| Forum Index > BW General |
|
hitthat
Poland2342 Posts
On March 23 2017 19:37 [[Starlight]] wrote: I know man, and I wasn't trying to be mean. But the posting window does have spellcheck. In my last case it wouldnt catch the error, I guess  Edit: thx, corrected. | ||
|
[[Starlight]]
United States1578 Posts
On March 23 2017 19:49 hitthat wrote: In my last case it wouldnt catche the error, I guess That's true. And it's "catch".  | ||
|
riotjune
United States3394 Posts
| ||
|
[[Starlight]]
United States1578 Posts
On March 23 2017 19:54 riotjune wrote: Watch out, we got a grammar nacho here. Trying not to be. You 'looser'. I guess we're getting off-track here, and should get back to bitching about an update whose contents we don't know even yet. Back to your regularly-scheduled program. | ||
|
saalih416
19 Posts
On March 23 2017 07:32 B-royal wrote: They won't fuck this up. Do you really think players like Flash, Bisu, Jaedong, EffOrt will switch to a game with a different field of view, MBS, and all these horrible changes? EffOrt complained about having to play on a different OS haha. And if pro's don't switch, their fans won't switch, which encompasses the entirety of Korea, the major instigator for this very remaster in the first place! Grubby doesn't even play wc3 in 16: 9 even though w3arena supports it. Pro's very much value comfort and familiarity. Exactly. I'm personally tired of these libtards that are hoping for the remaster to be what they want apart from the original. People are anticipating BWHD for the hope of it being EXACTLY THE SAME nothing more nothing less. People that want a change to the original already have options! Why are people whining when they can play a SC2 mod with ease!? Seriously, wider field of view, more unit selection... we already have that in SC2BW mods. Don't be a troll. User was warned for this post | ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
On March 23 2017 03:14 Jealous wrote: Loving the condescending tone from you, ZenithM. You ask for an explanation, get it, then get an attitude about the fact that what was presented is incontrovertible. I'm sorry that what I wrote disagrees with your fantasy world understanding of Brood War and what will and will not affect it and therefore what will and will not be palatable for the top-level players and organizers who have kept the scene alive in Korea, as well as the foreign players that have stuck with the game throughout the years. Don't descend to Fayth's level by making off-hand comments about me in unrelated discussions with other people. What are you gaining? Trying to get a rise out of me? Or are you justifying your stance by planting me in the "BW elitist" category, thereby dogmatizing my logically presented arguments by painting me an extremist? I would buy Brood War HD in a heartbeat if the name is representative of what it is: Brood War, unaltered, in higher aesthetic quality. If it is anything but, then I will continue to enjoy BW classic as I have for nearly 20 years and continue watching my favorite progamers continue playing BW classic to increasing viewer numbers and in growing prizepool tournaments without shedding a single tear. Thanks for your concern. I'm sorry for the snarky tone. I already said I actually know screen ratio would change some gameplay situations, that's why I can't really discuss that. But in turn, your argument isn't strong as you think, you haven't played in 16 : 9, and in fact few people have, and it doesn't change anything in the engine, so all you can do is speculate. I don't see how you wouldn't be a "BW elitist" in this discussion. So far, you haven't agreed to a single trade-off that BWHD could make. That's literally the most extreme position you can take in this debate. I know how it goes now, I'm arguing QoL changes like resolution changes to adapt to modern monitors, rebindable hotkeys, which may very well be enough to attract a nice amount of new players (like me, although I don't actually care much about screen ratio), and of course, you will answer that BW absolutely doesn't need new players because it has survived for so long. Fair enough, I won't discuss it anymore. But if you truly hope BWHD will change absolutely nothing, you're in for a disappointment. Edit: I actually almost couldn't tell if the above post was sarcasm or not. I hope you get what you want, BW fans. Which is apparently... BW with 4 times as many pixels? "BWHD" I guess, it's all in the title! That will be $30. | ||
|
Zera
Lithuania716 Posts
On March 23 2017 21:44 ZenithM wrote: I'm sorry for the snarky tone. I already said I actually know screen ratio would change some gameplay situations, that's why I can't really discuss that. But in turn, your argument isn't strong as you think, you haven't played in 16 : 9, and in fact few people have, and it doesn't change anything in the engine, so all you can do is speculate. I don't see how you wouldn't be a "BW elitist" in this discussion. So far, you haven't agreed to a single trade-off that BWHD could make. That's literally the most extreme position you can take in this debate. I know how it goes now, I'm arguing QoL changes like resolution changes to adapt to modern monitors, rebindable hotkeys, which may very well be enough to attract a nice amount of new players (like me, although I don't actually care much about screen ratio), and of course, you will answer that BW absolutely doesn't need new players because it has survived for so long. Fair enough, I won't discuss it anymore. But if you truly hope BWHD will change absolutely nothing, you're in for a disappointment. Edit: I actually almost couldn't tell if the above post was sarcasm or not. I hope you get what you want, BW fans. Which is apparently... BW with 4 times as many pixels? "BWHD" I guess, it's all in the title! That will be $30. Yes, it's all we want. Thank you  | ||
|
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6990 Posts
| ||
|
[[Starlight]]
United States1578 Posts
On March 23 2017 20:21 saalih416 wrote: Exactly. I'm personally tired of these libtards that are hoping for the remaster to be what they want apart from the original. Uhhh... how did BWHD become a liberal vs conservative political issue??? Srsly dude, wtf. The argument's heated enough as it is, now you want to drag POLITICS into it? | ||
|
B-royal
Belgium1330 Posts
| ||
|
Dazed.
