• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 06:15
CET 12:15
KST 20:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket7Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge1[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation14Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA12
StarCraft 2
General
SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t GM / Master map hacker and general hacking and cheating thread
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales! Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle Data analysis on 70 million replays soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[BSL21] GosuLeague T1 Ro16 - Tue & Thu 22:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group B - Sun 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group A - Sat 21:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Current Meta How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile [Game] Osu! Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI About SC2SEA.COM
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Evangelium — Chapt…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2239 users

Liquipedia Feedback Thread - Page 71

Forum Index > Website Feedback
Post a Reply
Prev 1 69 70 71 72 73 87 Next
akaMadMike
Profile Joined January 2011
Norway93 Posts
July 12 2016 09:34 GMT
#1401
Could you update the CSGO map page to be more like the SC2 map-pool page?

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Maps/Ladder_Maps/Legacy_of_the_Void

vs

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/counterstrike/Portal:Maps

I't would be nice to see what maps have been used in previous operations as well as what laddermap went out, and what came back and so on.
I know i was born and I know that I’ll die – the in between is mine!
FO-nTTaX
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Johto4954 Posts
July 12 2016 11:40 GMT
#1402
Technically we could, in a more practical way we would need to find someone willing to do it though. How about you being that person?
Administrator@FO_nTTaX | FO-nTTaX.de | 0xff0000.dev | Senior Lead Liquipedia Developer
"Nimm es. Es ist nicht viel, aber es kommt von Herzen. Vergiss mich nicht!"
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-09 21:47:40
August 09 2016 21:43 GMT
#1403
I am in the process of updating a lot of the info on the BW Wiki. This is what I'm thinking right now:

Attack speed should definitely be calculated in per second. This would be game speed * attack speed / 1000, where game speed is the delay between logical frames in ms. So for Fastest, on say the Marine, it would be 42 * 15 / 1000 = 0.63.

We should also use Fastest speed for all time-related things instead of normal, such as build time. For the Barracks, the Build Time would actually be 50.4 (rounded down to 50) seconds instead of 80 seconds. The way this is calculated is by build time * game speed / 1000.

Finally, I think Movement speed should be measured in cells per second, like SC2 is, so that it's a familiar number that people will understand. This would be calculated like speed * 1000 / game speed / cell size. So for Fastest speed, plugging in all the numbers for say the Marine, we do 4 * 1000 / 42 / 32 = 2.976 cells per second.

An alternative method for speed would just be pixels per second, which would be 4 * 1000 / 42 = 95.238

I'm already making some smaller edits and I'd be willing to make these changes for every single unit on the wiki.
Uuh.
FO-nTTaX
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Johto4954 Posts
August 09 2016 21:58 GMT
#1404
On August 10 2016 06:43 Templarfreak wrote:
I am in the process of updating a lot of the info on the BW Wiki. This is what I'm thinking right now:

Attack speed should definitely be calculated in per second. This would be game speed * attack speed / 1000, where game speed is the delay between logical frames in ms. So for Fastest, on say the Marine, it would be 42 * 15 / 1000 = 0.63.

We should also use Fastest speed for all time-related things instead of normal, such as build time. For the Barracks, the Build Time would actually be 50.4 (rounded down to 50) seconds instead of 80 seconds. The way this is calculated is by build time * game speed / 1000.

Finally, I think Movement speed should be measured in cells per second, like SC2 is, so that it's a familiar number that people will understand. This would be calculated like speed * 1000 / game speed / cell size. So for Fastest speed, plugging in all the numbers for say the Marine, we do 4 * 1000 / 42 / 32 = 2.976 cells per second.

An alternative method for speed would just be pixels per second, which would be 4 * 1000 / 42 = 95.238

I'm already making some smaller edits and I'd be willing to make these changes for every single unit on the wiki.

