• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 17:21
CEST 23:21
KST 06:21
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed10Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll4Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Who will win EWC 2025? Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion Starcraft in widescreen A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 685 users

Why is protoss considered to be the "easiest race" - Page 26

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 24 25 26 27 28 43 Next All
Pervect
Profile Joined June 2007
1280 Posts
August 11 2011 02:26 GMT
#501
On August 11 2011 11:25 quiet noise wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2011 11:12 PopcornColonel wrote:
On August 11 2011 09:46 ZAiNs wrote:
On August 11 2011 09:25 grobo wrote:
On August 11 2011 09:23 GoKu` wrote:
everyone thinks their race is the hardest to play. That is usually how these topics / ideas get started.


How do you explain the opinions of us random players?

You probably think random is the hardest.

Nah, Zerg is the hardest.

Random is the most fun though ^^


Funny, Zerg is the once race that is underrepresented in the lower leagues (Gold-Bronze). Most Zerg players are either platinum or higher. Statisticly, Zerg players are higher in league and rank standing than protoss and terran. Kinda denies the "Zerg is the hardest race to play"-myth.


anyone who plays zerg is inherently smarter thus gets a higher league. if you dont see this you're a fucking retard
nt-rAven
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada405 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-11 02:28:56
August 11 2011 02:28 GMT
#502
lol he was giving examples of builds to try not the standard builds of the obvious 4 gate.... trying to do things to counter it~~~ please learn how to read intent instead of reading what you want to read
get owned
chesshaha
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1117 Posts
August 11 2011 02:28 GMT
#503
imo, Protoss is the easiest race to hit diamond. Terran is the easiest race to hit masters... especially now. I do think Protoss is under powered in diamond and up leagues, of course also pro level of plays. But the game is pretty balanced I say.
"Hopefully you're not the real TLO so it's not casted" - SpecialK
Phemtos
Profile Joined May 2011
Canada163 Posts
August 11 2011 02:29 GMT
#504
On August 11 2011 11:22 Darclite wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2011 11:18 Phemtos wrote:


Warpgate is easier to use then having to constantly queue up units into production building without missing a beat, I don't think anyone would argue about that.


They're essentially the same thing, the only difference is that you go 4aaaadddd, and the protoss goes double tap 6 (proxy pylon)W, S,click,S,click,S,click,Z,click,Zclick,Zclick. Also, you can't queue warpgates. So you are essentially making an argument out of something petty (my making of units is harder than your making of units), but your petty argument is wrong. Nice work. Go back to Bnet.


I'm talking during early/mid game because when you reach late game you can queue 2-3 units on the same production facility and not have it hurt your economy but during the early/mid game you don't want to queue more then 1 unit per building usually unless you get supplied blocked so doing that while never missing a beat is in my opinion a bit harder then just staring at the bottom right of your screen to see when your cooldown for instant units is up. The only thing protoss need to queue in PvT is worth 6 supply.
dar5283
Profile Joined June 2011
United States65 Posts
August 11 2011 02:30 GMT
#505
On August 11 2011 11:22 ribboo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2011 11:17 dar5283 wrote:
I noticed on the first page, someone said Protoss have the lowest winrate.

http://www.majorleaguegaming.com/news/mlg-anaheim-sc2-stats/

Stats from MLG Anaheim.

These stats actually include the number of players in each race, which is fairly equal.

The other chart from Korean tournaments is SOOOO flawed. No total number of players for each race, and we all know Terrans run Korea.

So look at the international one?
http://i.imgur.com/uaVuw.png

20.000 games beat a couple of hundreds when it comes to statistics, any day.

Those games were from ladder?

The ladder that includes leagues like bronze/silver/gold/plat/low-mid masters?

How many players tell you ladder is for trying out different builds, etc.

I've watched numerous streams, where the streamer is talking about how he should be taking ladder more serious, etc.

Bring me tournament statistics where all races have same number of players, with the same level of skill(or something very close), that shows Protoss struggling. Please, please show me.

There are a very small number of Protoss' in tournaments recently, and when they don't do well, people don't even take into consideration all the other factors that make a genuine stat sheet.

