• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 09:34
CET 15:34
KST 23:34
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT25Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book17Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0241LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)46Weekly Cups (Feb 2-8): Classic, Solar, MaxPax win2Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker16
StarCraft 2
General
Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT Liquipedia WCS Portal Launched Kaelaris on the futue of SC2 and much more... How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game?
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) How do the "codes" work in GSL? LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ? [A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 512 Overclocked Mutation # 511 Temple of Rebirth
Brood War
General
Do you consider PvZ imbalanced? Recent recommended BW games BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion CasterMuse Youtube
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Fighting Spirit mining rates Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Diablo 2 thread Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Ask and answer stupid questions here! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Inside the Communication of …
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1635 users

*Results* Streaming SC2 Survey

Blogs > Quex
Post a Reply
Quex
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States10 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-04 20:05:42
February 04 2012 17:04 GMT
#1
This post is a bit late and for that I apologize. I needed to make an addendum to the IRB proposal and that took some time to get through with the holidays and myself working full time along with planning my wedding. Regardless, the following post outlines the results from a survey that people from this and other websites were kind enough to participate in. The entire post is rather long so I try to break everything into categories and I wanted to highlight a few results. Most of the results are simple cross-tabulations between survey questions. If you are mostly interested in the raw frequencies for each question they are located at the very bottom of the post.

Research Questions & Hypothesis

+ Show Spoiler +

R1. What are people watching?
R2. How are people streaming content?

H1. The most common type of streaming being watched are first person streams.
H2. Respondents are more likely to watch a heavy amount of content each week.
H3. Respondents are more likely to watch the better resolutions.
H4. Respondents require HD quality resolution in order to pay for content.
H5. Respondents are more likely to multi-task with first person streams and less with tournament broadcasts.
H6. Players spend more time watching than playing Starcraft II the more engaged with the community they are.


Methodology

+ Show Spoiler +

The data for this research was collected through an online survey and represents a cross-sectional non-probability study. A total of 113 responses were filed but 24 of those were either incomplete or from respondents which were under the age of 18. That left 89 valid responses for most questions. The survey consisted of 25 questions and took less than 5 minutes to complete. The questions were a combination of closed-ended questions, likert-scale responses, and two open ended questions about playing time and viewing time. These questions were related to several hypotheses about viewer habits when watching StarCraft II.

In order to measure the first hypothesis, respondents were asked to choose which type of broadcast they spent the most amount of time watching. This question included an “other” category and asked respondents to fill in an option if they selected the other option. All of the responses for the other category were combinations of other responses. For these responses I recoded the response to be whichever of the sources they wrote first.

For the second hypothesis, participants were given an open-ended question and asked how many hours in the previous 7 days they spent watching StarCraft II content. The third hypothesis relates to resolution. Resolutions above 480p, 720 thru 1080p+, were considered high definition (HD) quality. Four respondents did not respond and those were recoded as missing.

In order to understand how much people multi-task while watching StarCraft II, participants were asked on a 5-point scale how much they agreed with the statement they perform other activities while watching. These responses were recoded into a dichotomous variable with responses agree and strongly agree coded as a 1 while neutral, disagree and strongly disagree are recoded as 0.

This survey identified a trend of monetary, or community, engagement within the community. This allowed us to examine the sixth hypothesis. Three questions made up this index with an alpha of 0.7 and a factor analysis yielded one eigenvalue of 1.9 that accounted for 63% of the variance. The three questions asked whether the participants would pay for streaming content, if they had attended a community viewing experience, and whether they had paid for content in the past.


Results

Figure 1
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


+ Show Spoiler +

The Results from Figure 1 show absolute viewing numbers of respondents for what they watched the most by whether they watch a low, less than 8 hours of content a week, or high, more than 8 hours a week, . Throughout this survey a distinction was made between daily tournaments such as NASL and IGN and non-daily tournaments such as MLG and Dreamhack. However, in this chart we see the distribution for these two categories to be nearly identical in their split between low and high respondents. The mode for this question is First Person Streams, which accounted for 37% (n=89). 15 of the 89, 17%, respondents selected responses such as strategy videos, talk shows, YouTube, or VODs which were all recoded into a single Other category.


