• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:24
CEST 01:24
KST 08:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task25[ASL19] Ro4 Recap : The Peak15DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Info & Preview19herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2025)17Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, GuMiho, Classic, Cure6
Community News
[BSL20] RO20 Group Stage1EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1)9Weekly Cups (May 12-18): Clem sweeps WardiTV May3Code S Season 2 (2025) - Qualifier Results212025 GSL Season 2 (Qualifiers)14
StarCraft 2
General
Interview with oPZesty on Cheeseadelphia/Coaching herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2025) DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Info & Preview Power Rank: October 2018 Code S Season 2 (2025) - Qualifier Results
Tourneys
DreamHack Dallas 2025 EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1) Last Chance Qualifiers for OlimoLeague 2024 Winter $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly)
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat Mutation # 471 Delivery Guaranteed
Brood War
General
[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task [ASL19] Ro4 Recap : The Peak BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL 19 Tickets for foreigners BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] RO20 Group Stage [BSL20] RO20 Group A - Sunday 20:00 CET [ASL19] Semifinal B
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Yes Sir! How Commanding Impr…
TrAiDoS
Poker
Nebuchad
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 11415 users

US Politics Feedback Thread - Page 72

Forum Index > Website Feedback
Post a Reply
Prev 1 70 71 72 73 74 322 Next
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42292 Posts
August 20 2017 16:05 GMT
#1421
If he wants to go down this path then there's better material out there. I called GH uppity and offered him 40 acres and a mule to end his crusade for racial equality.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
August 20 2017 16:13 GMT
#1422
On August 21 2017 01:04 Sermokala wrote:
I think xdaunt forgets that Kwark is British and has the Humor and insults of a British person.

He has the pettiness and attitude of a toxic asshole who makes the thread worse for everyone. That's all that really needs to be said.

With regards to the specific remark, I can't say I particularly care, but you know most people would get actioned for that. It is not by virtue of being a model poster who deserves leeway that Kwark isn't part of that group, but by virtue of the fact that he gets special treatment in the same light as Testie, but with the added bonus of having a staff position. Problem is that he genuinely makes the thread worse whenever he does that and an imaginary non-public stern talking-to isn't changing that.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28609 Posts
August 20 2017 16:23 GMT
#1423
The pence vegetable fruit joke would be fine coming from anyone. Aside from that, I think it would be highly positive if posters overall would make a more concentrated effort to consistently argue in good faith rather than focus on tangential points that let them 'win the argument'. It's especially negative when people just won't let a tangential point go - but this does to some degree go both ways. (You don't lose face through stating some effect of 'this was badly phrased by me, I didn't mean it like that' - not that the absence of such a post necessitates spending 10 posts pushing for it. )
Moderator
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
August 20 2017 16:41 GMT
#1424
On August 21 2017 00:25 ChristianS wrote:
Jesus, I actually typed up a response to this last night and then thought "what's the point, it's just oBlade trying to make a fuss about it, and he'll probably drop it anyway."

You guys are literally getting salty over a pun. That's it. That's the whole thing. It's just a word association joke, gays -> fruits, Pence -> conversion therapy -> electroshock therapy -> comatose people -> vegetables, fruits -> vegetables. What exactly is the outrage here?

In other contexts the term "fruits" being used for gays might be considered a little offensive, but it's obviously not used as a pejorative here, it's just to make the joke. If it becomes clear that Kwark regularly uses the term fruits for gays in other discussions we can talk with him about how that's not the preferred term, but when we're in a discussion about the literal physical and psychological torture of gay people, it's patently absurd to get more offended by Kwark's joke than by the practice itself.

If you don't give a shit about gays, maybe you think using the word "vegetable" for comatose people is a little insensitive, but let's drop the act for a minute. oBlade, xDaunt, and Danglars are banding together to try to get everyone to use the right PC labels? I don't buy it for a second. If your quest to prove the moderation is biased, latching onto petty shit like this only makes it more likely no one ever takes your quest seriously.

Danglars, imo the attitude of "I think the other side is shitty so I have a right—no, obligation—to be shitty" seems to describe your posting better and better lately, and if anything ever gets you banned, that will be it. I hope that doesn't happen, because when you aren't acting like that I think you bring a lot of value to the thread. Just my opinion, obviously, so take it or leave it.

