• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:10
CEST 05:10
KST 12:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins Maestros of the Game 226ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7
Community News
MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon405.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes39Weekly Cups (June 22-28): Zergs thrive in new patch5[TLMC] Summer 2026 Ladder Map Rotation05.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start)102
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon Is the larve respawn broken? 5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start) Weekly Cups (June 29-July 5): Solar Doubles
Tourneys
HomeStory Cup 29 GSL CK #5 Race War RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Vespene Cup #1 — $300+ USD, July 10 Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28)
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
Mutation # 533 Die Together The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 532 Nuclear Family Mutation # 531 Experimental Artillery
Brood War
General
Snow On New ASL S22 Map, Zerg Nerf BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL 22 Proposed Map Pool BW General Discussion First season(s) of tastosis gomtv gsl vods?
Tourneys
CSLAN 4 is Coming! Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 The Casual Games of the Week Thread [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Relatively freeroll strategies Why doesn't anyone use restoration?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV Summer Games Done Quick 2026! ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Power Rank Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion McBoner: A hockey love story TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard? Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Major Shifts in the Gaming I…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 16050 users

Liquipedia Feedback Thread - Page 71

Forum Index > Website Feedback
Post a Reply
Prev 1 69 70 71 72 73 87 Next
akaMadMike
Profile Joined January 2011
Norway93 Posts
July 12 2016 09:34 GMT
#1401
Could you update the CSGO map page to be more like the SC2 map-pool page?

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Maps/Ladder_Maps/Legacy_of_the_Void

vs

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/counterstrike/Portal:Maps

I't would be nice to see what maps have been used in previous operations as well as what laddermap went out, and what came back and so on.
I know i was born and I know that I’ll die – the in between is mine!
FO-nTTaX
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Johto4990 Posts
July 12 2016 11:40 GMT
#1402
Technically we could, in a more practical way we would need to find someone willing to do it though. How about you being that person?
Administrator@FO_nTTaX | FO-nTTaX.de | 0xff0000.dev | Senior Lead Liquipedia Developer
"Nimm es. Es ist nicht viel, aber es kommt von Herzen. Vergiss mich nicht!"
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-09 21:47:40
August 09 2016 21:43 GMT
#1403
I am in the process of updating a lot of the info on the BW Wiki. This is what I'm thinking right now:

Attack speed should definitely be calculated in per second. This would be game speed * attack speed / 1000, where game speed is the delay between logical frames in ms. So for Fastest, on say the Marine, it would be 42 * 15 / 1000 = 0.63.

We should also use Fastest speed for all time-related things instead of normal, such as build time. For the Barracks, the Build Time would actually be 50.4 (rounded down to 50) seconds instead of 80 seconds. The way this is calculated is by build time * game speed / 1000.

Finally, I think Movement speed should be measured in cells per second, like SC2 is, so that it's a familiar number that people will understand. This would be calculated like speed * 1000 / game speed / cell size. So for Fastest speed, plugging in all the numbers for say the Marine, we do 4 * 1000 / 42 / 32 = 2.976 cells per second.

An alternative method for speed would just be pixels per second, which would be 4 * 1000 / 42 = 95.238

I'm already making some smaller edits and I'd be willing to make these changes for every single unit on the wiki.
Uuh.
FO-nTTaX
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Johto4990 Posts
August 09 2016 21:58 GMT
#1404
On August 10 2016 06:43 Templarfreak wrote:
I am in the process of updating a lot of the info on the BW Wiki. This is what I'm thinking right now:

Attack speed should definitely be calculated in per second. This would be game speed * attack speed / 1000, where game speed is the delay between logical frames in ms. So for Fastest, on say the Marine, it would be 42 * 15 / 1000 = 0.63.

We should also use Fastest speed for all time-related things instead of normal, such as build time. For the Barracks, the Build Time would actually be 50.4 (rounded down to 50) seconds instead of 80 seconds. The way this is calculated is by build time * game speed / 1000.

