amen brother. I want some funny english commentary besides just crazy people yelling

"DRRRRRROPPPPPPPPP SHIPPPPPUUUUUUUUUUUUU DROOOOOPPPPPPPPPPP SHIPPPPUUUUUUUUUUUU !!!!!!!!"

I understand you my brother...passionate Korean Commentators are for passionate people like South Koreans...they maybe dont keep up with demanding people like you...probably you want something like...sorry but I cant think of such boring commentaries that you might want...
And about Tasteless...I think he is great in his own way...and yeah it would be nice to have him there...to comment for the people that only knows English...because Tasteless is the best you can get right now in English Starcraft commentating...

Physician

United States4146 Posts

December 13 2006 11:10 GMT

#42

On December 13 2006 18:42 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: more complexity more fun is how many many games have signed their own death

Tell that to Chess players. Name one strategy game that through evolution to a more complex form died. When a popular game goes through a variation change, if the new variation does not succeed, it always falls back on its original form. I am a vanilla fan too, but Brood War is simply more fun; and one more race would make me dribble.

Equinox_kr

United States7395 Posts

December 13 2006 11:19 GMT

#43

On December 13 2006 14:31 GrandInquisitor wrote:
I just fucking want a better Battle.Net interface and fixed pathfinding. Is that so hard? T_T

LOL You'd expect Blizzard would update B.Net after 8 years ... -_-;;; so primitive.

Physician

United States4146 Posts

December 13 2006 11:25 GMT

#44

#Equinox_kr

Check the last 3 patch dates in particular. I don't know if you have noticed the massive lack of bots lately.

+ Show Spoiler +

On December 12 2006 09:47 mnm wrote:
http://www.mobygames.com/game/starcraft/release-info

Apr 23, 1998 - 1.01 patch
Aug 24, 1998 - 1.02 patch
Oct 14, 1998 - 1.03 patch
Dec 17, 1998 - 1.04 patch
Mar 15, 1999 - 1.05 patch
Sep 30, 1999 - 1.06 patch
May 22, 2001 - 1.08b patch
Feb 07, 2002 - 1.09 patch
Feb 27, 2002 - 1.09b patch
Apr 01, 2003 - 1.10 patch
Apr 28, 2004 - 1.11 patch
Jun 01, 2004 - 1.11b patch
Feb 16, 2005 - 1.12 patch (new features, updated maps and bug fixes)
Jun 29, 2005 - 1.13 patch
Aug 12, 2005 - 1.13b patch
Aug 22, 2005 - 1.13c patch
Sep 06, 2005 - 1.13d patch
Sep 12, 2005 - 1.13e patch
Jan 18, 2006 - 1.13f patch
Aug 01, 2006 - 1.14 patch (implements ladder, chat and other feature changes, over a dozen bug fixes, and a series of exploit repairs)

Kind of gives us a reasonable, reason, to hope. No?

KrAzYfoOL

Australia3037 Posts

December 13 2006 11:25 GMT

#45

the game itself shouldn't be changed at all, i think it's just the battle.net bugs and simplicity which needs to be worked on.

Night[Mare

Mexico4793 Posts

December 13 2006 11:33 GMT

#46

a battle.net system like WC3 has =)

Aphelion

United States2720 Posts

December 13 2006 12:17 GMT

#47

I think i'm to the point where I'd pay a small monthly fee for a b.net system like WC3 has, as well as an additional cost of an expansion just to fix all the bugs.

LuMiX

China5758 Posts

December 13 2006 14:44 GMT

#48

somoene stated something like 3 marines in a bunker is the same as 4 rines in bunker. does this mean that 3 rines in a bunker kills 1 zealot the same time it takes 4 marines in a bunker to kill it? im lost...

