• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 05:42
CET 11:42
KST 19:42
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !8Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15
StarCraft 2
General
When will we find out if there are more tournament ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump
Tourneys
Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ How Rain Became ProGamer in Just 3 Months FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle screp: Command line app to parse SC rep files [BSL21] RO8 Bracket & Prediction Contest
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO8 - Day 2 - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread PC Games Sales Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1909 users

*Results* Streaming SC2 Survey

Blogs > Quex
Post a Reply
Quex
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States10 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-04 20:05:42
February 04 2012 17:04 GMT
#1
This post is a bit late and for that I apologize. I needed to make an addendum to the IRB proposal and that took some time to get through with the holidays and myself working full time along with planning my wedding. Regardless, the following post outlines the results from a survey that people from this and other websites were kind enough to participate in. The entire post is rather long so I try to break everything into categories and I wanted to highlight a few results. Most of the results are simple cross-tabulations between survey questions. If you are mostly interested in the raw frequencies for each question they are located at the very bottom of the post.

Research Questions & Hypothesis

+ Show Spoiler +

R1. What are people watching?
R2. How are people streaming content?

H1. The most common type of streaming being watched are first person streams.
H2. Respondents are more likely to watch a heavy amount of content each week.
H3. Respondents are more likely to watch the better resolutions.
H4. Respondents require HD quality resolution in order to pay for content.
H5. Respondents are more likely to multi-task with first person streams and less with tournament broadcasts.
H6. Players spend more time watching than playing Starcraft II the more engaged with the community they are.


Methodology

+ Show Spoiler +

The data for this research was collected through an online survey and represents a cross-sectional non-probability study. A total of 113 responses were filed but 24 of those were either incomplete or from respondents which were under the age of 18. That left 89 valid responses for most questions. The survey consisted of 25 questions and took less than 5 minutes to complete. The questions were a combination of closed-ended questions, likert-scale responses, and two open ended questions about playing time and viewing time. These questions were related to several hypotheses about viewer habits when watching StarCraft II.

In order to measure the first hypothesis, respondents were asked to choose which type of broadcast they spent the most amount of time watching. This question included an “other” category and asked respondents to fill in an option if they selected the other option. All of the responses for the other category were combinations of other responses. For these responses I recoded the response to be whichever of the sources they wrote first.

For the second hypothesis, participants were given an open-ended question and asked how many hours in the previous 7 days they spent watching StarCraft II content. The third hypothesis relates to resolution. Resolutions above 480p, 720 thru 1080p+, were considered high definition (HD) quality. Four respondents did not respond and those were recoded as missing.

In order to understand how much people multi-task while watching StarCraft II, participants were asked on a 5-point scale how much they agreed with the statement they perform other activities while watching. These responses were recoded into a dichotomous variable with responses agree and strongly agree coded as a 1 while neutral, disagree and strongly disagree are recoded as 0.

This survey identified a trend of monetary, or community, engagement within the community. This allowed us to examine the sixth hypothesis. Three questions made up this index with an alpha of 0.7 and a factor analysis yielded one eigenvalue of 1.9 that accounted for 63% of the variance. The three questions asked whether the participants would pay for streaming content, if they had attended a community viewing experience, and whether they had paid for content in the past.


Results

Figure 1
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


+ Show Spoiler +

The Results from Figure 1 show absolute viewing numbers of respondents for what they watched the most by whether they watch a low, less than 8 hours of content a week, or high, more than 8 hours a week, . Throughout this survey a distinction was made between daily tournaments such as NASL and IGN and non-daily tournaments such as MLG and Dreamhack. However, in this chart we see the distribution for these two categories to be nearly identical in their split between low and high respondents. The mode for this question is First Person Streams, which accounted for 37% (n=89). 15 of the 89, 17%, respondents selected responses such as strategy videos, talk shows, YouTube, or VODs which were all recoded into a single Other category.


Figure 2
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


+ Show Spoiler +

Figure 2 shows a breakdown of what respondents recorded as their viewing resolution and whether they had paid at some point in the past. 44% (n=84) of respondents watch content in 720p, the most of any resolution. 27% (n=84) watch in non-HD resolutions of either 360p or 480p. While most respondents who watch do so in 720p, only half of them, 51%, reported they had paid for content at some point in the past compared to 77% for respondents who watch primarily in 1080p+. Interestingly, 5 of the 20 respondents who watch in 480p reported having paid for content and of those who report watching in 1080p, only 3 of the 11 (27%) report having paid for content in the past.