Finally, I think Movement speed should be measured in cells per second, like SC2 is, so that it's a familiar number that people will understand. This would be calculated like speed * 1000 / game speed / cell size. So for Fastest speed, plugging in all the numbers for say the Marine, we do 4 * 1000 / 42 / 32 = 2.976 cells per second.

An alternative method for speed would just be pixels per second, which would be 4 * 1000 / 42 = 95.238

I'm already making some smaller edits and I'd be willing to make these changes for every single unit on the wiki.

Possibly having both the normal speed and the fastest speed times would be worth it?
Administrator@FO_nTTaX | FO-nTTaX.de | 0xff0000.dev | Senior Lead Liquipedia Developer
"Nimm es. Es ist nicht viel, aber es kommt von Herzen. Vergiss mich nicht!"
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-10 09:29:16
August 09 2016 22:36 GMT
#1405
On August 10 2016 06:58 FO-nTTaX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2016 06:43 Templarfreak wrote:
I am in the process of updating a lot of the info on the BW Wiki. This is what I'm thinking right now:

Attack speed should definitely be calculated in per second. This would be game speed * attack speed / 1000, where game speed is the delay between logical frames in ms. So for Fastest, on say the Marine, it would be 42 * 15 / 1000 = 0.63.

We should also use Fastest speed for all time-related things instead of normal, such as build time. For the Barracks, the Build Time would actually be 50.4 (rounded down to 50) seconds instead of 80 seconds. The way this is calculated is by build time * game speed / 1000.

Finally, I think Movement speed should be measured in cells per second, like SC2 is, so that it's a familiar number that people will understand. This would be calculated like speed * 1000 / game speed / cell size. So for Fastest speed, plugging in all the numbers for say the Marine, we do 4 * 1000 / 42 / 32 = 2.976 cells per second.

An alternative method for speed would just be pixels per second, which would be 4 * 1000 / 42 = 95.238

I'm already making some smaller edits and I'd be willing to make these changes for every single unit on the wiki.

Possibly having both the normal speed and the fastest speed times would be worth it?


That would get cluttered and/or complicated unless you have a really good setup in mind. What is the purpose of having Normal speed anyway? It's not going to be the right information that people are looking for 90% of the time. The raw values are more useful for anyone else too (like AI programmers), like 1,200 for Barracks or 360 for Marines. And as for attack and movement speed, there'd still be a page dedicated to the raw values that would be linked back to, since the raw values do still have some use. I just think having the values adjusted for Fastest speed on the face of articles is more useful and quicker to access for the majority of people since the majority of people are probably looking it up for competitive purposes and thus would be playing on Fastest.

EDIT: Here is how I think the setup for the Unit Infobox should be so far: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/Template:Infobox_unitex

I've added some new sections and copied the way the SC2 Liquipedia shows hotkeys in the infobox.

The Talk page contains some extra comments.

EDIT2: Okay, I'm back. Do I have an okay to go here for these changes?
Uuh.
ChapatiyaqPTSM
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
France1887 Posts
August 10 2016 13:27 GMT
#1406
The normal speed has the advantage of being round numbers and exact. If you write that a Barracks is built in 50 seconds, you lose precision. I know that for the SC2 wiki, we use Fastest speed timings, but it's something that I'd like to change at some point.

My only worry is that you'll start this, probably alone, and be discouraged at some point and leave the wiki with time values at different speeds depending on the page. I'd like you to make a list of all the pages that you'll need to change, because it's not just the units and buildings pages (not just in the infobox, but also in the article body), it's abilities pages, statistics pages, etc. so that you take the measure of the task ahead of you.
LiquipediaBoy, these pretzels are makin' me thirsty.
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-10 16:09:31
August 10 2016 14:52 GMT
#1407
On August 10 2016 22:27 ChapatiyaqPTSM wrote:
The normal speed has the advantage of being round numbers and exact. If you write that a Barracks is built in 50 seconds, you lose precision. I know that for the SC2 wiki, we use Fastest speed timings, but it's something that I'd like to change at some point.

