EPTWe won one more battle, few more to win the war
Cross-server play coming post-release - Page 2
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
SoL[9]
Portugal1370 Posts
We won one more battle, few more to win the war | ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
On June 25 2010 18:57 Kantutan wrote: I hope everyone will stop whining so much now. We'll be getting some form of chat channels, clans, and cross-server play post release. LAN is yet to be seen, but I'd put my money on there being something worked out in the end. What's with the hate against whining? I am pretty sure that if it were not for all that whining and complaining, Blizzard would never have made all those promises. And even if they already had plans for this (they stated they had none), they certainly raised in priority. | ||
|
NuKedUFirst
Canada3139 Posts
Regardless, good news! LAN+X Server = My life is finally complete. | ||
|
razed.dead
Australia79 Posts
Still though, saying that the features won't be available at release means they have from July 28 to ~infinity to implement these features which could take quite a while .. but it's still awesome | ||
|
Merikh
United States918 Posts
Only thing that hasn't been confirmed is personal lan option (non tournament based; since you can't practice on LAN at home games might feel completely different latency wise) | ||
|
Nitron
Singapore177 Posts
| ||
|
Sadist
United States7326 Posts
| ||
|
zeox
Norway314 Posts
On June 25 2010 20:24 NuKedUFirst wrote: They said Europe and North American, nothing about Asia is there? :| Regardless, good news! LAN+X Server = My life is finally complete. Those two specific regions were used because of the question that was asked. Of course they are adding Asia into the equation. | ||
|
Boertie
Netherlands98 Posts
Jeeh! | ||
|
jojoleb
Lebanon180 Posts
| ||
|
skeldark
Germany2223 Posts
i dont pay for options that are essential. when we start paying for cross... they think they can take money for everything. so in some years they sell each unit alone. and if you dont have enough money you must play without tanks ^^ | ||
|
GodIsNotHere
Canada395 Posts
On June 25 2010 21:08 Boertie wrote: It seems like blizzard is finally developing this advanced technology that allows for cross-region play! Jeeh! Well you see blizzard used all the money they got from WoW to build a time machine an go back to retrieve the technology from 10 years ago, its the only explanation!  | ||
|
WhistlingMtn
United States190 Posts
On June 25 2010 21:08 Boertie wrote: It seems like blizzard is finally developing this advanced technology that allows for cross-region play! Jeeh! The concepts aren't advanced, but producing a network that actually has consistent playable latencies between continents seems to be. Hopefully they can do it right and set up infrastructure for relays. I don't want every third game to have someone from the other side of the world lagging like crazy. | ||
|
arb
Noobville17922 Posts
On June 25 2010 20:46 Merikh wrote: I'm confused; Haven't they stated all these things before? (Chat channel, Realms) Only thing that hasn't been confirmed is personal lan option (non tournament based; since you can't practice on LAN at home games might feel completely different latency wise) they said in a recent interview youd have to buy diff versions of the game to play crossrealm, and they said we didnt need chat rooms. however after we bitched a bunch they decided to add it in | ||
|
GoDannY
Germany442 Posts
| ||
|
Takkara
United States2503 Posts
On June 25 2010 20:48 Nitron wrote: this is so confusing. First they said they were working on cross realm, then frank pierce came in and said there will be cross realm and the only way is to buy another copy. And now this blizzard poster says they are trying to integrate it, who the hell are we supposed to listen to now? lol Frank Pierce was misunderstood. He was saying there will not be cross region at release so that to play with your friends from around the world, you would need another copy of the game keyed to their region. He neglected to say that once they add cross-region play you would no longer need to do that. This is the blue-post that addresses it. It is from before they officially announced intentions to add cross-region support, so don't get confused by the wording in the post. It just basically explains that they had no plans to formally support it, so what Frank Pierce said was basically the "workaround' unofficially to achieve it. + Show Spoiler + When you read the Frank Pearce interview you will notice that he didn't answer the cross-realm question the way you try to picture it. He was asked directly about a possibility of playing in different regions. We don't encourage it, it is not meant to be a "money grab" and it is only a possible workaround, as while we don't want you to do it, we also are not going to prevent it from happening. It's not like Frank Pearce said "yes, we give you this amazing opportunity and we have a special promotion for you: when you buy copies for all 3 regions, you will get a 2% discount". In our opinion it is not a good way of experiencing the game, but we are going to pass on your feedback. | ||
|
Qkombur
United States23 Posts
| ||
|
Merikh
United States918 Posts
On June 25 2010 21:20 arb wrote: they said in a recent interview youd have to buy diff versions of the game to play crossrealm, and they said we didnt need chat rooms. however after we bitched a bunch they decided to add it in They said that ages ago, then later they talked about how they are working on something after release. It's been rehashed so many times, I don't get how this is "new" news at all. | ||
|
ryanAnger
United States838 Posts
On June 25 2010 20:20 spinesheath wrote: What's with the hate against whining? I am pretty sure that if it were not for all that whining and complaining, Blizzard would never have made all those promises. And even if they already had plans for this (they stated they had none), they certainly raised in priority. There is a huge difference between whining and constructive criticism, and this community, the hardcore players, whines way too much, and it really overshadows the small amount of constructive feedback we give Blizzard. To me, at least, that doesn't seem like a good way to conduct ourselves. | ||
|
Channel56k
United States413 Posts
Call me pessimistic, but my recent experience with Blizzards failure to even recognize it as important in the beginning to me simply spells out an inability to react properly. When this does happen, you won't like it because it'll break on you, not be complete, cost you money, or one of another host of issues. You think they will make it easy.... ok, optimism, thats not a bad thing. | ||
| ||
