• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:10
CEST 01:10
KST 08:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview4[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview2herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2026)7Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO4 & Finals Preview5
Community News
StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th22Weekly Cups (May 18-25): MaxPax wins doubles0Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League4Weekly Cups (May 11-17): Classic wins double0Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO8 Results2
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview Weekly Cups (May 18-25): MaxPax wins doubles Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview
Tourneys
GSL Code S Season 2 (2026) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Welcome to the External Content forum Mutation # 527 Hell Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 526 Rubber and Glue
Brood War
General
Pros React To: ASL S21 Finals Every Matchup's Top 5 Winrates (all ASLs & KSLs) BW General Discussion Very long shot - StarCraft x A7X video Pros React to: TvT Masterclass in FlaSh vs Light
Tourneys
[ASL21] Grand Finals Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [BSL22] WB Final & LB Semis - Saturday 21:00 CEST [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Muta micro map competition [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
ZeroSpace Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Dating: How's your luck? European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development streaming software
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Customization Drives Loyalty…
TrAiDoS
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2402 users

Liquipedia Feedback Thread - Page 71

Forum Index > Website Feedback
Post a Reply
Prev 1 69 70 71 72 73 87 Next
akaMadMike
Profile Joined January 2011
Norway93 Posts
July 12 2016 09:34 GMT
#1401
Could you update the CSGO map page to be more like the SC2 map-pool page?

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Maps/Ladder_Maps/Legacy_of_the_Void

vs

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/counterstrike/Portal:Maps

I't would be nice to see what maps have been used in previous operations as well as what laddermap went out, and what came back and so on.
I know i was born and I know that I’ll die – the in between is mine!
FO-nTTaX
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Johto4985 Posts
July 12 2016 11:40 GMT
#1402
Technically we could, in a more practical way we would need to find someone willing to do it though. How about you being that person?
Administrator@FO_nTTaX | FO-nTTaX.de | 0xff0000.dev | Senior Lead Liquipedia Developer
"Nimm es. Es ist nicht viel, aber es kommt von Herzen. Vergiss mich nicht!"
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-09 21:47:40
August 09 2016 21:43 GMT
#1403
I am in the process of updating a lot of the info on the BW Wiki. This is what I'm thinking right now:

Attack speed should definitely be calculated in per second. This would be game speed * attack speed / 1000, where game speed is the delay between logical frames in ms. So for Fastest, on say the Marine, it would be 42 * 15 / 1000 = 0.63.

We should also use Fastest speed for all time-related things instead of normal, such as build time. For the Barracks, the Build Time would actually be 50.4 (rounded down to 50) seconds instead of 80 seconds. The way this is calculated is by build time * game speed / 1000.

Finally, I think Movement speed should be measured in cells per second, like SC2 is, so that it's a familiar number that people will understand. This would be calculated like speed * 1000 / game speed / cell size. So for Fastest speed, plugging in all the numbers for say the Marine, we do 4 * 1000 / 42 / 32 = 2.976 cells per second.

An alternative method for speed would just be pixels per second, which would be 4 * 1000 / 42 = 95.238

I'm already making some smaller edits and I'd be willing to make these changes for every single unit on the wiki.
Uuh.
FO-nTTaX
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Johto4985 Posts
August 09 2016 21:58 GMT
#1404
On August 10 2016 06:43 Templarfreak wrote:
I am in the process of updating a lot of the info on the BW Wiki. This is what I'm thinking right now:

Attack speed should definitely be calculated in per second. This would be game speed * attack speed / 1000, where game speed is the delay between logical frames in ms. So for Fastest, on say the Marine, it would be 42 * 15 / 1000 = 0.63.

We should also use Fastest speed for all time-related things instead of normal, such as build time. For the Barracks, the Build Time would actually be 50.4 (rounded down to 50) seconds instead of 80 seconds. The way this is calculated is by build time * game speed / 1000.

Finally, I think Movement speed should be measured in cells per second, like SC2 is, so that it's a familiar number that people will understand. This would be calculated like speed * 1000 / game speed / cell size. So for Fastest speed, plugging in all the numbers for say the Marine, we do 4 * 1000 / 42 / 32 = 2.976 cells per second.

