• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:57
CEST 09:57
KST 16:57
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pros React To: SoulKey's 5-Peat Challenge [ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence BW General Discussion ASL20 General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D [ASL20] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Borderlands 3
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1912 users

Why the Terran problems are not an imbalance issue - Page 16

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 14 15 16 17 18 20 Next All
ToastieNL
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Netherlands845 Posts
September 10 2010 15:44 GMT
#301
^ complains about people complaining about his race
Zerg lategame is imbalanced as shit. Also: "Protoss is really strong recently. Perhaps, it's time for there to be some changes for Terran." -MMA. Even MMA asks for buffs. Srsly Blizzard. Srsly.
diehilde
Profile Joined September 2008
Germany1596 Posts
September 10 2010 15:44 GMT
#302
100% agreed here. all these issues made me wonder if terran isnt op long time ago, but im too lazy for long writeups like this. Unfortunately I dont see it changing, as the number tweaks that blizz likes to put out will not change anything as fundamental as this. I see walling / salvageable bunkers as another mechanic that works heavily in terrans favor. The thing is, terran has so many options that there is LOTS of room for improvement for them, while Z/P does not have that huge potential imo. What will probably happen is that Blizz keeps on nerfing the dominant T strategies at the time just to see new strats surfacing which make terrans dominate again. I expect a cycle like this to go on for at least 3-4 balance patches tbh :/
Savior: "I will cheat everyone again in SC2!" - SCII Beta Tester
kosai
Profile Joined August 2010
20 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-10 15:46:28
September 10 2010 15:46 GMT
#303
On September 11 2010 00:43 Cranberries wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 11 2010 00:39 LuciferSC wrote:
Don't mean to start a flaming war, but just want to point out that you are not providing any supporting facts yourself.
Zerg isn't necessarily more difficult to play than Terrans and neither is Idra necessarily a better player than Morrow.
Look at it this way - if Terrans are clearly OP, u wouldn't see nothing but Terran on Pro-leagues.

Look how Zerg and Protoss are doing on GSL. They're doing FINE.

24 Races have currently qualified for the Ro32 in GSL.

12 Terran, 8 Protoss and 4 Zerg.

The racial matchups thus far:

TvZ: 2-2
ZvP: 3-3
PvT: 2-8

I really think the facts are against your arguments.



24 people are too few to put here. look at global sc2 stats, win:lose ratio is pretty even for every race. also, there ARE more terran in many leagues, because there ARE many terran players out there. its 2:1:1 (T: P: Z) i think.
arnath
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1317 Posts
September 10 2010 15:47 GMT
#304
Explain to me how tech lab/reactor swapping is any different than zerg (for example) having a Roach Warren and a Spire and being able to make a lot of mutas and eventually tech switch back to roaches.
eu.exodus
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
South Africa1186 Posts
September 10 2010 15:47 GMT
#305
On September 11 2010 00:36 vrok wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 11 2010 00:29 eu.exodus wrote:
On September 10 2010 23:55 vrok wrote:
On September 10 2010 23:52 eu.exodus wrote:
When youre harrasing the whole point is to click on workers.

Really? Then you need to tell your fellow terrans to stop dropping 8 marauders in our bases and sniping the nex/hatch/cc in 5 seconds flat. They should be attacking the workers! What a bunch of rofl-noobs!


main word being harrasing. If you are harrasing. Workers stay low priority with every race, so the point is if you are harrasing and your opponent sends defense, your attack priority changes. So you would have to click on the workers.
Read buddy.
It was a discussion about auto repair in a fight. Not marauder harasment.
I hope it makes sense to u now.

