• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:50
CEST 03:50
KST 10:50
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
WTL 2023 Summer - Week 5 Recap/Week 6 Preview5Maru wins Code S Season 1, achieves "6SL"42Team Liquid Map Contest #18: Finalists6WTL 2023 Summer - Week 4 Recap/Week 5 Preview3Code S Season 1 - RO4 & Finals Preview22
Community News
Alpha X disbands15ESL Open Week #175: ByuN, MaxPax, Solar win0Upcoming GSL to return to 100% live/offline play42WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament #10!12ESL Masters Summer - Regional Playoffs (May 17-21)14
StarCraft 2
General
Maru wins Code S Season 1, achieves "6SL" Was Protoss given the same design focus? GSL starts Patreon to crowdfund prize pool Alpha X disbands WTL 2023 Summer - Week 5 Recap/Week 6 Preview
Tourneys
WardiTV 2023 Opens (Monthly) [WTL 2023] Summer - Week 6 WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament #10! ESL Masters Summer - Regionals Tenacious Turtle Tussle (Americas/OCE/Asia)
Strategy
[G] Bumblebees Guide to Playing with Low APM
Custom Maps
TLMC#18 Judging Comments and Feedback Thread [M] (2) Magannatha [M] (2) Ultralove [M] (2) Vertigo
External Content
Mutation # 371 Never Say Die Mutation # 370 Astigmatism Mutation # 369 Undermined Mutation # 368 Secret Storm
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.com/ BW General Discussion Does FlaSh owe his success to picking Terran? FlaSh Explains Why There is No Protoss Bonjwas Uh.. Whats going on?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues BSL 2v2 ProLeague S2 - Day 4 - Sunday 20:00 CEST BSL 2v2 ProLeague S2 - Day 3 - Saturday 20:00 CEST New Worlds Map Contest III: Finals! (VOTE HERE)
Strategy
Carriers or arbiters [H] Yet even more questions about DT builds Abusive drop locations on Vermeer
Other Games
General Games
Frost Giant announce Stormgate Diablo IV The PlayStation 5 Nintendo Switch Thread Diablo 4 lvl 100 HC challenge!
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion Berlin Major 2023
League of Legends
MSI is happening, the thread TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead Building the Future of Sport at Riot Games
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes International Nations Cup - Berlin 2023
Hearthstone
TL Mafia
TL Endures Mafia TL Endures Voting Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia Community Thread [410]TL.net/forum/mafia Appeal Disambiguation 1.02
Community
General
NASA and the Private Sector US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2023! European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The Guru Fan Club INnoVation Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion! Rome (TV Series) [Manga] One Piece [TV] HBO The Last Of Us series
Sports
NBA General Discussion 2022 - 2023 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022 Thread
Tech Support
StarCraft 2 Is Crashing on My PC
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Berlin and Balloons!
FuDDx
Unexpected Wholesome SC Mome…
JieXian
Atom-Mech (Chapter 3)
Terryberri
Job interview
mantequilla
15 years
Shady Sands
The truth about Final Fan…
jameswatts
I need to borrow $2 on PayPal…
Garnet
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 909 users

TLnet Poll - Do you prefer the new ESL Swiss group format,…

Do you prefer the new ESL Swiss group format, or the previous round-robin format? :

I prefer Swiss (219)37%
I prefer round robin (210)35%
No preference/not relevant to me (168)28%

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
TL.net Bot
Profile Joined June 2004
TL.net100 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-05-07 22:20:11
May 07 2023 22:18 GMT
#1
Discussion thread for front page poll: "Do you prefer the new ESL Swiss group format, or the previous round-robin format?"
Blargh
Profile Joined September 2010
United States2015 Posts
May 07 2023 22:42 GMT
#2
I think the benefit is that you see good matches sooner, often in the second and third rounds, but it does feel sort of odd also having Bo3 with it (though I think you must for sc2)
LaughNgamez
Profile Joined April 2015
Canada510 Posts
May 07 2023 23:43 GMT
#3
Round robin for sure
(◕‿◕✿) Hopefully one day a decent caster http://www.youtube.com/LaughNgamez (◠‿◠✿)
dbRic1203
Profile Joined July 2019
Germany2547 Posts
May 08 2023 05:38 GMT
#4
I like the swiss format, but the seeding system they are using is just weired.
Map score seem to not matter at all and it looks pretty random in general.
In the rule book it is stated that they would use map score (but they do not).