My only worry is that you'll start this, probably alone, and be discouraged at some point and leave the wiki with time values at different speeds depending on the page. I'd like you to make a list of all the pages that you'll need to change, because it's not just the units and buildings pages (not just in the infobox, but also in the article body), it's abilities pages, statistics pages, etc. so that you take the measure of the task ahead of you.


You are mistaken in that advantage. It is not exact, actually. The most exact value you can get is directly getting the values from the DAT/IScript files, which are based off of logical frames. A Marine takes 360 logical frames to build and how fast those logical frames are adjusted are based on the Game speed. So on Normal, you have 360 * 67 / 1000 = exactly 24.12 seconds in real time on normal game speed. No more, no less. On fastest, it is 360 * 42 / 1000 = exactly 15.12 seconds in real time. They are not perfectly rounded numbers nor are they more accurate than calculating with different game speeds. Since 90% of players will be playing on Fastest, it is only natural that we use fastest speed on the wiki(s). Especially for SC2, given that the values you see in-game when you start the game on Faster speed are exactly how long it takes on that game speed (Since LotV has converted it's time display to display the proper times on the proper game speed instead of the times for Normal being shown on every game speed).

Considering I'm already knocking out most of the hard stuff I intend to do, it will be EZ-PZ to convert all the time displays to the right numbers. I've already got a huge list of movement speed on fastest speed for every single unit, including the Broodling, Scarab, and Interceptor, and getting the duration for all abilities, research times, and etc, won't be too much trouble either considering I can view all the data and can easily convert it to real time using that same formula (time * game speed / 1000)

I've been working on the Ability template right now and am getting fairly close to being done with it. You can check my changes once I submit it. Here is the code so far, though:

+ Show Spoiler +
{{#if:{{{range|}}}|
{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>'''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}
|<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>}}
|{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}</div>
|}}
}}
|{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}</div>
|<div>'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>}}
|}}
}}


EDIT: Changes to Ability Template has been submitted.

Just realized, maybe there should be DPS vs Ground and DPS vs Air, with their respective bonuses, too?
Uuh.
ChapatiyaqPTSM
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
France1887 Posts
August 10 2016 15:45 GMT
#1408
On August 10 2016 23:52 Templarfreak wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2016 22:27 ChapatiyaqPTSM wrote:
The normal speed has the advantage of being round numbers and exact. If you write that a Barracks is built in 50 seconds, you lose precision. I know that for the SC2 wiki, we use Fastest speed timings, but it's something that I'd like to change at some point.

My only worry is that you'll start this, probably alone, and be discouraged at some point and leave the wiki with time values at different speeds depending on the page. I'd like you to make a list of all the pages that you'll need to change, because it's not just the units and buildings pages (not just in the infobox, but also in the article body), it's abilities pages, statistics pages, etc. so that you take the measure of the task ahead of you.


You are mistaken in that advantage. It is not exact, actually. The most exact value you can get is directly getting the values from the DAT/IScript files, which are based off of logical frames. A Marine takes 360 logical frames to build and how fast those logical frames are adjusted are based on the Game speed. So on Normal, you have 360 * 67 / 1000 = exactly 24.12 seconds in real time on normal game speed. No more, no less. On fastest, it is 360 * 42 / 1000 = exactly 15.12 seconds in real time. They are not perfectly rounded numbers nor are they more accurate than calculating with different game speeds. Since 90% of players will be playing on Fastest, it is only naturally that we use fastest speed on the wiki(s). Especially for SC2, given that the values you see in-game when you start the game on Faster speed are exactly how long it takes on that game speed (Since LotV has converted it's time display to display the proper times on the proper game speed instead of the times for Normal being shown on every game speed).

