• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:02
CEST 01:02
KST 08:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202552RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams7Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 680 users

[Update] KeSPA Speaks Out On Intellectual Property Rights…

Forum Index > BW General
823 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 11 12 13 14 15 42 Next All
mrdx
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
Vietnam1555 Posts
May 04 2010 03:32 GMT
#241
On May 04 2010 12:04 ShadeR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 04 2010 11:41 DatTheMighty wrote:
I see everyone is just assuming sc2 is going to hit it big as an esports. I think some of you guys are having quite a thin notion of what Esports is. I am sure Sc2 will do as well as Wc3 or maybe better but will it be an Esports? Esports to me is year round multiple leagues with thousands of live fans at finals, two sports Channel broadcasting 24/7 (ogn, mbcgame), while some of you think if it has few tournaments here and there it should be called esports.


Agreed, the perfection that is BW was an accident.

I'm sceptical as to SC2 sucess as a perfectly balanced game like BW

Don't even start this discussion. BW's success was an accident or not didn't matter, Blizzard created it.

Even when an idiot invented something great he still deserves everything from his invention.
BoxerForever.com - the one and only international Boxer fansite since 2006 :)
Seijuro
Profile Joined December 2009
52 Posts
May 04 2010 03:34 GMT
#242
On May 04 2010 12:31 buhhy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 04 2010 12:15 Seijuro wrote:
On May 04 2010 12:04 ShadeR wrote:
On May 04 2010 11:41 DatTheMighty wrote:
I see everyone is just assuming sc2 is going to hit it big as an esports. I think some of you guys are having quite a thin notion of what Esports is. I am sure Sc2 will do as well as Wc3 or maybe better but will it be an Esports? Esports to me is year round multiple leagues with thousands of live fans at finals, two sports Channel broadcasting 24/7 (ogn, mbcgame), while some of you think if it has few tournaments here and there it should be called esports.


Agreed, the perfection that is BW was an accident.

I'm sceptical as to SC2 sucess as a perfectly balanced game like BW

aha
lets meet up
#care


wc3 > bw btw XD


If you truly believe that, then wow... Otherwise, nice troll.

im not saying wc3 was the bigger game in the esports scene, just saying wc3 > bw
u know what that sign means?
Sprouter
Profile Joined December 2009
United States1724 Posts
May 04 2010 03:36 GMT
#243
Another thing to note; There isn't any perceived ip infringement for tournaments (hdh, tsl, wcg, etc.). it's strange why blizzard is making such a fuss with kespa. i suppose it could be that kespa is big money and that's why blizzard is going after them.

another point is that kespa is making bucks while the smaller venues aren't, but that doesn't work. hdh, tsl, and wcg all have sponsors just like kespa so i don't think that point works well. if blizzard is claiming ip for showing starcraft gameplay, doesn't that put all videos of any videogame at risk? blizzard is certainly making some very difficult demands.
Jugan
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States1566 Posts
May 04 2010 03:37 GMT
#244
On May 04 2010 07:48 rotinegg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 04 2010 07:46 redtooth wrote:
i'm actually surprised at the number of people taking kespa's side. just try to remember a time you've heard kespa's name associated with a positive act? they are just a bunch of greedy bureaucratic idiots who are trying their best to stay alive with SC2 looming around the corner.


They may be, but they have now come to represent the entire esports industry. Whether they were idiots in the past or not, there is no chance that the esports scene will amputate kespa and run on its own, so hate it or love it, esports and kespa go hand in hand. Now if what kespa's statement outlines is true, blizzard is asking kespa to hand over the esports industry, and if you ask me that is absurd


It's true. If Blizzard is being as unreasonable as KeSPA says, then it is (in my eyes) that Blizzard is the one doing wrong, no matter how stupid KeSPA has been in the past. Assuming KeSPA's claims are accurate.
Even a Savior couldn't fix all problems. www.twitch.tv/xJugan
zgl
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
United States1055 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-04 03:41:38
May 04 2010 03:39 GMT
#245
Kespa's aces: existing infrastructure (mega sponsorship + players) and possibly government backing + Korean law

Blizzard's aces: SC2 + Bnet2.0

If Blizzard wants to strong arm Kespa (i.e. lock out SC2 from Kespa), then Kespa would be forced to stick with SC1 (not likely) or create their own RTS. Would be a loss for both sides, but probably bigger loss for Kespa. If this happens, we will find out about Blizzard's true intentions as they start working with new SC2 leagues.
Ronald_McD
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
Canada807 Posts
May 04 2010 03:42 GMT
#246
Thanks Waxangel. I bet a lot of people feel kinda stupid about slandering KeSPA in the thread about Blizz ceasing negotiations with KeSPA. I know I do.

I guess reading this gives me a lot more perspective. I'm kind of neutral here.

