That account was created on 2011-08-06 22:06:05 and had 756 posts.
Reason: Strategy forum guidelines. Balance. 2 days.
Forum Index > Closed |
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 05 2012 18:23 GMT
#28661
That account was created on 2011-08-06 22:06:05 and had 756 posts. Reason: Strategy forum guidelines. Balance. 2 days. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 05 2012 20:35 GMT
#28662
That account was created on 2012-11-06 05:18:15 and had 1 posts. Reason: Maybe Blizzard doesn't care, but we do. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 05 2012 22:41 GMT
#28663
That account was created on 2010-11-08 16:02:58 and had 294 posts. Reason: So you made your post, saw the mod note on the top of the page saying that your post was on a banned subject and decided to edit your post. But then instead of editing out the comment that discussion of was prohibited you instead decided to edit in a clarification that you had definitely seen the note. You're not very bright. Also you don't appear to know or understand the rules of this site but seem very eager to report abuses of them. Wait a bit longer before trying to judge the mods, we got our positions for a reason, when in doubt you're probably the one not getting it. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 05 2012 23:40 GMT
#28664
That account was created on 2011-12-11 12:50:05 and had 7 posts. Reason: Martyr. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 00:34 GMT
#28665
That account was created on 2012-09-15 02:41:16 and had 7 posts. Reason: All your posts are negative and most are complain-y in nature. Shape up. Also, take some time to read the strategy forum guidelines while you're banned. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 01:53 GMT
#28666
That account was created on 2012-01-30 04:38:56 and had 29 posts. Reason: Martyr. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 01:55 GMT
#28667
That account was created on 2012-10-04 22:09:56 and had 18 posts. Reason: Previously banned user. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 05:45 GMT
#28668
That account was created on 2011-03-18 23:22:58 and had 318 posts. Reason: On November 06 2012 04:05 jdsowa wrote: Show nested quote + On November 06 2012 04:01 kmillz wrote: On November 06 2012 03:14 farvacola wrote: Considering what is going down in Florida with understaffed early voting locations, provisional ballot issues, and shortened voting windows, this story struck me as simply incredible. We can manage to accept votes from astronauts but not poor black Floridians...... Call it the ultimate absentee ballot. NASA astronauts aboard the International Space Station have the option of voting in tomorrow's (Nov. 6) presidential election from orbit, hundreds of miles above their nearest polling location. Astronauts residing on the orbiting lab receive a digital version of their ballot, which is beamed up by Mission Control at the agency's Johnson Space Center (JSC) in Houston. Filled-out ballots find their way back down to Earth along the same path. "They send it back to Mission Control," said NASA spokesman Jay Bolden of JSC. "It's a secure ballot that is then sent directly to the voting authorities." This system was made possible by a 1997 bill passed by Texas legislators (nearly all NASA astronauts live in or around Houston). It was first used that same year by David Wolf, who happened to be aboard Russia's Mir space station at the time. Source That's weird, I don't see one black person in this photo of Florida voters waiting in line Point being, quite trying to pretend like its Florida trying to fuck black people. I'm pretty sure the mods will just dismiss you as an 'idiot' because this post doesn't fit their political bent. The passive aggressiveness is not welcome. Bitch about moderation in the website feedback forum, don't derails threads because you're bitter. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 07:37 GMT
#28669
That account was created on 2012-07-22 13:38:42 and had 55 posts. Reason: | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 08:56 GMT
#28670
That account was created on 2012-11-06 17:33:33 and had 1 posts. Reason: Advertising. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 11:39 GMT
#28671
That account was created on 2012-05-08 04:54:27 and had 323 posts. Reason: Stop trying to stir shit in LR topics. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 11:39 GMT
#28672
That account was created on 2012-09-18 06:04:27 and had 181 posts. Reason: cmon Sniper, rape that fugly nerd who thinks he can watch Starcraft in 3d with 3d glasses. O_O How is this an acceptable post? | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 15:53 GMT
#28673
That account was created on 2011-10-31 19:34:13 and had 250 posts. Reason: You just had to have the last word, didn't you? | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 17:06 GMT
#28674
That account was created on 2011-05-04 23:50:10 and had 2324 posts. Reason: On November 07 2012 01:19 s3rp wrote: MKP is not going to beat a Zerg that doesn't make BIG mistakes . No Terran or Protoss is. Only way Terran's or Toss win against Zerg right now is if their opponents fuck up or are far superior skillwise in the first place. Stop balance whining. You have many warnings about this. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 17:29 GMT
#28675
That account was created on 2012-11-07 02:14:16 and had 0 posts. Reason: Previously banned user. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 19:40 GMT
#28676
That account was created on 2012-08-27 02:23:13 and had 94 posts. Reason: Not sure how I missed this initially. No ad hominem attacks, especially over something so petty as an opinion over a television show. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 20:07 GMT
#28677
That account was created on 2011-09-14 10:46:32 and had 490 posts. Reason: You got a pass on the first comment because it's obviously a cult. That's not even debatable. Despite the cultist calling for your blood I ignored his protests and let your post stand. However you then decided to pursue the argument and try to defend yourself in the topic, even though you got no moderator action for the original comment. You have previous temp bans for starting off topic religion arguments, keep doing it and they'll just get longer. Also you don't get any points for "But, I'm not going to have a theological debate in the election thread.". Don't say you're not going to do it, don't do it. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 20:09 GMT
#28678
That account was created on 2011-02-20 08:53:17 and had 358 posts. Reason: I will post whatever the fuck I want and if you have an issue with it, ban me. Let's see who wins this battle of wits. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 21:16 GMT
#28679
That account was created on 2008-07-08 05:46:41 and had 5392 posts. Reason: I said please stay on topic. Also, this ban is to remind you to improve your posting. You've been warned about this multiple times and yet you still post like a 12 year old kid. That is unacceptable on our forums so please work on that when your ban expires. | ||
TL.net Bot
TL.net126 Posts
November 06 2012 23:54 GMT
#28680
That account was created on 2011-11-26 11:13:54 and had 116 posts. Reason: All the best in the future! Here's a 30 Day just in case you want to reconsider later on down the track. | ||
| ||
Korean StarCraft League
Week 66
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Hupsaiya 59 StarCraft: Brood War• Migwel • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv • Kozan • sooper7s • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube League of Legends Other Games |
Master's Coliseum
Maru vs GuMiho
Lancer vs GuMiho
herO vs Maru
CranKy Ducklings
Defiler Tour
CranKy Ducklings
OSC
OSC
OSC
OSC
|
|