EPTBW General Discussion - Page 159
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Gamlet
Ukraine336 Posts
| ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51117 Posts
| ||
c3rberUs
Japan11312 Posts
On October 31 2016 18:13 Gamlet wrote: Thrill Starleague Only found out about this today. The mix of players has a KeSPA era vibe to it. And Soulkey is there too :3 That was quick. | ||
|
LV_426
Poland436 Posts
guys sc:bw hd - early look enjoy | ||
|
midxxnight
4 Posts
| ||
|
c3rberUs
Japan11312 Posts
On November 05 2016 20:50 midxxnight wrote: Is the Terran army 200/200 really stronger than a 200/200 Protoss army? Can you go into depth? like 100/100 and 150/150 as well? Well, if you must know, unless maybe if you're Stork/JangBi , it takes more than one full engagement to clear a max terran army because your stuff starts melting before you even get past the minefield. | ||
|
Cryoc
Germany913 Posts
But if P can get his dream army with carrier/arbiter/high templar/dragoon, I doubt T can do anything. | ||
|
RouaF
France4121 Posts
On November 05 2016 20:44 LV_426 wrote: https://www.twitch.tv/starcraft/v/98981570?t=10h24m10s guys sc:bw hd - early look enjoy you ruined my hopes  | ||
|
FortyOne
Thailand26 Posts
On November 05 2016 20:44 LV_426 wrote: https://www.twitch.tv/starcraft/v/98981570?t=10h24m10s guys sc:bw hd - early look enjoy hahaha goddamn that is cruel. but well played. | ||
|
RoomOfMush
1296 Posts
On November 05 2016 20:50 midxxnight wrote: Is the Terran army 200/200 really stronger than a 200/200 Protoss army? Can you go into depth? like 100/100 and 150/150 as well? The terran army is more positional. In a good position with well set up mine fields and siege tank lines the terran army is the strongest. When caught offguard or in a bad position it is very weak and fragile. I would say terran mech has the biggest power potential but also the biggest variance. A protoss army is quite consistent and less dependent on position but also more predictable and overall less cost efficient in your average engagement. Besides that, it depends on what you max out. 200/200 carrier army will beat everything. (except maybe scourge or defilers) | ||
|
LV_426
Poland436 Posts
| ||
|
L_Master
United States8017 Posts
On November 05 2016 22:49 LV_426 wrote: dont think 200/200 carrier will beat 200/200 goliaths ;> Yea, unless you got a bunch of cliffs or w/e then no chance for the carriers. | ||
|
ProMeTheus112
France2027 Posts
zealot 2 supply goon 2 supply vulture 2 supply tank 2 supply a vulture deals 20 ranged damage to zealots or goons shields, and can lay 3 mines that potentially deal 125 damage or more (say 0-400 or something) a tank deals 70 long distance damage with splash they only have a little less health overall, well vultures half a zealot tanks bit less than goon in this the vulture is particularly cost effective but even the tank zealot 16 melee damage, goon 20 ranged damage to tanks or 15 to vults.. not particularly fast attack rate except for zealots the damage of the terran army is huge, and they deal all this before you can start attacking their weak point (lower health) with obstacles in between, mines and/or buildings. So in the first rounds you will likely just lose relative power to begin with. However you can potentially convert some of this damage to damage to themselves (say 10-20% of the damage) so overall yeah at equal supply the terran army is a lot stronger, not to mention they scale at quite a significant advantage with upgrades as well. They are also more cost efficient. The thing with 100/100 is that you're not fighting it with 100/100 but maybe 120 or something. Because you must have an economic advantage (which you can secure thanks to T having a hard time preventing you from expanding faster than him), and also because their tanks do cost quite a bit more resource per supply. Their upgrade advantage also hasn't yet fully developped. At 200/200 you can't have a 240/240 which would be necessary to fight back (although stasis has potential to mitigate to an extent). Also generally with bigger armies there is less space to maneuver which is to the T army advantage, since you'd want to be able to spread out, flank and rush in to avoid all the splash and get directly to the tanks. It does depend a lot on the type of engagement you manage to make happen. As P you have access to some special tools that can change this situation but it is hard to use or rely on ; DTs to sneak in and snipe tanks or drag mines, reavers to pick at things while they siege or slow down while you build up supply, zeal bombs super cost effective or make him unsiege, or templars. Things is you pretty much need that gas for arbiters (or carriers) not to lose at 200/200 and a goliath or two, or a turret, is effective at denying zeal bombs, so many times people just go for arbiters or carriers asap instead of making them DTs/temps. Reav is good at slowing down T early rather reliably so its more common. If only tanks cost 3 supply  | ||
|
-Archangel-
Croatia7457 Posts
| ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On November 07 2016 08:57 -Archangel- wrote: So Blizzard didn't announce BWHD like I hoped well, we only had a rumour so it's not that surprising. Maybe it's for the best ^^ | ||
|
FusionCutter
Canada974 Posts
 | ||
|
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium7010 Posts
On November 07 2016 16:46 FusionCutter wrote: Well, too bad the rumor didn't pan out. There's always next year and future announcements to look forward to. There is also the original game that is awesome. | ||
|
NickHotS
United States105 Posts
| ||
|
B-royal
Belgium1330 Posts
| ||
|
kogeT
Poland2042 Posts
| ||
| ||
