting civilians were helping palantenians. same goes for israel. if no other options are available to them, you gotta stop and think again before accusing people of mindless bloodlust.

Why is no other option available? why cant they merge with the PLO and actually hold negotiations? As long as they are violent (and that's 100% in Hamas's interest) nothing will be accomplished.


because israel already holds a very much disputed legal blockade on whole state, and not that flexiable on negotiation table. a negotiation with unconditional support from USA to israel and no leverage on palestenian side will not solve anything. Why would those people sit together with their oppresser without and promise on compremise.


The goal of the Hamas is the destruction of the state of Israel. Why would Israel want to compromise period? There is no trust, you give them a piece of land they move their rockets closer to you. The time for negotiating is long past.
Don't sweat the petty stuff, don't pet the sweaty stuff.
reincremate
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
China2216 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-17 20:09:54
November 17 2012 20:06 GMT
#1146
On November 18 2012 05:05 Feartheguru wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 04:27 Cuce wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:21 Goozen wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:18 Cuce wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:13 Goozen wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:08 Cuce wrote:
On November 18 2012 02:46 Feartheguru wrote:
On November 18 2012 02:42 NesquiKGG wrote:
On November 18 2012 01:18 sgfightmaster wrote:
On November 18 2012 00:41 NesquiKGG wrote:
just as i mentioned before... Israel is good at telling lies and manipulating people .. these people who are tryin to defend what Israel did to Palastine the few years are the best example of brainwashed brats who got manipluated .... You can turn your head away and stop looking at the facts but Israel and America did kill Millions of People for "defending" theirselfs ... good example 9/11 and Alqaida ... they used this to kill Millions of Iraqis and Afghans.. Israel uses hamas to keep on their projects getting their "land" back (LOLZ) by killing more and more innocent people .. and dont ever EVER EVER try to tell me they are not innocent or hamas is to blame for their death.... i cant run arround and kill every single American just because their Soldiers (i call them Terrorists) messed up my Country...


a cursory search on google/wiki reveals your figures of "millions of people" are off the mark by orders of magnitudes. this is literally a fact. also, many of the civilian casualties are caused by explosive devices of the insurgents themselves. would you stop hurting the discussion with these mistaken claims?

unless of course, you've "seen things", in which case do go right ahead and quote your sources


google huh? I lost 2 Uncles 4 cousins 1 aunt and my Grandfather .. you know how? Americans randomly shooted at a supermarket just for fun ... you know what the News published? It was a suicide mission of one of the terrorists ... now let me ask you one thing.. you remember the last attack from Israel against Gaza when they killed like hundres of innocent people at the Beach? when the Turkish President asked that moron how people try to defend him while he did this thing everybody tried to shut him up ... why? why do people who try to tell the truth always get cut off? Answer me some Questions and i gonna stop hatin on Israel.

How do you feel as a neutral Person about what happened the last time when Israel attacked Gaza? (the Beach story and so on) + Show Spoiler +
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfKwW3pkx7g&feature=player_detailpage#t=49s


How do you react when people kill a member of your Family or the whole Family? ( im sure you cant answer this cause you didnt go trough something like that and i wish you and the others here never gonna live through a hell like this )


You chose Hamas over peace, you face the consequences.


yeah but.. peace is quite shitty, with limited living space, razed down infrastructure, no mean on production, and ambargos both from sea and land.
Sorry, I honestly can not ask palestinians to sit down and accept everything getting worse.


It is not a choice of peace or killing all the jews! for most people its a choice of survival.

And firing rockets at civilians or organizing terror attack helps them..... how? Also remember they have a border with Egypt, and the gaza strip was always that size.


when did war helped anybody?
I never said targeting civilians were helping palantenians. same goes for israel. if no other options are available to them, you gotta stop and think again before accusing people of mindless bloodlust.

