| Blogs > Shady Sands |
|
Artok
Netherlands2219 Posts
On October 11 2012 11:15 Shady Sands wrote: would you want your daughter to marry a crime lord? Depends on mine, or father's stance, if he's in the same sphere, why not, it's way more respectable choice than basic civil service ;O Actually, it probably is better no matter what. | ||
|
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
On October 11 2012 11:48 targ wrote: I think what the dude means is like this: If you get plenty of money and social respectability: you may not necessarily get the girl you want not EVERY girl will be attracted but you will definitely get SOME girls. More of a matter of probability increasing. yep, and you will get more girls than if you tried to focus on being a caring and understanding guy. it's sad, but true | ||
|
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
On October 11 2012 11:52 Artok wrote: Depends on mine, or father's stance, if he's in the same sphere, why not, it's way more respectable choice than basic civil service ;O Actually, it probably is better no matter what. right, but for the vast majority of parents it's not something they want, unless the government is totally fucked up from where they live. | ||
|
Artok
Netherlands2219 Posts
On October 11 2012 11:53 Shady Sands wrote: yep, and you will get more girls than if you tried to focus on being a caring and understanding guy. it's sad, but true Guaranteed economically safe future sounds way better than act of kindness at this moment, no matter how you look at it. | ||
|
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
On October 10 2012 06:00 Kalingingsong wrote: my lords I have a brilliant plan: men's weakness = sex women's weakness = power+money so as men we should flip the table by Faking power+money. Get their sex, then escape like a biotch. specific plan: 1) get a bunch of guys together, pool their cash to buy a really fancy car (or a fancy suit etc) 2) get 1 guy to drive it out and pretend to be rich (don't tell people you only paid for 1% of it) 3) take people back to the hotel, promise them wealth and riches 4) bang them then escape 5) next day ==> give car to next person in the group <== repeat for 2nd guy and so on 6) after a short while ==> sell car and get new one (so people don't start recognizing it) <== repeat actually, a couple of short order cooks once did this there were about eight of them, and every (bimonthly) payday, they'd give all their paychecks to one guy out of the eight. he'd temporarily have like 7k in his pocket. then he'd go and blow it all in one crazy night and (likely) get laid. then he'd somehow survive on like 2k for 4 months, and then they'd repeat the process with the next guy the next paycycle, etc. | ||
|
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
On October 11 2012 11:58 Artok wrote: Guaranteed economically safe future sounds way better than act of kindness at this moment, no matter how you look at it. the funny thing is for most of history marriage was an economic contract. love had very, very little to do with it. the modern notion of romantic love being the sacrosanct, driving force for marriage is predated by things like railroads and even the telephone | ||
|
Kalingingsong
Canada633 Posts
and the real stupid part was that the guyfriend girl #2 brought along was still paying for all her drinks even though we knew he was just a $300k/yr working stiff. poor bloke, she only kept him around for 2 months... jesus christ lol, question: are these girls worth the money? can't you get similar quality goods/women somewhere else in the market for cheaper? or is it not about the women themselves? and its really just about bragging rights (in which case its really just spending money so one can brag about how much they spent). | ||
|
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
On October 11 2012 12:02 Kalingingsong wrote: jesus christ lol, question: are these girls worth the money? can't you get similar quality goods/women somewhere else in the market for cheaper? or is it not about the women themselves? and its really just about bragging rights (in which case its really just spending money so one can brag about how much they spent). i honestly wish i knew, but i think it goes back to that "man as a provider" theory. deep down inside, hardcoded into male DNA, guys get off when they play this role with changing views on gender, that's obsolete. what's also obsolete imo is the traditional notion of marriage--once it was a forever binding economic commitment--now it's something different. that's why i align myself with radical feminists here when i say that concomitant with gender equality, society should embrace a fairer and more flexible view on marriage (prenups and renewal clauses). unfortunately that male urge to provide is something that needs to be overcome in order to make this change happen | ||
|
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
