On October 29 2008 04:52 Spike wrote:
meh, the whole show was made on the cheap.
Same cut scenes and battle visuals over and over.
I think the main director/writer? left after the second season and the show became much more episodic in nature.
Liked the premise of the show but the execution was horrible.
Don't know how anyone can compare star trek/stargate to andromeda.
Star Trek/Stargate was much lighter compared to Andromeda which had a much more serious tone. The technobable and "space battles" in trek, and especially stargate, just became so absurd and unrealistic (yes, unrealistic close range pew pew laser space battles).
Comparing Andromeda to Battlestar Galactica would be much more appropriate; in which case, BSG >>>> Andromeda.
meh, the whole show was made on the cheap.
Same cut scenes and battle visuals over and over.
I think the main director/writer? left after the second season and the show became much more episodic in nature.
Liked the premise of the show but the execution was horrible.
Don't know how anyone can compare star trek/stargate to andromeda.
Star Trek/Stargate was much lighter compared to Andromeda which had a much more serious tone. The technobable and "space battles" in trek, and especially stargate, just became so absurd and unrealistic (yes, unrealistic close range pew pew laser space battles).
Comparing Andromeda to Battlestar Galactica would be much more appropriate; in which case, BSG >>>> Andromeda.
ill try BSG thanks!
edit - watching serenity now. :D