Figure 2
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


+ Show Spoiler +

Figure 2 shows a breakdown of what respondents recorded as their viewing resolution and whether they had paid at some point in the past. 44% (n=84) of respondents watch content in 720p, the most of any resolution. 27% (n=84) watch in non-HD resolutions of either 360p or 480p. While most respondents who watch do so in 720p, only half of them, 51%, reported they had paid for content at some point in the past compared to 77% for respondents who watch primarily in 1080p+. Interestingly, 5 of the 20 respondents who watch in 480p reported having paid for content and of those who report watching in 1080p, only 3 of the 11 (27%) report having paid for content in the past.


Figure 3
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


+ Show Spoiler +

Figure 3 illustrates the percentage of respondents for each type of broadcast that multi-task while watching the stream. For both the Daily (n = 19) and Non-Daily (n = 20) Tournament groups, approximately 60% of respondents admit to multi-tasking while watching content. This percentage increases to 80% (n = 15) for the Other category, and furthermore to 91% (n = 33) for the First Person Stream broadcasts.


Figure 4
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


+ Show Spoiler +

Figure 4 observes the data on our final hypothesis. This is an analysis of variance model of community engagement by the average hours played and hours watched. We see that for every category except for the 1 on the community engagement scale the average amount of time spent watching is greater than the amount of time spent playing. Overall the difference is nearly 2.5 hours. The 2 category in the index has the highest average number of hours watched at 17.26 per week while the 1 category has the highest mean play time of 15.92 hours.


Discussion

+ Show Spoiler +

It appears that for the purposes of this survey the distinction between Daily and Non-Daily Tournaments is artificial and unnecessary. The distribution for both between low and high viewers was nearly identical as well as the percentage who multitask during broadcasts. Many people are either watching the tournaments or a first person stream which is understandable. We should note, however, there are a significant number of respondents whose primary content consumption isn’t through either of those channels. Figure 1 also seems to indicate that for the tournaments and first person streams, respondents are more likely to watch a high amount of content a week. The Other category does not conform to this relationship and that is understandable given the generally shorter nature and less availability of this type of content.

Most of the results regarding resolutions that people use to watch streaming are expected. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of these results is the number of respondents who not only watch in non-HD streams but also who have paid for content in the past. One possible reason for this might be technical limitations related to bandwidth or computer hardware. Another possibility might be an increased prevalence in the use of mobile devices and tablet computers to watch content. These questions are beyond the scope of this survey but might shine some light into this question. In addition, the mode is 720p which indicates that many people are not fully utilizing the full graphics available that is used as a selling point for many streaming service. The reasons for this however, are beyond the scope of this survey.

The definition of multi-tasking in this survey is fairly broad. This might help explain the high rate of multi-tasking seen. Future surveys should define what this means and how streaming StarCraft II compares to other forms of media consumption such as television or radio. There are several advantages and disadvantages to a viewing base with a high rate of multi-tasking. To understand what these are however, would require a more in-depth investigation than this survey attempts to do.

The last figure would seem to help bolster the idea that a player who is more engaged monetarily with the community is spending more time watching than playing. There are a few issues with this. First, time watching and time playing are not necessarily distinct events. Indeed, with the amount of multi-tasking indicated by other questions we can presume for a significant amount of time the two activities are occurring simultaneously. Second, these are averages and therefore may not be the best indicator of the data. Additionally, we have to consider that selection bias is at play for this question. Those who watch streaming content are the ones who are likely to respond to this survey which could artificially inflate the watched numbers by some amount. Finally, this question asked about time spent watching over the last 7 days and there may be differences between this time period and general viewing or playing amounts.


Raw Frequencies (Long)
These looked very messy so I turned them in to images. If you have a better suggestion I would be glad to change. Otherwise, they are below.
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]


****
MisterD
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Germany1338 Posts
February 04 2012 17:54 GMT
#2
how is the "community engagement scale" calculated? you can't throw out that stuff and not explain what it is. Oo
Gold isn't everything in life... you need wood, too!
Quex
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States10 Posts
February 04 2012 20:05 GMT
#3
Sorry, I guess I do confuse some terms. Community engagement is what I refer to in the last paragraph of the methodology section as 'monetary engagement'
MisterD
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Germany1338 Posts
February 04 2012 23:53 GMT
#4
so .. what is category 3 on the community engagement scale for instance? am i missing something? Oo that x-axis in figure 4 just makes no sense whatsoever to me.
Gold isn't everything in life... you need wood, too!
Quex
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States10 Posts
February 05 2012 00:50 GMT
#5
Thanks for noticing these mistakes! I thought I had put a sentence in that explains what the community engagement was but you are correct and I had forgotten.

