• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:08
CEST 02:08
KST 09:08
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week0SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-69SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-64PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August)14Neeb returns to progaming; rejoins ONSYDE18
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) StarCraft 2 at SC4ALL II Invite #4/8 - Percival Protoss AoE skill expression 5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start) StarCraft 2 at SC4ALL II Invite #3/8 - Clem
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) Tasteless Time Warp: SC Evo Showmatch (May 25) SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-6
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 537 Hostile Territory Mutation # 536 Railroad Switch Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance
Brood War
General
Are you ready for ASL 22? NEW HYPE VIDEO ASL22 General Discussion Recent recommended BW games BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ The Korean Terminology Thread
Tourneys
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament - Season 3 SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-6
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Diablo 2 thread General RTS Discussion Thread ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live!
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Iain M Banks Says He Has Cancer And Months To Live European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Clem Fan Club INnoVation Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
NBA General Discussion Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
What is a Gamer?
TrAiDoS
Hello guys!
LIN1s
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8372 users

US Politics Feedback Thread - Page 71

Forum Index > Website Feedback
Post a Reply
Prev 1 69 70 71 72 73 344 Next
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
August 20 2017 03:38 GMT
#1401
It has brought the thread to a very dumb low. Not as bad as the 14 words, but very bad.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States6367 Posts
August 20 2017 04:20 GMT
#1402
Meanwhile, this is a proud mod:
On August 19 2017 13:00 KwarK wrote:
Pence, turning fruits into vegetables.

"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 04:29:06
August 20 2017 04:28 GMT
#1403
This has basically become zlefin's personal "rant about Danglars" thread. It's the most common reason for it to be revived.

Maybe if the rant had content it would be taken more seriously.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44216 Posts
August 20 2017 04:37 GMT
#1404
On August 20 2017 13:20 oBlade wrote:
Meanwhile, this is a proud mod:
On August 19 2017 13:00 KwarK wrote:
Pence, turning fruits into vegetables.


Dark jokes about how the VP electrocutes gay people, too far! VP electrocuting gay people, that's cool?

Yeah, it's fine. Humour is how we deal with this incredibly fucked up scenario where half the country decided that people like Mike Pence were their model leaders. Fuck your phony concern.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
August 20 2017 05:30 GMT
#1405
On August 20 2017 12:07 KwarK wrote:
At least he didn't attempt to explain why the 14 words were nothing to with white supremacism and that anyone who disagrees is a retard.

So honest question for the people on the right (Danglars, oBlade, Introvert, etc), because I really do have trouble making up my mind on this issue: Do you think that Kwark misrepresents stuff like this intentionally because of some pathology that prevents him from debating in good faith or unintentionally because he really doesn't understand the issues?

And for those who are confused, the argument made was not why the 14 words have nothing to do with white supremacism. The argument made was why Vox Day's use of them had nothing to do with white supremacism. Pretty important distinction, the kind of which Kwark habitually glosses over. I just want to know whether people think it's intentional or unintentional.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44216 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 05:49:26
August 20 2017 05:47 GMT
#1406
On August 20 2017 14:30 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2017 12:07 KwarK wrote:
At least he didn't attempt to explain why the 14 words were nothing to with white supremacism and that anyone who disagrees is a retard.

So honest question for the people on the right (Danglars, oBlade, Introvert, etc), because I really do have trouble making up my mind on this issue: Do you think that Kwark misrepresents stuff like this intentionally because of some pathology that prevents him from debating in good faith or unintentionally because he really doesn't understand the issues?

And for those who are confused, the argument made was not why the 14 words have nothing to do with white supremacism. The argument made was why Vox Day's use of them had nothing to do with white supremacism. Pretty important distinction, the kind of which Kwark habitually glosses over. I just want to know whether people think it's intentional or unintentional.

I think the people you listed are pretty much the only people you'll be able to find who will believe that you weren't defending the 14 words when you wrote that long rant defending the 14 words. And only because they're highly skilled in selective facts.

You can't use them in a non white supremacist way.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
August 20 2017 05:52 GMT
#1407
Can you quote where dauntless defends the 14 words in particular so we can assemble a tribunal?
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44216 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 06:06:33
August 20 2017 06:03 GMT
#1408
+ Show Spoiler +
On August 17 2017 12:24 xDaunt wrote:
So let me start by addressing why Vox Day's 14th Point ("The Alt Right believes we must secure the existence of white people and a future for white children.") is not about white supremacy. And let me preface this by saying now that some of you are going to feel really retarded by the time that I'm done, because everything that I'm about to say is right in the 16 Points. Point 15 is the first big hint:

Show nested quote +
The Alt Right does not believe in the general supremacy of any race, nation, people, or sub-species. Every race, nation, people, and human sub-species has its own unique strengths and weaknesses, and possesses the sovereign right to dwell unmolested in the native culture it prefers.