Figure 3
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


+ Show Spoiler +

Figure 3 illustrates the percentage of respondents for each type of broadcast that multi-task while watching the stream. For both the Daily (n = 19) and Non-Daily (n = 20) Tournament groups, approximately 60% of respondents admit to multi-tasking while watching content. This percentage increases to 80% (n = 15) for the Other category, and furthermore to 91% (n = 33) for the First Person Stream broadcasts.


Figure 4
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


+ Show Spoiler +

Figure 4 observes the data on our final hypothesis. This is an analysis of variance model of community engagement by the average hours played and hours watched. We see that for every category except for the 1 on the community engagement scale the average amount of time spent watching is greater than the amount of time spent playing. Overall the difference is nearly 2.5 hours. The 2 category in the index has the highest average number of hours watched at 17.26 per week while the 1 category has the highest mean play time of 15.92 hours.


Discussion

+ Show Spoiler +

It appears that for the purposes of this survey the distinction between Daily and Non-Daily Tournaments is artificial and unnecessary. The distribution for both between low and high viewers was nearly identical as well as the percentage who multitask during broadcasts. Many people are either watching the tournaments or a first person stream which is understandable. We should note, however, there are a significant number of respondents whose primary content consumption isn’t through either of those channels. Figure 1 also seems to indicate that for the tournaments and first person streams, respondents are more likely to watch a high amount of content a week. The Other category does not conform to this relationship and that is understandable given the generally shorter nature and less availability of this type of content.

Most of the results regarding resolutions that people use to watch streaming are expected. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of these results is the number of respondents who not only watch in non-HD streams but also who have paid for content in the past. One possible reason for this might be technical limitations related to bandwidth or computer hardware. Another possibility might be an increased prevalence in the use of mobile devices and tablet computers to watch content. These questions are beyond the scope of this survey but might shine some light into this question. In addition, the mode is 720p which indicates that many people are not fully utilizing the full graphics available that is used as a selling point for many streaming service. The reasons for this however, are beyond the scope of this survey.

The definition of multi-tasking in this survey is fairly broad. This might help explain the high rate of multi-tasking seen. Future surveys should define what this means and how streaming StarCraft II compares to other forms of media consumption such as television or radio. There are several advantages and disadvantages to a viewing base with a high rate of multi-tasking. To understand what these are however, would require a more in-depth investigation than this survey attempts to do.

The last figure would seem to help bolster the idea that a player who is more engaged monetarily with the community is spending more time watching than playing. There are a few issues with this. First, time watching and time playing are not necessarily distinct events. Indeed, with the amount of multi-tasking indicated by other questions we can presume for a significant amount of time the two activities are occurring simultaneously. Second, these are averages and therefore may not be the best indicator of the data. Additionally, we have to consider that selection bias is at play for this question. Those who watch streaming content are the ones who are likely to respond to this survey which could artificially inflate the watched numbers by some amount. Finally, this question asked about time spent watching over the last 7 days and there may be differences between this time period and general viewing or playing amounts.


Raw Frequencies (Long)
These looked very messy so I turned them in to images. If you have a better suggestion I would be glad to change. Otherwise, they are below.
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]


****
MisterD
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Germany1338 Posts
February 04 2012 17:54 GMT
#2
how is the "community engagement scale" calculated? you can't throw out that stuff and not explain what it is. Oo
Gold isn't everything in life... you need wood, too!
Quex
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States10 Posts
February 04 2012 20:05 GMT
#3
Sorry, I guess I do confuse some terms. Community engagement is what I refer to in the last paragraph of the methodology section as 'monetary engagement'
MisterD
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Germany1338 Posts
February 04 2012 23:53 GMT
#4
so .. what is category 3 on the community engagement scale for instance? am i missing something? Oo that x-axis in figure 4 just makes no sense whatsoever to me.
Gold isn't everything in life... you need wood, too!
Quex
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States10 Posts
February 05 2012 00:50 GMT
#5
Thanks for noticing these mistakes! I thought I had put a sentence in that explains what the community engagement was but you are correct and I had forgotten.