Why is no other option available? why cant they merge with the PLO and actually hold negotiations? As long as they are violent (and that's 100% in Hamas's interest) nothing will be accomplished.


because israel already holds a very much disputed legal blockade on whole state, and not that flexiable on negotiation table. a negotiation with unconditional support from USA to israel and no leverage on palestenian side will not solve anything. Why would those people sit together with their oppresser without and promise on compremise.


The goal of the Hamas is the destruction of the state of Israel. Why would Israel want to compromise period? There is no trust, you give them a piece of land they move their rockets closer to you. The time for negotiating is long past.

You can't kill them all. Or you can, but there will be splash damage from nuclear fallout. Unless you kill every single Palestinian there will still be resistance to the occupation. Also there are still tons of other Arab nations that can attack Israel.
Finrod1
Profile Joined December 2010
Germany3997 Posts
November 17 2012 20:07 GMT
#1147
On November 18 2012 05:01 m4inbrain wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 04:49 Finrod1 wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:41 m4inbrain wrote:
It's simply not the same if i would critisize israel (or the goverment) or if someone from the us does it. History and context matter in this debate.


Wrong. Plain wrong.

Edit: maybe you would be right in 1950. But not anymore.


Nope. I assume you are german? i recommend to you the heitmeyer study. here are some parts listed: http://www.bpb.de/politik/extremismus/antisemitismus/37967/traditioneller-und-moderner-antisemitismus?p=all


Guess so, when i say "as a fellow german".

Your source is quite stupid, starting with the picture of a banner in german, with not one german guy in the picture itself. Further, as you may know, we have quite a big arabic population, which does not help the case in terms of your polls.



The first sentence disqualifies you beyond everything else. How do you know none of these people are german? Because they look "arabic". Thats racism in its purest form.
Andy maybe you should read the heitmeyer research. It describes a pretty good problem in our society now. Not yesterday.
DeepElemBlues
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States5079 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-17 20:15:03
November 17 2012 20:09 GMT
#1148
How about boarding a boat and killing a whole bunch of unarmed people?


You mean the boat where the "unarmed" people were armed with clubs and knives and badly beat IDF commandos whose most lethal weapons were pistols that were not used until several commandos had been surrounded and badly beaten by the "unarmed" people?

Listen you have to concede some ground somewhere. The Israeli government is not the absolute perfect human representation of good morality. It has done bad things. You admit that, but whenever a specific case gets talked about, you rush to their defense. Its almost as if you are brainwashed.

What you will do now is probably shout PROOF PLEASE. As if it possible to prove an intention.

Can you prove to me with real proof and documentation that Hamas isn't targeting Israeli military figures with every single rocket they fired?


What i would like to see from you is to name one incident where the Israeli government acted deplorably, where innocent civilians were deliberately killed. It has happened many times. If you can't do that, your crediblity is zero.


Why? Because rejecting your argument makes you feel frustrated? Your personal feelings aren't a standard for what someone else "must" do. Where has anyone said that the Israeli government is perfect?

It isn't our job to do your job for you. If it has happened "many times," then point out some examples where it actually did so instead of crying that all your examples are bullshit propaganda by the Arabs.

I'll give you one, since it's so important that we acknowledge what we have never contradicted. When the IDF knew that Palestinians were being massacred by the hundreds in the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps by Christian militias it did nothing to stop it even though it had the camps surrounded and had the man- and firepower necessary to stop the killing. There was a huge investigation (Kahan Commission) set up by the Israeli government that severely criticized the IDF and civilian government.

When Arabs massacre Jews, what kind of investigations are there? One kind: an investigation of how big the street celebration should be.

It boggles the mind that in an argument one must accept the other side's arguments or they have "zero credibility." It's incredibly fucking stupid. "Disagreeing with me means you have zero credibility." Yeah, that's a good one.
no place i'd rather be than the satellite of love
m4inbrain
Profile Joined November 2011
1505 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-17 20:14:20
November 17 2012 20:10 GMT
#1149
On November 18 2012 05:07 Finrod1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 05:01 m4inbrain wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:49 Finrod1 wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:41 m4inbrain wrote:
It's simply not the same if i would critisize israel (or the goverment) or if someone from the us does it. History and context matter in this debate.