Possibly having both the normal speed and the fastest speed times would be worth it?
Administrator@FO_nTTaX | FO-nTTaX.de | 0xff0000.dev | Senior Lead Liquipedia Developer
"Nimm es. Es ist nicht viel, aber es kommt von Herzen. Vergiss mich nicht!"
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-10 09:29:16
August 09 2016 22:36 GMT
#1405
On August 10 2016 06:58 FO-nTTaX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2016 06:43 Templarfreak wrote:
I am in the process of updating a lot of the info on the BW Wiki. This is what I'm thinking right now:

Attack speed should definitely be calculated in per second. This would be game speed * attack speed / 1000, where game speed is the delay between logical frames in ms. So for Fastest, on say the Marine, it would be 42 * 15 / 1000 = 0.63.

We should also use Fastest speed for all time-related things instead of normal, such as build time. For the Barracks, the Build Time would actually be 50.4 (rounded down to 50) seconds instead of 80 seconds. The way this is calculated is by build time * game speed / 1000.

Finally, I think Movement speed should be measured in cells per second, like SC2 is, so that it's a familiar number that people will understand. This would be calculated like speed * 1000 / game speed / cell size. So for Fastest speed, plugging in all the numbers for say the Marine, we do 4 * 1000 / 42 / 32 = 2.976 cells per second.

An alternative method for speed would just be pixels per second, which would be 4 * 1000 / 42 = 95.238

I'm already making some smaller edits and I'd be willing to make these changes for every single unit on the wiki.

Possibly having both the normal speed and the fastest speed times would be worth it?


That would get cluttered and/or complicated unless you have a really good setup in mind. What is the purpose of having Normal speed anyway? It's not going to be the right information that people are looking for 90% of the time. The raw values are more useful for anyone else too (like AI programmers), like 1,200 for Barracks or 360 for Marines. And as for attack and movement speed, there'd still be a page dedicated to the raw values that would be linked back to, since the raw values do still have some use. I just think having the values adjusted for Fastest speed on the face of articles is more useful and quicker to access for the majority of people since the majority of people are probably looking it up for competitive purposes and thus would be playing on Fastest.

EDIT: Here is how I think the setup for the Unit Infobox should be so far: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/Template:Infobox_unitex

I've added some new sections and copied the way the SC2 Liquipedia shows hotkeys in the infobox.

The Talk page contains some extra comments.

EDIT2: Okay, I'm back. Do I have an okay to go here for these changes?
Uuh.
ChapatiyaqPTSM
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
France1887 Posts
August 10 2016 13:27 GMT
#1406
The normal speed has the advantage of being round numbers and exact. If you write that a Barracks is built in 50 seconds, you lose precision. I know that for the SC2 wiki, we use Fastest speed timings, but it's something that I'd like to change at some point.

My only worry is that you'll start this, probably alone, and be discouraged at some point and leave the wiki with time values at different speeds depending on the page. I'd like you to make a list of all the pages that you'll need to change, because it's not just the units and buildings pages (not just in the infobox, but also in the article body), it's abilities pages, statistics pages, etc. so that you take the measure of the task ahead of you.
LiquipediaBoy, these pretzels are makin' me thirsty.
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-10 16:09:31
August 10 2016 14:52 GMT
#1407
On August 10 2016 22:27 ChapatiyaqPTSM wrote:
The normal speed has the advantage of being round numbers and exact. If you write that a Barracks is built in 50 seconds, you lose precision. I know that for the SC2 wiki, we use Fastest speed timings, but it's something that I'd like to change at some point.

My only worry is that you'll start this, probably alone, and be discouraged at some point and leave the wiki with time values at different speeds depending on the page. I'd like you to make a list of all the pages that you'll need to change, because it's not just the units and buildings pages (not just in the infobox, but also in the article body), it's abilities pages, statistics pages, etc. so that you take the measure of the task ahead of you.