People who are going to argue with their only piece of information is a stat sheet with SOOOOOOOOOOO many flaws, need to take a basic stat class, and learn some things.
Trang
Profile Joined October 2009
Australia324 Posts
August 11 2011 02:30 GMT
#506
On August 11 2011 09:30 Shooks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2011 09:21 grobo wrote:
On August 11 2011 09:08 Shooks wrote:
Another thread with bronze level players commenting, sigh...
People talking about Protoss macro as if it's easy when we're the only race that can't really build units while micro'ing, people talking about how it's also easy to make gates, what? Terran have to make rax's, not much difference...

Point is, this thread is pointless, I wasn't lying when I said bronze level players, it's quite obvious the majority of the people posting have never even played at a high level if they think Protoss is A-moving race when that will get demolished by a MMM army with emp or an infestor based zerg army, Protoss is the most unforgiving race in terms of micro.

It also depends of which matchups, TvP is by far the most 1 dimensional matchup in the game, most top Terrans agree that it's a simple matchup for Terran.


With that sentence i can now conclude that you are one of those bronze players you speak of. Toss has the toughest units in the entire game. As a zerg an entire control group of lings get roasted in a second to hellions if you look away at the wrong moment, an infinite number of mutas gets destroyed to a thor volley if you missmicro, huge groups of marines perish to two fungals. Nothing in a Toss army dies that quickly to anything.

Now i play random so i don't care which race is easiest or hardest, but one thing is definitely true, as a toss you don't have to babysit your units like you have to with Z/T.


Not being able to admit Protoss is the most unforgiving race blows my mind. I mean watching Yigioh play Thorzain the other day, can you honestly say that you need to baby sit units as zerg? Infact it's the complete opposite, the only units you need to babysit is the Mutas, and it's a fast flying units....Not exactly that hard if you have good APM. Like shit, I've vsed Zerg's that have just right clicked my Nexus with a bunch of roaches and lose them all then be able to make a ton more since there so cheap

Since when is getting all your lings roasted gonna cost you the game, it can in the early game, but so does missing an FF on the ramp, durp.

Saying Protoss units are tough is stupid, we get caught off guard and get fungal'd and we can lose them game right there, we get an Obs sniped and cloaked ghosts emp the sentrys and HTs, we lose, we get our collosi out of position and get sniped by vikings we lose, we miss FFs we lose, we have an HT based army against Terran and most of them get EMP'd we lose, the list goes on and on.


I am not saying that Protoss is easier (I think this thread is a minefield really), but come on, let's be fair here. You're saying P loses if P gets EMP'd, misses FFs and so on. Sure that's true. But that isn't a fair basis for saying that P is the most unforgiving race. You're putting up a properly micro'd army against a non-micro'd army. No matter what the matchup, assuming comparable armies, the army with proper micro will always win against the army with no micro (I include setting up proper defensive positions, eg tank seiging, as micro). T and Z would lose too if their army gets stormed and feedbacked while they aren't watching.
pycho
Profile Joined January 2011
Paraguay372 Posts
August 11 2011 02:32 GMT
#507
this thread just gave me braincancer, never seen a thread so stacked with gold leaguers
SoKHo
Profile Joined April 2011
Korea (South)1081 Posts
August 11 2011 02:32 GMT
#508
I love when zergs say protoss is easy, then i ask if you want to switch races and I still beat them. I think at high levels all races are equally hard to play. I do agree that it takes protoss the least amount of time from bronze -> diamond imo
"If you don't understand my silence, you won't understand my words"|| Big Nal_rA fan boy!! Nal_rA, Bisu, Huk, MC, Hero fighting! SKT1---->
coreydota
Profile Joined October 2010
United States180 Posts
August 11 2011 02:33 GMT
#509
On August 11 2011 10:59 Chronald wrote:

You trolling?

No warn? Nothing?

Wow.

On topic...

Protoss is not the easiest race. There is no easiest race. The race is only as hard to play as you make it. Sure you could 4gate every game, and that is easy. Just like Terran can 6 rax marine and Zerg and 6 pool. Cheese is cheese, it is 'easy' no matter what race you are.