Wrong. Plain wrong.

Edit: maybe you would be right in 1950. But not anymore.


Nope. I assume you are german? i recommend to you the heitmeyer study. here are some parts listed: http://www.bpb.de/politik/extremismus/antisemitismus/37967/traditioneller-und-moderner-antisemitismus?p=all


Guess so, when i say "as a fellow german".

Your source is quite stupid, starting with the picture of a banner in german, with not one german guy in the picture itself. Further, as you may know, we have quite a big arabic population, which does not help the case in terms of your polls.



The first sentence disqualifies you beyond everything else. How do you know none of these people are german? Because they look "arabic". Thats racism in its purest form.
Andy maybe you should read the heitmeyer research. It describes a pretty good problem in our society now. Not yesterday.


I thought that you will catch only this. Funny enough. They don't "look" arabic. There are even woman which cover their hair. A sign of Religion, mate. You know what muslims think of Jews, right?

Edit: don't bother responding. The fact that you try to knife me and even labeled me as racist because you did not understand what i was saying, is enough to show me what kind of guy you are.

Edit2: the picture btw was taken by a demonstration against the war vs Lebanon in 2006. I did not see that the first time, makes it even more stupid.
Deleted User 124618
Profile Joined November 2010
1142 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-17 20:15:09
November 17 2012 20:12 GMT
#1150
This Palestine-Israel conflict goes back well over 60 years (!) so it's very hard for me to point any fingers at this point. Here is some reading and a history lesson.

1948 Palestine war

In Israel, the war is known as War of Independence or War of Liberation, because it saw the birth of the State of Israel.

In the immediate aftermath of the United Nations' approval of the partition plan, explosions of joy amongst the Jewish community were counterbalanced by the expression of discontent amongst the Arab community. Soon after, violence broke out and became more and more prevalent. Murders, reprisals, and counter-reprisals came fast upon each other, resulting in dozens of victims killed on both sides. The sanguinary impasse persisted as no force intervened to put a stop to the escalating cycles of violence.
reincremate
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
China2216 Posts
November 17 2012 20:13 GMT
#1151
On November 18 2012 05:09 DeepElemBlues wrote:
Show nested quote +
How about boarding a boat and killing a whole bunch of unarmed people?


You mean the boat where the "unarmed" people were armed with clubs and knives and badly beat IDF commandos whose most lethal weapons were pistols that were not used until several commandos had been surrounded and badly beaten by the "unarmed" people?

According to the activists on the boat, the commandos started firing as soon as they boarded. It's naive to assume that either account is accurate or that whatever is reported in the news is correct. Unless there is clear video footage, we only have dubious accounts of what happened.
Feartheguru
Profile Joined August 2011
Canada1334 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-17 20:23:39
November 17 2012 20:18 GMT
#1152
On November 18 2012 05:06 reincremate wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 05:05 Feartheguru wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:27 Cuce wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:21 Goozen wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:18 Cuce wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:13 Goozen wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:08 Cuce wrote:
On November 18 2012 02:46 Feartheguru wrote:
On November 18 2012 02:42 NesquiKGG wrote:
On November 18 2012 01:18 sgfightmaster wrote:
[quote]

a cursory search on google/wiki reveals your figures of "millions of people" are off the mark by orders of magnitudes. this is literally a fact. also, many of the civilian casualties are caused by explosive devices of the insurgents themselves. would you stop hurting the discussion with these mistaken claims?

unless of course, you've "seen things", in which case do go right ahead and quote your sources


google huh? I lost 2 Uncles 4 cousins 1 aunt and my Grandfather .. you know how? Americans randomly shooted at a supermarket just for fun ... you know what the News published? It was a suicide mission of one of the terrorists ... now let me ask you one thing.. you remember the last attack from Israel against Gaza when they killed like hundres of innocent people at the Beach? when the Turkish President asked that moron how people try to defend him while he did this thing everybody tried to shut him up ... why? why do people who try to tell the truth always get cut off? Answer me some Questions and i gonna stop hatin on Israel.