An alternative method for speed would just be pixels per second, which would be 4 * 1000 / 42 = 95.238

I'm already making some smaller edits and I'd be willing to make these changes for every single unit on the wiki.

Possibly having both the normal speed and the fastest speed times would be worth it?
Administrator@FO_nTTaX | FO-nTTaX.de | 0xff0000.dev | Senior Lead Liquipedia Developer
"Nimm es. Es ist nicht viel, aber es kommt von Herzen. Vergiss mich nicht!"
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-10 09:29:16
August 09 2016 22:36 GMT
#1405
On August 10 2016 06:58 FO-nTTaX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2016 06:43 Templarfreak wrote:
I am in the process of updating a lot of the info on the BW Wiki. This is what I'm thinking right now:

Attack speed should definitely be calculated in per second. This would be game speed * attack speed / 1000, where game speed is the delay between logical frames in ms. So for Fastest, on say the Marine, it would be 42 * 15 / 1000 = 0.63.

We should also use Fastest speed for all time-related things instead of normal, such as build time. For the Barracks, the Build Time would actually be 50.4 (rounded down to 50) seconds instead of 80 seconds. The way this is calculated is by build time * game speed / 1000.

Finally, I think Movement speed should be measured in cells per second, like SC2 is, so that it's a familiar number that people will understand. This would be calculated like speed * 1000 / game speed / cell size. So for Fastest speed, plugging in all the numbers for say the Marine, we do 4 * 1000 / 42 / 32 = 2.976 cells per second.

An alternative method for speed would just be pixels per second, which would be 4 * 1000 / 42 = 95.238

I'm already making some smaller edits and I'd be willing to make these changes for every single unit on the wiki.

Possibly having both the normal speed and the fastest speed times would be worth it?


That would get cluttered and/or complicated unless you have a really good setup in mind. What is the purpose of having Normal speed anyway? It's not going to be the right information that people are looking for 90% of the time. The raw values are more useful for anyone else too (like AI programmers), like 1,200 for Barracks or 360 for Marines. And as for attack and movement speed, there'd still be a page dedicated to the raw values that would be linked back to, since the raw values do still have some use. I just think having the values adjusted for Fastest speed on the face of articles is more useful and quicker to access for the majority of people since the majority of people are probably looking it up for competitive purposes and thus would be playing on Fastest.

EDIT: Here is how I think the setup for the Unit Infobox should be so far: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft/Template:Infobox_unitex

I've added some new sections and copied the way the SC2 Liquipedia shows hotkeys in the infobox.

The Talk page contains some extra comments.

EDIT2: Okay, I'm back. Do I have an okay to go here for these changes?
Uuh.
ChapatiyaqPTSM
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
France1887 Posts
August 10 2016 13:27 GMT
#1406
The normal speed has the advantage of being round numbers and exact. If you write that a Barracks is built in 50 seconds, you lose precision. I know that for the SC2 wiki, we use Fastest speed timings, but it's something that I'd like to change at some point.

My only worry is that you'll start this, probably alone, and be discouraged at some point and leave the wiki with time values at different speeds depending on the page. I'd like you to make a list of all the pages that you'll need to change, because it's not just the units and buildings pages (not just in the infobox, but also in the article body), it's abilities pages, statistics pages, etc. so that you take the measure of the task ahead of you.
LiquipediaBoy, these pretzels are makin' me thirsty.
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-10 16:09:31
August 10 2016 14:52 GMT
#1407
On August 10 2016 22:27 ChapatiyaqPTSM wrote:
The normal speed has the advantage of being round numbers and exact. If you write that a Barracks is built in 50 seconds, you lose precision. I know that for the SC2 wiki, we use Fastest speed timings, but it's something that I'd like to change at some point.