Saying you can just 1a protoss armies is stupid and ignorant. Try playing above Copper level (yes I mean Copper, the league that was below bronze and doesn't exist anymore) and you will see that without micro-ing your army you lose almost every game.

IMO Terran is the easiest race. A wall you can lower, simple army tactics (stim, stutter), siege tanks, viable drops, MULEs, etc. Terran is obviously the easiest to play, or Blizzard wouldn't have given them out as the free race.


What? Be careful not to be so contradictory.
quiet noise
Profile Joined May 2011
599 Posts
August 11 2011 02:33 GMT
#510
On August 11 2011 11:26 Pervect wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2011 11:25 quiet noise wrote:
On August 11 2011 11:12 PopcornColonel wrote:
On August 11 2011 09:46 ZAiNs wrote:
On August 11 2011 09:25 grobo wrote:
On August 11 2011 09:23 GoKu` wrote:
everyone thinks their race is the hardest to play. That is usually how these topics / ideas get started.


How do you explain the opinions of us random players?

You probably think random is the hardest.

Nah, Zerg is the hardest.

Random is the most fun though ^^


Funny, Zerg is the once race that is underrepresented in the lower leagues (Gold-Bronze). Most Zerg players are either platinum or higher. Statisticly, Zerg players are higher in league and rank standing than protoss and terran. Kinda denies the "Zerg is the hardest race to play"-myth.


anyone who plays zerg is inherently smarter thus gets a higher league. if you dont see this you're a fucking retard


I agree. if you dont see why zerg is the best race to play at the moment, you are pretty stupid. Why would anyone play protoss, lol?

<.<
CCupcakeDyran
Profile Joined January 2011
United States53 Posts
August 11 2011 02:33 GMT
#511
On August 11 2011 11:24 darthfoley wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2011 11:18 CCupcakeDyran wrote:
On August 11 2011 11:13 The KY wrote:
On August 11 2011 11:08 CCupcakeDyran wrote:
On August 11 2011 11:04 Phemtos wrote:
On August 11 2011 11:00 The KY wrote:
On August 11 2011 10:56 Phemtos wrote:
On August 11 2011 10:44 iChau wrote:

When you get out of bronze, try blinking back hurt stalkers while macroing with warpgates, kk?


Ok you try queueing up your units nonstop without missing a beat while kiting the protoss army, spreading your bio and getting good emp off all the while microing the vikings so they all focus on the same colossus.


Ok this is just ridiculous now. Go back to the b.net forums with this kind of 'HERE IS A PURPOSEFULLY EXTENDED LIST OF THINGS I HAVE TO DO TO WIN, HERE IS A PURPOSEFULLY SHORTENED LIST OF THING YOU HAVE TO DO TO WIN, SEE HOW MUCH HARDER IT IS FOR ME WITH MY CLEARLY AND OBVIOUSLY BIASED DESCRIPTIONS OF THE GAME' bullshit.

Seriously. This doesn't belong here.


Alright then please do explain me what else does a protoss need to do beside getting good Storm/FF off to win a big engagement. Go try and A move a max terran army bio against a max protoss army with a good amount of colossus without either of them being micro'd and tell me who win. Terran simply has to work more against HTS/chargelot or Colossus based army to win the battle.


Why would you ever go heavy bio against a colossus based army anyway? Terran has tanks. The siege unit with the longest ground attack range in the game. You know, those things that kill Colo really damn fast if you know what focus fire is.


...nah tanks are bad against colossus + gateway armies. Colossus and tanks essentially fill the same role in that match up, the difference is that tanks have to take the time to siege and the colossus can just ball around, making you incredibly immobile in a matchup where mobility is key, if they die they take fucking ages to rebuild, immortals utterly destroy them...there's a reason very very few people use tanks in TvP.


That's weird. I usually just spread them out and have some vikings around to help snipe colo. And it usually works out for me. It's all in the positioning and making sure you're not unsieged when you engage, IMO.


That's true, but chargelots and immortals can still do insane dmg when they just charge tanks.


I totally agree, dude. I play P/Z but I used to be a random. But if you have a good stutter step micro, you can at least keep the chargelots/immorts back until your tanks/vikings snipe some colo.