How do you feel as a neutral Person about what happened the last time when Israel attacked Gaza? (the Beach story and so on) + Show Spoiler +
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfKwW3pkx7g&feature=player_detailpage#t=49s


How do you react when people kill a member of your Family or the whole Family? ( im sure you cant answer this cause you didnt go trough something like that and i wish you and the others here never gonna live through a hell like this )


You chose Hamas over peace, you face the consequences.


yeah but.. peace is quite shitty, with limited living space, razed down infrastructure, no mean on production, and ambargos both from sea and land.
Sorry, I honestly can not ask palestinians to sit down and accept everything getting worse.


It is not a choice of peace or killing all the jews! for most people its a choice of survival.

And firing rockets at civilians or organizing terror attack helps them..... how? Also remember they have a border with Egypt, and the gaza strip was always that size.


when did war helped anybody?
I never said targeting civilians were helping palantenians. same goes for israel. if no other options are available to them, you gotta stop and think again before accusing people of mindless bloodlust.

Why is no other option available? why cant they merge with the PLO and actually hold negotiations? As long as they are violent (and that's 100% in Hamas's interest) nothing will be accomplished.


because israel already holds a very much disputed legal blockade on whole state, and not that flexiable on negotiation table. a negotiation with unconditional support from USA to israel and no leverage on palestenian side will not solve anything. Why would those people sit together with their oppresser without and promise on compremise.


The goal of the Hamas is the destruction of the state of Israel. Why would Israel want to compromise period? There is no trust, you give them a piece of land they move their rockets closer to you. The time for negotiating is long past.

You can't kill them all. Or you can, but there will be splash damage from nuclear fallout. Unless you kill every single Palestinian there will still be resistance to the occupation. Also there are still tons of other Arab nations that can attack Israel.


This is irrelevant, they tried appeasement, it failed because the Palestinians don't want a peace that both sides can live with. Their goal is not to acquire a fair share of land and resources to live now, their goal is to destroy Israel so they can live with magic man after they die. All Israel can do is play hardball until the resistance is crushed to the point of irrelevance or die trying. It doesn't matter how bad the current strategy is when there are no alternatives.
Don't sweat the petty stuff, don't pet the sweaty stuff.
DeepElemBlues
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States5079 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-17 20:23:16
November 17 2012 20:21 GMT
#1153
On November 18 2012 05:13 reincremate wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 05:09 DeepElemBlues wrote:
How about boarding a boat and killing a whole bunch of unarmed people?


You mean the boat where the "unarmed" people were armed with clubs and knives and badly beat IDF commandos whose most lethal weapons were pistols that were not used until several commandos had been surrounded and badly beaten by the "unarmed" people?

According to the activists on the boat, the commandos started firing as soon as they boarded. It's naive to assume that either account is accurate or that whatever is reported in the news is correct. Unless there is clear video footage, we only have dubious accounts of what happened.


roflmao

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_flotilla_raid#Mavi_Marmara_boarding

http://technorati.com/politics/article/video-shows-very-different-story-on/

http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Government/Communiques/2010/Israel_Navy_warns_flotilla_31-May-2010.htm

The only naive one here is you, for believing the stories of anti-Semites and rabid "peace" activists. The only "dubious" accounts come from them, repeatedly contradicted by actual physical evidence time and again.

"We had no weapons." I guess IDF commandos got stab wounds by magic then.

"The soldiers fired on us as soon as they landed." Video doesn't lie. Anti-Semites and "peace" activists do. One side lies repeatedly and constantly as part of a deliberate strategy. One side releases videos and details and has real investigations. The side that lies all the time has its lies swallowed down whole, and the other side has every word it says treated with the utmost hostility and skepticism.
no place i'd rather be than the satellite of love
Pimpmuckl
Profile Joined March 2011
Germany528 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-17 20:25:56
November 17 2012 20:25 GMT
#1154
On November 18 2012 05:01 m4inbrain wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 04:49 Finrod1 wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:41 m4inbrain wrote:
It's simply not the same if i would critisize israel (or the goverment) or if someone from the us does it. History and context matter in this debate.


