|
On March 08 2013 03:50 Birdie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 07 2013 22:04 Reason wrote:Stupid question : Where am I on this list ?  Use Ctrl-F to find your iCCup ID. If it isn't there yet, then the script hasn't caught up to the matches you've played in. It's up to about match 3000 out of more than 14000 matches so it might take another day or so to catch up, I'm not sure.
I had a few accounts on the list which are now missing. o.o
|
On March 08 2013 04:54 Sero wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 03:50 Birdie wrote:On March 07 2013 22:04 Reason wrote:Stupid question : Where am I on this list ? Use Ctrl-F to find your iCCup ID. If it isn't there yet, then the script hasn't caught up to the matches you've played in. It's up to about match 3000 out of more than 14000 matches so it might take another day or so to catch up, I'm not sure. I had a few accounts on the list which are now missing. o.o
As I said before, I reset the ranking because I had wrong matches being ranked, so it is going through all the matches again and re-ranking them. They should be all up to date in a few hours.
|
There are 1 game accounts on this list, that is silly. I think you can guess real ELO after 5 games. I won just a one game and im 4ish...
|
On March 08 2013 11:37 bulbasaur) wrote:
There are 1 game accounts on this list, that is silly. I think you can guess real ELO after 5 games. I won just a one game and im 427...
Your uncertainty (the number after the +/-) will be very high after one game. So the ranking is clearly not accurate after one game, because of the uncertainty.
|
So maybe hide low games acc
|
No, because people want to see their rankings :O
Still buggy, because I can see dM-Spartacus has only played 21 games on iCCup but my rankings say he's played 26, I'll have a look for the bug and see if I can find it.
EDIT
Found the bug, fixing now. Hrmph.
|
Hmm I don't appear in the ranking anymore
|
TrueSkill handles uncertainty by subtracting 3 times the uncertainty from the player's mean skill in order to get a "level" representing a lower confidence bound on how good the player is. It works pretty well to avoid over-ranking players who don't play much, and as a side effect works decently for ladders that want to reward players for playing often.
I think the same approach could work with the ratings you're using.
|
This is a really refreshing way to look at ICCup. The ranking has been so off for so long. This will actually make me play even more, thaaaaanks Birdie!!
|
On March 08 2013 03:50 Birdie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 00:02 Darksoldierr wrote:
After line 954 on the site, the table loses its red background color What browser are you using?
I also have this problem.
Firefox
Edit: Sorry for DP...
|
Australia7069 Posts
If you want any help I'm happy to pitch in if u wanna github it and I can add features and bug fix whatever
|
I'll look into the Firefox bug and see what I can do. Till then, use Chrome ;o
I've fixed the matches being double-counted bug, and it's up to something like 12000 games out of the current 17000 so it's not too far off being caught up, sometime tomorrow it should catch up.
Kiante, I can do that but my code is terrible terrible awful looking code, I'll clean it up to the best of my lowly ability before I put it on github.
|
Australia7069 Posts
It's fine dude. I'm used to awful code. i could do refactoring if you want. just throw it up even on a private repository if you're feeling self concious or whatever and I can do some work and submit it as a patch for you to review. got some time on monday as its a public holiday here
|
1 SuperKorean2 2187.73 ± 73 50 43 7
2 SuperKorean 2164.46 ± 86 34 31 3
There's a 23 point difference between two accounts of the same player, at a fairly large difference in games. That pretty much proves that the ranking is working, as one player should end up with very similiar points as any of his alternate accounts as long as he plays enough games to give the system a reasonable amount of accuracy. It will be interesting to see how many other dual accounts end up close on the points chart.
Kiante is adding in a very nice pagination/sorting system, and I'll be adding in stats pages during this next week. I'm pretty busy with university so we'll see how it goes. We may also switch everything into an MVC framework, as Kiante thinks it's a good idea and I should learn how to use MVC anyway, but the external effect should be unnoticed so don't worry about that.
|
Awesome guys! This is gonna be pretty cool  wish I could code (well)
|
I'll start working on this again. It's currently ranked about 31k matches out of nearly 50k so I think iCCup is playing games faster than it can add them to the database, which is annoying.
|
losing rating to 1000 point C+ players is rage inducing
|
can you also make it count map statistics?
|
On March 08 2013 20:27 Birdie wrote:
I'll look into the Firefox bug and see what I can do. Till then, use Chrome ;o
I've fixed the matches being double-counted bug, and it's up to something like 12000 games out of the current 17000 so it's not too far off being caught up, sometime tomorrow it should catch up.
Kiante, I can do that but my code is terrible terrible awful looking code, I'll clean it up to the best of my lowly ability before I put it on github.
Hey, can I volunteer for this too? I'm looking for a side project that's hopefully interesting and involves machine learning or statistics. I don't know how much 'interesting work' you have left though.
|
On March 13 2013 10:23 Cambium wrote:Show nested quote +On March 08 2013 20:27 Birdie wrote:
I'll look into the Firefox bug and see what I can do. Till then, use Chrome ;o
I've fixed the matches being double-counted bug, and it's up to something like 12000 games out of the current 17000 so it's not too far off being caught up, sometime tomorrow it should catch up.
Kiante, I can do that but my code is terrible terrible awful looking code, I'll clean it up to the best of my lowly ability before I put it on github. Hey, can I volunteer for this too? I'm looking for a side project that's hopefully interesting and involves machine learning or statistics. I don't know how much 'interesting work' you have left though.
You can put in any features you want into the github page and I'll look at them and consider adding them to the main source, if you like, but it's not a big enough project for me to be handing out any more jobs than what myself and Kiante already have. Thanks for the offer though!
On March 13 2013 09:23 zimp wrote:
can you also make it count map statistics?
Yes, doing that now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
