• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:36
CEST 21:36
KST 04:36
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru0BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack0Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation StarCraft 1 & 2 Added to Xbox Game Pass
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO8 - Group B Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu BW General Discussion StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread What do you want from future RTS games? Armies of Exigo - YesYes? Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 32201 users

Balance and Bonjwas: A Statistical Analysis - Page 4

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next All
SlayerS_BunkiE
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Canada1707 Posts
March 29 2012 15:01 GMT
#61
was reading this thread; then i ran into this quote and it made me laugh:

"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." - Benjamin Disraeli
iloveby.SlayerS_BunkiE[Shield]
blueblimp
Profile Joined May 2009
Canada297 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-29 17:58:34
March 29 2012 17:49 GMT
#62
I argue that the correct cut-off point for historical results has to be after muta stacking was introduced to the pro-scene. This is different than most innovations because most innovations introduce new strategies and tactics using existing micro techniques. Muta stacking, though, is like introducing a brand new unit into the game. Modern ZvT would be completely hopeless without it and it also tilts ZvP more towards Zerg.

Muta stacking is not particularly map-dependent, since it makes Zerg better on every map. It's also not strategy-dependent, as long as the strategy builds mutas at some point. It's not skill-dependent, since even D players can have better muta micro now than was possible for pro players before muta stacking.

It's reasonable to argue that the popularization of Forge FE is comparable, except that Nal_rA was doing Forge FE before revolution day. Forge FE needed the right combination of maps and follow-ups to become game-changing.

On the other hand, I've seen Yellow doing 2 hatch muta in an old VOD. The strategies where muta stacking is useful existed before muta stacking. It's not crazy to think that Yellow might have won a title if he just knew to group his mutalisks with an overlord. (As a random example I just pulled out of the VOD archive, check out this moment in a Boxer vs Yellow game. Imagine if those mutas were stacked.)

On March 29 2012 14:55 oldgregg wrote:
Ok probably not relevant and maybe no one cares but I just did some averages and for the top 10 peak and current ELO of ZvZ and PvP, ZvZ got higher scores for both, so PvP is more of a coinflip matchup!

ZvZ peak average (for top 10): 2223.9 PvP peak avg: 2194.5
ZvZ current avg : 2125.3 PvP current avg: 2109.8


A progamer (Stork?) said in an interview that pro PvP is more of a coinflip than pro ZvZ.
Savant
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States379 Posts
March 29 2012 18:35 GMT
#63
Lightwip made this thread just to cover his back every time he complains when Fla...I mean Terran wins an SL and every time Bis...I mean a Protoss doesn't. Your argument is that Terrans are statiscally favored towards the end of starleagues by nature of their imbalance, but look at recent results....its the ZERGS who are crowding the top finishes at starleagues, and almost all of them did it with victories in ZvZ's. Not to mention many many of them were flukes and not considered top tier players (Great vs Hydra anyone?). The ONLY terran players who've accomplished anything of note in (recent) individuals are Flash and Fantasy.

All this effort to prove that Terran *actually* has a 2-3% more chance of winning a particular game than some other race. I'd argue that in an important match, the many many other factors involved - skill level, practice, mindgames, map, mental condition, build order, etc. etc. more than muddle the stats to the point that racial imbalances don't matter when applied to an individual's league success. Flash wins because he can harness all factors to beat any player inferior to him no matter what and reach the finals consistently, and if he was Zerg or Protoss, he'd do the same thing. Bisu on the other hand, isn't dropping out of OSL's due to PvP's...





Mortality
Profile Blog Joined December 2005
United States4790 Posts
March 29 2012 18:49 GMT
#64
The problem with using muta stacking as a cut-off is that it took a while before everybody started using the skill and even longer for everybody to master it. Muta stacking was invented in 2005 during the height of Terran supremacy.

Anyway, muta stacking had MUCH LESS OF AN IMMEDIATE IMPACT than netizens seem to think. It's a bad case of selective memory.