Wrong. Plain wrong.

Edit: maybe you would be right in 1950. But not anymore.


Nope. I assume you are german? i recommend to you the heitmeyer study. here are some parts listed: http://www.bpb.de/politik/extremismus/antisemitismus/37967/traditioneller-und-moderner-antisemitismus?p=all


Guess so, when i say "as a fellow german".

Your source is quite stupid, starting with the picture of a banner in german, with not one german guy in the picture itself. Further, as you may know, we have quite a big arabic population, which does not help the case in terms of your polls.

One of which btw calls someone "anti-semit", if he's tired of hearing again and again that we germans were bad people. That's not anti-semitism. Maybe start watching news and see the shitstorm that happens (including public outcry) if someone like Günther Grass is writing a critical poem on Israel. Which again, was NOT antisemitic, even jewish historians will tell you that. Overly critical, maybe. But not anti-semitic in any way.

So stop fucking around with germans even AS a german, to tell me that i NEED to feel guilty for Israel. I frikkin don't. I did not burn anyone, i did not do anything wrong. I learned over and over again how bad germany was in 1945, which is quite a time back. None of my family actually lived in that period of time, they all died to this point. So yeah. I'm tired being called "nazi", or pointed at me for the sins of my ancestors. I did nothing wrong (actually, i pay helluva lot of money in reparations), so i have the right to criticise a jewish or whatever government if i think they screwed up. As i criticised the american government in many other threads for their "warmongering". That doesn't make me KKK or Taliban either.


Yep, that is exactly what i am thinking at the moment. You can not say anything in the slightest that is criticizing Israel. Always because one is german. Like what the hell, i hate like everything the nazis did, but i am not responsible for anything. Yet i can't debate about a military action just because i am german? Bullshit.

I honestly don't know what to say here, both sides are extremely stupid in their actions, the big problem in this thread though is that too many people have no idea how Israel behaved with taking their country. The story behind this is interesting and explains many actions by the two sides.

Now the worst thing to happen is a war with more islamic states rushing to help their fellow Palestinians.
twitter.com/pimpmuckl
HowitZer
Profile Joined February 2003
United States1610 Posts
November 17 2012 20:26 GMT
#1155
On November 18 2012 05:07 Finrod1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 05:01 m4inbrain wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:49 Finrod1 wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:41 m4inbrain wrote:
It's simply not the same if i would critisize israel (or the goverment) or if someone from the us does it. History and context matter in this debate.


Wrong. Plain wrong.

Edit: maybe you would be right in 1950. But not anymore.


Nope. I assume you are german? i recommend to you the heitmeyer study. here are some parts listed: http://www.bpb.de/politik/extremismus/antisemitismus/37967/traditioneller-und-moderner-antisemitismus?p=all


Guess so, when i say "as a fellow german".

Your source is quite stupid, starting with the picture of a banner in german, with not one german guy in the picture itself. Further, as you may know, we have quite a big arabic population, which does not help the case in terms of your polls.



The first sentence disqualifies you beyond everything else. How do you know none of these people are german? Because they look "arabic". Thats racism in its purest form.
Andy maybe you should read the heitmeyer research. It describes a pretty good problem in our society now. Not yesterday.


Racism is when prejudices are applied. I think you mean prejudice in its purest form.
Human teleportation, molecular decimation, breakdown and reformation is inherently purging. It makes a man acute.
m4inbrain
Profile Joined November 2011
1505 Posts
November 17 2012 20:29 GMT
#1156
On November 18 2012 05:26 HowitZer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 05:07 Finrod1 wrote:
On November 18 2012 05:01 m4inbrain wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:49 Finrod1 wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:41 m4inbrain wrote:
It's simply not the same if i would critisize israel (or the goverment) or if someone from the us does it. History and context matter in this debate.


