On July 05 2009 06:44 mO.Palantir wrote:
Anf of course anything can happen ever...but if the better player is in a (clear) lead...one can asume he will win?
1) What does "being a better player" have to do with anything? If that affected anything, shouldn't Strelok have won game 1?
2) Obviously it wasn't a clear enough lead since we're arguing about it.
Not addressing the quote:
3) You can't have two people arbitrarily try to remake the game by hand because that requires them to time their upgrades in a way that is identical to the game at hand. Even an approximation is "off" and being off by a little bit would have a large effect since both sides know where each other is. Toss would be forced to turtle until his upgrades completed, Terran would want to attack soon but has given no indication of doing so in the game at hand.
4) "Toss can't defend the push"- A) That requires Terran to push soon which he's given no indication of. Any delay leads to more energy for the HTs and allows the Arbiter to come out. Also, it'd give time for Protoss to get his expansions set up and build more units. B) Terran would have to guess at which base to attack with his army. Does he go for the relatively undefended expansion or go straight into the main? If he goes to the expansion, does he get cut off by large Toss forces or is there a chance of a larger attack into one of his own bases? It's easy to see which of these is rational when you're a spectator, but being in the position is completely different especially minus all the intel.