Here's the game of an unknown Zerg DEMOLISHING NaDa who was 70% wins in the past 12 months TvZ against THE HARDEST IMAGINABLE opponents at the time:
(see record here: http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/details.php?section=korean&type=players&id=147&part=games&vs=Z&league=standard&map=any&from_year=2004&from_month=4&from_day=27&to_year=2005&to_month=4&to_day=27&action=Update)

That player's name was SAVIOR and he did it WITHOUT muta stacking.
(see video here: http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/korean/games/2081_NaDa_vs_sAviOr/vod)

Prior to Shark inventing the muta stacking trick, it was still possible to group your mutas, for example, by clicking them all over the same mineral patch. This form of "stacking" is what Savior uses to trap NaDa in his base and it's so effective he is able to expand twice AND tech hive before NaDa even moves out.

It was 3 hatch muta into fast 4 base hive (later changed to 3 base hive) that "fixed" ZvT. The importance of muta stacking was that it allowed this style to remain effective to this day.

Forge -> FE is actually VERY old. I first saw it done by {B_Blade]Annippy who was a progamer around 2001-2002. The build started entering the mainstream around 2004 or so and became the backbone of PvZ long before Bisu. In fact, Bisu did not even invent the "Bisu build." It was Daezang. Bisu perfected that style of play, but again, it wasn't really until about a year later that Protoss entered its height as this strategy was perfected.

OLD SCHOOL ZvZ was the TRUE coinflip. In old school ZvZ palyers would go 9 pool (before OL) + gas, 12 pool + gas or 12 hatch. This created a rock-paper-scissors dynamic. If two players were of equal skill, the player with the BO advantage had an almost guaranteed victory, period. In modern ZvZ, 9 pool before OL is no longer used instead replaced by overpool (popularized by Savior) and 12 pool gas was changed into 12 pool -> 12 hatch gas. With these new builds, although BO advantages and disadvantages still exist, at the highest level it is possible to work around them with careful play and a little luck. basically, a 90% advantage got turned into more like a 60 or 70% advantage assuming equal skill.

In PvP things have kind of gone the other way it seems. The issue is the reaver. As Starcraft history moves forward, build orders and midgame strategies always become more and more streamlined, so every scarab counts for more and every injury your reaver or your shuttle takes counts for more.
Even though this Proleague bullshit has been completely bogus, I really, really, really do not see how Khan can lose this. I swear I will kill myself if they do. - nesix before KHAN lost to eNature
Keone
Profile Joined April 2011
United States812 Posts
March 29 2012 21:21 GMT
#65
On March 29 2012 15:48 Lightwip wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 29 2012 15:44 Demonhunter04 wrote:
On March 29 2012 13:49 Mortality wrote:
2) As has been pointed out numerous times, winning a boX is not the same as bo1 records.
If player A wins against player B 2/3 of the time, then the chance that player A wins a bo3 against player B is 74%. Much, much higher.


How'd you calculate that? If A has 2/3 win ratio vs B, doesn't A have a 89% chance (8/9) to win a bo3? (This would be either 2-0 or 2-1, it doesn't change the odds)

Chance of B to win is 1/3, and B has to win 2 games to win the bo3, so (1/3)^2 is 1/9.

Mortality is right. It's a binomial distribution scenario.
Given 2/3 winrate, you have a 74.1% chance of not getting less than 2 wins.

Sorry to jump in with the statistics again...

Let's clear this all up:

Ways to win: WW, WLW, LWW

Calculating A:
(2/3)*(2/3) + (2/3)*(1/3)*(2/3) + (1/3)*(2/3)*(2/3) = 4/9 + 4/27 + 4/27 = 20/27 = 74.1%

Calculating B:
1-A = 25.9%

As far as I know, Lightwip & Mortality are right.
BW Forever. Flash is the Ultimate Bonjwa.
Grend
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
1600 Posts
March 29 2012 21:54 GMT
#66
I was expecting a lot more. Kind of disappointed.
♞ Against the Wind - Bob Seger ♞
blueblimp
Profile Joined May 2009
Canada297 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-30 00:13:20
March 30 2012 00:01 GMT
#67
On March 30 2012 03:49 Mortality wrote:
OLD SCHOOL ZvZ was the TRUE coinflip. In old school ZvZ palyers would go 9 pool (before OL) + gas, 12 pool + gas or 12 hatch. This created a rock-paper-scissors dynamic. If two players were of equal skill, the player with the BO advantage had an almost guaranteed victory, period. In modern ZvZ, 9 pool before OL is no longer used instead replaced by overpool (popularized by Savior) and 12 pool gas was changed into 12 pool -> 12 hatch gas. With these new builds, although BO advantages and disadvantages still exist, at the highest level it is possible to work around them with careful play and a little luck. basically, a 90% advantage got turned into more like a 60 or 70% advantage assuming equal skill.


