Why you shouldn't qq about girls - Page 8

On October 11 2012 11:15 Shady Sands wrote:

would you want your daughter to marry a crime lord?

On October 11 2012 11:48 targ wrote:
I think what the dude means is like this:

If you get plenty of money and social respectability:

you may not necessarily get the girl you want

not EVERY girl will be attracted

but you will definitely get SOME girls.

More of a matter of probability increasing.

On October 11 2012 11:52 Artok wrote:

Depends on mine, or father's stance, if he's in the same sphere, why not, it's way more respectable choice than basic civil service ;O Actually, it probably is better no matter what.

On October 11 2012 11:53 Shady Sands wrote:

yep, and you will get more girls than if you tried to focus on being a caring and understanding guy. it's sad, but true

On October 10 2012 06:00 Kalingingsong wrote:
my lords I have a brilliant plan:

men's weakness = sex
women's weakness = power+money

so as men we should flip the table by Faking power+money. Get their sex, then escape like a biotch.

specific plan:

1) get a bunch of guys together, pool their cash to buy a really fancy car (or a fancy suit etc)
2) get 1 guy to drive it out and pretend to be rich (don't tell people you only paid for 1% of it)
3) take people back to the hotel, promise them wealth and riches
4) bang them then escape
5) next day ==> give car to next person in the group <== repeat for 2nd guy and so on
6) after a short while ==> sell car and get new one (so people don't start recognizing it) <== repeat

On October 11 2012 11:58 Artok wrote:

Guaranteed economically safe future sounds way better than act of kindness at this moment, no matter how you look at it.

and the real stupid part was that the guyfriend girl #2 brought along was still paying for all her drinks even though we knew he was just a $300k/yr working stiff. poor bloke, she only kept him around for 2 months...

On October 11 2012 12:02 Kalingingsong wrote:


jesus christ lol,

question: are these girls worth the money? can't you get similar quality goods/women somewhere else in the market for cheaper?

or is it not about the women themselves? and its really just about bragging rights (in which case its really just spending money so one can brag about how much they spent).

On October 11 2012 12:15 Shady Sands wrote:
basically, if a girl says she wants to marry you out of love, she should have no problem completely separating your economic interests from hers with a firewall of solid pre-nup clauses including pre-nup net worth assessments, renewal clauses, pre-determined child support and alimony payments (before your career advances), and most critically, exclusion of the spouse from any estate planning. otherwise she's being a hypocrite

On October 11 2012 12:11 Shady Sands wrote:

i honestly wish i knew, but i think it goes back to that "man as a provider" theory. deep down inside, hardcoded into male DNA, guys get off when they play this role

with changing views on gender, that's obsolete. what's also obsolete imo is the traditional notion of marriage--once it was a forever binding economic commitment--now it's something different. that's why i align myself with radical feminists here when i say that concomitant with gender equality, society should embrace a fairer and more flexible view on marriage (prenups and renewal clauses). unfortunately that male urge to provide is something that needs to be overcome in order to make this change happen

On October 11 2012 14:48 RavenLoud wrote:
I thought this was popular generalized knowledge, I wonder why this is a two stars.

So instead of qqing about le femme, just learn the hustle instead

On October 11 2012 17:27 nojok wrote:

Did my brower messed up & translated a bit of the sentence? "Le femme" sounds so shemale.

On October 11 2012 22:30 HwangjaeTerran wrote:
That graph is on to something, and with something I mean misogyny.

To be serious (and honest) for a moment, I think you are bound to suffer if you think your happiness is connected to the need of having someone in your life.

On October 11 2012 23:10 Kalingingsong wrote:


some people do get lucky, I have a couple of friends who are in a situation where:

the guy is needy, but they end up getting together with a girl who is also needy. and they just happily obsess about eachother all day.

On October 11 2012 23:18 Shady Sands wrote:

ah the yoko and john couple.

don't worry you'll probably go through one or two of those relationships in your life as well