In all honesty, I kinda try to treat colo like banelings on crack. (Marine splits, tank spread, good stim micro, etc)


But to stay on topic, if you've played P enough and then you switched to Z or T, then playing XvP is so easy.
TCC: Putting lings in your mineral lines since 2010.
ribboo
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden1842 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-11 02:36:38
August 11 2011 02:34 GMT
#512
On August 11 2011 11:30 dar5283 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2011 11:22 ribboo wrote:
On August 11 2011 11:17 dar5283 wrote:
I noticed on the first page, someone said Protoss have the lowest winrate.

http://www.majorleaguegaming.com/news/mlg-anaheim-sc2-stats/

Stats from MLG Anaheim.

These stats actually include the number of players in each race, which is fairly equal.

The other chart from Korean tournaments is SOOOO flawed. No total number of players for each race, and we all know Terrans run Korea.

So look at the international one?
http://i.imgur.com/uaVuw.png

20.000 games beat a couple of hundreds when it comes to statistics, any day.

Those games were from ladder?

The ladder that includes leagues like bronze/silver/gold/plat/low-mid masters?

How many players tell you ladder is for trying out different builds, etc.

I've watched numerous streams, where the streamer is talking about how he should be taking ladder more serious, etc.

Bring me tournament statistics where all races have same number of players, with the same level of skill(or something very close), that shows Protoss struggling. Please, please show me.

There are a very small number of Protoss' in tournaments recently, and when they don't do well, people don't even take into consideration all the other factors that make a genuine stat sheet.

People who are going to argue with their only piece of information is a stat sheet with SOOOOOOOOOOO many flaws, need to take a basic stat class, and learn some things.

That is tournament results. You can look for yourself what tournaments they put in there. It's by far the most valid statistics we have. -.-

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/sc2-international

Or.. go read the thread.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=252090
da_head
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada3350 Posts
August 11 2011 02:34 GMT
#513
see if this was bw, i would have said that we have the tankiest units, and thus required the least amount of micro to use effectively (hence 1a2a3a). however, given that is no longer the case, i cant really say why...
When they see MC Probe, all the ladies disrobe.
quiet noise
Profile Joined May 2011
599 Posts
August 11 2011 02:35 GMT
#514
On August 11 2011 11:28 chesshaha wrote:
imo, Protoss is the easiest race to hit diamond. Terran is the easiest race to hit masters... especially now. I do think Protoss is under powered in diamond and up leagues, of course also pro level of plays. But the game is pretty balanced I say.


statisticly, Zerg has less players in gold-bronze and more in platinum-grand master. kinda points in the opposite direction
The KY
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United Kingdom6252 Posts
August 11 2011 02:37 GMT
#515
On August 11 2011 11:18 Phemtos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2011 11:09 The KY wrote:
On August 11 2011 11:04 Phemtos wrote:
On August 11 2011 11:00 The KY wrote:
On August 11 2011 10:56 Phemtos wrote:
On August 11 2011 10:44 iChau wrote:

When you get out of bronze, try blinking back hurt stalkers while macroing with warpgates, kk?


Ok you try queueing up your units nonstop without missing a beat while kiting the protoss army, spreading your bio and getting good emp off all the while microing the vikings so they all focus on the same colossus.


Ok this is just ridiculous now. Go back to the b.net forums with this kind of 'HERE IS A PURPOSEFULLY EXTENDED LIST OF THINGS I HAVE TO DO TO WIN, HERE IS A PURPOSEFULLY SHORTENED LIST OF THING YOU HAVE TO DO TO WIN, SEE HOW MUCH HARDER IT IS FOR ME WITH MY CLEARLY AND OBVIOUSLY BIASED DESCRIPTIONS OF THE GAME' bullshit.

Seriously. This doesn't belong here.


Alright then please do explain me what else does a protoss need to do beside getting good Storm/FF off to win a big engagement. Go try and A move a max terran army bio against a max protoss army with a good amount of colossus without either of them being micro'd and tell me who win. Terran simply has to work more against HTS/chargelot or Colossus based army to win the battle.


You know what? NO. I'm not going to explain to you each individual piece of micro that every race has to pull off. Because that's what balance whining children do, on the b.net forums. If you are one of those people, PLEASE, go back there.