Wrong. Plain wrong.

Edit: maybe you would be right in 1950. But not anymore.


Nope. I assume you are german? i recommend to you the heitmeyer study. here are some parts listed: http://www.bpb.de/politik/extremismus/antisemitismus/37967/traditioneller-und-moderner-antisemitismus?p=all


Guess so, when i say "as a fellow german".

Your source is quite stupid, starting with the picture of a banner in german, with not one german guy in the picture itself. Further, as you may know, we have quite a big arabic population, which does not help the case in terms of your polls.



The first sentence disqualifies you beyond everything else. How do you know none of these people are german? Because they look "arabic". Thats racism in its purest form.
Andy maybe you should read the heitmeyer research. It describes a pretty good problem in our society now. Not yesterday.


Racism is when prejudices are applied. I think you mean prejudice in its purest form.


It's not prejudice if i see religious muslims. It's actually a reasonable conclusion.
reincremate
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
China2216 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-17 20:32:59
November 17 2012 20:30 GMT
#1157
On November 18 2012 05:21 DeepElemBlues wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 05:13 reincremate wrote:
On November 18 2012 05:09 DeepElemBlues wrote:
How about boarding a boat and killing a whole bunch of unarmed people?


You mean the boat where the "unarmed" people were armed with clubs and knives and badly beat IDF commandos whose most lethal weapons were pistols that were not used until several commandos had been surrounded and badly beaten by the "unarmed" people?

According to the activists on the boat, the commandos started firing as soon as they boarded. It's naive to assume that either account is accurate or that whatever is reported in the news is correct. Unless there is clear video footage, we only have dubious accounts of what happened.


roflmao

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_flotilla_raid#Mavi_Marmara_boarding

http://technorati.com/politics/article/video-shows-very-different-story-on/

http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Government/Communiques/2010/Israel_Navy_warns_flotilla_31-May-2010.htm

The only naive one here is you, for believing the stories of anti-Semites and rabid "peace" activists. The only "dubious" accounts come from them, repeatedly contradicted by actual physical evidence time and again.

"We had no weapons." I guess IDF commandos got stab wounds by magic then.

"The soldiers fired on us as soon as they landed." Video doesn't lie. Anti-Semites and "peace" activists do. One side lies repeatedly and constantly as part of a deliberate strategy. One side releases videos and details and has real investigations. The side that lies all the time has its lies swallowed down whole, and the other side has every word it says treated with the utmost hostility and skepticism.

I don't support either side. I didn't say the activists didn't attack the commandos. I'm just saying you can't know exactly what happened when there are only one-sided accounts. The video starts in the middle of boarding and you can't see shit except guys with sticks fighting guys coming down on ropes. You don't know who did what first or why. And the news isn't supposed to be a "side"; it's supposed to report what happens, even though it doesn't really do a reliable job of that because it can only provide accounts of what happened.
3DGlaDOS
Profile Joined February 2011
Germany607 Posts
November 17 2012 20:32 GMT
#1158
On November 18 2012 05:25 Pimpmuckl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 05:01 m4inbrain wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:49 Finrod1 wrote:
On November 18 2012 04:41 m4inbrain wrote:
It's simply not the same if i would critisize israel (or the goverment) or if someone from the us does it. History and context matter in this debate.


Wrong. Plain wrong.

Edit: maybe you would be right in 1950. But not anymore.


Nope. I assume you are german? i recommend to you the heitmeyer study. here are some parts listed: http://www.bpb.de/politik/extremismus/antisemitismus/37967/traditioneller-und-moderner-antisemitismus?p=all


Guess so, when i say "as a fellow german".

Your source is quite stupid, starting with the picture of a banner in german, with not one german guy in the picture itself. Further, as you may know, we have quite a big arabic population, which does not help the case in terms of your polls.