My only worry is that you'll start this, probably alone, and be discouraged at some point and leave the wiki with time values at different speeds depending on the page. I'd like you to make a list of all the pages that you'll need to change, because it's not just the units and buildings pages (not just in the infobox, but also in the article body), it's abilities pages, statistics pages, etc. so that you take the measure of the task ahead of you.


You are mistaken in that advantage. It is not exact, actually. The most exact value you can get is directly getting the values from the DAT/IScript files, which are based off of logical frames. A Marine takes 360 logical frames to build and how fast those logical frames are adjusted are based on the Game speed. So on Normal, you have 360 * 67 / 1000 = exactly 24.12 seconds in real time on normal game speed. No more, no less. On fastest, it is 360 * 42 / 1000 = exactly 15.12 seconds in real time. They are not perfectly rounded numbers nor are they more accurate than calculating with different game speeds. Since 90% of players will be playing on Fastest, it is only natural that we use fastest speed on the wiki(s). Especially for SC2, given that the values you see in-game when you start the game on Faster speed are exactly how long it takes on that game speed (Since LotV has converted it's time display to display the proper times on the proper game speed instead of the times for Normal being shown on every game speed).

Considering I'm already knocking out most of the hard stuff I intend to do, it will be EZ-PZ to convert all the time displays to the right numbers. I've already got a huge list of movement speed on fastest speed for every single unit, including the Broodling, Scarab, and Interceptor, and getting the duration for all abilities, research times, and etc, won't be too much trouble either considering I can view all the data and can easily convert it to real time using that same formula (time * game speed / 1000)

I've been working on the Ability template right now and am getting fairly close to being done with it. You can check my changes once I submit it. Here is the code so far, though:

+ Show Spoiler +
{{#if:{{{range|}}}|
{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>'''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}
|<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>}}
|{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}</div>
|}}
}}
|{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}</div>
|<div>'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>}}
|}}
}}


EDIT: Changes to Ability Template has been submitted.

Just realized, maybe there should be DPS vs Ground and DPS vs Air, with their respective bonuses, too?
Uuh.
ChapatiyaqPTSM
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
France1887 Posts
August 10 2016 15:45 GMT
#1408
On August 10 2016 23:52 Templarfreak wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2016 22:27 ChapatiyaqPTSM wrote:
The normal speed has the advantage of being round numbers and exact. If you write that a Barracks is built in 50 seconds, you lose precision. I know that for the SC2 wiki, we use Fastest speed timings, but it's something that I'd like to change at some point.

My only worry is that you'll start this, probably alone, and be discouraged at some point and leave the wiki with time values at different speeds depending on the page. I'd like you to make a list of all the pages that you'll need to change, because it's not just the units and buildings pages (not just in the infobox, but also in the article body), it's abilities pages, statistics pages, etc. so that you take the measure of the task ahead of you.


You are mistaken in that advantage. It is not exact, actually. The most exact value you can get is directly getting the values from the DAT/IScript files, which are based off of logical frames. A Marine takes 360 logical frames to build and how fast those logical frames are adjusted are based on the Game speed. So on Normal, you have 360 * 67 / 1000 = exactly 24.12 seconds in real time on normal game speed. No more, no less. On fastest, it is 360 * 42 / 1000 = exactly 15.12 seconds in real time. They are not perfectly rounded numbers nor are they more accurate than calculating with different game speeds. Since 90% of players will be playing on Fastest, it is only naturally that we use fastest speed on the wiki(s). Especially for SC2, given that the values you see in-game when you start the game on Faster speed are exactly how long it takes on that game speed (Since LotV has converted it's time display to display the proper times on the proper game speed instead of the times for Normal being shown on every game speed).

Considering I'm already knocking out most of the hard stuff I intend to do, it will be EZ-PZ to convert all the time displays to the right numbers. I've already got a huge list of movement speed on fastest speed for every single unit, including the Broodling, Scarab, and Interceptor, and getting the duration for all abilities, research times, and etc, won't be too much trouble either considering I can view all the data and can easily convert it to real time using that same formula (time * game speed / 1000)

I've been working on the Ability template right now and am getting fairly close to being done with it. You can check my changes once I submit it. Here is the code so far, though:

+ Show Spoiler +
{{#if:{{{range|}}}|
{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}
'''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}
|
'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}
}}
|{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}

|}}
}}
|{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}

|
'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}
}}
|}}
}}


EDIT: Changes to Ability Template has been submitted.