I have an obligation to ride that edge until people like ChristianS stop making excuses for only one side (or admit they hold a double standard). And to channel a little StealthBlue for a moment now, you missed a spot of cum on your face.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 16:44:21
August 20 2017 16:43 GMT
#1425
On August 20 2017 15:03 KwarK wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On August 17 2017 12:24 xDaunt wrote:
So let me start by addressing why Vox Day's 14th Point ("The Alt Right believes we must secure the existence of white people and a future for white children.") is not about white supremacy. And let me preface this by saying now that some of you are going to feel really retarded by the time that I'm done, because everything that I'm about to say is right in the 16 Points. Point 15 is the first big hint:

Show nested quote +
The Alt Right does not believe in the general supremacy of any race, nation, people, or sub-species. Every race, nation, people, and human sub-species has its own unique strengths and weaknesses, and possesses the sovereign right to dwell unmolested in the native culture it prefers.


Just in case there's any ambiguity here, let's look at Points 10 and 16, respectively:

Show nested quote +
The Alt Right is opposed to the rule or domination of any native ethnic group by another, particularly in the sovereign homelands of the dominated peoples. The Alt Right is opposed to any non-native ethnic group obtaining excessive influence in any society through nepotism, tribalism, or any other means.

The Alt Right is a philosophy that values peace among the various nations of the world and opposes wars to impose the values of one nation upon another as well as efforts to exterminate individual nations through war, genocide, immigration, or genetic assimilation.


Here, Vox Day is clearly advocating for peaceful coexistence among peoples and advocating directly against the supremacy/imperialism of one people over another. Not exactly the typical skinhead dribble, right? So now let's talk about his reasoning for ethnostates. We see it stated right in Point 11:

Show nested quote +
The Alt Right understands that diversity + proximity = war.


Now, unlike the previous points, I am willing to cut people a little bit of slack for not fully understanding the significance of what Vox Day is communicating here given the terseness of the statement and the fact that most probably have not had the opportunity to read or hear Vox Day elaborate on this point. But his argument is basically as follows: history shows that conflict -- often violent conflict -- occurs when different cultures either a) exist in close proximity to each other, or b) find themselves in a situation whether they otherwise have to compete with each other over the same resources. Stated another way, multiculturalism breeds strife that is not easily repressed and eliminated until there is some degree of convergence between the cultures because people tend to be assholes to "the other." It's just who we are and what we do. Vox Day's solution to this human condition is to keep everyone separated and allow each people the right to national self-determination. This is stated in Point 5:

Show nested quote +
The Alt Right is openly and avowedly nationalist. It supports all nationalisms and the right of all nations to exist, homogeneous and unadulterated by foreign invasion and immigration.


Accordingly, securing the future of white people is merely the logical extension of this principle. The goal, is the preservation of Western Culture, of which Vox Day writes in Point 4:

Show nested quote +
The Alt Right believes Western civilization is the pinnacle of human achievement and supports its three foundational pillars: Christianity, the European nations, and the Graeco-Roman legacy.


For the numerous posters who struggle with reading, let me make the following abundantly clear: All of what I have said so far is what Vox Day thinks. Not necessarily what I think.

Like I have said many times before, my primary disagreement with the Alt Right lies in its preoccupation with race. And this is where I deviate from Vox Day as well. Here is what he writes in the summary section of his 16 Points:

Show nested quote +
TL;DR: The Alt Right is a Western ideology that believes in science, history, reality, and the right of a genetic nation to exist and govern itself in its own interests.

The patron saint of conservatives, Russell Kirk, wrote: "The great line of demarcation in modern politics, Eric Voegelin used to point out, is not a division between liberals on one side and totalitarians on the other. No, on one side of that line are all those men and women who fancy that the temporal order is the only order, and that material needs are their only needs, and that they may do as they like with the human patrimony. On the other side of that line are all those people who recognize an enduring moral order in the universe, a constant human nature, and high duties toward the order spiritual and the order temporal."

This is no longer true, assuming it ever was. The great line of demarcation in modern politics is now a division between men and women who believe that they are ultimately defined by their momentary opinions and those who believe they are ultimately defined by their genetic heritage. The Alt Right understands that the former will always lose to the latter in the end, because the former is subject to change.