Considering I'm already knocking out most of the hard stuff I intend to do, it will be EZ-PZ to convert all the time displays to the right numbers. I've already got a huge list of movement speed on fastest speed for every single unit, including the Broodling, Scarab, and Interceptor, and getting the duration for all abilities, research times, and etc, won't be too much trouble either considering I can view all the data and can easily convert it to real time using that same formula (time * game speed / 1000)

I've been working on the Ability template right now and am getting fairly close to being done with it. You can check my changes once I submit it. Here is the code so far, though:

+ Show Spoiler +
{{#if:{{{range|}}}|
{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}
'''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}
|
'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}
}}
|{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}

|}}
}}
|{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}

|
'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}
}}
|}}
}}


EDIT: Changes to Ability Template has been submitted.

Just realized, maybe there should be DPS vs Ground and DPS vs Air, with their respective bonuses, too?

Ok, my bad then :x

About SC2, what I meant is that I agree that it should be like the faster speed, but that what we show are rounded values, when ideally I'd like them to be more precise.Like blink research doesn't take 121 seconds but 170/1.4 = almost 121.4 seconds (I know the 1.4 ratio is not always true, it's a target value, and the engine tries to be as close as it can to this value)

To be honest, I'm ok with the change, but I don't feel comfortable taking any decision about the Brood War wiki. I know you're eager to start working on it, but I hope this change will be accepted by others as well.
LiquipediaBoy, these pretzels are makin' me thirsty.
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-10 16:16:35
August 10 2016 16:11 GMT
#1409
On August 11 2016 00:45 ChapatiyaqPTSM wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2016 23:52 Templarfreak wrote:
On August 10 2016 22:27 ChapatiyaqPTSM wrote:
The normal speed has the advantage of being round numbers and exact. If you write that a Barracks is built in 50 seconds, you lose precision. I know that for the SC2 wiki, we use Fastest speed timings, but it's something that I'd like to change at some point.

My only worry is that you'll start this, probably alone, and be discouraged at some point and leave the wiki with time values at different speeds depending on the page. I'd like you to make a list of all the pages that you'll need to change, because it's not just the units and buildings pages (not just in the infobox, but also in the article body), it's abilities pages, statistics pages, etc. so that you take the measure of the task ahead of you.


You are mistaken in that advantage. It is not exact, actually. The most exact value you can get is directly getting the values from the DAT/IScript files, which are based off of logical frames. A Marine takes 360 logical frames to build and how fast those logical frames are adjusted are based on the Game speed. So on Normal, you have 360 * 67 / 1000 = exactly 24.12 seconds in real time on normal game speed. No more, no less. On fastest, it is 360 * 42 / 1000 = exactly 15.12 seconds in real time. They are not perfectly rounded numbers nor are they more accurate than calculating with different game speeds. Since 90% of players will be playing on Fastest, it is only naturally that we use fastest speed on the wiki(s). Especially for SC2, given that the values you see in-game when you start the game on Faster speed are exactly how long it takes on that game speed (Since LotV has converted it's time display to display the proper times on the proper game speed instead of the times for Normal being shown on every game speed).

Considering I'm already knocking out most of the hard stuff I intend to do, it will be EZ-PZ to convert all the time displays to the right numbers. I've already got a huge list of movement speed on fastest speed for every single unit, including the Broodling, Scarab, and Interceptor, and getting the duration for all abilities, research times, and etc, won't be too much trouble either considering I can view all the data and can easily convert it to real time using that same formula (time * game speed / 1000)

I've been working on the Ability template right now and am getting fairly close to being done with it. You can check my changes once I submit it. Here is the code so far, though:

+ Show Spoiler +
{{#if:{{{range|}}}|
{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>'''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}
|<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>}}
|{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}</div>
|}}
}}
|{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}</div>
|<div>'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>}}
|}}
}}


EDIT: Changes to Ability Template has been submitted.

Just realized, maybe there should be DPS vs Ground and DPS vs Air, with their respective bonuses, too?