I understood you from the beginning. I just think it's a very narrow minded view that ignores the fact that repairing scvs are more dangerous than attacking scvs and should be treated as such, i.e same attack priority as attacking units.


guys please keep in mind that even I think that terrans are OP. i said that in a previous post but not for what the original post was. there i totally disagree. the things mention are balanced and they arent the problem. trust me i know whats coming for terrans in the next patch and quite frankly im looking forward to it.
6 poll is a good skill toi have
Numy
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
South Africa35471 Posts
September 10 2010 15:51 GMT
#306
On September 11 2010 00:46 kosai wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 11 2010 00:43 Cranberries wrote:
On September 11 2010 00:39 LuciferSC wrote:
Don't mean to start a flaming war, but just want to point out that you are not providing any supporting facts yourself.
Zerg isn't necessarily more difficult to play than Terrans and neither is Idra necessarily a better player than Morrow.
Look at it this way - if Terrans are clearly OP, u wouldn't see nothing but Terran on Pro-leagues.

Look how Zerg and Protoss are doing on GSL. They're doing FINE.

24 Races have currently qualified for the Ro32 in GSL.

12 Terran, 8 Protoss and 4 Zerg.

The racial matchups thus far:

TvZ: 2-2
ZvP: 3-3
PvT: 2-8

I really think the facts are against your arguments.



24 people are too few to put here. look at global sc2 stats, win:lose ratio is pretty even for every race. also, there ARE more terran in many leagues, because there ARE many terran players out there. its 2:1:1 (T: P: Z) i think.


Well what the GSL stats show is more about debunking the whole concept that Zerg dominates in Korea. Out of the 4 zerg that have qualified 3 are Idra/Cool/Check. They are arguably in the top 5 Zergs in the world. So kinda strange there aren't more of the other zergs in there.
Cranberries
Profile Joined July 2010
Wales567 Posts
September 10 2010 15:51 GMT
#307
On September 11 2010 00:46 kosai wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 11 2010 00:43 Cranberries wrote:
On September 11 2010 00:39 LuciferSC wrote:
Don't mean to start a flaming war, but just want to point out that you are not providing any supporting facts yourself.
Zerg isn't necessarily more difficult to play than Terrans and neither is Idra necessarily a better player than Morrow.
Look at it this way - if Terrans are clearly OP, u wouldn't see nothing but Terran on Pro-leagues.

Look how Zerg and Protoss are doing on GSL. They're doing FINE.

24 Races have currently qualified for the Ro32 in GSL.

12 Terran, 8 Protoss and 4 Zerg.

The racial matchups thus far:

TvZ: 2-2
ZvP: 3-3
PvT: 2-8

I really think the facts are against your arguments.



24 people are too few to put here. look at global sc2 stats, win:lose ratio is pretty even for every race. also, there ARE more terran in many leagues, because there ARE many terran players out there. its 2:1:1 (T: P: Z) i think.


Actually the split was 26 P / 21 T / 15 Z if I recall correctly.
eu.exodus
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
South Africa1186 Posts
September 10 2010 15:51 GMT
#308
On September 11 2010 00:16 Cranberries wrote:
If you really want to balance PvT into perfection just give the Stalker a base damage of 11/15 with +1/+2 on attack upgrades. With this the Stalker (compared to the Marauder) will always trade itself equally with the Marauder if both are on the same level of upgrades - and when the Marauder or Stalker are 1 ahead, the unit with the higher upgrade will perform better (as it should be).

At the moment a +2 Stalker loses to a +1 Marauder and a +1 Stalker trades equally to a 0/0 Marauder. This isn't how it should work. Attack upgrades should grant an upgrade, not grant equal footing with a unit that produces faster, is cheaper, and can slow and snipe buildings relatively fast.


you cant compare everything unit for unit. thats not how starcraft works. although i do agree with what youre saying. keep in mind that what youre saying is that attribute for attribute marauders are stronger than stalkers. its like comparing a ling with a zealot and trying to see who will win. thats not how the game works. but i do agree the more especially protoss players lack a hard early game counter to the rauder
6 poll is a good skill toi have
fleeze
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany895 Posts
September 10 2010 15:53 GMT
#309
On September 11 2010 00:47 eu.exodus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 11 2010 00:36 vrok wrote:
On September 11 2010 00:29 eu.exodus wrote:
On September 10 2010 23:55 vrok wrote:
On September 10 2010 23:52 eu.exodus wrote:
When youre harrasing the whole point is to click on workers.