Go back a couple of your posts. You say that you have to get off a good EMP or you're dead. Ok. But then you say all protoss has to do is get off good storm and ff...can you seriously not see how fucking blinded you are by bias? Why is that so easy for them but so hard for you? I guarantee you if you played protoss you'd be saying 'all terran has to do is get off one good EMP and my super expensive ht's are useless'.

FYI I play terran 75%, protoss 25%. Please try PvT some time, enjoy losing to MMM a dozen times in a row. Until then shut up about how hard everything is for you.


Warpgate is easier to use then having to constantly queue up units into production building without missing a beat, I don't think anyone would argue about that. Alright take out the emp/ff/storm of the battle and tell me which of the two army has more action that need to be done in order to win. A protoss need to put his zealot in the front which is just positionning before the battle and focus the marine with his colossus and focus the vikings with his stalker. A terran need to spread his army so it doesn't get destroyed by the colossus aoe and has to kite the chargelot and focus each colosssus with his vikings. Now tell me which has more action in a battle that need to be done in order for them to win.


Lrn2read, I already said I'm not getting pulled into a pointless and retarded argument about listing minor micro requirements and comparing who has the most.

One thing I will argue is that warpgate is not easier to use. It is so, so easy to go 5aaaaaaddddddgg during a battle. It is much harder to take your eyes off the battle completely, go to a pylon, and warp in the different units you need. You can macro as terran without thinking about it, enough practise and it becomes reflex. But no matter how good you are, with protoss you have to refocus your attention to warp in units.
Applesmack
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada680 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-11 02:39:14
August 11 2011 02:37 GMT
#516
On August 11 2011 11:30 Trang wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2011 09:30 Shooks wrote:
On August 11 2011 09:21 grobo wrote:
On August 11 2011 09:08 Shooks wrote:
Another thread with bronze level players commenting, sigh...
People talking about Protoss macro as if it's easy when we're the only race that can't really build units while micro'ing, people talking about how it's also easy to make gates, what? Terran have to make rax's, not much difference...

Point is, this thread is pointless, I wasn't lying when I said bronze level players, it's quite obvious the majority of the people posting have never even played at a high level if they think Protoss is A-moving race when that will get demolished by a MMM army with emp or an infestor based zerg army, Protoss is the most unforgiving race in terms of micro.

It also depends of which matchups, TvP is by far the most 1 dimensional matchup in the game, most top Terrans agree that it's a simple matchup for Terran.


With that sentence i can now conclude that you are one of those bronze players you speak of. Toss has the toughest units in the entire game. As a zerg an entire control group of lings get roasted in a second to hellions if you look away at the wrong moment, an infinite number of mutas gets destroyed to a thor volley if you missmicro, huge groups of marines perish to two fungals. Nothing in a Toss army dies that quickly to anything.

Now i play random so i don't care which race is easiest or hardest, but one thing is definitely true, as a toss you don't have to babysit your units like you have to with Z/T.


Not being able to admit Protoss is the most unforgiving race blows my mind. I mean watching Yigioh play Thorzain the other day, can you honestly say that you need to baby sit units as zerg? Infact it's the complete opposite, the only units you need to babysit is the Mutas, and it's a fast flying units....Not exactly that hard if you have good APM. Like shit, I've vsed Zerg's that have just right clicked my Nexus with a bunch of roaches and lose them all then be able to make a ton more since there so cheap

Since when is getting all your lings roasted gonna cost you the game, it can in the early game, but so does missing an FF on the ramp, durp.

Saying Protoss units are tough is stupid, we get caught off guard and get fungal'd and we can lose them game right there, we get an Obs sniped and cloaked ghosts emp the sentrys and HTs, we lose, we get our collosi out of position and get sniped by vikings we lose, we miss FFs we lose, we have an HT based army against Terran and most of them get EMP'd we lose, the list goes on and on.