Community engagement is a measure of 3 questions that were turned in to binary variables:

Have you attended a community viewing party?
Have you paid money for streaming content?
Would you be willing to pay for streaming content in the future?

An index of 3 represents a respondent who was affirmative on all three questions.

The x axis in figure 4 corresponds with the community engagement index.

Unfortunately, for those who scored a 1 or 2 on the index, I cannot be sure which of the three questions they responded negatively or positively for.

Hope this helps to clear up some of the confusion. Thanks again!
reneg
Profile Joined September 2010
United States859 Posts
February 05 2012 01:50 GMT
#6
looks like the image for figure 1 broke

Other than that, interesting info, i'm reading more through it right now
moose...indian
3rdEYEsix
Profile Joined February 2012
United States28 Posts
February 05 2012 03:36 GMT
#7
Its always to see statistics on subjects that interest me. Thank you for the time and effort spent on this useful information. I just have one question. What is the "Cum Percent?
|| Team Emanations || NA/EU Channel: MN8 || twitch.tv/thirdEYEsix || "Manifesting Ideas Daily" -thirdEYEsix
Thermia
Profile Joined August 2010
United States866 Posts
February 05 2012 03:44 GMT
#8
On February 05 2012 12:36 3rdEYEsix wrote:
Its always to see statistics on subjects that interest me. Thank you for the time and effort spent on this useful information. I just have one question. What is the "Cum Percent?


cumulative
Sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from trolling. IGN: Mierin
Dknight
Profile Blog Joined April 2005
United States5223 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-11 18:31:14
February 11 2012 18:29 GMT
#9
This is really interesting (though I like it because of the research aspect). What was your reasoning behind not using equal class intervals for questions 21 and 22 to allow for direct comparison between hours playing and hours watching? Also, a few questions, I personally would've used straight up dichotomous variables for some (question 12 comes to mind). How'd your get your participants for the survey? You seem well versed in research and methodology which begs the question..why only 89 and not 200 or 500? Assuming you used SPSS or some other statistical software, the only difference would've been waiting for the data a bit longer.

Are you using this for a graduate project or a sample run for a master's thesis?
WGT<3. Former CL/NW head admin.
Primadog
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States4411 Posts
February 12 2012 19:53 GMT
#10
Nice to see some real statistics and survey methodology in eSports for a change. Even if some results are "obvious," it's still reassuring for measured data to confirm them. I couldn't make sense of Figure 4. What is it depicting? How does it address H6?
Thank God and gunrun.
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiG Sty Festival
09:00
Group D
YoungYakov vs ShoWTimELIVE!
ByuN vs Serral
PiGStarcraft1688
TKL 395
IndyStarCraft 293
BRAT_OK 199
Rex187
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft1688
TKL 395
IndyStarCraft 293
BRAT_OK 199
Rex 187
ProTech48
EmSc Tv 1
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 47989
Calm 7232
Rain 4868
Jaedong 1615
Horang2 1453
Larva 1064
actioN 807
Mini 681
Stork 480
Soma 316
[ Show more ]
hero 233
Zeus 231
PianO 230
Rush 200
JulyZerg 163
Last 120
Sharp 120
Dewaltoss 103
Shine 94
firebathero 92
Pusan 87
Barracks 78
Movie 71
Sea.KH 64
Killer 59
yabsab 51
Hm[arnc] 36
Sacsri 33
sorry 33
ToSsGirL 27
soO 27
scan(afreeca) 21
HiyA 16
Noble 13
Rock 11
Terrorterran 9
Dota 2
Gorgc5818
qojqva1585
XcaliburYe151
canceldota95
Counter-Strike
fl0m2399
byalli1067
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King86
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor314
MindelVK8
Other Games
Grubby3079
singsing2599
Liquid`RaSZi1450
B2W.Neo1129
DeMusliM289
ToD168
Sick1
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL15627
StarCraft 2
WardiTV564
EmSc Tv 1
EmSc2Tv 1
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1544
League of Legends
• Jankos3553
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
9h 27m
Replay Cast
18h 27m
Wardi Open
21h 27m
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 2h
OSC
1d 9h
WardiTV Winter Champion…
1d 21h
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
SC Evo Complete
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 1st Round
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
WardiTV Winter 2026
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025

Upcoming

Acropolis #4 - TS5
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round Qualifier
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.