Thanks for your interesting post. This paragraph is mistaken about modern ZvZ builds though. 9 pool gas (with the pool before overlord, and the gas usually for speed), 12 pool gas expand, and 12 hatch remain the most common builds in modern ZvZ. There are some other builds (such as overpool gas, overgas) but they are much less common.

To ensure that I'm not crazy, I went through the 5 most recent ZvZs and checked builds:
  • Hoejja vs Shine: overpool gas vs 12hatch
  • Action vs Shine: 12pool gas expand vs 12pool gas expand
  • Roro vs Hoejja: 9pool gas vs 12pool gas expand
  • Crazy-Hydra vs Hydra: 12pool gas expand vs 12hatch
  • Effort vs Action: 9pool gas vs 9pool gas

The only unusual build in these 5 was Shine's overpool gas, and the game illustrates why overpool gas is rare, as his zerglings are too late to punish Hoejja's 12hatch.

Edit: Regarding Forge FE, I thought it was pretty well known that Bisu didn't invent the Bisu build (and of course the Bisu build is only one particular follow-up to Forge FE).

If you have a link to a VOD where the muta stacking trick was first used in a promatch, I'd be very interested. I thought the first time it was shown on TV was in Hwasin vs July, since Hwasin looks pretty surprised in that game. Given that July and Shark were both on MBC at the time, it seems plausible to me that Shark could've taught July the trick.
VeNoM HaZ Skill
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1528 Posts
March 30 2012 00:15 GMT
#68
On March 30 2012 03:49 Mortality wrote:
The problem with using muta stacking as a cut-off is that it took a while before everybody started using the skill and even longer for everybody to master it. Muta stacking was invented in 2005 during the height of Terran supremacy.

Anyway, muta stacking had MUCH LESS OF AN IMMEDIATE IMPACT than netizens seem to think. It's a bad case of selective memory.

Here's the game of an unknown Zerg DEMOLISHING NaDa who was 70% wins in the past 12 months TvZ against THE HARDEST IMAGINABLE opponents at the time:
(see record here: http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/details.php?section=korean&type=players&id=147&part=games&vs=Z&league=standard&map=any&from_year=2004&from_month=4&from_day=27&to_year=2005&to_month=4&to_day=27&action=Update)

That player's name was SAVIOR and he did it WITHOUT muta stacking.
(see video here: http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/korean/games/2081_NaDa_vs_sAviOr/vod)

Prior to Shark inventing the muta stacking trick, it was still possible to group your mutas, for example, by clicking them all over the same mineral patch. This form of "stacking" is what Savior uses to trap NaDa in his base and it's so effective he is able to expand twice AND tech hive before NaDa even moves out.

It was 3 hatch muta into fast 4 base hive (later changed to 3 base hive) that "fixed" ZvT. The importance of muta stacking was that it allowed this style to remain effective to this day.

Forge -> FE is actually VERY old. I first saw it done by {B_Blade]Annippy who was a progamer around 2001-2002. The build started entering the mainstream around 2004 or so and became the backbone of PvZ long before Bisu. In fact, Bisu did not even invent the "Bisu build." It was Daezang. Bisu perfected that style of play, but again, it wasn't really until about a year later that Protoss entered its height as this strategy was perfected.

OLD SCHOOL ZvZ was the TRUE coinflip. In old school ZvZ palyers would go 9 pool (before OL) + gas, 12 pool + gas or 12 hatch. This created a rock-paper-scissors dynamic. If two players were of equal skill, the player with the BO advantage had an almost guaranteed victory, period. In modern ZvZ, 9 pool before OL is no longer used instead replaced by overpool (popularized by Savior) and 12 pool gas was changed into 12 pool -> 12 hatch gas. With these new builds, although BO advantages and disadvantages still exist, at the highest level it is possible to work around them with careful play and a little luck. basically, a 90% advantage got turned into more like a 60 or 70% advantage assuming equal skill.