I am not saying that Protoss is easier (I think this thread is a minefield really), but come on, let's be fair here. You're saying P loses if P gets EMP'd, misses FFs and so on. Sure that's true. But that isn't a fair basis for saying that P is the most unforgiving race. You're putting up a properly micro'd army against a non-micro'd army. No matter what the matchup, assuming comparable armies, the army with proper micro will always win against the army with no micro (I include setting up proper defensive positions, eg tank seiging, as micro). T and Z would lose too if their army gets stormed and feedbacked while they aren't watching.


Except that once again, it is far more difficult to set up the right forcefields and storms then it is to simply stutter step backwards as your vikings slaughter the colossus. Notice how no pro ever messes up their stutter step and easily crushes the protoss army while the protoss pros storm their own zealots due to chasing stutter step, miss forcefields, etc all the time. Even from top caliber code S players. The protoss player only can win if he caught the terran pinned against the wall or he hits insanely good forcefields without getting his sentries EMP'ed (almost impossible).

I also LOL at people saying protoss macro is easier. How is it easier exactly? Both P and T build units from their structures. Protoss has chrono and T has mule/scans (which I think is better). Both terran and protoss make their units from basically 3 structures: stargate/port, fac/robo/, gateway/rax. They basically identical in macro skill.
hiturheartx
Profile Joined August 2011
61 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-11 02:40:31
August 11 2011 02:38 GMT
#517
i dont care if people think toss is the easiest race, but i think terran players should understand that their race is the most ridiculous right now

1. blue flame hellions.
2. flying dts
3. fkin dropship healers
4. MULEs. i once watched tourney or something.. and the terran killed off most of his SCVs late game and started massing OCs. the commentators said it was a legit tactic.. 'MULE economy' seriously. i face palmed at how ridiculous this race is when i heard those 2 words.

no other race has such a diverse use for their army aside from terran. hopefully the expansions fix this.
figq
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
12519 Posts
August 11 2011 02:38 GMT
#518
Average APM by race from 1128 replays at semi-pro and pro level at MLG Columbus 2011:
[image loading]
APM isn't a very important measure, but still I thought this could be interesting stats to check out.

Keep in mind though, that landing a perfect storm, or perfect forcefields, counts very little to the number of actions, and yet, it's more difficult than building 40 lings/rines and running them around.
If you stand next to my head, you can hear the ocean. - Day[9]
dar5283
Profile Joined June 2011
United States65 Posts
August 11 2011 02:39 GMT
#519
On August 11 2011 11:34 ribboo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2011 11:30 dar5283 wrote:
On August 11 2011 11:22 ribboo wrote:
On August 11 2011 11:17 dar5283 wrote:
I noticed on the first page, someone said Protoss have the lowest winrate.

http://www.majorleaguegaming.com/news/mlg-anaheim-sc2-stats/

Stats from MLG Anaheim.

These stats actually include the number of players in each race, which is fairly equal.

The other chart from Korean tournaments is SOOOO flawed. No total number of players for each race, and we all know Terrans run Korea.

So look at the international one?
http://i.imgur.com/uaVuw.png

20.000 games beat a couple of hundreds when it comes to statistics, any day.

Those games were from ladder?

The ladder that includes leagues like bronze/silver/gold/plat/low-mid masters?

How many players tell you ladder is for trying out different builds, etc.

I've watched numerous streams, where the streamer is talking about how he should be taking ladder more serious, etc.

Bring me tournament statistics where all races have same number of players, with the same level of skill(or something very close), that shows Protoss struggling. Please, please show me.

There are a very small number of Protoss' in tournaments recently, and when they don't do well, people don't even take into consideration all the other factors that make a genuine stat sheet.

People who are going to argue with their only piece of information is a stat sheet with SOOOOOOOOOOO many flaws, need to take a basic stat class, and learn some things.

It's by far the most valid statistics we have. -.-

What don't you understand about statistics? Like, seriously, do I need to explain this again?

WHERE IS THE NUMBER OF PLAYERS FOR EACH RACE?

Not only that, but some of those stats have 2v2 games from EGMC, LMFAO!!!!
quiet noise
Profile Joined May 2011
599 Posts
August 11 2011 02:40 GMT
#520
On August 11 2011 11:37 Applesmack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2011 11:30 Trang wrote:
On August 11 2011 09:30 Shooks wrote:
On August 11 2011 09:21 grobo wrote:
On August 11 2011 09:08 Shooks wrote:
Another thread with bronze level players commenting, sigh...
People talking about Protoss macro as if it's easy when we're the only race that can't really build units while micro'ing, people talking about how it's also easy to make gates, what? Terran have to make rax's, not much difference...

