| Forum Index > Brood War Tournaments |
|
rand0MPrecisi0n
313 Posts
On April 12 2017 19:36 xccam wrote: Yes another bust into win No zerg wants to take that map to lategame against protoss. What's the problem of camelot in this scenario? | ||
FlaShFTW
United States10253 Posts
| ||
|
Routa
Finland43 Posts
| ||
|
ortseam
996 Posts
| ||
|
coolprogrammingstuff
906 Posts
On April 12 2017 19:38 rand0MPrecisi0n wrote: What's the problem of camelot in this scenario? I've only seen the map, but bases seem spread out, it doesn't seem like the kind of base where you establish one and get a free one, no real center, broad map in general, and the ramps seem quite large which means it's hard to hold a choke. | ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24593 Posts
On April 12 2017 19:36 tanngard wrote: But thats the point. If P follow that logic EVERY time and skip cannons (i'm talking about when P is playing in the blind ofc), Z can just hydra bust him because of it. And then you are dead, so no worries about your economy. Thats why a am asking why dont P do the opposite gamble sometimes? Is it just me who feels this? I'm no expert but I'd probably say that it's better to die occasionally to hydra busts than to do a lot to your own defensive cannoning. | ||
|
rand0MPrecisi0n
313 Posts
On April 12 2017 19:42 coolprogrammingstuff wrote: I've only seen the map, but bases seem spread out, it doesn't seem like the kind of base where you establish one and get a free one, no real center, broad map in general, and the ramps seem quite large which means it's hard to hold a choke. Why is it only bad for the Z and not the P though? | ||
GTR
51507 Posts
 910 is the observer, he also works at afreeca | ||
|
xccam
Great Britain1150 Posts
On April 12 2017 19:38 rand0MPrecisi0n wrote: What's the problem of camelot in this scenario? Who knows if they are right, but the pro zergs seem to think that the easy split map situation makes Protoss very hard to beat lategame. Certainly when I did watch zerg streams in the last few weeks it didn't look good for zerg. | ||
|
coolprogrammingstuff
906 Posts
On April 12 2017 19:44 rand0MPrecisi0n wrote: Why is it only bad for the Z and not the P though? Z usually expands to a natural to secure it with sunkens and it's usually an integral part of ZvP. Z wants more space in centre of a surround than P needs - it's a bit shit. Ramps are pretty good for lurker control, however, but may be hard at expansions where it's just not strong enough. Lurker strong builds in general seem relatively better though. | ||
|
Zera
Lithuania716 Posts
| ||
|
GTR
51507 Posts
| ||
|
gngfn
United States1726 Posts
| ||
|
rand0MPrecisi0n
313 Posts
On April 12 2017 19:45 coolprogrammingstuff wrote: Z usually expands to a natural to secure it with sunkens and it's usually an integral part of ZvP. Z wants more space in centre of a surround than P needs - it's a bit shit. Ramps are pretty good for lurker control, however, but may be hard at expansions where it's just not strong enough. Lurker strong builds in general seem relatively better though. Makes sense, thanks! | ||
|
coolprogrammingstuff
906 Posts
im pretty shit so my analysis could be complete crap though | ||
|
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
| ||
|
tanngard
Norway1325 Posts
On April 12 2017 19:43 Heartland wrote: I'm no expert but I'd probably say that it's better to die occasionally to hydra busts than to do a lot to your own defensive cannoning. What i am saying is that i think we see these kinds of games too much. That is a consequense off Ps predictability following the logic that you described. But i cannot recall seeing a P just suddenly adding 4-5 cannons without information off what Z is doing. Z is hurting their economy too by building hydras, so why not do the defensive cannon gamble when your scout is denied? | ||
|
ortseam
996 Posts
| ||
|
739
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
| ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50601 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
RotterdaM Event
Patches Events
PiGosaur Cup
OSC
SOOP
OSC
OSC
SOOP
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