Really? Then you need to tell your fellow terrans to stop dropping 8 marauders in our bases and sniping the nex/hatch/cc in 5 seconds flat. They should be attacking the workers! What a bunch of rofl-noobs!


main word being harrasing. If you are harrasing. Workers stay low priority with every race, so the point is if you are harrasing and your opponent sends defense, your attack priority changes. So you would have to click on the workers.
Read buddy.
It was a discussion about auto repair in a fight. Not marauder harasment.
I hope it makes sense to u now.

I understood you from the beginning. I just think it's a very narrow minded view that ignores the fact that repairing scvs are more dangerous than attacking scvs and should be treated as such, i.e same attack priority as attacking units.


guys please keep in mind that even I think that terrans are OP. i said that in a previous post but not for what the original post was. there i totally disagree. the things mention are balanced and they arent the problem. trust me i know whats coming for terrans in the next patch and quite frankly im looking forward to it.

why should anyone trust you??? your posts also don't make you look like a trustworthy person...
arguing with terran is like arguing with a wall it seems. none of the issues of the OP is being addressed by the next patch (as far as the notes are released, could be they will change way more).
Lennon
Profile Joined February 2010
United Kingdom2275 Posts
September 10 2010 15:53 GMT
#310
On September 10 2010 11:15 MindRush wrote:
right now, zergs are domination in Korea and Asia in general. Look at how Sen is doing, CheckPrime, even our friendly neighborhood IdrA for that matter. Messing up with terran to balance some bronze level issues might cause some major balance blow at top-level play.


Zergs aren't dominating in Asia; the races are just more balanced in terms of success.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
September 10 2010 15:54 GMT
#311
On September 11 2010 00:38 BlindPhaydo wrote:
I don't see what you gain by trying to disguise an obvious balance discussion as a discussion about "mechanics." Of the arguments you made, only the one about prioritizing SCV targeting has to do with mechanics, the others are all pure balance arguments. For example, your argument about Sensor Towers is that they're too cheap, build too fast, and cover too much area. This has nothing to do with mechanics, you're just saying they should tweak the numbers for the sake of balance.

Also, removing swappable tech labs and reactors from the game would take away one of the unique and interesting aspects about Terran. It would be like saying we should take warp gates away from Toss because it's a unique ability that other races don't have. These are fundamental aspects of the design of both races, and the game would be less interesting without them. Blizzard is going about balance the right way, by tweaking the damage/cost/build times etc. Not overhauling the basic design of each race, which is totally unnecessary.

In short, just be up front that your thread is complaining about BALANCE, like many other threads. Don't feel you have to hide that fact. I think balance threads get a bad name because most often people put no effort into them and just whine. This OP had a lot of effort put into it, so it doesn't deserve that same stigma, though it is definitely, contrary to the title, a balance thread.


This is exactly correct. The ONLY reason why any of the issues that are raised in the OP are relevant is because they pertain to balance. I don't think that the mechanics need drastic changes. Yes, they're very powerful if properly used, but so are warp in, spawn larvae, and creep tumors. The real problem with terran are the strength and relative cheapness of many their units.

I won't comment on ZvT, but in PvT, the tier 2 advantage that terran has over protoss is absolutely disgusting. For example, and as has been well-documented, once a bioball with ghosts and medivacs reaches a certain size, protoss needs tier 3 to compete. Even if the protoss has the proper tier 3 units out (like high templar), victory still isnt' guaranteed against a pure tier 2 terran army given the strength of EMP, stim, and medivacs. Basically, protoss does not have a unit or force composition that can force terran off of bio. (Don't even bring up carriers or massed void rays, those are too expensive to seriously consider, and only come into play if the protoss has a huge economic advantage over the terran) When you compare this to PvZ, where both protoss and zerg can force each other down certain tech paths, which makes for a very dynamic matchup, you start to understand how stupid PvT is right now. Unless Blizzard has changes in mind for patch 1.1 other than what they've disclosed so far, this won't be changing any time soon.