In PvP things have kind of gone the other way it seems. The issue is the reaver. As Starcraft history moves forward, build orders and midgame strategies always become more and more streamlined, so every scarab counts for more and every injury your reaver or your shuttle takes counts for more.

Just as as a note: very few builds in BW are attributed to the right person, SK Terran is one of the only ones that come to mind. And even though SoulKey pioneered it, NaDa is the one who took it to the point where it became a core style in TvZ. Which brings up the huge point of attributing the person who did perfect it. A lot of the times, a player can win with a certain style for the wrong reasons, mainly the whatthefuckbuildisthisi'veneverseenthisbeforewhatthefuckdoidohowdoicounteritwowilostwhatthefuck?!?!?!? factor, more commonly known as the Surprise Factor.
The player who can take a build like that and make it perfectly viable, even when everyone knows it's coming is just as much, if not more, important to the process of making a build.
#1 MMA fan! I like you too Taeja. Still patiently waiting for the Crown Prince to become the King.
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
March 30 2012 00:28 GMT
#69
Overpool was really popular before 12pool expo became a prominent build. Like, around the time when Luxury and Jaedong were pumping out tons of creative ZvZ openings like 11gas 10pool and overgas. Before 12pool expo became solidified all these funky 1base builds had a place, but after 12pool expo became refined they pretty much all became obsolete. Overpool suffered because it couldn't punish 12pool expo, and 12pool expo itself didn't really lose out to 9pool much after people refined timings, so the role of overpool petered out. The coinflip of builds actually became worse since 12pool expo came out I think, because creativity in openings pretty much got shattered and it has pretty much been reduced to 9pool, 12pool, and 12hatch again, with the occasional overgas that has mostly been relegated to a map specific build now.

The main difference though, is that people have started to learn how to make the most out of build disadvantages a lot more now, mostly by studying how Jaedong used to pull out the most ridiculous wins during his long ZvZ supremacy.
blueblimp
Profile Joined May 2009
Canada297 Posts
March 30 2012 00:30 GMT
#70
On March 30 2012 03:49 Mortality wrote:
Here's the game of an unknown Zerg DEMOLISHING NaDa who was 70% wins in the past 12 months TvZ against THE HARDEST IMAGINABLE opponents at the time:
(see record here: http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/details.php?section=korean&type=players&id=147&part=games&vs=Z&league=standard&map=any&from_year=2004&from_month=4&from_day=27&to_year=2005&to_month=4&to_day=27&action=Update)

That player's name was SAVIOR and he did it WITHOUT muta stacking.
(see video here: http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/korean/games/2081_NaDa_vs_sAviOr/vod)

Prior to Shark inventing the muta stacking trick, it was still possible to group your mutas, for example, by clicking them all over the same mineral patch. This form of "stacking" is what Savior uses to trap NaDa in his base and it's so effective he is able to expand twice AND tech hive before NaDa even moves out.

It was 3 hatch muta into fast 4 base hive (later changed to 3 base hive) that "fixed" ZvT. The importance of muta stacking was that it allowed this style to remain effective to this day.


I feel this game actually supports the importance of muta stacking. If Savior had known the muta stacking trick, he would've had a decent chance of ending this game with mutalisks (since Nada built only a single turret), without any change to his strategy. That's why muta stacking is so important: it makes every mutalisk build better, on every map, in every situation. Strategic innovations only apply if you actually use the strategy.
Mindcrime
Profile Joined July 2004
United States6899 Posts
March 30 2012 01:03 GMT
#71
On March 30 2012 09:01 blueblimp wrote:
If you have a link to a VOD where the muta stacking trick was first used in a promatch, I'd be very interested. I thought the first time it was shown on TV was in Hwasin vs July, since Hwasin looks pretty surprised in that game. Given that July and Shark were both on MBC at the time, it seems plausible to me that Shark could've taught July the trick.


