EPTNinazerg Rising - Page 2
| Blogs > Epishade |
|
fluffy_pylon
United States79 Posts
| ||
|
ninazerg
United States7291 Posts
On May 02 2015 06:43 fluffy_pylon wrote: dude, ninazerg is a hot babe. I am legitimately scared for my life right now. | ||
|
Skynx
Turkey7150 Posts
On May 02 2015 06:43 fluffy_pylon wrote: dude, ninazerg is a hot babe. This is how its done on TL, just saying. | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On May 01 2015 23:47 helpman169 wrote: If anyone is interested, this is the original paper from Sokal that was published in the academic journal Social Text. Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity In this paper, Sokal proves that quantum gravity is a social construct. This caused a huge uproar because it lead huge parts of academia ad absurdum. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair That's hilarious. :D Not surprising, but hilarious! So is philosophy the social science of social sciences, in the sense that other social sciences find philosophy not really serious and full of hippies? | ||
|
WonnaPlay
Netherlands912 Posts
wow hahaha, I have spent the past hour viewing all related topics to that now! What awesomeness | ||
|
ninazerg
United States7291 Posts
On May 02 2015 09:55 Cascade wrote: That's hilarious. :D Not surprising, but hilarious! So is philosophy the social science of social sciences, in the sense that other social sciences find philosophy not really serious and full of hippies? I'm not a scientist, but I think philosophy, especially abstract philosophy, is pretty close to being worthless. I dunno, I had this discussion before, and some philosophy-supporters got pretty mad at me. | ||
|
helpman169
28 Posts
| ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On May 02 2015 15:15 helpman169 wrote: Bringing to the attention of philosophers that philosophy is worthless is like stirring up a hornets nest. Soon you will find yourself doing philosophy with philosophers about the usefulness of philosophy. Yes, that's more or less what I'd guess as well, and I have no desire to go there. Which is why I phrased the question towards the other social sciences, not towards the philosophers themselves.  | ||
|
helpman169
28 Posts
On May 02 2015 17:04 Cascade wrote: Yes, that's more or less what I'd guess as well, and I have no desire to go there. Which is why I phrased the question towards the other social sciences, not towards the philosophers themselves. Ah now I get it. I'm fine with social sciences as long as they stay descriptive by merely presenting collected data. Knowing that half the population is obese may be of some value for example. It gets problematic when they start interpreting the data and shit gets really real when it turns into "social critique" and "symbolism". Then I honestly don't see how they differentiate themselves from philosophy. | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On May 02 2015 17:30 helpman169 wrote: Ah now I get it. I'm fine with social sciences as long as they stay descriptive by merely presenting collected data. Knowing that half the population is obese may be of some value for example. It gets problematic when they start interpreting the data and shit gets really real when it turns into "social critique" and "symbolism". Then I honestly don't see how they differentiate themselves from philosophy. I'd also be fine with social science (psychology, economy, teaching and learning, political sciences, history, etc) if they'd do the science properly. But well, you know...  For the record, I'd group obesity in medicine, which I wouldn't really call social science (although medicine share some issues with social sciences).Anyway, I'm curious to know if those sciences look down a bit on philosophy in the same way that the natural sciences look down on the social sciences. Hopefully without going into a debate on whether it's motivated or not, but we'll see. :o | ||
|
helpman169
28 Posts
| ||
|
JieXian
Malaysia4677 Posts
On May 02 2015 15:15 helpman169 wrote: Bringing to the attention of philosophers that philosophy is worthless is like stirring up a hornets nest. Soon you will find yourself doing philosophy with philosophers about the usefulness of philosophy. hahaha shit is getting serious | ||
|
fred1
4 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/general/484602-the-philosophy-of-social-structures | ||
|
Glowsphere
United States170 Posts
On May 04 2015 17:02 fred1 wrote: Ninazerg's seed has spread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/general/484602-the-philosophy-of-social-structures She is the disciple of another in this venerable new style. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
ninazerg
United States7291 Posts
On May 07 2015 04:55 Alakaslam wrote: You can't travel back in time yet I already sent my first D-mail. | ||
| ||
