EPTNBA Playoffs 2012 - Page 140
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
|
Aerisky
United States12129 Posts
now we have some  ugh wow potential for an awesome play but lebron misses it blehhhh | ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
|
Aerisky
United States12129 Posts
damn, behind at the half even after Wade's insane performance. Hope we can have another big 3rd >< | ||
|
justinpal
United States3810 Posts
| ||
|
RowdierBob
Australia13029 Posts
| ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
| ||
|
Elvedeta
Portugal395 Posts
On May 25 2012 10:18 RowdierBob wrote: The +/- of the Pacers starters is amazing yet they're only up by 2. If Wade wasn't on fire today, the pacers would have a really good lead. | ||
|
justinpal
United States3810 Posts
| ||
|
Bonzinator
Slovenia862 Posts
On May 25 2012 10:22 Elvedeta wrote: If Wade wasn't on fire today, the pacers would have a really good lead. If the Pacers players wouldn't have amazing +/-, Heat would have a nice lead. | ||
|
Aerisky
United States12129 Posts
| ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Chunhyang
Bangladesh1389 Posts
On May 25 2012 07:14 slyboogie wrote: That's exactly what I thought when I read that sentence. There's no way PD is strictly "the best indicator of playoff success." I have not doubt it tells you a team over/under-performed it's true talent or some team is due for regression. But that statement just struck me wrong. Hi! Um, it's been in various articles. "Point Differential", you can search. Here's one from basketball prospectus: http://www.basketballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=2236 Historically speaking, point differential is where it's at when it comes to forecasting the NBA playoff bracket. Related to something like Pythagorean wins. You can see the idea from David Berri on wages of wins blog, and I think Hollinger likes it too [if that means anything, hahaha]. Don't quote me on this, but I read somewhere that point differential is good, head to head is also good, but head-to-head point differential is best. | ||
|
justinpal
United States3810 Posts
On May 25 2012 10:29 Ace wrote: People complaining about Indiana not feeding the bigs more: They get tired and Miami's D is making it difficult to get a solid entry pass in every time. Well, I think the problem is that they weren't on the floor. Miami's D can't really stop them. They are often overplaying them with the fronting and stuff. | ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
|
Bonzinator
Slovenia862 Posts
| ||
|
Aerisky
United States12129 Posts
On May 25 2012 10:35 Bonzinator wrote: I liked that J from LBJ. Go get it! Ye, smooth jumper right over his man :D | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Pacers issue is they aren't moving the ball around to create a better angle to get the passes in. Just trying to dump the ball into the paint isn't going to work for enough time. | ||
|
Bonzinator
Slovenia862 Posts
He HAS to get it rolling. EARLY in the 3rd. | ||
|
BlackJack
United States10568 Posts
| ||
| ||