No game showcases magic box stacked mutas better than that one, but it's not the first televised appearance of the trick. TL became aware of the trick a couple months earlier:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=40490

I have no idea when it was was first used in a televised game though.
That wasn't any act of God. That was an act of pure human fuckery.
ajmbek
Profile Joined November 2008
Italy460 Posts
March 30 2012 01:12 GMT
#72
99% of you guys speaking vs the original post are really good at understading sc, but have apsolutly no idea of statistic

good job man
Sic iter ad astra
Mortality
Profile Blog Joined December 2005
United States4790 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-30 01:44:09
March 30 2012 01:22 GMT
#73
On March 30 2012 09:30 blueblimp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 30 2012 03:49 Mortality wrote:
Here's the game of an unknown Zerg DEMOLISHING NaDa who was 70% wins in the past 12 months TvZ against THE HARDEST IMAGINABLE opponents at the time:
(see record here: http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/details.php?section=korean&type=players&id=147&part=games&vs=Z&league=standard&map=any&from_year=2004&from_month=4&from_day=27&to_year=2005&to_month=4&to_day=27&action=Update)

That player's name was SAVIOR and he did it WITHOUT muta stacking.
(see video here: http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/korean/games/2081_NaDa_vs_sAviOr/vod)

Prior to Shark inventing the muta stacking trick, it was still possible to group your mutas, for example, by clicking them all over the same mineral patch. This form of "stacking" is what Savior uses to trap NaDa in his base and it's so effective he is able to expand twice AND tech hive before NaDa even moves out.

It was 3 hatch muta into fast 4 base hive (later changed to 3 base hive) that "fixed" ZvT. The importance of muta stacking was that it allowed this style to remain effective to this day.


I feel this game actually supports the importance of muta stacking. If Savior had known the muta stacking trick, he would've had a decent chance of ending this game with mutalisks (since Nada built only a single turret), without any change to his strategy. That's why muta stacking is so important: it makes every mutalisk build better, on every map, in every situation. Strategic innovations only apply if you actually use the strategy.


It seems I am wrong about ZvZ, although I should add that when I said "12 pool gas" I don't mean "12 pool gas expo" but just "12 pool gas." That's how ZvZ used to be played. Lair would follow before a second hatch would be made.

Something else that I did not point out is the benefit of modern muta micro to ZvZ (not just stacking, but in particular the use of "patrol"). This is why if you did not have the economic advantage you had to at the very least severely damage your opponent with lings or else you had no chance of victory.

However, I disagree with your post above. Yes muta stacking would have made Savior even more imbalanced, but the point is that:
1) It is commonly thought among netizens that mutas were useless in ZvT prior to stacking, which is simply not true. In fact 3 hatch spire was a common build, although the particular variant I remember as being typically used was something like expo -> lair -> 3rd hatch -> spire, which was popularized for Lost Temple since mutas are crucial for defending your cliff from a drop. Savior's style revolutionized timings and gave Zerg a cohesive mid game plan that lead to a strong late game. Even without muta stacking.

2) Muta stacking was not the real turning point for ZvT. It was Savior's style. The real problem with ZvT was the timing issues. Trying to get such a fast hive would mean giving up the initiative, but persisting in lair tech would ultimately mean a weaker late game. Savior gained control of the timings, which when you get down to it, is the one common defining feature behind every revolutionary player since mid/late 2002 and onwards, certainly including TBLS.

3) Muta stacking was not perfected the moment it was introduced. It definitely created a skill gap between elite players and non-elite, as was made most painfully obvious by July's thorough dismantling of In_Dove in WCG Korea in 2006, but it took a full year before this skill gap started becoming obvious and it wasn't until much later (in particular Jaedong) that muta stacking showed its full advantage, which played a significant role in re-popularizing 2 hatch lair, which had been made completely obsolete by Savior.

4) In the long run it did indeed become necessary for Zerg's to continue with his style, but that turning point did not occur until sometime after Savior had already switched from 4 gas hive to 3 gas hive that it became a necessary component for success, because until then the main advance had been the streamlining of the timing inherent to the build.

Edit:

5) At the end of the day what's relevant when choosing a cut-off date is that changes that happen that day are instantaneous and universal, so the 1.08 patch really is the only logical cut-off date. Muta stacking was really a much more gradual change than people remember. We didn't go from "lololol mutas are irrelevant" to Jaedong over night. Mutas were always relevant and the true impact of muta stacking took at least a year, arguably 2 years before it was truly felt.