So I would love to see some clarification on how they decide the matches. It seems like the casters are left in the dark as well, wich doesn t help..
MaxPax
sc2rush
Profile Joined July 2022
1 Post
May 09 2023 13:10 GMT
#5
Liquipedia currently has 1 vs 2 and 3 vs 4. Seems like #1 and #2 are punished for playing well.
Other than that I like the Swiss
Balnazza
Profile Joined January 2018
235 Posts
May 09 2023 14:06 GMT
#6
Round-Robin is just a disaster of a system, so using Swiss is actually really cool. It basically eliminates meaningless matches which in the past were a big critique especially for Europe.
MJG
Profile Joined May 2018
United Kingdom319 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-05-09 14:43:50
May 09 2023 14:17 GMT
#7
It's obvious that round robins are an inefficient system when you have this many players, especially once you consider that ESL needs to cut down on costs now that Blizzard have withdrawn funding, so I think that using the Swiss format is a good solution.
GM Protoss | Berserker eSports | Twitch & YouTube: SatedSC2
Philippe
Profile Joined October 2020
155 Posts
May 09 2023 14:26 GMT
#8
Some are complaining about the swiss format because it means less spotlight and money for players lower down the ranking, but frankly, as a viewer I do not want to see dead rubbers. So curious to see how the year pans out
tigera6
Profile Joined March 2021
2193 Posts
May 09 2023 15:11 GMT
#9
Yeah, if people want to still have the round-robin format, it should never be 4 group of 8 players which take forever to complete. Either 2 groups of 8 or 3 groups of 6 should be the limit, make the rest of them play through another "code A" event to trim down the player size.
batatm
Profile Joined June 2014
Israel116 Posts
May 10 2023 01:51 GMT
#10
Personally I prefer a GSL format, that is double elimination group stage (ro32) into another group stage (ro16) into a single elimination playoff (ro8). If it turns out to be too long I don't mind the second group stage switched out in favor of the playoffs starting at the ro16.
mark_lenders
Profile Joined July 2019
73 Posts
May 10 2023 21:18 GMT
#11
i don't have a problem with the round robin (besides the fact that watching the first 4-5 round felt kinda useless), but if SC2 needs downsizing the swiss system is infinitely superior
hjpalpha
Profile Joined August 2017
Germany324 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-05-13 15:08:59
May 13 2023 15:07 GMT
#12
from Liquipedia perspective:
pseudo-"swiss" is a massive pain in the ...
it causes lots of issues with the automations we implemented over the last years and hence cause additional work for contributors (and that is after i had to invest several hours to get the swissTableLeague module up to its current capabilities)

as a clarification:
it is no swiss format, it is a triple-elimination bracket with very very very bad (and unpublished) re-seeding rules

personal opinion:
i very much dislike the pseudo-"swiss"
yes it cuts down on the number of irrelevant matches
but with such bad (re-)seeding rules and esl not even announcing the re-seeding rules it just is a total mess
the stuff they show on stream doesn't help people in understanding what actually is going on either
the display we have on lp is already not optimal (imo displaying it as a bracket would be better but for that the seeding rules would have to be logical ...) but what they show on stream is just plain bad

imo a clean gsl style group stage is the way better format
i personally would even cut the number of players to 16 for eu and 8 for the other 2 regions so we actually get high(er) lvl of play all around
btw. you can expect HSC to have a better format than ept
LiquipediaSCV ready | SC2-Liquipedia Admin, reviewer and editor | Wax called me a Liquipedia wizard in one of his articles for 2019 WCS Standings
jy_9876543210
Profile Joined March 2016
221 Posts
May 13 2023 15:51 GMT
#13
On May 14 2023 00:07 hjpalpha wrote:
from Liquipedia perspective:
pseudo-"swiss" is a massive pain in the ...
it causes lots of issues with the automations we implemented over the last years and hence cause additional work for contributors (and that is after i had to invest several hours to get the swissTableLeague module up to its current capabilities)

as a clarification:
it is no swiss format, it is a triple-elimination bracket with very very very bad (and unpublished) re-seeding rules

personal opinion:
i very much dislike the pseudo-"swiss"
yes it cuts down on the number of irrelevant matches
but with such bad (re-)seeding rules and esl not even announcing the re-seeding rules it just is a total mess
the stuff they show on stream doesn't help people in understanding what actually is going on either
the display we have on lp is already not optimal (imo displaying it as a bracket would be better but for that the seeding rules would have to be logical ...) but what they show on stream is just plain bad

imo a clean gsl style group stage is the way better format
i personally would even cut the number of players to 16 for eu and 8 for the other 2 regions so we actually get high(er) lvl of play all around
btw. you can expect HSC to have a better format than ept