Just realized, maybe there should be DPS vs Ground and DPS vs Air, with their respective bonuses, too?

Ok, my bad then :x

About SC2, what I meant is that I agree that it should be like the faster speed, but that what we show are rounded values, when ideally I'd like them to be more precise.Like blink research doesn't take 121 seconds but 170/1.4 = almost 121.4 seconds (I know the 1.4 ratio is not always true, it's a target value, and the engine tries to be as close as it can to this value)

To be honest, I'm ok with the change, but I don't feel comfortable taking any decision about the Brood War wiki. I know you're eager to start working on it, but I hope this change will be accepted by others as well.
LiquipediaBoy, these pretzels are makin' me thirsty.
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-10 16:16:35
August 10 2016 16:11 GMT
#1409
On August 11 2016 00:45 ChapatiyaqPTSM wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 10 2016 23:52 Templarfreak wrote:
On August 10 2016 22:27 ChapatiyaqPTSM wrote:
The normal speed has the advantage of being round numbers and exact. If you write that a Barracks is built in 50 seconds, you lose precision. I know that for the SC2 wiki, we use Fastest speed timings, but it's something that I'd like to change at some point.

My only worry is that you'll start this, probably alone, and be discouraged at some point and leave the wiki with time values at different speeds depending on the page. I'd like you to make a list of all the pages that you'll need to change, because it's not just the units and buildings pages (not just in the infobox, but also in the article body), it's abilities pages, statistics pages, etc. so that you take the measure of the task ahead of you.


You are mistaken in that advantage. It is not exact, actually. The most exact value you can get is directly getting the values from the DAT/IScript files, which are based off of logical frames. A Marine takes 360 logical frames to build and how fast those logical frames are adjusted are based on the Game speed. So on Normal, you have 360 * 67 / 1000 = exactly 24.12 seconds in real time on normal game speed. No more, no less. On fastest, it is 360 * 42 / 1000 = exactly 15.12 seconds in real time. They are not perfectly rounded numbers nor are they more accurate than calculating with different game speeds. Since 90% of players will be playing on Fastest, it is only naturally that we use fastest speed on the wiki(s). Especially for SC2, given that the values you see in-game when you start the game on Faster speed are exactly how long it takes on that game speed (Since LotV has converted it's time display to display the proper times on the proper game speed instead of the times for Normal being shown on every game speed).

Considering I'm already knocking out most of the hard stuff I intend to do, it will be EZ-PZ to convert all the time displays to the right numbers. I've already got a huge list of movement speed on fastest speed for every single unit, including the Broodling, Scarab, and Interceptor, and getting the duration for all abilities, research times, and etc, won't be too much trouble either considering I can view all the data and can easily convert it to real time using that same formula (time * game speed / 1000)

I've been working on the Ability template right now and am getting fairly close to being done with it. You can check my changes once I submit it. Here is the code so far, though:

+ Show Spoiler +
{{#if:{{{range|}}}|
{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>'''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}
|<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>}}
|{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Range:''' {{{range|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}</div>
|}}
}}
|{{#if:{{{radius|}}}|
{{#if:{{{duration|}}}|
<div>'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}} '''Duration:''' {{{duration|}}}</div>
|<div>'''Effect-Radius:''' {{{radius|}}}</div>}}
|}}
}}


EDIT: Changes to Ability Template has been submitted.

Just realized, maybe there should be DPS vs Ground and DPS vs Air, with their respective bonuses, too?

Ok, my bad then :x

About SC2, what I meant is that I agree that it should be like the faster speed, but that what we show are rounded values, when ideally I'd like them to be more precise.Like blink research doesn't take 121 seconds but 170/1.4 = almost 121.4 seconds (I know the 1.4 ratio is not always true, it's a target value, and the engine tries to be as close as it can to this value)

To be honest, I'm ok with the change, but I don't feel comfortable taking any decision about the Brood War wiki. I know you're eager to start working on it, but I hope this change will be accepted by others as well.