Just in case there's any ambiguity here, let's look at Points 10 and 16, respectively:

Show nested quote +
The Alt Right is opposed to the rule or domination of any native ethnic group by another, particularly in the sovereign homelands of the dominated peoples. The Alt Right is opposed to any non-native ethnic group obtaining excessive influence in any society through nepotism, tribalism, or any other means.

The Alt Right is a philosophy that values peace among the various nations of the world and opposes wars to impose the values of one nation upon another as well as efforts to exterminate individual nations through war, genocide, immigration, or genetic assimilation.


Here, Vox Day is clearly advocating for peaceful coexistence among peoples and advocating directly against the supremacy/imperialism of one people over another. Not exactly the typical skinhead dribble, right? So now let's talk about his reasoning for ethnostates. We see it stated right in Point 11:

Show nested quote +
The Alt Right understands that diversity + proximity = war.


Now, unlike the previous points, I am willing to cut people a little bit of slack for not fully understanding the significance of what Vox Day is communicating here given the terseness of the statement and the fact that most probably have not had the opportunity to read or hear Vox Day elaborate on this point. But his argument is basically as follows: history shows that conflict -- often violent conflict -- occurs when different cultures either a) exist in close proximity to each other, or b) find themselves in a situation whether they otherwise have to compete with each other over the same resources. Stated another way, multiculturalism breeds strife that is not easily repressed and eliminated until there is some degree of convergence between the cultures because people tend to be assholes to "the other." It's just who we are and what we do. Vox Day's solution to this human condition is to keep everyone separated and allow each people the right to national self-determination. This is stated in Point 5:

Show nested quote +
The Alt Right is openly and avowedly nationalist. It supports all nationalisms and the right of all nations to exist, homogeneous and unadulterated by foreign invasion and immigration.


Accordingly, securing the future of white people is merely the logical extension of this principle. The goal, is the preservation of Western Culture, of which Vox Day writes in Point 4:

Show nested quote +
The Alt Right believes Western civilization is the pinnacle of human achievement and supports its three foundational pillars: Christianity, the European nations, and the Graeco-Roman legacy.


For the numerous posters who struggle with reading, let me make the following abundantly clear: All of what I have said so far is what Vox Day thinks. Not necessarily what I think.

Like I have said many times before, my primary disagreement with the Alt Right lies in its preoccupation with race. And this is where I deviate from Vox Day as well. Here is what he writes in the summary section of his 16 Points:

Show nested quote +
TL;DR: The Alt Right is a Western ideology that believes in science, history, reality, and the right of a genetic nation to exist and govern itself in its own interests.

The patron saint of conservatives, Russell Kirk, wrote: "The great line of demarcation in modern politics, Eric Voegelin used to point out, is not a division between liberals on one side and totalitarians on the other. No, on one side of that line are all those men and women who fancy that the temporal order is the only order, and that material needs are their only needs, and that they may do as they like with the human patrimony. On the other side of that line are all those people who recognize an enduring moral order in the universe, a constant human nature, and high duties toward the order spiritual and the order temporal."

This is no longer true, assuming it ever was. The great line of demarcation in modern politics is now a division between men and women who believe that they are ultimately defined by their momentary opinions and those who believe they are ultimately defined by their genetic heritage. The Alt Right understands that the former will always lose to the latter in the end, because the former is subject to change.


While I am willing to entertain the idea that there is some genetic variation between races, I do not accept the idea that this variation is significant enough to affect the ability of members of a given race to be able to embrace, or assimilate into, a certain culture, particularly if we are to assume tabula rasa immersion into that culture (ie taking a baby from one race/culture and raising it in another race/culture). Stated another way, Vox Day thinks that race and culture are largely inseparable. I don't. Now, for practical purposes, I can see why race might be a useful proxy for culture given that every culture is the product of predominantly one race, but it doesn't change the basic point that a member of any race can, in theory, adopt any culture.

So let's turn to IgnE's post:

Show nested quote +
On August 17 2017 08:52 IgnE wrote:
you mentioned "pluralism" as one of the pillars of western civilization so im just hoping that one of your major disagreements with the alt right is this fixation on "homeland" and "ethnic" homogeneity. unless you meant pluralism in the strictly narrow sense of division of governmental powers.

cultural homogeneity seems more like the xdaunt brand of fascism. properly oedipal but enlightened enough to not worry about the fiction of race


First, I mentioned that "political pluralism" is a pillar of western civilization, referring mostly to the idea that we value truly democratic and representative rule, as opposed to some form of autocratic or even single party rule. As for cultural pluralism, it really boils down to a matter of degree. While I reject outright multiculturalism, I do think that there is some room for variation within a culture. Or using IgnE's terminology, the xDaunt brand of fascism does require a certain level of cultural homogeneity within the nation. I'll just say right now that I don't know exactly where the line is as it pertains to the US. However, and per my previous posts addressing this matter, I do think it critical that everyone within the US, at a minimum, accept and embrace the most important traditions of Western culture: individual liberty, inalienable rights, political plurality, rationalism, and the rule of law. And I will be first to say that we have not done a good job of imprinting these values upon our own people (as is amply evidenced by some of the posters around here), thus this isn't even strictly an issue of insider vs outsider.