While I am willing to entertain the idea that there is some genetic variation between races, I do not accept the idea that this variation is significant enough to affect the ability of members of a given race to be able to embrace, or assimilate into, a certain culture, particularly if we are to assume tabula rasa immersion into that culture (ie taking a baby from one race/culture and raising it in another race/culture). Stated another way, Vox Day thinks that race and culture are largely inseparable. I don't. Now, for practical purposes, I can see why race might be a useful proxy for culture given that every culture is the product of predominantly one race, but it doesn't change the basic point that a member of any race can, in theory, adopt any culture.

So let's turn to IgnE's post:

Show nested quote +
On August 17 2017 08:52 IgnE wrote:
you mentioned "pluralism" as one of the pillars of western civilization so im just hoping that one of your major disagreements with the alt right is this fixation on "homeland" and "ethnic" homogeneity. unless you meant pluralism in the strictly narrow sense of division of governmental powers.

cultural homogeneity seems more like the xdaunt brand of fascism. properly oedipal but enlightened enough to not worry about the fiction of race


First, I mentioned that "political pluralism" is a pillar of western civilization, referring mostly to the idea that we value truly democratic and representative rule, as opposed to some form of autocratic or even single party rule. As for cultural pluralism, it really boils down to a matter of degree. While I reject outright multiculturalism, I do think that there is some room for variation within a culture. Or using IgnE's terminology, the xDaunt brand of fascism does require a certain level of cultural homogeneity within the nation. I'll just say right now that I don't know exactly where the line is as it pertains to the US. However, and per my previous posts addressing this matter, I do think it critical that everyone within the US, at a minimum, accept and embrace the most important traditions of Western culture: individual liberty, inalienable rights, political plurality, rationalism, and the rule of law. And I will be first to say that we have not done a good job of imprinting these values upon our own people (as is amply evidenced by some of the posters around here), thus this isn't even strictly an issue of insider vs outsider.

We can see a nice little microcosm as to why cultural homogeneity matters just by looking at what has been going on over at Google. How was the internal reaction to Damore's memo any different than a cultural conflict? As with cultural conflicts between nations or peoples, conflicting values were the issue. And as we with so many cultural conflicts, one side is clearly working to eliminate the other. As Vox Day says, diversity + proximity = war.

Note that Vox Day made that point his 14th point. I wonder whether xDaunt thinks it's coincidental, or if he accepts that it is a deliberate reference to the 14 words but is about to tell us that he's referencing them in a non Nazi way.

xDaunt's argument comes down to "but everyone gets separate but equal homelands so how can that even be racist?"


it's possible that xDaunt didn't know that it was a direct copy of a nazi slogan or whatever. i for sure didn't know it was a direct copy, because i don't read nazi literature very often. maybe he should be applauded for not literally white-washing the vox day points by selectively editing it? he presented it all, in context, and described it in a less aggressive and disconcerting way than vox idiot would have himself, which perhaps helps "good" people like us understand it. and he did that before presenting what he (xdaunt) thinks, which has substantial differences with the ethnotheology of vox idiot. so i don't really see the point in putting words in xdaunt's mouth when you could quite rightly, and quite effectively, attack his desire for a strong united culture, presumably built around conservative values like family, hard work, personal responsibility, and Western liberal values (most of which, i think it could be fairly said, you share with him).
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States5413 Posts
August 20 2017 16:46 GMT
#1426
On August 21 2017 00:25 ChristianS wrote:
Jesus, I actually typed up a response to this last night and then thought "what's the point, it's just oBlade trying to make a fuss about it, and he'll probably drop it anyway."

You guys are literally getting salty over a pun. That's it. That's the whole thing. It's just a word association joke, gays -> fruits, Pence -> conversion therapy -> electroshock therapy -> comatose people -> vegetables, fruits -> vegetables. What exactly is the outrage here?

In other contexts the term "fruits" being used for gays might be considered a little offensive, but it's obviously not used as a pejorative here, it's just to make the joke. If it becomes clear that Kwark regularly uses the term fruits for gays in other discussions we can talk with him about how that's not the preferred term, but when we're in a discussion about the literal physical and psychological torture of gay people, it's patently absurd to get more offended by Kwark's joke than by the practice itself.