You are mistaken in that advantage. It is not exact, actually. The most exact value you can get is directly getting the values from the DAT/IScript files, which are based off of logical frames. A Marine takes 360 logical frames to build and how fast those logical frames are adjusted are based on the Game speed. So on Normal, you have 360 * 67 / 1000 = exactly 24.12 seconds in real time on normal game speed. No more, no less. On fastest, it is 360 * 42 / 1000 = exactly 15.12 seconds in real time. They are not perfectly rounded numbers nor are they more accurate than calculating with different game speeds. Since 90% of players will be playing on Fastest, it is only natural that we use fastest speed on the wiki(s). Especially for SC2, given that the values you see in-game when you start the game on Faster speed are exactly how long it takes on that game speed (Since LotV has converted it's time display to display the proper times on the proper game speed instead of the times for Normal being shown on every game speed).

Considering I'm already knocking out most of the hard stuff I intend to do, it will be EZ-PZ to convert all the time displays to the right numbers. I've already got a huge list of movement speed on fastest speed for every single unit, including the Broodling, Scarab, and Interceptor, and getting the duration for all abilities, research times, and etc, won't be too much trouble either considering I can view all the data and can easily convert it to real time using that same formula (time * game speed / 1000)

I've been working on the Ability template right now and am getting fairly close to being done with it. You can check my changes once I submit it. Here is the code so far, though:

+ Show Spoiler +
{{#if:{{{range|}}}|
{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>'''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}
|<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>}}
|{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}</div>
|}}
}}
|{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}</div>
|<div>'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>}}
|}}
}}


EDIT: Changes to Ability Template has been submitted.

Just realized, maybe there should be DPS vs Ground and DPS vs Air, with their respective bonuses, too?
Uuh.
ChapatiyaqPTSM
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
France1887 Posts
August 10 2016 15:45 GMT
#1408
On August 10 2016 23:52 Templarfreak wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2016 22:27 ChapatiyaqPTSM wrote:
The normal speed has the advantage of being round numbers and exact. If you write that a Barracks is built in 50 seconds, you lose precision. I know that for the SC2 wiki, we use Fastest speed timings, but it's something that I'd like to change at some point.

My only worry is that you'll start this, probably alone, and be discouraged at some point and leave the wiki with time values at different speeds depending on the page. I'd like you to make a list of all the pages that you'll need to change, because it's not just the units and buildings pages (not just in the infobox, but also in the article body), it's abilities pages, statistics pages, etc. so that you take the measure of the task ahead of you.


You are mistaken in that advantage. It is not exact, actually. The most exact value you can get is directly getting the values from the DAT/IScript files, which are based off of logical frames. A Marine takes 360 logical frames to build and how fast those logical frames are adjusted are based on the Game speed. So on Normal, you have 360 * 67 / 1000 = exactly 24.12 seconds in real time on normal game speed. No more, no less. On fastest, it is 360 * 42 / 1000 = exactly 15.12 seconds in real time. They are not perfectly rounded numbers nor are they more accurate than calculating with different game speeds. Since 90% of players will be playing on Fastest, it is only naturally that we use fastest speed on the wiki(s). Especially for SC2, given that the values you see in-game when you start the game on Faster speed are exactly how long it takes on that game speed (Since LotV has converted it's time display to display the proper times on the proper game speed instead of the times for Normal being shown on every game speed).

Considering I'm already knocking out most of the hard stuff I intend to do, it will be EZ-PZ to convert all the time displays to the right numbers. I've already got a huge list of movement speed on fastest speed for every single unit, including the Broodling, Scarab, and Interceptor, and getting the duration for all abilities, research times, and etc, won't be too much trouble either considering I can view all the data and can easily convert it to real time using that same formula (time * game speed / 1000)

I've been working on the Ability template right now and am getting fairly close to being done with it. You can check my changes once I submit it. Here is the code so far, though:

+ Show Spoiler +
{{#if:{{{range|}}}|
{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}
'''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}
|
'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}
}}
|{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}

|}}
}}
|{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}

|
'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}
}}
|}}
}}


EDIT: Changes to Ability Template has been submitted.