We can see a nice little microcosm as to why cultural homogeneity matters just by looking at what has been going on over at Google. How was the internal reaction to Damore's memo any different than a cultural conflict? As with cultural conflicts between nations or peoples, conflicting values were the issue. And as we with so many cultural conflicts, one side is clearly working to eliminate the other. As Vox Day says, diversity + proximity = war.

Note that Vox Day made that point his 14th point. I wonder whether xDaunt thinks it's coincidental, or if he accepts that it is a deliberate reference to the 14 words but is about to tell us that he's referencing them in a non Nazi way.

xDaunt's argument comes down to "but everyone gets separate but equal homelands so how can that even be racist?"
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
August 20 2017 06:16 GMT
#1409
On August 20 2017 14:30 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2017 12:07 KwarK wrote:
At least he didn't attempt to explain why the 14 words were nothing to with white supremacism and that anyone who disagrees is a retard.

So honest question for the people on the right (Danglars, oBlade, Introvert, etc), because I really do have trouble making up my mind on this issue: Do you think that Kwark misrepresents stuff like this intentionally because of some pathology that prevents him from debating in good faith or unintentionally because he really doesn't understand the issues?

You picked a rather sympathetic group of folks to ask, so I think you know what answer to expect. I don't think it unfair to treat the question as effectively rhetorical.

That being so, I have one for you: why continue to engage Kwark in discussion? You know what you can expect from him, and you know that he is not likely to change and no one is likely to reel him in to make him debate charitably or avoid engaging in piss-fights at every turn. There is of course something to be said for defending yourself, but at this point we all know the score on that front. That being so, what is there to gain from it? Because frankly, given that the moderation staff essentially permits any degree of Kwark shitposting, the only remaining recourse is "don't feed the troll." Of course once in a while we all get baited, but I think that's the only real way forward.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States6367 Posts
August 20 2017 06:23 GMT
#1410
On August 20 2017 14:30 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2017 12:07 KwarK wrote:
At least he didn't attempt to explain why the 14 words were nothing to with white supremacism and that anyone who disagrees is a retard.

So honest question for the people on the right (Danglars, oBlade, Introvert, etc), because I really do have trouble making up my mind on this issue: Do you think that Kwark misrepresents stuff like this intentionally because of some pathology that prevents him from debating in good faith or unintentionally because he really doesn't understand the issues?

And for those who are confused, the argument made was not why the 14 words have nothing to do with white supremacism. The argument made was why Vox Day's use of them had nothing to do with white supremacism. Pretty important distinction, the kind of which Kwark habitually glosses over. I just want to know whether people think it's intentional or unintentional.

I'm not on the right but it's probably not intentional, he wouldn't keep doing this if he saw himself, some people are too busy/noisy/wound up to be dispassionate about subtle things.

On August 20 2017 13:37 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2017 13:20 oBlade wrote:
Meanwhile, this is a proud mod:
On August 19 2017 13:00 KwarK wrote:
Pence, turning fruits into vegetables.


Dark jokes about how the VP electrocutes gay people, too far! VP electrocuting gay people, that's cool?

Yeah, it's fine. Humour is how we deal with this incredibly fucked up scenario where half the country decided that people like Mike Pence were their model leaders. Fuck your phony concern.

-The VP doesn't electrocute gay people or want to, try Snopes
-Gay people aren't fruits
-You aren't on 4chan, post better

The US has been electing Republicans for over a century, it's only you who didn't notice it and now thinks the sky is falling, if you need a personal way to cope then maybe look into therapy, which has had booming demand after the election so might help.
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44216 Posts
August 20 2017 06:29 GMT
#1411
I know that gay people aren't literally fruits oBlade. I'm aware they're human. I can tell the difference between humans and fruits. However fruits is used as a euphemism for homosexuals. It's a little antiquated but it's a funny line. Turning homosexuals into vegetables wouldn't be as clever. And I'm aware he doesn't electrocute anyone. Few reasons for that. Firstly, by definition electrocution has to be to death. If the person survives they were shocked, not electrocuted. Secondly, even if Pence did want gays to be electrocuted he'd probably not do it himself. Thirdly, it's just gay conversion therapy he supports.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
oBlade
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States6367 Posts
August 20 2017 06:44 GMT
#1412
On August 20 2017 15:29 KwarK wrote:
I know that gay people aren't literally fruits oBlade. I'm aware they're human. I can tell the difference between humans and fruits. However fruits is used as a euphemism for homosexuals. It's a little antiquated but it's a funny line. Turning homosexuals into vegetables wouldn't be as clever.