Ok, my bad then :x

About SC2, what I meant is that I agree that it should be like the faster speed, but that what we show are rounded values, when ideally I'd like them to be more precise.Like blink research doesn't take 121 seconds but 170/1.4 = almost 121.4 seconds (I know the 1.4 ratio is not always true, it's a target value, and the engine tries to be as close as it can to this value)

To be honest, I'm ok with the change, but I don't feel comfortable taking any decision about the Brood War wiki. I know you're eager to start working on it, but I hope this change will be accepted by others as well.


I have already gotten an O-K from someone on the Wiki (prech) and about 3 people in the IRC chat commented about it and seemed okay with it. I do agree though. This will probably be another day or so before enough people give me the O-K to make me comfortable with changing the time frames for every single unit and upgrade, just to be sure everyone is on page and okay with it.

I made some edits to the Marine to demonstrate how the final product would look.
Uuh.
FO-nTTaX
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Johto4990 Posts
August 10 2016 17:13 GMT
#1410
If prech says it is ok then by all means go for it. prech is basically the head of the Brood War wiki
Administrator@FO_nTTaX | FO-nTTaX.de | 0xff0000.dev | Senior Lead Liquipedia Developer
"Nimm es. Es ist nicht viel, aber es kommt von Herzen. Vergiss mich nicht!"
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
August 11 2016 18:41 GMT
#1411
Alright, I'd say I'm like half-way done with preparations and editing the templates to include more information then it's off to editing each unit, upgrade, and ability.
Uuh.
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-12 20:02:33
August 12 2016 20:02 GMT
#1412
I've made some more edits across a few more units because they made me add new functionality to the template, such as on the Ghost.

For the Siege Tank, I'm thinking I should include splash in some way in the infobox but I don't want it to get too cluttered. Maybe as a completely separate infobox that can go just below the unit infobox?
Uuh.
nunchaku-
Profile Joined August 2016
1 Post
Last Edited: 2016-08-15 06:22:00
August 15 2016 06:21 GMT
#1413
I've found false information just now. On JDM64's page (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/counterstrike/Jdm64/Results#Detailed_Results), it states that he participated in ELeague Season 1. This needs revision, since he was not part of the line up that participated versus Faze.

Source: http://www.hltv.org/match/2303422-faze-clg-eleague-season-1\

Please have a policy that enforces and promotes a strong use of sources.
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19228 Posts
August 15 2016 12:37 GMT
#1414
it's a wiki, you know you can edit it yourself, right?
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
salle
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Sweden5554 Posts
August 15 2016 15:02 GMT
#1415
On August 15 2016 15:21 nunchaku- wrote:
I've found false information just now. On JDM64's page (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/counterstrike/Jdm64/Results#Detailed_Results), it states that he participated in ELeague Season 1. This needs revision, since he was not part of the line up that participated versus Faze.

Source: http://www.hltv.org/match/2303422-faze-clg-eleague-season-1\

Please have a policy that enforces and promotes a strong use of sources.


He was part of CLG for most of ELEAGUE Season 1, no?
Administrator"Ambitious but rubbish!" - Jeremy Clarkson
FO-nTTaX
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Johto4990 Posts
August 15 2016 15:18 GMT
#1416
yeah, that's why it is listed as his result
Administrator@FO_nTTaX | FO-nTTaX.de | 0xff0000.dev | Senior Lead Liquipedia Developer
"Nimm es. Es ist nicht viel, aber es kommt von Herzen. Vergiss mich nicht!"
tolkienfanatic
Profile Joined February 2015
United States110 Posts
August 29 2016 16:52 GMT
#1417
On August 15 2016 15:21 nunchaku- wrote:
I've found false information just now. On JDM64's page (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/counterstrike/Jdm64/Results#Detailed_Results), it states that he participated in ELeague Season 1. This needs revision, since he was not part of the line up that participated versus Faze.