On this topic KeSPA isn't really trying to wrong Blizzard or anyone, but on several other accounts they've proven to be greedy pricks.

Then there's Blizzard who's just as greedy it seems, and basically wants to turn KeSPA into it's gay man slave bitch. Sure KeSPA fucks around a lot, but I think it's fair to say that they would definitely do their part in bringing success to SC2.

I just hope that the two parties come to a reasonable agreement.
FUCKING GAY LAGS
Fraidnot
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States824 Posts
May 04 2010 03:43 GMT
#247
On May 04 2010 07:46 redtooth wrote:
i'm actually surprised at the number of people taking kespa's side. just try to remember a time you've heard kespa's name associated with a positive act? they are just a bunch of greedy bureaucratic idiots who are trying their best to stay alive with SC2 looming around the corner.


Battered housewife syndrome.
cartoon]x
Profile Joined March 2010
United States606 Posts
May 04 2010 03:43 GMT
#248
On May 04 2010 07:36 Adron wrote:
hmm, looks like blizzard woke up and eecided it wanted a piece of the pie Kespa baked.
Or am i way off here?

sounds like you hit the nail on the head
It is not enough to conquer; one must learn to seduce.
zgl
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
United States1055 Posts
May 04 2010 03:44 GMT
#249
I wouldn't give any credit to what either side claims the terms are... unless they release the official documents or "meetings" (i.e. not likely).
NeuralVibe
Profile Joined April 2009
Singapore13 Posts
May 04 2010 03:45 GMT
#250
Oh well ... As far as how I see it, there is an ideal solution to all of this problem.

Korea continues their BW Proscene. Majority sticks to playing SC:BW instead of SC2.
1) All the progamers can continue plying their trade.
2) All the infrastructure can continue unhindered.
3) The casual gamers might play around abit with SC2, but the truly hardcore fans would still stick to what they have grown to love for the past few years.

The rest of the world can start to develop the SC2 proscene.
1) From all the beta tournaments etc, there seems to be promise in this area.
2) Blizzard can have total monopoly of the international E-sports development through their new Bnet.
3) Foreigners will have a chance to start winning.

Why must everyone assume immediately that its a case of either/or?

True that theres lots of assumptions in the above, but from what I see, perhaps thats what the koreans are thinking too, with their 18+ rating on SC2. It's quite a good move in my opinion.
Win-Win.



my 2cent worth.

True freedom is not being able to say yes to everything, but being able to say no to anything.
Jugan
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States1566 Posts
May 04 2010 03:47 GMT
#251
On May 04 2010 12:32 mrdx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 04 2010 12:04 ShadeR wrote:
On May 04 2010 11:41 DatTheMighty wrote:
I see everyone is just assuming sc2 is going to hit it big as an esports. I think some of you guys are having quite a thin notion of what Esports is. I am sure Sc2 will do as well as Wc3 or maybe better but will it be an Esports? Esports to me is year round multiple leagues with thousands of live fans at finals, two sports Channel broadcasting 24/7 (ogn, mbcgame), while some of you think if it has few tournaments here and there it should be called esports.


Agreed, the perfection that is BW was an accident.

I'm sceptical as to SC2 sucess as a perfectly balanced game like BW

Don't even start this discussion. BW's success was an accident or not didn't matter, Blizzard created it.

Even when an idiot invented something great he still deserves everything from his invention.


A lot of people invented things or created theories and don't get a single ounce of credit for it.
Even a Savior couldn't fix all problems. www.twitch.tv/xJugan
Captain Peabody
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3102 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-05-04 03:55:02
May 04 2010 03:50 GMT
#252
Based on what? I'm almost certain blizzard doesn't have the intellectual property rights to secondary products and will lose if there is litigation.


I'm not sure you understand what the US law on "intellectual property" is. Blizzard in theory at least owns the Starcraft universe itself, all of the races, characters, and units, in the same way Walt Disney owns Mickey Mouse. If I make a map that has a slightly larger Zealot that shoots lasers out of his eyes, the map may be mine, but Blizzard still owns the Zealot, and thus I can't make any money off that map without Blizzard's express permission, in the same way that I can't make money selling a book about Mickey Mouse without Walt Disney's permission.

At least in terms of US law (NOTE: THIS IS IMPORTANT), the holding company has a great deal of control over their intellectual properties; Disney has even gone so far in the past as to sue day-care centers that have used their characters promotionally without permission. In the case of Disney, NO ONE is allowed to use their IP and profit off of it without their direct control and oversight.

Basically, from Blizzard's point of view, Kespa has been profiting off their IP for years by using the artwork, units, and even sound clips in all kinds of ways to promote their own events and in conjunction with all kinds of sponsors. As an example, just take a look at some of the recent Korean Air OSL commercials featuring Hydralisks, Dark Templar, and even sound-clips from the game itself; under at the very least US law, these commercials would almost definitely require direct authorization by Blizzard. Blizzard has basically let this slide, to a large extent simply because they weren't using or focusing on the Starcraft IP at all at that time, being engaged in the massive WoW endeavor.