Just realized, maybe there should be DPS vs Ground and DPS vs Air, with their respective bonuses, too?

Ok, my bad then :x

About SC2, what I meant is that I agree that it should be like the faster speed, but that what we show are rounded values, when ideally I'd like them to be more precise.Like blink research doesn't take 121 seconds but 170/1.4 = almost 121.4 seconds (I know the 1.4 ratio is not always true, it's a target value, and the engine tries to be as close as it can to this value)

To be honest, I'm ok with the change, but I don't feel comfortable taking any decision about the Brood War wiki. I know you're eager to start working on it, but I hope this change will be accepted by others as well.
LiquipediaBoy, these pretzels are makin' me thirsty.
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-10 16:16:35
August 10 2016 16:11 GMT
#1409
On August 11 2016 00:45 ChapatiyaqPTSM wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2016 23:52 Templarfreak wrote:
On August 10 2016 22:27 ChapatiyaqPTSM wrote:
The normal speed has the advantage of being round numbers and exact. If you write that a Barracks is built in 50 seconds, you lose precision. I know that for the SC2 wiki, we use Fastest speed timings, but it's something that I'd like to change at some point.

My only worry is that you'll start this, probably alone, and be discouraged at some point and leave the wiki with time values at different speeds depending on the page. I'd like you to make a list of all the pages that you'll need to change, because it's not just the units and buildings pages (not just in the infobox, but also in the article body), it's abilities pages, statistics pages, etc. so that you take the measure of the task ahead of you.


You are mistaken in that advantage. It is not exact, actually. The most exact value you can get is directly getting the values from the DAT/IScript files, which are based off of logical frames. A Marine takes 360 logical frames to build and how fast those logical frames are adjusted are based on the Game speed. So on Normal, you have 360 * 67 / 1000 = exactly 24.12 seconds in real time on normal game speed. No more, no less. On fastest, it is 360 * 42 / 1000 = exactly 15.12 seconds in real time. They are not perfectly rounded numbers nor are they more accurate than calculating with different game speeds. Since 90% of players will be playing on Fastest, it is only naturally that we use fastest speed on the wiki(s). Especially for SC2, given that the values you see in-game when you start the game on Faster speed are exactly how long it takes on that game speed (Since LotV has converted it's time display to display the proper times on the proper game speed instead of the times for Normal being shown on every game speed).

Considering I'm already knocking out most of the hard stuff I intend to do, it will be EZ-PZ to convert all the time displays to the right numbers. I've already got a huge list of movement speed on fastest speed for every single unit, including the Broodling, Scarab, and Interceptor, and getting the duration for all abilities, research times, and etc, won't be too much trouble either considering I can view all the data and can easily convert it to real time using that same formula (time * game speed / 1000)

I've been working on the Ability template right now and am getting fairly close to being done with it. You can check my changes once I submit it. Here is the code so far, though:

+ Show Spoiler +
{{#if:{{{range|}}}|
{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>'''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}
|<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>}}
|{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}</div>
|}}
}}
|{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}</div>
|<div>'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>}}
|}}
}}


EDIT: Changes to Ability Template has been submitted.

Just realized, maybe there should be DPS vs Ground and DPS vs Air, with their respective bonuses, too?

Ok, my bad then :x

About SC2, what I meant is that I agree that it should be like the faster speed, but that what we show are rounded values, when ideally I'd like them to be more precise.Like blink research doesn't take 121 seconds but 170/1.4 = almost 121.4 seconds (I know the 1.4 ratio is not always true, it's a target value, and the engine tries to be as close as it can to this value)

To be honest, I'm ok with the change, but I don't feel comfortable taking any decision about the Brood War wiki. I know you're eager to start working on it, but I hope this change will be accepted by others as well.


I have already gotten an O-K from someone on the Wiki (prech) and about 3 people in the IRC chat commented about it and seemed okay with it. I do agree though. This will probably be another day or so before enough people give me the O-K to make me comfortable with changing the time frames for every single unit and upgrade, just to be sure everyone is on page and okay with it.