Source: http://www.hltv.org/match/2303422-faze-clg-eleague-season-1\

Please have a policy that enforces and promotes a strong use of sources.


As mentioned above, this is not false information - Josh played for CLG in 12/15 of the matches they played at ELEAGUE - far above the fuzzy requirement of 50%.

If you feel our sourcing policy is weak (it isn't), there is no better way to change that than contributing yourself.
Liquipedia@tolkienfanatic | Skype: tolkienfanatic | Liquipedia Staff | HLTV Staff | CS/FGC/RL
xuanzue
Profile Joined October 2010
Colombia1747 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-01 22:48:27
October 01 2016 22:45 GMT
#1418
Hi, I'm watching the liquipedia for CSGO using OPERA kinda broken:

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

[image loading]


The liquipedia for SC2, BW, smash, Heroes and overwatch all are good for me.

The one for CSGO is the only one I see broken.

Dominions 4: "Thrones of Ascension".
FO-nTTaX
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Johto4990 Posts
October 01 2016 23:11 GMT
#1419
Clear your cache, it's a broken cache in your browser.

Firefox / Safari: Hold Shift while clicking Reload, or press either Ctrl-F5 or Ctrl-R (⌘-R on a Mac)
Google Chrome: Press Ctrl-Shift-R (⌘-Shift-R on a Mac)
Internet Explorer: Hold Ctrl while clicking Refresh, or press Ctrl-F5
Opera: Clear the cache in Tools → Preferences
Administrator@FO_nTTaX | FO-nTTaX.de | 0xff0000.dev | Senior Lead Liquipedia Developer
"Nimm es. Es ist nicht viel, aber es kommt von Herzen. Vergiss mich nicht!"
xuanzue
Profile Joined October 2010
Colombia1747 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-02 00:09:56
October 02 2016 00:09 GMT
#1420
On October 02 2016 08:11 FO-nTTaX wrote:
Clear your cache, it's a broken cache in your browser.

Firefox / Safari: Hold Shift while clicking Reload, or press either Ctrl-F5 or Ctrl-R (⌘-R on a Mac)
Google Chrome: Press Ctrl-Shift-R (⌘-Shift-R on a Mac)
Internet Explorer: Hold Ctrl while clicking Refresh, or press Ctrl-F5
Opera: Clear the cache in Tools → Preferences


I'm using Opera
cleared the cache from the beginning of time, and nothing changed with the wiki page.

later also cleared the cookies, and no changes.

With internet explorer seems fine
Dominions 4: "Thrones of Ascension".
Prev 1 69 70 71 72 73 87 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Cup
00:00
#89
PiGStarcraft740
CranKy Ducklings106
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft740
ProTech114
Nina 112
RuFF_SC2 88
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 29064
GuemChi 2901
Rain 2721
Artosis 653
Mind 80
NaDa 41
Bale 33
Dota 2
LuMiX0
League of Legends
Doublelift4085
JimRising 742
Counter-Strike
summit1g10375
taco 385
m0e_tv342
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox1534
C9.Mang0659
Mew2King245
Other Games
ViBE220
Maynarde149
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick34081
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP142
• Hupsaiya 85
• EnkiAlexander 65
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos668
• Stunt180
Other Games
• Scarra968
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
6h 50m
Replay Cast
1d 5h
CrankTV Team League
1d 7h
OSC
1d 13h
Replay Cast
1d 20h
Replay Cast
2 days
CrankTV Team League
2 days
OSC
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Serral vs Bunny
ByuN vs GgMaChine
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Snow vs Jaedong
YSC vs hero
RSL Revival
4 days
Solar vs Rogue
Maru vs NightMare
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
GSL
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 21: Qualifier 2
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E1

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
YSL S3
CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
SCTL 2026 Spring
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W2
ASL Season 22: Wild Card Qualifier
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Eternal Conflict S2 E3
Eternal Conflict S2 E2
Heroes Pulsing #3
Logitech G Connect 2026
StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.