Why Haven't You Edited Liquipedia Yet? - Page 9
Forum Index > Brood War Strategy |
Julmust
Sweden4867 Posts
| ||
BlasiuS
United States2405 Posts
ZvP fighting 2gate ZvP fighting 1gate-tech I would like to add them to liquipedia, since the zerg v protoss timing guide only has 2 lines about responding to these builds | ||
![]()
Imperator
United States246 Posts
On November 13 2009 06:28 BlasiuS wrote: Hi, I wrote two mini-guides for ZvP, one for defending against 2gate, and one for defending against 1gate-tech. They are here: ZvP fighting 2gate ZvP fighting 1gate-tech I would like to add them to liquipedia, since the zerg v protoss timing guide only has 2 lines about responding to these builds You definitely should. Add them under "Zerg Counter to 1 Gate Tech" and "Zerg Counter to 2 Gate". If the page doesn't exist then create it. | ||
Mobius
Canada1268 Posts
| ||
![]()
Mystlord
![]()
United States10264 Posts
And for the record, Savior's more of the "I'll take some other guy's build but make it 20x better than he ever did" kind of guy. He didn't originate either idea, but he refined it so it became a near science. | ||
Husky
United States3362 Posts
One thing I wanted to change on Liquipedia was the entry about the Devourer. It says it does splash damage which isnt actually true. Before I did a cast of a game I knew had devourers I checked Liquipedia to see if they did splash damage (wanted to make sure) and when I cast that game a lot of people pointed out they actually don't do splash damage. I tested this by making a map with an enemy Devourer and a control group of 11 Mutalisks and an Overlord for my control. After the Mutas were clumped up into one I would fly it in circles around the Devourer. Sure enough they only damage one target while their spores do splash (but not damage). The sentence in question: The Devourer is a rarely used Hive-tech air-to-air unit that requires a Greater Spire to morph from a Mutalisk. It deals splash damage and also applies a unique, stackable debuff called Acid Spores | ||
![]()
Aesop
Hungary11240 Posts
![]() | ||
Mobius
Canada1268 Posts
On November 18 2009 16:39 Mystlord wrote: If you aren't confident about an edit, feel free to put it in the discussion page. When people see your edit, they'll respond and we'll see if your suggestions are true. And for the record, Savior's more of the "I'll take some other guy's build but make it 20x better than he ever did" kind of guy. He didn't originate either idea, but he refined it so it became a near science. thankyouthankyouthankyou! and i shall do. | ||
blue_arrow
1971 Posts
personally, my biggest problem with liquipedia right now is the lack of a neutral tone and the presence of an extremely narrative tone but i'll contribute in whatever way is the most helpful for liquipedia right now i guess | ||
![]()
Aesop
Hungary11240 Posts
On November 23 2009 13:50 blue_arrow wrote: do you think it's more important to add content right now or to improve upon content? personally, my biggest problem with liquipedia right now is the lack of a neutral tone and the presence of an extremely narrative tone but i'll contribute in whatever way is the most helpful for liquipedia right now i guess I can't say I favor one over the other. Both are needed at all times, finetuning existing content and adding new one. Do what you feel is natural for you to do! is my main recommendation. | ||
Radiomouse
Netherlands209 Posts
But as soon as i have a clear grasp of the game i'll hopefully contribute some stuff, even if it were just bio's of players or something non strategy related :D | ||
spitball
Australia81 Posts
![]() | ||
Zapdos_Smithh
Canada2620 Posts
Thanks a fucking lot, I only wasted about an hour and a half writing all that shit to help people out and some asshole removes it and replaces it with shit knowledge. | ||
DyEnasTy
United States3714 Posts
On January 30 2010 09:24 resonance wrote: Some idiot removed/edited a shit ton of info i did for 3 hatch muta zvt. I literally wrote an essay for that and now it's all gone replaced by some D+ level knowledge. Thanks a fucking lot, I only wasted about an hour and a half writing all that shit to help people out and some asshole removes it and replaces it with shit knowledge. Doesnt someone in charge have to "clear" any changes that are made? Shoulda saved your "essay" as well. | ||
overpool
United States191 Posts
On January 30 2010 09:24 resonance wrote: Some idiot removed/edited a shit ton of info i did for 3 hatch muta zvt. I literally wrote an essay for that and now it's all gone replaced by some D+ level knowledge. Thanks a fucking lot, I only wasted about an hour and a half writing all that shit to help people out and some asshole removes it and replaces it with shit knowledge. It's not gone; you can either undo the edit or re-add your information from the history. | ||
Zapdos_Smithh
Canada2620 Posts
On January 31 2010 13:20 overpool wrote: It's not gone; you can either undo the edit or re-add your information from the history. Found it. Turns out one of my practice partners who used to compliment me for my standard play removed all my stuff. Thanks Mystlord ![]() | ||
TheAntZ
Israel6248 Posts
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/Special:Contributions/Theantz for the protoss counter to 2 fac page, wrote almost all of it, made the pic, made the video and for corsair/dragoon rewrote superjongmans guide and put it up there :D | ||
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
| ||
70107
Belgium18 Posts
sorries | ||
HumanGod
Canada24 Posts
| ||
| ||