I made some edits to the Marine to demonstrate how the final product would look.
Uuh.
FO-nTTaX
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Johto4954 Posts
August 10 2016 17:13 GMT
#1410
If prech says it is ok then by all means go for it. prech is basically the head of the Brood War wiki
Administrator@FO_nTTaX | FO-nTTaX.de | 0xff0000.dev | Senior Lead Liquipedia Developer
"Nimm es. Es ist nicht viel, aber es kommt von Herzen. Vergiss mich nicht!"
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
August 11 2016 18:41 GMT
#1411
Alright, I'd say I'm like half-way done with preparations and editing the templates to include more information then it's off to editing each unit, upgrade, and ability.
Uuh.
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-12 20:02:33
August 12 2016 20:02 GMT
#1412
I've made some more edits across a few more units because they made me add new functionality to the template, such as on the Ghost.

For the Siege Tank, I'm thinking I should include splash in some way in the infobox but I don't want it to get too cluttered. Maybe as a completely separate infobox that can go just below the unit infobox?
Uuh.
nunchaku-
Profile Joined August 2016
1 Post
Last Edited: 2016-08-15 06:22:00
August 15 2016 06:21 GMT
#1413
I've found false information just now. On JDM64's page (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/counterstrike/Jdm64/Results#Detailed_Results), it states that he participated in ELeague Season 1. This needs revision, since he was not part of the line up that participated versus Faze.

Source: http://www.hltv.org/match/2303422-faze-clg-eleague-season-1\

Please have a policy that enforces and promotes a strong use of sources.
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19156 Posts
August 15 2016 12:37 GMT
#1414
it's a wiki, you know you can edit it yourself, right?
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
salle
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Sweden5554 Posts
August 15 2016 15:02 GMT
#1415
On August 15 2016 15:21 nunchaku- wrote:
I've found false information just now. On JDM64's page (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/counterstrike/Jdm64/Results#Detailed_Results), it states that he participated in ELeague Season 1. This needs revision, since he was not part of the line up that participated versus Faze.

Source: http://www.hltv.org/match/2303422-faze-clg-eleague-season-1\

Please have a policy that enforces and promotes a strong use of sources.


He was part of CLG for most of ELEAGUE Season 1, no?
Administrator"Ambitious but rubbish!" - Jeremy Clarkson
FO-nTTaX
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Johto4954 Posts
August 15 2016 15:18 GMT
#1416
yeah, that's why it is listed as his result
Administrator@FO_nTTaX | FO-nTTaX.de | 0xff0000.dev | Senior Lead Liquipedia Developer
"Nimm es. Es ist nicht viel, aber es kommt von Herzen. Vergiss mich nicht!"
tolkienfanatic
Profile Joined February 2015
United States110 Posts
August 29 2016 16:52 GMT
#1417
On August 15 2016 15:21 nunchaku- wrote:
I've found false information just now. On JDM64's page (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/counterstrike/Jdm64/Results#Detailed_Results), it states that he participated in ELeague Season 1. This needs revision, since he was not part of the line up that participated versus Faze.

Source: http://www.hltv.org/match/2303422-faze-clg-eleague-season-1\

Please have a policy that enforces and promotes a strong use of sources.


As mentioned above, this is not false information - Josh played for CLG in 12/15 of the matches they played at ELEAGUE - far above the fuzzy requirement of 50%.

If you feel our sourcing policy is weak (it isn't), there is no better way to change that than contributing yourself.
Liquipedia@tolkienfanatic | Skype: tolkienfanatic | Liquipedia Staff | HLTV Staff | CS/FGC/RL
xuanzue
Profile Joined October 2010
Colombia1747 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-01 22:48:27
October 01 2016 22:45 GMT
#1418
Hi, I'm watching the liquipedia for CSGO using OPERA kinda broken:

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

[image loading]


The liquipedia for SC2, BW, smash, Heroes and overwatch all are good for me.