However, with the release of SC2, the SC IP is going to be back in the public eye in a big way, continuing hopefully for many years to come. Now, they're trying to reassert their control over their intellectual property, so that they can control how their trademarks, logos, etc are used and with whom they are associated.

Understand that for Blizzard, this is much less about Starcraft 2 the GAME and much more about the IP and trademarks involved; the name, characters, universe, units, art, etc. Blizzard wants to control exactly how these things are used by other companies to make a profit.

In this way, it's not really about money in the most immediate sense (though of course it is in a larger sense); royalties are certainly a part of it, but the most important thing Blizzard wants is CONTROL. It's really all about image for Blizzard. They want to protect and guard their image and the image of their products from anything that might tarnish that image in any way.

Bad publicity is a big deal in industries like this; Blizzard gets a very large portion of its sales based solely on the Blizzard image and logo, on their reputation for quality and professionalism, and SC2 is going to make most of its sales based solely on the Starcraft IP and image. It's understandable that Blizzard would want to be in a position to decide what gets associated with that image, and what doesn't, and what that image is used to represent.

However, Blizzard really does seem to want e-sports to flourish; for one thing, done right it's an amazing marketing tool, as the success of SC1 in Korea shows pretty clearly. It promotes and gets their IP out there in a way that few other things do; and if run professionally in a way worthy of the name "E-SPORTS," it makes their image even more prestigious, leading to more sales.
As Mike Morhaime said, Blizzard is not into E-SPORTS as a direct money-making tool, but as a marketing tool.

However, Blizzard wants e-sports done in such a way that they can still control how their IP is used. In Korea, they want a business partner that will basically run e-sports for them, but still allow them the ultimate say on what gets associated with the IP, and what doesn't. Basically, they want to be in such a position that if the OSL got sponsored by a strip club or slave-labor using corporation, they could veto that; or if the players are being treated poorly (which would lead to bad press and a tarnishing of the image of SC as related to child labor, etc), they want to be able to change that; and they want to be able to take an active hand in preventing and prosecuting things like the match-fixing scandal, things that tarnish the image of Starcraft and Blizzard.

Image has always been VERY important to Blizzard, and it's very important to guys like Mike Morhaime. And, like it or not, Blizzard wants to be able to protect that image and control how it gets used, even in the realm of E-SPORTS.

And above all, regardless of what they've done to promote the popularity and profitability of e-sports, Kespa has had a HUGE image problem. Things like the "pp" scandals, the massive "free agency" scrap, and now the match-fixing scandal are EXACTLY the kinds of things Blizzard doesn't want to be associated with the name of Starcraft in consumers' minds.

From Blizzard's point of view, they absolutely can't just let Kespa have free reign over e-sports if it would mean even a single additional incident like the ones above...especially since (as they've done so far in Beta and have said they will continue to do and expand upon in the future) they plan to be aggressively promoting SC2 e-sports events to the general public through their websites, media, etc. And, really, there's no reason to expect Kespa to be any different than they have been in the future...

As the article shows, Kespa is perfectly willing to pay fees to Blizzard, so long as they're basically left alone to do whatever they want; but this is exactly what Blizzard won't allow, and it's exactly why they're trying to exercise more control over e-sports in the first place.

In other words, this conflict really cannot be resolved given the positions of the two sides. This could go into legal arbitration (in which case, not knowing ANYTHING about Korean laws concerning IP and copyright, I have no idea what would happen)...but more likely, Blizzard will simply allow Kespa to keep using SC1 and seek another, more cooperative, partner for SC2. There's a looooot of risk involved for both sides if they go to court; and I don't think either side will want to risk it.

But allowing Kespa to use the SC2 IP without oversight is something that Blizzard is never going to be willing to do...and accepting that kind of oversight is almost definitely something that Kespa, used to years of benign neglect from Blizzard, is not going to be willing to do.

Begun, the E-SPORT War has...