| ||
|
Artok
Netherlands2219 Posts
On October 11 2012 12:15 Shady Sands wrote: basically, if a girl says she wants to marry you out of love, she should have no problem completely separating your economic interests from hers with a firewall of solid pre-nup clauses including pre-nup net worth assessments, renewal clauses, pre-determined child support and alimony payments (before your career advances), and most critically, exclusion of the spouse from any estate planning. otherwise she's being a hypocrite For that to happen she has to adapt to an idea of radical equality and defy general consensus which would be mentioned oh so much by her surroundings. Yup, unlikely to happen, on top of that marriage purely out of love is generally not the best idea. | ||
|
y0su
Finland7871 Posts
On October 11 2012 12:11 Shady Sands wrote: i honestly wish i knew, but i think it goes back to that "man as a provider" theory. deep down inside, hardcoded into male DNA, guys get off when they play this role with changing views on gender, that's obsolete. what's also obsolete imo is the traditional notion of marriage--once it was a forever binding economic commitment--now it's something different. that's why i align myself with radical feminists here when i say that concomitant with gender equality, society should embrace a fairer and more flexible view on marriage (prenups and renewal clauses). unfortunately that male urge to provide is something that needs to be overcome in order to make this change happen The funny part to me is that most girls have that same "need to be provided for" wired into their DNA... Sure, in their head they say that they want equality (and I'm inclined with Shady and the feminists to give it to them) but a majority of them still want a man. Someone that will provide and make them feel safe (make them feel like a sexy desired lady). EDIT: @Shady Sands, I totally forgot I opened this thread to tell you to get back to sharing your world take-over! | ||
|
RavenLoud
Canada1100 Posts
| ||
|
qtiehunter
1088 Posts
On October 11 2012 14:48 RavenLoud wrote: I thought this was popular generalized knowledge, I wonder why this is a two stars. People are hurt, I guess. "OMG This guy is so shallow!! Girls I like aren't like that, only hoes are!!" Although it depresses me that rockstars/athletes have so much respectability. You're good at doing one only thing that only serves to entertain others? Good, you should be in par with the guy who controls the world and the guy who makes the world a better place! I guess fame's attractive enough. ^_^ 5 stars just for the rage-filled comments | ||
|
FataLe
New Zealand4534 Posts
It's power and status. Money is just a bonus. Obviously this excludes clever girls who are only after a mans money. But we're talking in general terms. | ||
|
nojok
France15846 Posts
So instead of qqing about le femme, just learn the hustle instead Did my brower messed up & translated a bit of the sentence? "Le femme" sounds so shemale. | ||
|
qtiehunter
1088 Posts
On October 11 2012 17:27 nojok wrote: Did my brower messed up & translated a bit of the sentence? "Le femme" sounds so shemale. Probably meant to be "la faim". He must be quite the hungry guy. | ||
|
HwangjaeTerran
Finland5967 Posts
To be serious (and honest) for a moment, I think you are bound to suffer if you think your happiness is connected to the need of having someone in your life. | ||
|
Kalingingsong
Canada633 Posts
On October 11 2012 22:30 HwangjaeTerran wrote: That graph is on to something, and with something I mean misogyny. To be serious (and honest) for a moment, I think you are bound to suffer if you think your happiness is connected to the need of having someone in your life. some people do get lucky, I have a couple of friends who are in a situation where: the guy is needy, but they end up getting together with a girl who is also needy. and they just happily obsess about eachother all day. | ||
|
Shady Sands
United States4021 Posts
On October 11 2012 23:10 Kalingingsong wrote: some people do get lucky, I have a couple of friends who are in a situation where: the guy is needy, but they end up getting together with a girl who is also needy. and they just happily obsess about eachother all day. ah the yoko and john couple. don't worry you'll probably go through one or two of those relationships in your life as well | ||
|
Kalingingsong
Canada633 Posts
On October 11 2012 23:18 Shady Sands wrote: ah the yoko and john couple. don't worry you'll probably go through one or two of those relationships in your life as well edit: i wouldn't mind yoko. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
The PondCast
OSC
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
OSC
Korean StarCraft League
RSL Revival
BSL
Bonyth vs Doodle
Dewalt vs TerrOr
GSL
Cure vs herO
SHIN vs Maru
BSL
OyAji vs JDConan
DragOn vs TBD
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