So it looks like a swiss format but just much worse? So why don't they just use swiss format, which CS GO major has been doing for years?
Phase 1: F2    Phase 2: A   Phase 3: Profit!
hjpalpha
Profile Joined August 2017
Germany324 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-05-13 16:06:19
May 13 2023 15:58 GMT
#14
On May 14 2023 00:51 jy_9876543210 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2023 00:07 hjpalpha wrote:
from Liquipedia perspective:
pseudo-"swiss" is a massive pain in the ...
it causes lots of issues with the automations we implemented over the last years and hence cause additional work for contributors (and that is after i had to invest several hours to get the swissTableLeague module up to its current capabilities)

as a clarification:
it is no swiss format, it is a triple-elimination bracket with very very very bad (and unpublished) re-seeding rules

personal opinion:
i very much dislike the pseudo-"swiss"
yes it cuts down on the number of irrelevant matches
but with such bad (re-)seeding rules and esl not even announcing the re-seeding rules it just is a total mess
the stuff they show on stream doesn't help people in understanding what actually is going on either
the display we have on lp is already not optimal (imo displaying it as a bracket would be better but for that the seeding rules would have to be logical ...) but what they show on stream is just plain bad

esl (and other esport orgs) wrongly call it swiss even though it doesn't meet the criteria of being actually a swiss format
imo a clean gsl style group stage is the way better format
i personally would even cut the number of players to 16 for eu and 8 for the other 2 regions so we actually get high(er) lvl of play all around
btw. you can expect HSC to have a better format than ept

So it looks like a swiss format but just much worse? So why don't they just use swiss format, which CS GO major has been doing for years?


cs doesn't use swiss either
it is pseudo-swiss too
to quote wikipedia:
A Swiss-system tournament is a non-eliminating tournament format that features a fixed number of rounds of competition, but considerably fewer than for a round-robin tournament; thus each competitor (team or individual) does not play all the other competitors. Competitors meet one-on-one in each round and are paired using a set of rules designed to ensure that each competitor plays opponents with a similar running score, but does not play the same opponent more than once. The winner is the competitor with the highest aggregate points earned in all rounds. With an even number of participants, all competitors play in each round.


esl (and other esport TOs) wrongly call it swiss even though it clearly is no swiss format

i will probably push something on lp later today explaining this bad format better than esl did
LiquipediaSCV ready | SC2-Liquipedia Admin, reviewer and editor | Wax called me a Liquipedia wizard in one of his articles for 2019 WCS Standings
jy_9876543210
Profile Joined March 2016
221 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-05-13 17:03:59
May 13 2023 17:03 GMT
#15
On May 14 2023 00:58 hjpalpha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2023 00:51 jy_9876543210 wrote:
On May 14 2023 00:07 hjpalpha wrote:
from Liquipedia perspective:
pseudo-"swiss" is a massive pain in the ...
it causes lots of issues with the automations we implemented over the last years and hence cause additional work for contributors (and that is after i had to invest several hours to get the swissTableLeague module up to its current capabilities)

as a clarification:
it is no swiss format, it is a triple-elimination bracket with very very very bad (and unpublished) re-seeding rules

personal opinion:
i very much dislike the pseudo-"swiss"
yes it cuts down on the number of irrelevant matches
but with such bad (re-)seeding rules and esl not even announcing the re-seeding rules it just is a total mess
the stuff they show on stream doesn't help people in understanding what actually is going on either
the display we have on lp is already not optimal (imo displaying it as a bracket would be better but for that the seeding rules would have to be logical ...) but what they show on stream is just plain bad

esl (and other esport orgs) wrongly call it swiss even though it doesn't meet the criteria of being actually a swiss format
imo a clean gsl style group stage is the way better format
i personally would even cut the number of players to 16 for eu and 8 for the other 2 regions so we actually get high(er) lvl of play all around
btw. you can expect HSC to have a better format than ept

So it looks like a swiss format but just much worse? So why don't they just use swiss format, which CS GO major has been doing for years?


cs doesn't use swiss either
it is pseudo-swiss too
to quote wikipedia:
Show nested quote +
A Swiss-system tournament is a non-eliminating tournament format that features a fixed number of rounds of competition, but considerably fewer than for a round-robin tournament; thus each competitor (team or individual) does not play all the other competitors. Competitors meet one-on-one in each round and are paired using a set of rules designed to ensure that each competitor plays opponents with a similar running score, but does not play the same opponent more than once. The winner is the competitor with the highest aggregate points earned in all rounds. With an even number of participants, all competitors play in each round.