Ilvy

Germany2445 Posts

December 13 2006 14:54 GMT

#49

On December 13 2006 14:48 asel wrote:
7) I want blizzard to kick WGT's ass and start the ladder :/

It´s other way arround ^^

KizZBG

u gotta skate8152 Posts

December 13 2006 14:56 GMT

#50

Tasteless for English commentator!

chiflutz

Romania1025 Posts

December 13 2006 15:12 GMT

#51

Go watch the vids over in the Project Revolution thread and ask yourselves if that's what you really want for SC2 or the future of Starcraft in general. It's a fast-paced, old-school RTS with manual control over everything. It's what's keeping all the 13-year olds that got bored with WoW out. Is that a good thing? 'cause I think it is. Mastering this game is arguably harder than mastering any other real-time strategy game out there.
The tricky part is getting the smarter, more-versed gamers out there in on the game. And I don't think it'll die just yet. As long as friends see you still playing this (to be) 10-year old game they're bound to ask 'what makes it so special?' Some might overcome their need for "leet" graphics and high resolutions and pick it up and play it once in a while. Maybe more often. But it's pretty difficult to keep communities involved without a ladder everyone can agree on being the best. We need that asap. If not sooner.
Oh yeah, and Tasteless needs to be cloned a few times.

Fen

Australia1848 Posts

December 13 2006 16:25 GMT

#52

On December 13 2006 15:08 azndsh wrote:
A more user-friendly lower-apm requirement interface

multiple building selection
larger group size
not multiple casting with a group of casters

Ugh
Go play Warcraft 3. The absence of those things is what makes broodwar such a great game. It makes the game require skill. And rewards those who do have skill.

3. A new race*

*
i)adding a new race adds complexity, more complexity more fun, more strategically depth, and it permits to side step the balance issue, once launched the new race can be tweaked, independently, until it is balanced with respect to the other races (without having to mess with the units of the established races).

I disagree. Theres a limit to how many diff unique units there can be in an rts game. And starcraft pretty much covers them all. If you add another race, all of their units are going to be similar to unit of another races. It will be almost impossible to make them unique. Therefore instead of having 3 totally unique races, youll end up with 3 totally unique races and 1 race which is a hybrid of them all.

The lack of uniqueness this would bring is noticable in Warcraft 3. Knights/Tauren/DruidsofClaw/Abomination are extremely similar units. Grunts/Footmen/Ghouls vary only in stats. Balista/Catapult/Mortar/Meat wagon etc

Bascially every race ends up with the same units that are just slightly tweaked and a different look.

Tezumai

Sweden19 Posts

December 13 2006 19:09 GMT

#53

How about add a "around the corner" feature? Like running the units outside of the map and they pop out on the other side of the map? That would be way cool and lots of cool new strategies could be made.

Hmm, maybe I should make one of those maps? ^_^

asel

Germany1605 Posts

December 13 2006 19:16 GMT

#54

On December 13 2006 23:54 Ilvy wrote:

Show nested quote +

It´s other way arround ^^

Anyway... someone should bleed

nite3

130 Posts

December 13 2006 20:40 GMT

#55

new race = imba game. its is almost teorethically impossible to make balanced game with 4 races and make it totally logical like BW now is...

1. Instead of new race, tweak shitty units (like ghost scout) and BW will get new strategies that will not unbalance the game.
2. Fucking ladder.

gravity

Australia2330 Posts

December 13 2006 21:20 GMT

#56

I agree that adding in multiple building selection, etc, will destroy the game, just like adding in right-click rally-point setting destroyed the game. Oh wait...

Sometimes I wish the SC community wasn't so hopelessly conservative.

Musli

Poland5130 Posts

December 13 2006 21:37 GMT

#57

On December 13 2006 16:17 MaZza[KIS] wrote:

Show nested quote +

amen brother. I want some funny english commentary besides just crazy people yelling

"DRRRRRROPPPPPPPPP SHIPPPPPUUUUUUUUUUUUU DROOOOOPPPPPPPPPPP SHIPPPPUUUUUUUUUUUU !!!!!!!!"

A M E N !!!

Phantom

Canada2151 Posts

December 14 2006 07:13 GMT

#58

if they put in a 3rd race they should make it imba in the beginning to it gets popular, then nerf the hell out of it in later days

Physician

United States4146 Posts

December 14 2006 07:21 GMT

#59

#phantom You said if they add a third race! - lay of the sake man! (much amused)

SF-Fork

Russian Federation1401 Posts

December 14 2006 07:27 GMT

#60

On December 14 2006 04:09 Tezumai wrote:
How about add a "around the corner" feature? Like running the units outside of the map and they pop out on the other side of the map? That would be way cool and lots of cool new strategies could be made.

Hmm, maybe I should make one of those maps? ^_^

I'd try that! Go maelstrom!

Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All

Please or register to reply.

Live Events Refresh