Before someone comes in an flames me for being a newb who complains about PvT, I'm don't believe that the overall matchup is imbalanced such that protoss can't win. I win most of my PvT's. My point is that the internal dynamics of the matchup are retarded and need some tweaking, primarily because of aspects of terrans as they exist now.
Capnstank
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada47 Posts
September 10 2010 15:57 GMT
#312
The issue for me with Terran is the way that Tanks have changed from BW. In BW you had your ball of tanks and they'd blast the shit out of that first zergling letting the others run up and wreck havok. Zealot bombing? Hell yes!

Now in SC2 you have the no-overshoot which means tanks are inherently smart and can immediately stop a wall of incoming melee units. Blizzard keeps trying to compensate for this advantage by nerfing tank damage, which I think is the absolute worst way to do it. Make tanks overshoot and suddenly zerglings are a viable counter. Hell, with overshoot terran could drop MULES on the tank line to force them into suicide mode.

I simply think the over-simplification of unit AI has changed this game. In BW the best players overcame pathing and issues like ramps/friendly splash etc. while the struggling players just dealt with it. In SC2 there is hardly a gap between player's abilities to control units. My ability to move a MMM ball is just as good as a top tier player. There is practically no additional skill required to keep your units balled where in BW it was an essential skill to have a proper ball and spread when required.
Cranberries
Profile Joined July 2010
Wales567 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-10 15:59:56
September 10 2010 15:58 GMT
#313
On September 11 2010 00:51 eu.exodus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 11 2010 00:16 Cranberries wrote:
If you really want to balance PvT into perfection just give the Stalker a base damage of 11/15 with +1/+2 on attack upgrades. With this the Stalker (compared to the Marauder) will always trade itself equally with the Marauder if both are on the same level of upgrades - and when the Marauder or Stalker are 1 ahead, the unit with the higher upgrade will perform better (as it should be).

At the moment a +2 Stalker loses to a +1 Marauder and a +1 Stalker trades equally to a 0/0 Marauder. This isn't how it should work. Attack upgrades should grant an upgrade, not grant equal footing with a unit that produces faster, is cheaper, and can slow and snipe buildings relatively fast.


you cant compare everything unit for unit. thats not how starcraft works. although i do agree with what youre saying. keep in mind that what youre saying is that attribute for attribute marauders are stronger than stalkers. its like comparing a ling with a zealot and trying to see who will win. thats not how the game works. but i do agree the more especially protoss players lack a hard early game counter to the rauder


4 Zerglings (100 minerals) can beat 1 Zealot (100 minerals) with sufficient micro, likewise the Zealot can kill the 4 Zerglings with micro. With +1 upgrade 1 Zealot can take on 6 Zerglings before death. (assuming no speed upgrade)

The problem is that the Stalker is more expensive than the Marauder and the Stalker loses to it. You really would never build Stalkers in PvT if Banshees weren't super awesome.
Umpteen
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United Kingdom1570 Posts
September 10 2010 15:59 GMT
#314
On September 11 2010 00:11 eu.exodus wrote:
overlords cant be compared to medivacs. To get them you must . . . Rax, fact, port, medivac and pay for every one you build. Overlords get built every time you need supplies which you need anyway and the by just by teching to a lair hey presto. Every overlord you already have can drop. So its balanced. You pay once for the ability to drop with zerg but pay every time for the ability to drop with the benifit of healing at the extra expense. Sounds balanced to me


It would be balanced if your units auto-targeted my overlords instead of killing, y'know, my army.
The existence of a food chain is inescapable if we evolved unsupervised, and inexcusable otherwise.
Bibdy
Profile Joined March 2010
United States3481 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-10 16:06:32
September 10 2010 16:01 GMT
#315
Definitely agree with the Medivac. It should only be able to transport like 4 supply of units or something and you have to upgrade it to 8. Give you a bit more time before they can pull off the "HOLYFUCKINGSHIT8MARAUDERSORHELLIONSGOODBYEECONOMYLOSEGAME" maneuver.

