| Forum Index > Brood War Strategy |
|
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
On June 21 2009 15:18 Nightmarjoo wrote: Wow the zerg pages are pretty bad hah, I'll try helping. Im with him except i do edit somethings the mods missed, mainly grammar errors lol. But i will start discussions soon. | ||
|
kdog3683
United States916 Posts
| ||
Mystlord
United States10264 Posts
| ||
|
ActualSteve
United States627 Posts
On July 11 2009 17:07 Mystlord wrote: I'd say that C+ level players have a good enough understanding of the game to make Liquipedia helpful to all players. Besides, we haven't really gotten too much involvement in the Strategy section yet. I've mostly been seeing edits in the Progaming and units sections. Besides, you don't have to be mechanically good at the game to know what you're talking about. I only go there for BOs and lingo. 100% accurate, so far. But that is my experience. | ||
cgrinker
United States3824 Posts
On July 10 2009 14:45 kdog3683 wrote: Not to criticize liquipeida but since the majority of use are D-C+ players, with a few exceptions above C+, isn't it possible that the experiences/knowledge we have gained are in fact incorrect? Sarcastic answer first, if everyone was doing their part and reading the wiki to get better at SC then we could tell you to only build Scouts and it would work out since everyone would be doing it! But for real everyone has something that they know about Starcraft that they can contribute. Every time you play SC you work through an idea in your head to improve. veryone has something to offer. | ||
|
ggnet)mOnion
United States72 Posts
On July 11 2009 17:07 Mystlord wrote: I'd say that C+ level players have a good enough understanding of the game to make Liquipedia helpful to all players. Besides, we haven't really gotten too much involvement in the Strategy section yet. I've mostly been seeing edits in the Progaming and units sections. Besides, you don't have to be mechanically good at the game to know what you're talking about. i agree, once you're around that level you have a very strong fundamental knowledge of the game, and what separates C from BA is execution, practice, and teamwork | ||
|
Clasic
Bosnia-Herzegovina1437 Posts
On July 13 2009 04:29 ggnet)mOnion wrote: i agree, once you're around that level you have a very strong fundamental knowledge of the game, and what separates C from BA is execution, practice, and teamwork I also agree. When I was simply a D player not even D+ I knew a whole lot about the game but my mechanics just weren't good enough... | ||
|
deL
Australia5540 Posts
| ||
|
The_Australian
Australia458 Posts
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/User:The_Australian/Ecolings | ||
|
cgrinker
United States3824 Posts
| ||
|
closed
Vatican City State491 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/2483/ludzik2.png) Also, is there any equivalent of the {fact} tag to mark unverified claims? | ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
On July 11 2009 17:07 Mystlord wrote: I'd say that C+ level players have a good enough understanding of the game to make Liquipedia helpful to all players. Besides, we haven't really gotten too much involvement in the Strategy section yet. I've mostly been seeing edits in the Progaming and units sections. Besides, you don't have to be mechanically good at the game to know what you're talking about. Combat-Ex being the exception to the rule. | ||
|
besiger
Croatia2452 Posts
| ||
|
besiger
Croatia2452 Posts
 | ||
|
FaCE_1
Canada6185 Posts
 | ||
|
Ota Solgryn
Denmark2011 Posts
Fx I just found out why hyds dont completely owns vultures. They only deal 7.5 dmg to them and not 10. | ||
|
hefty
Denmark555 Posts
One thing I would really like to see added is information on micro technics. The vulture entry could have details on how to perform patrol-move attacks and how to ensure good mine-laying. I will consider how I can contribute. If anyone out there have some useful information on how to properly micro valks, please DO add it asap! =) EDIT: Just realized there already is a section on vulture micro, only it isn't very obvious how to get to it. Maybe a micro subsection should be standard in race stragetegy overviews? | ||
|
FaCE_1
Canada6185 Posts
On July 20 2009 23:48 hefty wrote: Good call bringing this up. I recently discovered liquipedia (as I recently started playing bw again) and it has already been very helpful. One thing I would really like to see added is information on micro technics. The vulture entry could have details on how to perform patrol-move attacks and how to ensure good mine-laying. I will consider how I can contribute. If anyone out there have some useful information on how to properly micro valks, please DO add it asap! =) EDIT: Just realized there already is a section on vulture micro, only it isn't very obvious how to get to it. Maybe a micro subsection should be standard in race stragetegy overviews? If you use the search option and type search for "micro" the first link that you receive is Vulture Micro The search option is really usefull if you want something in particular | ||
|
n.n.n
United Kingdom8 Posts
Edit: Until then I'm just going to tinker with unclear wording issues, or maybe try and rewrite some bits of the Zerg vs. Terran section, as it's really bad right now. | ||
|
n.n.n
United Kingdom8 Posts
Is there a better way to discuss changes bigger than adding new pages / rewording things? | ||
| ||
[ Submit Event ] |
|
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
Replay Cast
Afreeca Starleague
Shine vs Rush
WardiTV Weekly
Monday Night Weeklies
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Light vs EffOrt
OSC
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