If you don't give a shit about gays, maybe you think using the word "vegetable" for comatose people is a little insensitive, but let's drop the act for a minute. oBlade, xDaunt, and Danglars are banding together to try to get everyone to use the right PC labels? I don't buy it for a second. If your quest to prove the moderation is biased, latching onto petty shit like this only makes it more likely no one ever takes your quest seriously.

I care about garbage and hypocrisy, not about political correctness per se, although you need to mind the outlet. Kwark sets no standards for himself. The other day Wuffles was warned for saying he heard Bannon sucks his own cock, which was at least hearsay from Scaramucci, this thing about Pence and electroshock therapy is 4chan meme pollution, having no basis in fact and relying on perpetuating multiple stereotypes to make no point in the end. And it's of course rich to see the author's sudden interest in context. We have the whole rest of the internet and media to read about Putin cock holsters and so forth.
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 16:57:42
August 20 2017 16:56 GMT
#1427
Pence has never expressly supported or denounced conversion therapy, even when directly asked. He did call for federal funding to go to groups that "change sexual behavior" and prevent the spread of HIV. His people were never specific which groups he was talking about.

If that dog whistle homophobia? Who knows, but it's odd not to denounce conversion therapy after talking about changing sexual behavior. Your mileage may vary. But considering his back ground and evangelical background, it's not out of left field to see it that way.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42292 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 17:14:11
August 20 2017 17:13 GMT
#1428
Electroshock therapy was a component of aversion conditioning therapy which is a component of gay conversion therapy. It's no longer medically approved because the APA declassified homosexuality as a mental illness, but all that means is that gay conversion therapy is no longer a medical procedure, not that it doesn't happen. Aversion conditioning (hurting the gay person whenever they have gay impulses) is still actually a thing that is done in America to this day. There are still gay conversion camps that gay kids are forced to. There is absolutely a basis in fact for that.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Nixer
Profile Joined July 2011
2774 Posts
August 20 2017 17:14 GMT
#1429
On August 21 2017 01:23 Liquid`Drone wrote:
The pence vegetable fruit joke would be fine coming from anyone. Aside from that, I think it would be highly positive if posters overall would make a more concentrated effort to consistently argue in good faith rather than focus on tangential points that let them 'win the argument'. It's especially negative when people just won't let a tangential point go - but this does to some degree go both ways. (You don't lose face through stating some effect of 'this was badly phrased by me, I didn't mean it like that' - not that the absence of such a post necessitates spending 10 posts pushing for it. )

I have to echo this. Please guys, come on. You can do better than this.

Shortly put; grow the fuck up.
Graphics
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
August 20 2017 17:20 GMT
#1430
On August 21 2017 01:23 Liquid`Drone wrote:
The pence vegetable fruit joke would be fine coming from anyone.

I don't doubt you mean this in all sincerity coming from yourself specifically. But I think experience has shown that there is a tendency for a double standard, in that you can usually get away with a lot worse if you're on the right side of being favored in popular opinion. And there is also variance in moderation styles, to the point that some seem to ban almost based on personal feelings above all else. The result is that some are moderated harder than others and certain folk can get away with pretty much anything.

On August 21 2017 01:23 Liquid`Drone wrote:
Aside from that, I think it would be highly positive if posters overall would make a more concentrated effort to consistently argue in good faith rather than focus on tangential points that let them 'win the argument'. It's especially negative when people just won't let a tangential point go - but this does to some degree go both ways. (You don't lose face through stating some effect of 'this was badly phrased by me, I didn't mean it like that' - not that the absence of such a post necessitates spending 10 posts pushing for it. )

Yes.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States5413 Posts
August 20 2017 17:25 GMT
#1431
On August 21 2017 02:13 KwarK wrote:
Electroshock therapy was a component of aversion conditioning therapy which is a component of gay conversion therapy. It's no longer medically approved because the APA declassified homosexuality as a mental illness, but all that means is that gay conversion therapy is no longer a medical procedure, not that it doesn't happen. Aversion conditioning (hurting the gay person whenever they have gay impulses) is still actually a thing that is done in America to this day. There are still gay conversion camps that gay kids are forced to. There is absolutely a basis in fact for that.