The one for CSGO is the only one I see broken.

Dominions 4: "Thrones of Ascension".
FO-nTTaX
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Johto4954 Posts
October 01 2016 23:11 GMT
#1419
Clear your cache, it's a broken cache in your browser.

Firefox / Safari: Hold Shift while clicking Reload, or press either Ctrl-F5 or Ctrl-R (⌘-R on a Mac)
Google Chrome: Press Ctrl-Shift-R (⌘-Shift-R on a Mac)
Internet Explorer: Hold Ctrl while clicking Refresh, or press Ctrl-F5
Opera: Clear the cache in Tools → Preferences
Administrator@FO_nTTaX | FO-nTTaX.de | 0xff0000.dev | Senior Lead Liquipedia Developer
"Nimm es. Es ist nicht viel, aber es kommt von Herzen. Vergiss mich nicht!"
xuanzue
Profile Joined October 2010
Colombia1747 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-02 00:09:56
October 02 2016 00:09 GMT
#1420
On October 02 2016 08:11 FO-nTTaX wrote:
Clear your cache, it's a broken cache in your browser.

Firefox / Safari: Hold Shift while clicking Reload, or press either Ctrl-F5 or Ctrl-R (⌘-R on a Mac)
Google Chrome: Press Ctrl-Shift-R (⌘-Shift-R on a Mac)
Internet Explorer: Hold Ctrl while clicking Refresh, or press Ctrl-F5
Opera: Clear the cache in Tools → Preferences


I'm using Opera
cleared the cache from the beginning of time, and nothing changed with the wiki page.

later also cleared the cookies, and no changes.

With internet explorer seems fine
Dominions 4: "Thrones of Ascension".
Prev 1 69 70 71 72 73 87 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
07:30
Playoffs
MaxPax vs TriGGeRLIVE!
Crank 1205
Tasteless957
IndyStarCraft 136
Rex106
CranKy Ducklings50
3DClanTV 44
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Crank 1205
Tasteless 957
IndyStarCraft 136
Rex 106
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 14469
Larva 3303
Rain 3005
Sea 2018
Flash 983
Shuttle 880
EffOrt 459
BeSt 318
Killer 275
Soulkey 275
[ Show more ]
Mini 245
Light 205
Soma 174
Hyun 172
Last 168
Pusan 120
Rush 94
Backho 80
Aegong 78
Snow 75
Barracks 63
ToSsGirL 57
ZerO 45
Movie 44
Mind 40
Shine 37
zelot 36
soO 33
sorry 25
Sexy 18
HiyA 18
Icarus 14
Sea.KH 12
Terrorterran 12
Bale 6
ivOry 4
Dota 2
Gorgc1543
XcaliburYe332
BananaSlamJamma167
singsing120
League of Legends
JimRising 383
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1683
zeus808
shoxiejesuss655
x6flipin351
byalli202
Heroes of the Storm
Trikslyr35
Other Games
B2W.Neo643
ceh9593
crisheroes428
Fuzer 229
Mew2King95
ArmadaUGS25
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream12662
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 988
Other Games
gamesdonequick573
StarCraft 2
ComeBackTV 210
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HappyZerGling 76
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1421
League of Legends
• Jankos1129
Upcoming Events
OSC
1h 46m
BSL: GosuLeague
9h 46m
RSL Revival
20h 16m
Zoun vs Classic
herO vs Reynor
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d
Replay Cast
1d 11h
RSL Revival
1d 20h
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
IPSL
2 days
Julia vs Artosis
JDConan vs DragOn
BSL 21
2 days
TerrOr vs Aeternum
HBO vs Kyrie
RSL Revival
2 days
[ Show More ]
Wardi Open
3 days
IPSL
3 days
StRyKeR vs OldBoy
Sziky vs Tarson
BSL 21
3 days
StRyKeR vs Artosis
OyAji vs KameZerg
Replay Cast
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-16
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.