One of which btw calls someone "anti-semit", if he's tired of hearing again and again that we germans were bad people. That's not anti-semitism. Maybe start watching news and see the shitstorm that happens (including public outcry) if someone like Günther Grass is writing a critical poem on Israel. Which again, was NOT antisemitic, even jewish historians will tell you that. Overly critical, maybe. But not anti-semitic in any way.

So stop fucking around with germans even AS a german, to tell me that i NEED to feel guilty for Israel. I frikkin don't. I did not burn anyone, i did not do anything wrong. I learned over and over again how bad germany was in 1945, which is quite a time back. None of my family actually lived in that period of time, they all died to this point. So yeah. I'm tired being called "nazi", or pointed at me for the sins of my ancestors. I did nothing wrong (actually, i pay helluva lot of money in reparations), so i have the right to criticise a jewish or whatever government if i think they screwed up. As i criticised the american government in many other threads for their "warmongering". That doesn't make me KKK or Taliban either.


Yep, that is exactly what i am thinking at the moment. You can not say anything in the slightest that is criticizing Israel. Always because one is german. Like what the hell, i hate like everything the nazis did, but i am not responsible for anything. Yet i can't debate about a military action just because i am german? Bullshit.

You can, are allowed to and do critizise Israel. I don't know why people here say we "are not allowed to criticize Israel." Look in the media. Many people here critisize Israel (some justified, some unjustified imo) and nothing happens.
Hello Sir, do you have a minute for atheism?
DeepElemBlues
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States5079 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-17 20:39:58
November 17 2012 20:34 GMT
#1159
I don't support either side. I didn't say the activists didn't attack the commandos. I'm just saying you can't know exactly what happened when there are only one-sided accounts. The video starts in the middle of fighting and you can't see shit except guys with sticks fighting guys coming down on ropes. You don't know who did what first or why. And the news isn't supposed to be a "side"; it's supposed to report what happens, even though it doesn't really do a reliable job of that because it can only provide accounts of what happened.


So even though the video evidence directly contradicts one side time and time again (we were unarmed, the Israelis started shooting the instant they landed, we didn't plan to fight, all totally false), we still can't be sure because blah blah blah.

Okay.

The truth is the truth. Truth and balance are not synonyms. If the truth is one-sided, then it is. And I do know who did what first and why, because there are consistent accounts from multiple sources. The Israelis fired warning shots from paintball guns and threw stun grenades onto the deck of the ship, abseiled down, were attacked, fought back with hand-to-hand and non-lethal weapons, were losing because they were getting overwhelmed with numbers, and requested permission to use live fire before they did so. There is no evidence other than the word of the activists that that is not what happened. All the actual non-testimonial evidence is on one side.
no place i'd rather be than the satellite of love
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-17 20:45:07
November 17 2012 20:37 GMT
#1160
On November 18 2012 05:21 DeepElemBlues wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 05:13 reincremate wrote:
On November 18 2012 05:09 DeepElemBlues wrote:
How about boarding a boat and killing a whole bunch of unarmed people?


You mean the boat where the "unarmed" people were armed with clubs and knives and badly beat IDF commandos whose most lethal weapons were pistols that were not used until several commandos had been surrounded and badly beaten by the "unarmed" people?

According to the activists on the boat, the commandos started firing as soon as they boarded. It's naive to assume that either account is accurate or that whatever is reported in the news is correct. Unless there is clear video footage, we only have dubious accounts of what happened.


roflmao

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_flotilla_raid#Mavi_Marmara_boarding

http://technorati.com/politics/article/video-shows-very-different-story-on/

http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Government/Communiques/2010/Israel_Navy_warns_flotilla_31-May-2010.htm

The only naive one here is you, for believing the stories of anti-Semites and rabid "peace" activists. The only "dubious" accounts come from them, repeatedly contradicted by actual physical evidence time and again.

"We had no weapons." I guess IDF commandos got stab wounds by magic then.