So no. I mean, I disagree with OP jumping to such conclusions based only on the rough numbers because it does not adequately describe the situation on the SC scene, and I do agree that muta stacking, Savior's style, and other innovations make the balance issues of Boxer era Starcraft completely irrelevant. But you can't just choose muta stacking as the cut-off point and say that's an accurate representation of balance either.

There's no reason why that date stands out as being more significant than, for example, 3/3/2007. Prior to Bisu Savior was winning 80% of his ZvP games in brutally one-sided fashion. But again, it took about a year before the full impact of the Bisu build was realized... and what followed from there? Protoss domination in 2008.

But then we could just as easily choose Jaedong's 4 hatch hydra/muta build as a turning point. Or July's 3 hatch spire -> 5 hatch hydra that followed about 6 months later. And again, it took about a full year for these advances to shift the balance. And then what occurred? SWARM SEASON!

So OP did choose the best cut-off date, but what I've been saying this entire time is that Starcraft balance is controlled (mainly) by the metagame. And yes, he's not without a point that Terran has historically had the overall metagame edge for the longest, but that edge came from innovation, not imbalance.
Even though this Proleague bullshit has been completely bogus, I really, really, really do not see how Khan can lose this. I swear I will kill myself if they do. - nesix before KHAN lost to eNature
TheYango
Profile Joined September 2008
United States47024 Posts
March 30 2012 01:30 GMT
#74
While selecting the discovery of the muta stacking trick is indeed an arbitrary cutoff, the discussion does indicate something:

Games that have been played more recently are more indicative of balance than games that have been played further in the past. There are a multitude of factors to this--player improvement, discovery of certain core mechanics, more balanced map design, etc.

The proper way to approximate this is not to toss out games at an arbitrary cutoff, but rather to re-calculate a time-weighted win percentage. Rather than using raw historical win % numbers, it would make more sense to determine a weighting scheme that gives higher value to recently played games.
Moderator
GhostOwl
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
766 Posts
March 30 2012 01:57 GMT
#75
On March 30 2012 03:35 Savant wrote:
Lightwip made this thread just to cover his back every time he complains when Fla...I mean Terran wins an SL and every time Bis...I mean a Protoss doesn't. Your argument is that Terrans are statiscally favored towards the end of starleagues by nature of their imbalance, but look at recent results....its the ZERGS who are crowding the top finishes at starleagues, and almost all of them did it with victories in ZvZ's. Not to mention many many of them were flukes and not considered top tier players (Great vs Hydra anyone?). The ONLY terran players who've accomplished anything of note in (recent) individuals are Flash and Fantasy.

All this effort to prove that Terran *actually* has a 2-3% more chance of winning a particular game than some other race. I'd argue that in an important match, the many many other factors involved - skill level, practice, mindgames, map, mental condition, build order, etc. etc. more than muddle the stats to the point that racial imbalances don't matter when applied to an individual's league success. Flash wins because he can harness all factors to beat any player inferior to him no matter what and reach the finals consistently, and if he was Zerg or Protoss, he'd do the same thing. Bisu on the other hand, isn't dropping out of OSL's due to PvP's...



This is so wrong on so many levels....
Yes, Z did win a lot of starleagues but there are many factors in a tournament(luck, opponent level, maps, etc)
If Flash played Z or P, he would NOT have the amount of dominance he has today. Terran, at S class level, is the strongest race.
blueblimp
Profile Joined May 2009
Canada297 Posts
March 30 2012 02:02 GMT
#76
Very nice post, thanks. I definitely underestimated how much Savior managed to overturn ZvT imbalance without the use of muta stacking, and I concede it's completely possible that Savior's strategic innovations made a bigger difference than the introduction of muta stacking, even in the long run.

That said, I still support muta stacking as an arbitrary cutoff. The reason is that there have been many times in Brood War's history when strategic innovations (and map pool for that matter) have changed match-up win rates. While Savior was one of the most significant, there have been many changes afterwards too. On the other hand, I can't think of any significant micro trick that was discovered after muta stacking. (Maybe Valkyrie micro? That's minor, anyway.)