You are correct, gay conversion exists and people force it on kids, this is a Bob Woodward scale scoop to rival your earlier revelation that Trump uses Twitter. The vice president does not and has never supported electroshock therapy which was the premise of your contributions to the thread.
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42292 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 17:32:11
August 20 2017 17:30 GMT
#1432
On August 21 2017 02:25 oBlade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2017 02:13 KwarK wrote:
Electroshock therapy was a component of aversion conditioning therapy which is a component of gay conversion therapy. It's no longer medically approved because the APA declassified homosexuality as a mental illness, but all that means is that gay conversion therapy is no longer a medical procedure, not that it doesn't happen. Aversion conditioning (hurting the gay person whenever they have gay impulses) is still actually a thing that is done in America to this day. There are still gay conversion camps that gay kids are forced to. There is absolutely a basis in fact for that.

You are correct, gay conversion exists and people force it on kids, this is a Bob Woodward scale scoop to rival your earlier revelation that Trump uses Twitter. The vice president does not and has never supported electroshock therapy which was the premise of your contributions to the thread.

Pence supported gay conversion therapy. A component of gay conversion therapy is hurting gay people to create an aversion to gay impulses. Is your argument just that technically he didn't expand upon how he wanted the gays to be converted? Because otherwise I don't know how you're getting from supporting gay conversion therapy to opposing aversion therapy. It'd be great if Pence had just come out and said "I don't support gay conversion therapy", that'd clear all this up, but that's not the world we live in.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28609 Posts
August 20 2017 17:33 GMT
#1433
No he is arguing that Pence did not support gay conversion therapy. From looking at both politifact and snopes, it seems like this issue is 'not conclusive', because it's certainly possible to interpret his words from 2000 as advocating that gays should be abstinent, not that they should be tortured into being disgusted by homosexuality.
Moderator
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3187 Posts
August 20 2017 17:35 GMT
#1434
On August 21 2017 01:41 Danglars wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2017 00:25 ChristianS wrote:
Jesus, I actually typed up a response to this last night and then thought "what's the point, it's just oBlade trying to make a fuss about it, and he'll probably drop it anyway."

You guys are literally getting salty over a pun. That's it. That's the whole thing. It's just a word association joke, gays -> fruits, Pence -> conversion therapy -> electroshock therapy -> comatose people -> vegetables, fruits -> vegetables. What exactly is the outrage here?

In other contexts the term "fruits" being used for gays might be considered a little offensive, but it's obviously not used as a pejorative here, it's just to make the joke. If it becomes clear that Kwark regularly uses the term fruits for gays in other discussions we can talk with him about how that's not the preferred term, but when we're in a discussion about the literal physical and psychological torture of gay people, it's patently absurd to get more offended by Kwark's joke than by the practice itself.

If you don't give a shit about gays, maybe you think using the word "vegetable" for comatose people is a little insensitive, but let's drop the act for a minute. oBlade, xDaunt, and Danglars are banding together to try to get everyone to use the right PC labels? I don't buy it for a second. If your quest to prove the moderation is biased, latching onto petty shit like this only makes it more likely no one ever takes your quest seriously.

Danglars, imo the attitude of "I think the other side is shitty so I have a right—no, obligation—to be shitty" seems to describe your posting better and better lately, and if anything ever gets you banned, that will be it. I hope that doesn't happen, because when you aren't acting like that I think you bring a lot of value to the thread. Just my opinion, obviously, so take it or leave it.

I have an obligation to ride that edge until people like ChristianS stop making excuses for only one side (or admit they hold a double standard). And to channel a little StealthBlue for a moment now, you missed a spot of cum on your face.

It sure seems to me that this crusade only ends one way. At some point you'll deliberately say some shitty stuff and it will shit up the thread, and some mod will go back through and think:

Is this post shitty?
Yes, by the poster's own admission.
Is it responsible for shitting up the thread?
Yes, definitely.
Is he likely to learn his lesson without being actioned?
No, in fact he's publicly said he's gonna keep escalating his shitposts to prove a point.

Then you'll be in Disneyland and we'll never hear the end of zlefin's cooing. What if instead you took a more positive, lead-by-example attitude? Call out shitposts in the thread if you want, or bring them up here, but in your own posting, why not try to post in a way that improves the quality of discussion rather than degrades it?