esl (and other esport TOs) wrongly call it swiss even though it clearly is no swiss format

i will probably push something on lp later today explaining this bad format better than esl did


That's interesting... I've thought about this problem "what's the most efficient algorithm for finding the largest k elements from n by comparing (in parallel)". k=1 is simple, just use single elimination, but it becomes way more complicated after that. Double elimination / GSL format works for k=2, but they don't prevent rematches. I tried to find a way to avoid rematches in swiss format, and I had limited success with binary labeling but there are cases that there are odd number of players with the same score. Also, I noticed that the CSGO swiss format doesn't even guarantee that the top 2 teams with 3-0 are actually top 8 if we don't have any presumed knowledge about them, because #9 team may get really lucky and advance with a 3-0. So anyways, it's a very complicated problem. I wonder how the seeding actually works.
Phase 1: F2    Phase 2: A   Phase 3: Profit!
hjpalpha
Profile Joined August 2017
Germany324 Posts
May 13 2023 19:25 GMT
#16
small format explanation: (Wiki)Pseudo-Swiss format
LiquipediaSCV ready | SC2-Liquipedia Admin, reviewer and editor | Wax called me a Liquipedia wizard in one of his articles for 2019 WCS Standings
jy_9876543210
Profile Joined March 2016
221 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-05-14 00:04:38
May 13 2023 22:51 GMT
#17
On May 14 2023 04:25 hjpalpha wrote:
small format explanation: (Wiki)Pseudo-Swiss format

I wonder if you could just modify the csgo module and use it here? It should be easier than writing one from scratch, no? Is it because the seeding rules are different?

BTW This is my explanation of the pseudo-swiss format in simple language:
You have 16 players and you want to select the top 8, here's what you do:
Pair them up, so you have 8 winners (1:0) and 8 losers (0:1);
Those who won would face each other, and who lost face each other, the result would be 4 with score (2:0), 8 with (1:1), 4 with (0:2);
Pair them up within each score group, so you get 2 players with score (3:0), 2+4=6 with score(2:1), 4+2=6 with score (1:2) and 2 with score (0:3). The two top players advance, the two bottom player are eliminated,
Pair them up within each score group, so you get 3 with score (3:1) and 3+3=6 with score (2:2) and 3 with score (1:3), those won 3 games advance, and those lost 3 games are eliminated;
Finally the last 6 players in the middle face each other, those who won would advance and those who lost would be eliminated. You get your top 8 players.
The only non-trivial problem is how to avoid rematches.

(It's like a triple elimination but not really, because it doesn't guarantee that the top 3 selected are actually the best 3. In fact, if the seed is random, rank 9 may advance as top 1 and rank 8 may be eliminated as bottom 1, though the probability is small. But of course, any other common format has this issue too. I think this format is a good balance between complexity and accuracy.
E.g, on the wiki page, if the ranks of players I~P are 9~16, player #9 would win 3:0 and advance, although they're not in top 8.)
Phase 1: F2    Phase 2: A   Phase 3: Profit!
covetousrat
Profile Joined October 2010
2106 Posts
May 14 2023 01:23 GMT
#18
I feel this format is a total mess. I dont even know what upcoming matchup.
hjpalpha
Profile Joined August 2017
Germany324 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-05-14 05:17:57
May 14 2023 04:36 GMT
#19
On May 14 2023 07:51 jy_9876543210 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2023 04:25 hjpalpha wrote:
small format explanation: (Wiki)Pseudo-Swiss format

I wonder if you could just modify the csgo module and use it here? It should be easier than writing one from scratch, no? Is it because the seeding rules are different?


The csgo module is outdated af, has some issues with wrong calculations, only supports teams not players, doesn't support several functionality we want to have on sc2 and uses the old match systems data instead of the new match systems data. And it also has the same limitations the current sc2 version has.
So not really an option to use that.
And i didn't write one from scratch i had to make an existing one useable for our automations. It still cost me several hours.


BTW This is my explanation of the pseudo-swiss format in simple language:
You have 16 players and you want to select the top 8, here's what you do:
Pair them up, so you have 8 winners (1:0) and 8 losers (0:1);
Those who won would face each other, and who lost face each other, the result would be 4 with score (2:0), 8 with (1:1), 4 with (0:2);
Pair them up within each score group, so you get 2 players with score (3:0), 2+4=6 with score(2:1), 4+2=6 with score (1:2) and 2 with score (0:3). The two top players advance, the two bottom player are eliminated,
Pair them up within each score group, so you get 3 with score (3:1) and 3+3=6 with score (2:2) and 3 with score (1:3), those won 3 games advance, and those lost 3 games are eliminated;
Finally the last 6 players in the middle face each other, those who won would advance and those who lost would be eliminated. You get your top 8 players.
The only non-trivial problem is how to avoid rematches.

or in short:
In this format 16 participants play until they have won 3 matches or lost 3 matches. The participants that win 3 matches advance to the next tournament stage while the players that lost 3 matches are eliminated. In each round participants are matched versus an opponent with the same match score. Usually rematches are not permitted.