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

Addendum: People complaining about Blizzard wanting to audit Kespa's finances don't know what they're talking about. This is simply another way for Blizzard to exercise control over their image; they don't want to be associated with any company that might not be totally above-the-board or honest. It's pretty standard for companies entering business partnerships to audit each other's finances...and like it or not, this is the relationship Blizzard is envisioning with Kespa. The one-year thing is also just Blizzard not wanting to commit themselves indefinitely to partnership with any one company. It probably also reflects their doubts about Kespa's capacity to manage the game.
Dies Irae venit. youtube.com/SnobbinsFilms
SkyLegenD
Profile Joined February 2010
United States304 Posts
May 04 2010 03:53 GMT
#253
serously, without KeSPA SC would be NOTHING.
"Victory belongs to the most persevering." - Napoleon Bonaparte
TwoToneTerran
Profile Joined March 2009
United States8841 Posts
May 04 2010 03:56 GMT
#254
Without SC Kespa would be nothing. That's an entire non-issue. The two are symbiotic entities.
Remember Violet.
shinosai
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1577 Posts
May 04 2010 03:56 GMT
#255
On May 04 2010 12:47 Jugan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 04 2010 12:32 mrdx wrote:
On May 04 2010 12:04 ShadeR wrote:
On May 04 2010 11:41 DatTheMighty wrote:
I see everyone is just assuming sc2 is going to hit it big as an esports. I think some of you guys are having quite a thin notion of what Esports is. I am sure Sc2 will do as well as Wc3 or maybe better but will it be an Esports? Esports to me is year round multiple leagues with thousands of live fans at finals, two sports Channel broadcasting 24/7 (ogn, mbcgame), while some of you think if it has few tournaments here and there it should be called esports.


Agreed, the perfection that is BW was an accident.

I'm sceptical as to SC2 sucess as a perfectly balanced game like BW

Don't even start this discussion. BW's success was an accident or not didn't matter, Blizzard created it.

Even when an idiot invented something great he still deserves everything from his invention.


A lot of people invented things or created theories and don't get a single ounce of credit for it.


Yeah, that's true. But those people aren't corporations with deep pockets. =0 In the US though it was only recently that inventors and researchers actually get any credit, never mind getting paid. You'd think that if you helped research technology that saves millions of lives medically, you'd be one of the richest people in the country. Not so true as it turns out.

Ok, aside from that little diversion, Blizzard has deep pockets. I'm pretty sure they will get what they deserve and more.
Be versatile, know when to retreat, and carry a big gun.
RyanS
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States620 Posts
May 04 2010 03:57 GMT
#256
This all started from GOMtv having a tournament and Blizzard enjoying what they did and giving them prize money. Such childish stuff.
heyitsme
Profile Joined June 2008
153 Posts
May 04 2010 03:58 GMT
#257
I love it when people say that Blizzard doesn't need KeSPA... if Blizz truly doesn't need KeSPA then why would they be negociating with them in the first place?

One big thing about esports is that you need an audience, and the only place where you'll find a real one for SC is S.Korea. Outside the only followers you'll get is mostly people that are actually playing or have already played the game. There's already an infrastructure in SK, and Blizz won't be able to pierce through the market if they don't go through the platform that is already there which is KeSPA, mainly because the organization controls esports in all of its most important aspects : Teams, TV channels and sponsors.

SC2 is already having issues in SK because of the ''adult only'' rating it might get. Do you think that an AO rated game will be broadcast 24/7 in all sorts of programs? There's no way an american based company will be able to lobby SC2 out of this without having at least a Korean partner taking interest in that business... so what about the major video game channels MBC and OGN? Sorry bud, they're part of KeSPA. So what about a major S.Korean corporation that could also sponsor our events like SK or Samsung?

You guys see where Blizzard is going without KeSPA?
RoosterSamurai
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Japan2108 Posts
May 04 2010 04:00 GMT
#258
E-sports was what made me get back into starcraft in the first place. Both e-sports, and HDstarcraft. If they pull the plug on KeSPA, I am going to be very disappointed. It's like Blizzard is pulling a Microsoft on Korea.
Scarecrow
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Korea (South)9172 Posts
May 04 2010 04:01 GMT
#259
On May 04 2010 07:44 SichuanPanda wrote:
Seems to me that Blizzard wants KeSPA to stop broadcasting Brood War to coincide with StarCraft 2 Release....

I'm boycotting all future blizzard products including SC2 if this happens.
Yhamm is the god of predictions
FraCuS
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States1072 Posts
May 04 2010 04:04 GMT
#260
my life for broodwar.
Apink/Girl's Day/miss A/IU/Crayon Pop/Sistar/Exo K :D l Kpop and Kdrama Enthusiast
Prev 1 11 12 13 14 15 42 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 11h 58m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 211
Nina 145
StarCraft: Brood War
Sexy 15
ivOry 7
Dota 2
monkeys_forever889
League of Legends
Dendi1030
syndereN170
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1659
Stewie2K1102
Super Smash Bros
Liquid`Ken47
AZ_Axe1
Other Games
summit1g10656
tarik_tv4856
ViBE196
C9.Mang0147
ToD78
PPMD49
Day[9].tv18
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 88
• davetesta41
• musti20045 35
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 56
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21315
League of Legends
• TFBlade529
Other Games
• imaqtpie1647
• Shiphtur418
• Day9tv18
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
11h 58m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
14h 58m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 10h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 14h
CSO Cup
1d 16h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 18h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.