On August 21 2017 01:23 Liquid`Drone wrote:
The pence vegetable fruit joke would be fine coming from anyone. Aside from that, I think it would be highly positive if posters overall would make a more concentrated effort to consistently argue in good faith rather than focus on tangential points that let them 'win the argument'. It's especially negative when people just won't let a tangential point go - but this does to some degree go both ways. (You don't lose face through stating some effect of 'this was badly phrased by me, I didn't mean it like that' - not that the absence of such a post necessitates spending 10 posts pushing for it. )

I think this is sometimes a fair criticism of Kwark's posting. He'll keep hammering a particular point that he feels isn't being addressed fully, and even if I think he's right, if the point isn't that central I might wish he'd just drop it. Even worse when he's wrong or only narrowly right, but people aren't adequately explaining that so he keeps pushing and pushing. I've never read one of these posts and thought "I think this is actionable" but I've definitely thought "I think I could explain why this is dumb and he should drop this but if I try I might just prolong it indefinitely."
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42292 Posts
August 20 2017 17:36 GMT
#1435
The line in question is
Resources should be directed toward those institutions which provide assistance to those seeking to change their sexual behavior.

I read that as support of gay conversion therapy. This would be much easier if Pence would just tell us where he stands on the issue though.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28609 Posts
August 20 2017 17:49 GMT
#1436
He kinda has, through his spokesperson Marc Lotter:


Mr. Pence had not addressed speculation about his support for conversion therapy until last weekend, when Mr. Lotter told The Times it was “patently false” that Mr. Pence “supported or advocated” the practice.

Mr. Lotter said the vice president-elect had been calling for federal funds to “be directed to groups that promoted safe sexual practices” during his 2000 congressional campaign, and he said it was a “mischaracterization” to see the statement as a reference to conversion therapy.


Maybe he did support it in 2000. A lot of people have changed views on homosexuality since then. Maybe he didn't actually change views personally, but did because anti-gay has become a losing political stance. But this statement is from last year.

I still think the joke is totally fine - and I laughed out loud at it. Jokes don't need to be grounded in absolute truth to be funny. But this is one of those examples of assuming the worst about political opponents and not letting go. It's incredibly hard to get a healthy political discussion going in a climate where posters choose the interpretation that paints their co-debaters in the worst possible light.
Moderator
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States5413 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 17:59:46
August 20 2017 17:50 GMT
#1437
On August 21 2017 02:33 Liquid`Drone wrote:
No he is arguing that Pence did not support gay conversion therapy. From looking at both politifact and snopes, it seems like this issue is 'not conclusive', because it's certainly possible to interpret his words from 2000 as advocating that gays should be abstinent, not that they should be tortured into being disgusted by homosexuality.

I'm sorry drone but I just tried to be completely clear:
On August 21 2017 02:25 oBlade wrote:
The vice president does not and has never supported electroshock therapy which was the premise of your contributions to the thread.

I would grant for the sake of argument that he liked conversion therapy at some point or even now, although I don't think he's ever talked about it one way or the other, but nobody does electroshock therapy as far as I can tell, nobody did electroshock therapy at the time in question, during his campaign, so he couldn't have been allegedly supporting something that was already concluded in the past, were we just in such a rush to take the stance against putting electricity into children as to not realize this?

This was not so light-hearted according to the last page, the intent was putting this forward to show how fucked up Republican leaders are, yet to take the record here and extrapolate support for putting voltage through people, it's a bad taste fabrication and in that context people who fall for and repeat it are doing themselves a disservice.
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
August 20 2017 17:51 GMT
#1438
On August 21 2017 02:49 Liquid`Drone wrote:
It's incredibly hard to get a healthy political discussion going in a climate where posters choose the interpretation that paints their co-debaters in the worst possible light.

It is, and that goes double for the fact that we live in a pretty hostile political climate in general. But I hope you realize "we all need to be nicer to each other" is not really a solution, simply because there are genuine bad-faith actors afoot. If nothing is done about them, what kind of discussion can you really hope for?
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 17:53:39
August 20 2017 17:53 GMT
#1439
On August 21 2017 02:33 Liquid`Drone wrote:
No he is arguing that Pence did not support gay conversion therapy. From looking at both politifact and snopes, it seems like this issue is 'not conclusive', because it's certainly possible to interpret his words from 2000 as advocating that gays should be abstinent, not that they should be tortured into being disgusted by homosexuality.