Canada3301 Posts
If bwhd is just fixing bugs and increasing graphics, then it quite literally merits the name broodwar high definition. If its changing gameplay mechanics this is just a lazy attempt by blizzard to once again produce an RTS off the back of starcrafts success. Thats some low lying slime piece of shit behaviour. | ||
|
PVJ
Hungary5221 Posts
On March 24 2017 06:57 Dazed_Spy wrote: If bwhd is just fixing bugs and increasing graphics, then it quite literally merits the name broodwar high definition. If its changing gameplay mechanics this is just a lazy attempt by blizzard to once again produce an RTS off the back of starcrafts success. Thats some low lying slime piece of shit behaviour. That's why they'll call it Brood War: Remastered and fuck w/ it like a bad DJ trying to score hot chicks on your annual cringe-worthy high school party. I'm praying to be proven wrong just this once. | ||
|
KameZerg
Sweden1770 Posts
| ||
|
JungleTerrain
Chile799 Posts
On March 24 2017 06:24 [[Starlight]] wrote: Uhhh... how did BWHD become a liberal vs conservative political issue??? Srsly dude, wtf. The argument's heated enough as it is, now you want to drag POLITICS into it? Make Brood War Great Again | ||
|
PharaphobiaSC
Czech Republic457 Posts
 support and chinese got something special for netease client. If you guys expect something more that feel free to but dont be dissapointed, from business side of Blizzard im quite sure its "minimal investment" for potentional profit. Also all of you guys are playing on free servers anyway so there is that. Wonder how that will do for adapting iccup and fish into it. | ||
|
Whiplash
United States2929 Posts
On March 24 2017 07:19 ICanFlyLow wrote: btw theres no way they can make units like the reaver behave the same way as they do in BW. You guys can kiss that goodbye, tellin u now. You are ignoring 20 years of advancements in coding and game development. Where theres a will, theres a way. | ||
|
[[Starlight]]
United States1578 Posts
It never stopped being great. | ||
|
Lorch
Germany3694 Posts
On March 24 2017 07:19 ICanFlyLow wrote: btw theres no way they can make units like the reaver behave the same way as they do in BW. You guys can kiss that goodbye, tellin u now. They don't have to. It could easily run on the BW engine. Halo remakes for example, were mere texture updates and you could even switch between the original and the hd version during gameplay. | ||
|
Jealous
10324 Posts
On March 24 2017 07:19 ICanFlyLow wrote: btw theres no way they can make units like the reaver behave the same way as they do in BW. You guys can kiss that goodbye, tellin u now. Unless they use the same engine but upgrade sprites and terrain graphics? Oops. | ||
|
KameZerg
Sweden1770 Posts
On March 24 2017 07:36 Whiplash wrote: You are ignoring 20 years of advancements in coding and game development. Where theres a will, theres a way. idk, it's modern blizzard. What can u do except be suspicious? | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
RSL Revival
Lambo vs SHIN
Solar vs Rogue
herO vs Clem
Maestros of the Game
SKillous vs Ryung
Solar vs Percival
Maru vs sOs
Lambo vs Arrogfire
IPSL
ZZZero vs WorsT
Julia vs eOnzErG
BSL
TerrOr vs Dewalt
Bonyth vs eOnzErG
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Maestros of the Game
SHIN vs Nicoract
Rogue vs Gerald
ByuN vs Shameless
Cure vs TriGGeR
OSC
IPSL
Dragon vs Artosis
dxtr13 vs Hawk
BSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