(It's like a triple elimination but not really, because it doesn't guarantee that the top 3 selected are actually the best 3.

Triple elimination doesn't guarantee that either. It all depends on the seeding and the results in the matches. There are events that use rnd seeding in brackets.

In fact, if the seed is random, rank 9 may advance as top 1 and rank 8 may be eliminated as bottom 1, though the probability is small. But of course, any other common format has this issue too. I think this format is a good balance between complexity and accuracy.
E.g, on the wiki page, if the ranks of players I~P are 9~16, player #9 would win 3:0 and advance, although they're not in top 8.)

I still heavily prefer gsl style groups (technically a 3 round pseudo swiss but with this one the seeding is obvious and hence no confusion and you directly know the next rounds matchups) over the 5 round pseudo swiss.
And ESL does a very bad job at explaining the format. No explanation at all on their website nor in the rules, which makes the rule book very useless this year as it factually is just plain wrong in big chunks. And on stream the graphics are pretty useless too.
I think the way we show it on LP with the swissTableLeague is better. I would love to use a triple elim bracket. but for that the seeding would have to be logical and fixed instead of the unknown (and as of now arbitrary and in contradiction to the rule book) seeding they do.
LiquipediaSCV ready | SC2-Liquipedia Admin, reviewer and editor | Wax called me a Liquipedia wizard in one of his articles for 2019 WCS Standings
Balnazza
Profile Joined January 2018
235 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-05-14 09:50:12
May 14 2023 09:47 GMT
#20
It isn't really a triple elim bracket though, since I'm pretty sure in a triple elim the amount of matches would vary more. You would also probably be just qualified after 2x Bo3 instead of 3, right?

Speaking purely as a user, I don't really see what the problem with the (pseudo)Swiss system is? You can explain it in two sentences and you can see all matches in one table. Sure, the seeding isn't known beforehand for the next rounds, but who really cares about that in a groupstage?
Compared to that, I find even the CS:GO ESL Pro League triple-elim bracket confusing and they only use eight teams per group, not sixteen. I had to think rather long about it and I still feel the seeding doesn't make that much sense. Swiss (or "swiss") I did understand in like 45sec top...
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 10m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
aXVindicta 195
Vindicta 195
Forgg! 116
RuFF_SC2 107
ROOTCatZ 95
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis1749
Shinee 262
Dota 2
capcasts173
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
missharvey56
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox2355
Other Games
tarik_tv28021
summit1g16097
Liquid`RaSZi4963
Coldzera 1616
Stewie2K827
JimRising 679
Maynarde200
ToD182
WinterStarcraft153
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick49858
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
ESL CS:GO709
StarCraft 2
Esl_sc2306
ESL.tv306
Other Games
BasetradeTV27
StarCraft: Brood War
StarcraftVOD2
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta58
• musti20045 23
• nightgamer69 2
• Kozan
• Alpha X_
• aXEnki
• BadBorz1 0
• intothetv
• Gussbus
• Poblha
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamez Trovo
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• sscaitournament1
• STPLYoutube
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21976
Upcoming Events
ESL Open Cup
7h 10m
OSC
10h 10m
ESL Open Cup
14h 10m
ESL Open Cup
21h 10m
Wardi Open
1d 9h
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
BeAsT Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Ascension: World Tour
WardiTV TLMC #10
NC 2023 - EU Quals. - 2nd Stage
ESL Challenger League S45 EU

Ongoing

FS Mania
KCM Ladies Race Survival 2023 Season 2
Wisdom Invitational
KCM Race Survival 2023 Season 2
GRS Season 6
Super Anchor Qualifying S1
Platinum StarCraft League S1
CSL 9: 2023 Summer
BSL 2v2 ProLeague #2
WTL 2023 Summer
Nexus Never Dies #3
CCT Online Finals #1

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana Season 2
ESL Winter
HSC XXIII
ESL Summer
LTK Thunderball
Nations Cup 2023
ESL Pro League Season 18
IEM Cologne 2023
BLAST Premier Fall Groups
ESL Challenger Katowice 2023
BLAST Premier Spring Final
ESL Impact League S3 Finals
IEM Dallas 2023
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2023 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.