Point is, this thread is pointless, I wasn't lying when I said bronze level players, it's quite obvious the majority of the people posting have never even played at a high level if they think Protoss is A-moving race when that will get demolished by a MMM army with emp or an infestor based zerg army, Protoss is the most unforgiving race in terms of micro.

It also depends of which matchups, TvP is by far the most 1 dimensional matchup in the game, most top Terrans agree that it's a simple matchup for Terran.


With that sentence i can now conclude that you are one of those bronze players you speak of. Toss has the toughest units in the entire game. As a zerg an entire control group of lings get roasted in a second to hellions if you look away at the wrong moment, an infinite number of mutas gets destroyed to a thor volley if you missmicro, huge groups of marines perish to two fungals. Nothing in a Toss army dies that quickly to anything.

Now i play random so i don't care which race is easiest or hardest, but one thing is definitely true, as a toss you don't have to babysit your units like you have to with Z/T.


Not being able to admit Protoss is the most unforgiving race blows my mind. I mean watching Yigioh play Thorzain the other day, can you honestly say that you need to baby sit units as zerg? Infact it's the complete opposite, the only units you need to babysit is the Mutas, and it's a fast flying units....Not exactly that hard if you have good APM. Like shit, I've vsed Zerg's that have just right clicked my Nexus with a bunch of roaches and lose them all then be able to make a ton more since there so cheap

Since when is getting all your lings roasted gonna cost you the game, it can in the early game, but so does missing an FF on the ramp, durp.

Saying Protoss units are tough is stupid, we get caught off guard and get fungal'd and we can lose them game right there, we get an Obs sniped and cloaked ghosts emp the sentrys and HTs, we lose, we get our collosi out of position and get sniped by vikings we lose, we miss FFs we lose, we have an HT based army against Terran and most of them get EMP'd we lose, the list goes on and on.


I am not saying that Protoss is easier (I think this thread is a minefield really), but come on, let's be fair here. You're saying P loses if P gets EMP'd, misses FFs and so on. Sure that's true. But that isn't a fair basis for saying that P is the most unforgiving race. You're putting up a properly micro'd army against a non-micro'd army. No matter what the matchup, assuming comparable armies, the army with proper micro will always win against the army with no micro (I include setting up proper defensive positions, eg tank seiging, as micro). T and Z would lose too if their army gets stormed and feedbacked while they aren't watching.



I also LOL at people saying protoss macro is easier. How is it easier exactly? Both P and T build units from their structures. Protoss has chrono and T has mule/scans (which I think is better). Both terran and protoss make their units from basically 3 structures: stargate/port, fac/robo/, gateway/rax. They basically identical in macro skill.


Yep, and Zerg builds everything from 1 building and therefor doesnt need to add new facilities to increase production. Also, its cool if you slack on your macro for a minute because your larvae stacks up.

Zerg has by far the easiest macro imo.
Prev 1 24 25 26 27 28 43 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 39m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
UpATreeSC 144
ZombieGrub142
Nathanias 131
ViBE104
StarCraft: Brood War
Mini 406
firebathero 192
Dota 2
canceldota122
League of Legends
Grubby5110
febbydoto2
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K420
flusha414
Foxcn274
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King67
PPMD56
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu594
Trikslyr56
Other Games
summit1g9999
FrodaN4355
mouzStarbuck324
Skadoodle179
C9.Mang0160
ROOTCatZ83
Sick46
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3699
StarCraft 2
angryscii 35
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• sitaska36
• musti20045 29
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2646
• masondota21460
League of Legends
• Doublelift1452
• TFBlade1066
Other Games
• imaqtpie1926
• Shiphtur200
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
2h 39m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
18h 39m
Replay Cast
1d 2h
The PondCast
1d 12h
WardiTV European League
1d 18h
Replay Cast
2 days
Epic.LAN
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
CSO Contender
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Online Event
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Esports World Cup
6 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.