TL.net Attack! (Episode 1, 02/24) - Page 14
Forum Index > BW General |
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
| ||
rpf
United States2705 Posts
| ||
R1CH
Netherlands10340 Posts
| ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36362 Posts
On February 26 2008 01:17 lake wrote: You could announce on the forums. There's a million alternatives but you're pretty set on the way things are so lets both pretend there aren't. Why do you have to pick a player from a bunch of spamming retards in the first place eludes me as well. LOL THIS GUYS NAME IS NIGGERBALLS, GAME HIM ASAP. Second 1 good player vs 1 baddish player who wants to be good is not the same as liquibition or replays that are all over the place no matter what form it's presented in Seriously youre so adamant about the way you want it you aren't even maknig sense when refuting my suggestions. The mere fact that you have to sit here and refute suggestions on improving the show that you asked for is telling enough about how receptive you are to criticism. uh, nobody is saying TL attack is trying to be the same as liquibition, that's stupid it's a fun event where people dick around in the game, where the community can participate and where we can be relaxed and joke around all the stuff you are asking for is essentially "make it liquibition2" which is a dumb suggestion because it's a it's not the point of TL attack to be a high level showmatch | ||
lake
Canada150 Posts
What part of a low skilled player getting the chance to play a high skilled player who isn't going play like a fucking retard (incontrol) who can also contribute to the commentating on the game by answering the commentators questions and sharing in some part of the commenting since you know they are the pro. In some set up that isn't just 2 people vent hacking against eachother both doing their best to make the game as horrible as humanly possible as even the commentators themselves urge the players to hurry up and end the farce so the next one can begin When you name it after Bnet Attack you can't blame someone for expecting it to be like the show its named after. Which isn't 3 dorks on vent and 2 retards typing obscenities at eachother in caps and calling it a quality production | ||
Chill
Calgary25938 Posts
| ||
XCetron
5225 Posts
| ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36362 Posts
| ||
Chill
Calgary25938 Posts
| ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36362 Posts
| ||
NonY
8716 Posts
| ||
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
| ||
ATeddyBear
Canada2843 Posts
also learn more about ur damn community. you could've had JUMPER on! (the kid that drove a tour bus over fakesteve during TL race wars) | ||
G5
United States2825 Posts
| ||
littlechava
United States7215 Posts
On February 26 2008 03:59 ATeddyBear wrote: and tomfoolery also learn more about ur damn community. you could've had JUMPER on! (the kid that drove a tour bus over fakesteve during TL race wars) yeah thats what i thought too could have been a second prize for the RW | ||
True_Spike
Poland3396 Posts
I think that this show should concentrate on the "star" player rather than the game itself. Like you said, it's not supposed to be fair - but only the "star" player is supposed to be at an disadvantage; it doesn't make any sense when you make it even easier for that "gosu" to crush his opponents, he's supposed to be doing that without any help at all and handicapped - because he's *that* good. Most of the commentary has nothing to do with the game itself anyway, so "watching half of it", as you said, won't really be a problem. I actually think it would be more fun this way, since you could elaborate on the guest player's play, his build orders (as crazy as they are) and whatever he's doing on right now - making it much harder for him (as his opponent might be listening to the stream) and therefore, more fun for the spectators - as the entire show is much less predictable. Also, don't get me wrong, even if the games were played for fun using silly build orders most of them were just bad. It would all look a lot more fun if we wouldnt be able to see how much the players chosen to play the "star" suck I think that would give an illusion of skill, in some cases, as we couldn't see any idle scv's, messed up build orders and so on. And if they don't suck - lack of their vision would make the game look more dramatic. Dropships, rushes, sunken brakes - nobody could anticipate that coming, it would always be a huge surprise to both the star player and the spectators. Every single game incontrol played would look a 100x better if we didn't have vision of his opponent and everything was concentrated on his play only. I *do* understand that show is all about fun and I *do* think that lack of the guest player opponent's vision would make it much, much more fun as everything would be completely unpredictable. | ||
Luddite
United States2315 Posts
| ||
Chill
Calgary25938 Posts
On February 26 2008 05:14 True_Spike wrote: "Since both pro and player are on the stream, anything we say about either player is heard. There is no way to make it a "fair" game. That's the entire point of this event! Why would you want to watch half a game? The idea is a fun event, not competitive play." I think that this show should concentrate on the "star" player rather than the game itself. Like you said, it's not supposed to be fair - but only the "star" player is supposed to be at an disadvantage; it doesn't make any sense when you make it even easier for that "gosu" to crush his opponents, he's supposed to be doing that without any help at all and handicapped - because he's *that* good. Most of the commentary has nothing to do with the game itself anyway, so "watching half of it", as you said, won't really be a problem. I actually think it would be more fun this way, since you could elaborate on the guest player's play, his build orders (as crazy as they are) and whatever he's doing on right now - making it much harder for him (as his opponent might be listening to the stream) and therefore, more fun for the spectators - as the entire show is much less predictable. Also, don't get me wrong, even if the games were played for fun using silly build orders most of them were just bad. It would all look a lot more fun if we wouldnt be able to see how much the players chosen to play the "star" suck I think that would give an illusion of skill, in some cases, as we couldn't see any idle scv's, messed up build orders and so on. And if they don't suck - lack of their vision would make the game look more dramatic. Dropships, rushes, sunken brakes - nobody could anticipate that coming, it would always be a huge surprise to both the star player and the spectators. Every single game incontrol played would look a 100x better if we didn't have vision of his opponent and everything was concentrated on his play only. I *do* understand that show is all about fun and I *do* think that lack of the guest player opponent's vision would make it much, much more fun as everything would be completely unpredictable. Interesting. We'll think about it. | ||
MorningMusume11
United States3490 Posts
ANyways things liek these are supposed to be fun. The mood is supposed to be chill compared to real matches | ||
mahnini
United States6862 Posts
I like this idea. :O lake should take a lesson on how to give constructive criticism and not sound like a butthole. | ||
| ||