"The soldiers fired on us as soon as they landed." Video doesn't lie. Anti-Semites and "peace" activists do. One side lies repeatedly and constantly as part of a deliberate strategy. One side releases videos and details and has real investigations. The side that lies all the time has its lies swallowed down whole, and the other side has every word it says treated with the utmost hostility and skepticism.


The physical evidence in those links doesn't really establish what you're saying. The video itself mentions that the activists are using chairs and poles, not guns. It also looks like the first soldier down from the heli (if that video starts off that way and not partway through the boarding) kicks one of the people onboard the ship almost immediately-though we can't hear whatever verbal exchange went on very well, nor can we know from that video what the IDF had previously communicated to the ship.

Heck, the article implies the first two soldiers were attacked by metal poles while getting off the helicopter, which just isn't true at all in the video.

Edit: There's also a cut in the tape halfway through for some reason. There may have been shoving of the first IDF member off the heli, but even that's unclear because of the distance of the recorder.

Edit2: And they even say this means the violence was premeditated...huh? Not to mention the Israelis do indeed start firing after the cut in the tape.


Interviewer: Welcome; we have a small guest as well.

Yildirim: We've now entered the critical hours. What we're really talking about here is humanitarian aid, and this small child will always remember this journey in the future. The boy's picture will certainly pique Israeli public opinion.

Interviewer: What makes this voyage so critical?

Yildirim: The reason stems from Israel's aggressive position, which has unnecessarily inflated the whole matter. They are using their naval fleet against women, children and elderly people. Civil rights organization representatives are here, and the whole world will see what's happening here. We will definitely resist and we will not allow the Israelis to enter here.
(see the first three minutes of the video)

2. Interview on the Turkish state television channel TRT 1, broadcast the evening of 30 May 2010:

Bulent Yildirim: The Israelis think that the more soldiers they send, the less casualties there will be among the activists. On this ship there are also women and children. The whole world knows this. We'll show them what is means to board the ship. If Israel wants to board this ship, it will meet strong resistance.



To me that sounds more like defense was premeditated...not violence.
Prev 1 56 57 58 59 60 94 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
AI Arena Tournament
19:00
KOTH
Laughngamez YouTube
BSL
19:00
RO32 Group D
StRyKeR vs rasowy
Artosis vs Aether
JDConan vs OyAji
Hawk vs izu
LiquipediaDiscussion
IPSL
16:00
Ro24 Group D
JDConan vs TBD
Aegong vs rasowy
Liquipedia
Ladder Legends
15:00
Valedictorian Cup #1 Qualifier
SteadfastSC171
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Liquid`TLO 378
elazer 179
SteadfastSC 171
BRAT_OK 72
JuggernautJason68
LaughNgamez 2
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 3110
Mini 573
ZZZero.O 245
Dewaltoss 121
actioN 78
Movie 35
Rock 26
Counter-Strike
fl0m10629
olofmeister3795
byalli422
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King77
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor683
Liquid`Hasu552
Other Games
summit1g4558
Grubby3624
FrodaN1087
B2W.Neo747
KnowMe202
Pyrionflax130
RotterdaM80
ArmadaUGS57
MindelVK12
Organizations
StarCraft 2
ComeBackTV 874
Other Games
gamesdonequick817
BasetradeTV633
StarCraft 2
angryscii 45
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Reevou 8
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 18
• FirePhoenix5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade1766
Other Games
• imaqtpie1119
• Shiphtur173
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
4h 14m
Replay Cast
13h 14m
Wardi Open
14h 14m
Afreeca Starleague
14h 14m
Bisu vs Ample
Jaedong vs Flash
Monday Night Weeklies
20h 14m
RSL Revival
1d 6h
GSL
1d 12h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 14h
Barracks vs Leta
Royal vs Light
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
1d 15h
RSL Revival
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
KCM Race Survival
3 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
Escore
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
5 days
Universe Titan Cup
5 days
Rogue vs Percival
Ladder Legends
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
BSL
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
6 days
Ladder Legends
6 days
BSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W3
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W4
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.