Community engagement is a measure of 3 questions that were turned in to binary variables:

Have you attended a community viewing party?
Have you paid money for streaming content?
Would you be willing to pay for streaming content in the future?

An index of 3 represents a respondent who was affirmative on all three questions.

The x axis in figure 4 corresponds with the community engagement index.

Unfortunately, for those who scored a 1 or 2 on the index, I cannot be sure which of the three questions they responded negatively or positively for.

Hope this helps to clear up some of the confusion. Thanks again!
reneg
Profile Joined September 2010
United States859 Posts
February 05 2012 01:50 GMT
#6
looks like the image for figure 1 broke

Other than that, interesting info, i'm reading more through it right now
moose...indian
3rdEYEsix
Profile Joined February 2012
United States28 Posts
February 05 2012 03:36 GMT
#7
Its always to see statistics on subjects that interest me. Thank you for the time and effort spent on this useful information. I just have one question. What is the "Cum Percent?
|| Team Emanations || NA/EU Channel: MN8 || twitch.tv/thirdEYEsix || "Manifesting Ideas Daily" -thirdEYEsix
Thermia
Profile Joined August 2010
United States866 Posts
February 05 2012 03:44 GMT
#8
On February 05 2012 12:36 3rdEYEsix wrote:
Its always to see statistics on subjects that interest me. Thank you for the time and effort spent on this useful information. I just have one question. What is the "Cum Percent?


cumulative
Sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from trolling. IGN: Mierin
Dknight
Profile Blog Joined April 2005
United States5223 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-11 18:31:14
February 11 2012 18:29 GMT
#9
This is really interesting (though I like it because of the research aspect). What was your reasoning behind not using equal class intervals for questions 21 and 22 to allow for direct comparison between hours playing and hours watching? Also, a few questions, I personally would've used straight up dichotomous variables for some (question 12 comes to mind). How'd your get your participants for the survey? You seem well versed in research and methodology which begs the question..why only 89 and not 200 or 500? Assuming you used SPSS or some other statistical software, the only difference would've been waiting for the data a bit longer.

Are you using this for a graduate project or a sample run for a master's thesis?
WGT<3. Former CL/NW head admin.
Primadog
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States4411 Posts
February 12 2012 19:53 GMT
#10
Nice to see some real statistics and survey methodology in eSports for a change. Even if some results are "obvious," it's still reassuring for measured data to confirm them. I couldn't make sense of Figure 4. What is it depicting? How does it address H6?
Thank God and gunrun.
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Master Swan Open #99
CranKy Ducklings64
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Rex 28
ForJumy 21
MindelVK 15
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 8789
Horang2 832
Jaedong 619
firebathero 581
Larva 503
Leta 430
Stork 237
EffOrt 179
Pusan 142
Last 123
[ Show more ]
Mong 111
ggaemo 52
ZerO 49
yabsab 43
Shinee 30
NotJumperer 22
Movie 15
zelot 13
SilentControl 10
Noble 6
Dota 2
XcaliburYe335
League of Legends
JimRising 415
Counter-Strike
zeus1097
edward181
oskar145
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor173
Other Games
summit1g5318
Livibee152
XaKoH 133
Trikslyr24
Pyrionflax17
ZerO(Twitch)7
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1013
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 9
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 20
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota257
League of Legends
• Jankos1882
• HappyZerGling243
Upcoming Events
WardiTV 2025
18m
Spirit vs Cure
Reynor vs MaxPax
SHIN vs TBD
Solar vs herO
Classic vs TBD
TBD vs Clem
Rex28
TaKeTV 0
SC Evo League
1h 48m
Ladder Legends
8h 18m
BSL 21
9h 18m
Sziky vs Dewalt
eOnzErG vs Cross
Sparkling Tuna Cup
23h 18m
Ladder Legends
1d 6h
BSL 21
1d 9h
StRyKeR vs TBD
Bonyth vs TBD
Replay Cast
1d 22h
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Classic
Cure vs herO
Reynor vs MaxPax
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS3
RSL Offline Finals
Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 1
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.