Since all-time match-up imbalances are less than 5%, then even if muta stacking only makes a slight difference to win rates, the lack of that technique would still be a significant disadvantage to early Zergs.
GhostOwl
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
766 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-30 02:14:54
March 30 2012 02:09 GMT
#77
What is this season/past season's race winrates?

@Mortality: You do realize swarm season was 50/50 ZvT right? The fact that the period the Zergs did the best vs Terran was relatively even doesnt set off any alarms about match imbalance?
moopie
Profile Joined July 2009
12605 Posts
March 30 2012 02:14 GMT
#78
On March 30 2012 11:09 GhostOwl wrote:
What is this season/past season's race winrates?

http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/korean/team-leagues
click on league -> see statistics.
I'm going to sleep, let me get some of that carpet.
shaftofpleasure
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Korea (North)1375 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-03-30 02:22:01
March 30 2012 02:18 GMT
#79
On March 30 2012 10:12 ajmbek wrote:
99% of you guys speaking vs the original post are really good at understading sc, but have apsolutly no idea of statistic

good job man


lol

Why not divide the history of the scene into parts and not take the history of the game as a whole?

divide it into 4s.

2000-2003
2004-2006
2007-2010
2011-present?

or base the division on evolution/quality/balance-ish of maps? Started following back in 2007 but when I watched the older games, maps before were horrendous.
It's either the holes of my nose are getting smaller or my fingers are getting bigger. /// Always Rooting for the Underdog. Hyuk/Sin/Jaehoon/Juni/Hyvva/Hoejja/Canata //// Hiding in thread somewhere where BW is still in it's pure form here on TL.
Infinite Lurker
Profile Joined January 2011
United States24 Posts
March 30 2012 02:33 GMT
#80
I would heavily disagree with the use of pure statistics to view balance. To fully examine balance would require a few things.
1. Examine what makes a unit "cost-effective", based on range, DPS, health, harassment potential and cost. Then determine what the most cost-effective units are.
2. Examine compositions. Which race's units have the best synergy and what are the risks of each unit composition.
3. Build times for units and buildings, transitioning between tech tiers, and the ability to exploit certain timings. For example, whichever race has the earliest exploitable timing windows will clearly have an advantage.
4. Spellcasters and support units (assume jaedong/boxer level micro)
5. Special abilities (i.e. repair, lifting, building warp-in, regeneration)
6. Responsiveness. The combination of a race's ability to be versatile with the each unit (i.e. which has the fewest hard and soft counters) and the speed with which a race can adapt their army composition.
7. Ability to exploit maps
8. Best music

I'm sure there are many more features (SCV IMBA) to consider but I feel like it's impossible to address all of these coherently, and I think that if somebody could, they would find that different races win in each category. As a protoss though, vultures are the only thing i consider when i think of balance. If reavers were that fast I would drop the issue.
"When Song's archon is EMP'd, it becomes essentially retarded"
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL: GosuLeague
19:15
Quarter Finals
Hejek vs Herbmon
Semih vs Kyrie
cavapoo vs TousaN
ZZZero.O60
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 669
BRAT_OK 97
UpATreeSC 94
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 5338
Sea 1756
Dewaltoss 159
ZZZero.O 60
Aegong 52
Sacsri 20
Dota 2
Pyrionflax94
Counter-Strike
fl0m6809
olofmeister3408
rGuardiaN89
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu547
Khaldor176
Other Games
tarik_tv38818
gofns14295
Grubby1618
FrodaN925
Beastyqt638
ceh9617
shahzam255
Mew2King80
TKL 73
ZombieGrub67
Trikslyr52
QueenE46
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream1313
Other Games
BasetradeTV94
StarCraft 2
angryscii 51
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta25
• Reevou 6
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix6
• Michael_bg 3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21529
League of Legends
• Jankos1767
• TFBlade1201
Other Games
• imaqtpie1072
• Shiphtur338
• WagamamaTV179
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
4h 24m
GSL Code S
13h 54m
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Online Event
1d 4h
Replay Cast
1d 6h
GSL Code S
1d 13h
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
1d 14h
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
OSC
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
[ Show More ]
SOOP
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Cheesadelphia
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
GSL Code S
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.