The argument that most gay rights advocates lean on is that Pence has never been clear about his stance on conversation therapy. It would be an easy issue to clear up over the 17 years since then. And it is a repugnant practice that is medical unsound. I don't have a clear answer on how to discuss possible dog whistle politics. But they should be discussed.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3187 Posts
August 20 2017 18:05 GMT
#1440
On August 21 2017 01:46 oBlade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 21 2017 00:25 ChristianS wrote:
Jesus, I actually typed up a response to this last night and then thought "what's the point, it's just oBlade trying to make a fuss about it, and he'll probably drop it anyway."

You guys are literally getting salty over a pun. That's it. That's the whole thing. It's just a word association joke, gays -> fruits, Pence -> conversion therapy -> electroshock therapy -> comatose people -> vegetables, fruits -> vegetables. What exactly is the outrage here?

In other contexts the term "fruits" being used for gays might be considered a little offensive, but it's obviously not used as a pejorative here, it's just to make the joke. If it becomes clear that Kwark regularly uses the term fruits for gays in other discussions we can talk with him about how that's not the preferred term, but when we're in a discussion about the literal physical and psychological torture of gay people, it's patently absurd to get more offended by Kwark's joke than by the practice itself.

If you don't give a shit about gays, maybe you think using the word "vegetable" for comatose people is a little insensitive, but let's drop the act for a minute. oBlade, xDaunt, and Danglars are banding together to try to get everyone to use the right PC labels? I don't buy it for a second. If your quest to prove the moderation is biased, latching onto petty shit like this only makes it more likely no one ever takes your quest seriously.

I care about garbage and hypocrisy, not about political correctness per se, although you need to mind the outlet. Kwark sets no standards for himself. The other day Wuffles was warned for saying he heard Bannon sucks his own cock, which was at least hearsay from Scaramucci, this thing about Pence and electroshock therapy is 4chan meme pollution, having no basis in fact and relying on perpetuating multiple stereotypes to make no point in the end. And it's of course rich to see the author's sudden interest in context. We have the whole rest of the internet and media to read about Putin cock holsters and so forth.

It's literally just a pun. What does any of this discussion of Pence's true position on conversion therapy matter? If we find that actually Pence doesn't support conversion therapy and it's just a popular misconception, does that transform the joke into something actionable? If I make a joke about Dan Quayle misspelling potato, do I get banned because it turns out the card they gave him was wrong?

oBlade even admits he doesn't care about the joke itself, and is just trying to prove something about the moderation staff. So even the accuser in this case doesn't think the post is actionable. What's the issue here?
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
Prev 1 70 71 72 73 74 322 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Road to EWC
15:00
DreamHack Dallas Group Stage
ewc_black3271
ComeBackTV 1915
SteadfastSC504
CranKy Ducklings315
CosmosSc2 205
EnkiAlexander 127
Rex124
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 504
CosmosSc2 205
NeuroSwarm 164
Rex 124
EnDerr 12
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 15173
Calm 3247
Mini 515
firebathero 191
ggaemo 98
Dota 2
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
fl0m3761
Fnx 2086
Stewie2K753
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox1285
AZ_Axe120
Mew2King19
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby3966
Other Games
tarik_tv14025
summit1g12326
gofns11996
FrodaN4767
shahzam548
ViBE157
Hui .102
Sick70
KnowMe51
kaitlyn38
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1464
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 82
• davetesta30
• HeavenSC 23
• gosughost_ 8
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 81
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift3901
Other Games
• imaqtpie1547
• Shiphtur177
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
5h 36m
BeSt vs Soulkey
AllThingsProtoss
11h 36m
Road to EWC
14h 36m
BSL: ProLeague
18h 36m
Cross vs TT1
spx vs Hawk
JDConan vs TBD
Wardi Open
1d 11h
SOOP
2 days
NightMare vs Wayne
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Cure vs Zoun
Solar vs Creator
The PondCast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
3 days
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
GSL Code S
4 days
GuMiho vs Bunny
ByuN vs SHIN
Online Event
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-05-20
2025 GSL S1
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
ASL Season 19
YSL S1
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
China & Korea Top Challenge
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Heroes 10 EU
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
2025 GSL S2
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.