I have already gotten an O-K from someone on the Wiki (prech) and about 3 people in the IRC chat commented about it and seemed okay with it. I do agree though. This will probably be another day or so before enough people give me the O-K to make me comfortable with changing the time frames for every single unit and upgrade, just to be sure everyone is on page and okay with it.

I made some edits to the Marine to demonstrate how the final product would look.
Uuh.
FO-nTTaX
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Johto4985 Posts
August 10 2016 17:13 GMT
#1410
If prech says it is ok then by all means go for it. prech is basically the head of the Brood War wiki
Administrator@FO_nTTaX | FO-nTTaX.de | 0xff0000.dev | Senior Lead Liquipedia Developer
"Nimm es. Es ist nicht viel, aber es kommt von Herzen. Vergiss mich nicht!"
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
August 11 2016 18:41 GMT
#1411
Alright, I'd say I'm like half-way done with preparations and editing the templates to include more information then it's off to editing each unit, upgrade, and ability.
Uuh.
Templarfreak
Profile Joined February 2012
United States39 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-08-12 20:02:33
August 12 2016 20:02 GMT
#1412
I've made some more edits across a few more units because they made me add new functionality to the template, such as on the Ghost.

For the Siege Tank, I'm thinking I should include splash in some way in the infobox but I don't want it to get too cluttered. Maybe as a completely separate infobox that can go just below the unit infobox?
Uuh.
nunchaku-
Profile Joined August 2016
1 Post
Last Edited: 2016-08-15 06:22:00
August 15 2016 06:21 GMT
#1413
I've found false information just now. On JDM64's page (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/counterstrike/Jdm64/Results#Detailed_Results), it states that he participated in ELeague Season 1. This needs revision, since he was not part of the line up that participated versus Faze.

Source: http://www.hltv.org/match/2303422-faze-clg-eleague-season-1\

Please have a policy that enforces and promotes a strong use of sources.
tofucake
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Hyrule19215 Posts
August 15 2016 12:37 GMT
#1414
it's a wiki, you know you can edit it yourself, right?
Liquipediaasante sana squash banana
salle
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Sweden5554 Posts
August 15 2016 15:02 GMT
#1415
On August 15 2016 15:21 nunchaku- wrote:
I've found false information just now. On JDM64's page (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/counterstrike/Jdm64/Results#Detailed_Results), it states that he participated in ELeague Season 1. This needs revision, since he was not part of the line up that participated versus Faze.

Source: http://www.hltv.org/match/2303422-faze-clg-eleague-season-1\

Please have a policy that enforces and promotes a strong use of sources.


He was part of CLG for most of ELEAGUE Season 1, no?
Administrator"Ambitious but rubbish!" - Jeremy Clarkson
FO-nTTaX
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Johto4985 Posts
August 15 2016 15:18 GMT
#1416
yeah, that's why it is listed as his result
Administrator@FO_nTTaX | FO-nTTaX.de | 0xff0000.dev | Senior Lead Liquipedia Developer
"Nimm es. Es ist nicht viel, aber es kommt von Herzen. Vergiss mich nicht!"
tolkienfanatic
Profile Joined February 2015
United States110 Posts
August 29 2016 16:52 GMT
#1417
On August 15 2016 15:21 nunchaku- wrote:
I've found false information just now. On JDM64's page (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/counterstrike/Jdm64/Results#Detailed_Results), it states that he participated in ELeague Season 1. This needs revision, since he was not part of the line up that participated versus Faze.

Source: http://www.hltv.org/match/2303422-faze-clg-eleague-season-1\

Please have a policy that enforces and promotes a strong use of sources.


As mentioned above, this is not false information - Josh played for CLG in 12/15 of the matches they played at ELEAGUE - far above the fuzzy requirement of 50%.

