EPTjust very luckily got a press pass, and was reading up and found this gem. obviously shouldnt ever happen, but would be hilarious if it did. imagine the fun of no stalkers or no roaches. terran would be fine though they got marines ^_^
interesting mlg rule
| Blogs > esla_sol |
|
esla_sol
United States756 Posts
just very luckily got a press pass, and was reading up and found this gem. obviously shouldnt ever happen, but would be hilarious if it did. imagine the fun of no stalkers or no roaches. terran would be fine though they got marines ^_^ | ||
|
avilo
United States4100 Posts
| ||
|
LlamaNamedOsama
United States1900 Posts
ZvP: "no sentries" ZvZ: "no roaches" ZvT: "no siege tanks" TvP: "no stalkers" TvT: "no tanks" TvZ: "no banelings" PvT: "no marauders" PvZ: "no roaches" PvP: "no stalkers" XD | ||
|
Earll
Norway847 Posts
| ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
| ||
|
Zim23
United States1681 Posts
| ||
|
Djzapz
Canada10681 Posts
also protoss without stalkers doesn't get too far | ||
|
Count9
China10928 Posts
On July 28 2011 10:56 Jibba wrote: I thought MLG took their stupid Halo shit out of the SC2 rules? They said they were going to take their stupid Halo shit out of the SC2 rules. No self respecting pro will use that rule, I honestly expect them to change it immediately if anyone ever cites it. | ||
|
Juliette
United States6003 Posts
the halo version after 3 technicals is you wait a full minute or something like that during the start of a game before you can pick up a controller so basically lol O_O. | ||
|
AssuredVacancy
United States1167 Posts
| ||
|
Soap
Brazil1546 Posts
At least makes sure everyone gets extra GM. | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On July 28 2011 11:12 Count9 wrote: They said they were going to take their stupid Halo shit out of the SC2 rules. No self respecting pro will use that rule, I honestly expect them to change it immediately if anyone ever cites it. I dunno, removing banelings against IdrA would be pretty hilarious, even if it makes for a sham of a competition. | ||
|
AnxiousHippo
Australia1451 Posts
| ||
|
Al Bundy
7257 Posts
Anyway I've never seen MLG actually enforce rules in sc2, hopefully they won't have to do so in the future  It's all about sportsmanship, even though it's true that some in-game conversations can be borderline. I remember a Idra vs Huk game... | ||
|
Bibbit
Canada5377 Posts
| ||
|
TheAmazombie
United States3714 Posts
| ||
|
SiN]
United States540 Posts
| ||
|
TranceStorm
1616 Posts
| ||
|
DroneAllDay
United States140 Posts
| ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
On July 28 2011 10:56 Jibba wrote: I thought MLG took their stupid Halo shit out of the SC2 rules? you dont know much about mlg do you  they think every game is halo until proven otherwise :D i would imagine that if they tried to enforce this rule the players would either refuse to play or would pick units like battlecruiser and carrier to avoid being a dick ; / | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
| ||
|
Zlasher
United States9129 Posts
Maybe they'll change it next season, but like, theres no way it would ever be implemented | ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
| ||
|
Hikko
United States1126 Posts
"1. No standing on chairs, tables, or other tournament equipment. 2. No verbal abuse of Referees and other tournament officials. Verbal abuse of a Referee or other tournament official includes, but is not limited to, the use of vulgar language directed at a Referee or other tournament official, the use of insulting words or gestures directed at a Referee or other tournament official, and excessive argument with a Referee or other tournament official resulting in the delay of a Match. 3. No use of vulgar language directed at a Player, Coach, or Spectator. 4. No inciting Spectators into taunting a Player, Coach, or Spectator. 5. No excessive taunting or celebration by Coaches or Players. Excessive taunting or celebration includes, but is not limited to, post-Match taunting or celebration directed at or referencing an opposing Player(s) and/or Coach. Post-Match interactions between opposing Players and Coaches must be limited to acts of sportsmanship. 6. No unsportsmanlike physical contact. 7. No throwing anything in the direction of an opposing Player(s) and/or Coach. No throwing objects that could cause injury into the crowd." Don't start a fight, don't cuss out other players or refs, don't be a (total) jerk. Otherwise, you're going to lose your next game. It might be ridiculous, but bear in mind that players need to be totally ridiculous (THREE TIMES IN THE SAME EVENT) in order to recieve the game penalty. If you can't chill out after the first and second fouls, then you should receive some major consequences. | ||
|
Endymion
United States3701 Posts
On July 28 2011 12:11 DroneAllDay wrote: I'm surprised no one has said no investors yet... Also this would be crazy hilarious to watch. Yeah, wallstreet wouldn't stand a chance without their investors! | ||
|
SarR
476 Posts
On July 28 2011 15:00 Endymion wrote: Yeah, wallstreet wouldn't stand a chance without their investors! ROFL...quote of the day...made me laugh. | ||
|
DroneAllDay
United States140 Posts
On July 28 2011 15:00 Endymion wrote: Yeah, wallstreet wouldn't stand a chance without their investors! I gotta stop posting on my iPod, auto-correct is killing me... T.T | ||
|
Emporio
United States3069 Posts
ggnore | ||
| ||