Throw in Sensor Towers as well and its just laughable how strong Terran drops are, and how weak everyone's else's are.

I'm sure Blizzard did a lot of testing with unit stats to make sure that equal cost and supply armies beat each other fairly, but you have to wonder how much effort they put into each race's bag of tricks.

Terrans need to play the other races for a while, and need to actually play against Medivac drops before they claim how easy they are to stop.
eu.exodus
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
South Africa1186 Posts
September 10 2010 16:02 GMT
#316
On September 11 2010 00:47 arnath wrote:
Explain to me how tech lab/reactor swapping is any different than zerg (for example) having a Roach Warren and a Spire and being able to make a lot of mutas and eventually tech switch back to roaches.


keep in mind that in mid game all unit producing buildings will have attachments on them. A (decent) terran player will (if hes scouting properly) build what he needs to counter you, or quickly go for something like teching to banshees as soon as possible to harass which will involve some attachment swapping. either way it end up with have stationary building that most of the time use the same attachment. late game more rax fax or ports will be built to again either counter or instigate, either way, if you scout right you know exactly whats coming.
6 poll is a good skill toi have
thekoven
Profile Joined July 2010
United States128 Posts
September 10 2010 16:04 GMT
#317
This is the most in depth well analyzed thread on Terran imbalance I've read so far. Very well written and to the point. I couldn't agree more with everything OP said. Now if blizzard will just do something about it...
twitch.tv/thekoven
HolydaKing
Profile Joined February 2010
21254 Posts
September 10 2010 16:05 GMT
#318
Best OP in a while. All those things you wrote are fine imo.
crms
Profile Joined February 2010
United States11933 Posts
September 10 2010 16:06 GMT
#319
On September 11 2010 00:39 LuciferSC wrote:


Look how Zerg and Protoss are doing on GSL. They're doing FINE.


you know there are only 4 zerg in round of THIRTY TWO, right?


4/32 isn't doing fine.
http://i.imgur.com/fAUOr2c.png | Fighting games are great
TMTurtle
Profile Joined August 2010
183 Posts
September 10 2010 16:06 GMT
#320
On September 11 2010 00:47 arnath wrote:
Explain to me how tech lab/reactor swapping is any different than zerg (for example) having a Roach Warren and a Spire and being able to make a lot of mutas and eventually tech switch back to roaches.
Zerg has to spend time building both tech buildings. Any time during this, it can be easily scanned/scouted and reveal the Zerg's build plans.

The tech lab is already built. You could be building Marauders with it, Reapers with it, Siege Tanks with it, Banshees, or Ravens with it. And there really is no way to tell.
Prev 1 14 15 16 17 18 20 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 3m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech71
OGKoka 26
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 1290
actioN 917
PianO 185
Leta 163
soO 66
Dewaltoss 64
Sharp 49
Noble 42
Sacsri 16
NaDa 13
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm134
XcaliburYe128
BananaSlamJamma4
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K693
allub198
shoxiejesuss10
olofmeister1
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King28
Other Games
ceh9407
C9.Mang0331
XaKoH 176
SortOf108
Pyrionflax86
Trikslyr23
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick440
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• OhrlRock 36
• LUISG 21
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1309
• Stunt446
• Jankos236
• HappyZerGling127
Upcoming Events
LiuLi Cup
3h 3m
OSC
11h 3m
RSL Revival
1d 2h
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
1d 5h
RSL Revival
2 days
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.