If you feel our sourcing policy is weak (it isn't), there is no better way to change that than contributing yourself.
Liquipedia@tolkienfanatic | Skype: tolkienfanatic | Liquipedia Staff | HLTV Staff | CS/FGC/RL
xuanzue
Profile Joined October 2010
Colombia1747 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-01 22:48:27
October 01 2016 22:45 GMT
#1418
Hi, I'm watching the liquipedia for CSGO using OPERA kinda broken:

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

[image loading]


The liquipedia for SC2, BW, smash, Heroes and overwatch all are good for me.

The one for CSGO is the only one I see broken.

Dominions 4: "Thrones of Ascension".
FO-nTTaX
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
Johto4985 Posts
October 01 2016 23:11 GMT
#1419
Clear your cache, it's a broken cache in your browser.

Firefox / Safari: Hold Shift while clicking Reload, or press either Ctrl-F5 or Ctrl-R (⌘-R on a Mac)
Google Chrome: Press Ctrl-Shift-R (⌘-Shift-R on a Mac)
Internet Explorer: Hold Ctrl while clicking Refresh, or press Ctrl-F5
Opera: Clear the cache in Tools → Preferences
Administrator@FO_nTTaX | FO-nTTaX.de | 0xff0000.dev | Senior Lead Liquipedia Developer
"Nimm es. Es ist nicht viel, aber es kommt von Herzen. Vergiss mich nicht!"
xuanzue
Profile Joined October 2010
Colombia1747 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-02 00:09:56
October 02 2016 00:09 GMT
#1420
On October 02 2016 08:11 FO-nTTaX wrote:
Clear your cache, it's a broken cache in your browser.

Firefox / Safari: Hold Shift while clicking Reload, or press either Ctrl-F5 or Ctrl-R (⌘-R on a Mac)
Google Chrome: Press Ctrl-Shift-R (⌘-Shift-R on a Mac)
Internet Explorer: Hold Ctrl while clicking Refresh, or press Ctrl-F5
Opera: Clear the cache in Tools → Preferences


I'm using Opera
cleared the cache from the beginning of time, and nothing changed with the wiki page.

later also cleared the cookies, and no changes.

With internet explorer seems fine
Dominions 4: "Thrones of Ascension".
Prev 1 69 70 71 72 73 87 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
19:00
Mid Season Playoffs
Gerald vs MindelVK
goblin vs TBD
Jumy vs HonMonO
SteadfastSC140
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft682
ZombieGrub152
SteadfastSC 140
JuggernautJason53
SpeCial 4
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 516
NaDa 20
Dota 2
capcasts119
Counter-Strike
summit1g12728
Doublelift3381
tarik_tv3287
Fnx 1467
minikerr2
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King112
PPMD57
Other Games
Liquid`RaSZi1601
C9.Mang0169
Day[9].tv164
ViBE113
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick454
BasetradeTV179
Counter-Strike
PGL159
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 102
• RyuSc2 43
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21356
Other Games
• Day9tv164
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
50m
Maestros of the Game
13h 50m
Big Brain Bouts
16h 50m
Shino vs Scarlett
Bly vs DnS
Serral vs ByuN
Replay Cast
1d
RSL Revival
1d 7h
Lambo vs SHIN
Solar vs Rogue
herO vs Clem
Maestros of the Game
1d 11h
IPSL
1d 16h
ZZZero vs WorsT
Julia vs eOnzErG
BSL
1d 19h
TerrOr vs Dewalt
Bonyth vs eOnzErG
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
[ Show More ]
Maestros of the Game
2 days
OSC
2 days
IPSL
2 days
Dragon vs Artosis
dxtr13 vs Hawk
BSL
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Spring Champion…
4 days
Maestros of the Game
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Maestros of the Game
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
WardiTV Spring Champion…
6 days
Maestros of the Game
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 21
2026 GSL S1
Heroes Pulsing #1

Ongoing

2026 KK StarCraft Pro League
BSL Season 22
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
KK 2v2 League Season 1
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
SCTL 2026 Spring
WardiTV Spring 2026
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: King of Kings
YSL S3
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
Bounty Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.