EPTEntropy's SC Wish List - Page 2
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
StimD
Norway738 Posts
| ||
|
mrdx
Vietnam1555 Posts
On December 13 2006 16:18 comabreaded wrote: 3 marines have the same firing animation as 4 so as a deterrant it's just as effective So 3 rines in a bunker, 3 zeals in a shuttle, 3 hydras in an ovie? I'm wondering why they normally have 4 players in an OSL/MSL group. o.o | ||
|
Pressure
7326 Posts
On December:48 asel wrote: 7) I want blizzard to kick WGT's ass and start the ladder :/ | ||
|
Dendra
Croatia801 Posts
On December 13 2006 15:24 Yogurt wrote: just go play wc3... starcraft is perfect because of the number of things you need to be good  don't mess with the game,mess with the servers/friends list/ladder etc. i mean it's a disgrace x number of people can't even host a game and requirements are like pentium 133 :D | ||
|
techn1cal
United States68 Posts
| ||
|
Dendra
Croatia801 Posts
On December 13 2006 16:44 techn1cal wrote: Seriously who wants sc2 in 3d form? i think it would be crap, making sc in 3d makes the game slow paced and more boring anyone agree? i think only ppl that disagree are either 2dumb 2play sc:bw or 2young 2understand they don't have time to zoom in their groovie tank and watch it drive across the map or something else and i can't think of it now :D | ||
CaucasianAsian
Korea (South)11597 Posts
On December 13 2006 16:47 Dendra wrote: i think only ppl that disagree are either 2dumb 2play sc:bw or 2young 2understand they don't have time to zoom in their groovie tank and watch it drive across the map or something else and i can't think of it now :D u gotta admit tho, in replays micro battles would be fricken AMAZING with 3d... | ||
|
QuietIdiot
7004 Posts
| ||
|
Zeller
United States1109 Posts
| ||
|
himurakenshin
Canada1845 Posts
On December 13 2006 16:25 mrdx wrote: So 3 rines in a bunker, 3 zeals in a shuttle, 3 hydras in an ovie? I'm wondering why they normally have 4 players in an OSL/MSL group. o.o I think 4 represents death in Korean culture or Chinese culture | ||
|
KaasZerg
Netherlands927 Posts
On December 13 2006 15:08 azndsh wrote: A more user-friendly lower-apm requirement interface multiple building selection larger group size not multiple casting with a group of casters They did for warcraft. Not sc :c | ||
KwarK
United States43991 Posts
| ||
|
[jOyO]
United States920 Posts
| ||
|
WastedYouth
United States563 Posts
| ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
| ||
|
Mora
Canada5235 Posts
On December 13 2006 18:42 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: more complexity more fun is how many many games have signed their own death that is because they think that complexity equates to depth. it makes me cry. | ||
|
Bub
United States3518 Posts
all i want is all the bs bnet problems to get FIXED | ||
|
yare
507 Posts
The only thing i want for BW is more gamers!! Every month battle.net seems to contract little by little.  | ||
|
QuietIdiot
7004 Posts
On December 13 2006 18:50 Teroru wrote: that is because they think that complexity equates to depth. it makes me cry. Warhammer expansions, C&C....newer rts's.....o man your right | ||
|
SuperJongMan
Jamaica11586 Posts
The world will never know..... for 2 years. | ||
| ||