That's what I was reminding you they're not, bub. It's not clever at all, as you admitted it's just a meme you injected because you saw the VP's name and somehow thought it was relevant.

On August 20 2017 15:29 KwarK wrote:
And I'm aware he doesn't electrocute anyone. Few reasons for that. Firstly, by definition electrocution has to be to death. If the person survives they were shocked, not electrocuted. Secondly, even if Pence did want gays to be electrocuted he'd probably not do it himself. Thirdly, it's just gay conversion therapy he supports.

He doesn't support electrocution or electroshock or anything else a pedant could conceive relating homosexuals and voltage.
On August 20 2017 13:37 KwarK wrote:
VP electrocuting gay people, that's cool?

On August 19 2017 12:50 KwarK wrote:
I mean electrocuting gays just doesn't cut it as extreme in the modern Republican party.

On August 20 2017 15:29 KwarK wrote:
And I'm aware he doesn't electrocute anyone.



What are you trying to accomplish here? Stop being this smartass troll and at least try to set an example.
"I read it. You know how to read, you ignorant fuck?" - Andy Dufresne
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44216 Posts
August 20 2017 06:49 GMT
#1413
The topic under discussion was Pence and reasons why him taking over the top job wouldn't be great. His history with the gays is relevant. Gay conversion therapy is barbaric.

As for whether that line is clever, maybe it's subjective.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
August 20 2017 13:40 GMT
#1414
On August 20 2017 14:30 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2017 12:07 KwarK wrote:
At least he didn't attempt to explain why the 14 words were nothing to with white supremacism and that anyone who disagrees is a retard.

So honest question for the people on the right (Danglars, oBlade, Introvert, etc), because I really do have trouble making up my mind on this issue: Do you think that Kwark misrepresents stuff like this intentionally because of some pathology that prevents him from debating in good faith or unintentionally because he really doesn't understand the issues?

And for those who are confused, the argument made was not why the 14 words have nothing to do with white supremacism. The argument made was why Vox Day's use of them had nothing to do with white supremacism. Pretty important distinction, the kind of which Kwark habitually glosses over. I just want to know whether people think it's intentional or unintentional.

I think it's intentional for private humor and also to make easier arguments for himself. He really does seem intelligent enough to grasp the plain truth and debate that if that was his desire. It's fun to dodge nuance, and probably no one he respects will call him on it, then laugh at someone that he's portrayed as ridiculous. When arguing from a correct structure is boring, you just obliterate the conditionals and predicates then make a nice slanderous conclusion.

Is it also in service of thread mob mentality or TL lefist tribalism? Of course, they're all secretly permissive of white supremacist ideology and harbor racist sentiments, so arguments should not be about point-counterpoint, but rather about eliciting their hidden sympathies? That's a possible third rationale, but I the first two are more easily seen.

On August 17 2017 03:47 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2017 03:45 Danglars wrote:
On August 17 2017 02:57 ninazerg wrote:
Of all the groups of people I have ever debated in my life, far-left progressives have been the most resistant to having an actual discussion with me. Not even a 'debate'. Just a discussion. And this is a problem because people who hold these beliefs (I know I'm not being very specific here, but I don't want to get into that right now. That's another discussion for another time.) sit in influential positions in some cases. This failure to articulate and defend ideas with evidence and reason is a hallmark of intellectual laziness, and when some white supremacist posts anywhere on any website that has a public forum, I kind of expect the internet to do what the internet does and brutally assail them in written form, but I would also expect people who consider themselves to be 'intellectual' to engage them in a serious discussion. For example, if a Neo-Nazi says something like "Jews control all the banks" or something to that effect, my first thought would be to open a tab up and look up the CEOs of major banks to see if they're actually all Jewish or not. I don't even consider myself to be a very 'intellectual' person, but I consider myself smart enough not to immediately just go straight to personal insults in a discussion.

if the left wants to 'win' in the marketplace of ideas, shutting down dissent, relying on Antifa for physical intimidation, refusing to engage in debate, and calling political-moderates names for asking questions is ultimately going to be counterproductive to their platform.

I've had the same experience. And same reaction. I find in-person to be loads better because there's less Kwark and Plansix "you're a racist" distractions, but there's still hurdles in people showing me why they think they're right versus justifying why its right to shut down people who think they're wrong.

Your post was like a breath of fresh air.

Dangles, we don't necessarily think that you're a racist, we just think you voted for someone who gave racists boners and you continue to defend the giver of racist-boners even after one of these excited racists killed someone.

Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
August 20 2017 13:45 GMT
#1415
On August 20 2017 15:23 oBlade wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2017 13:37 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2017 13:20 oBlade wrote:
Meanwhile, this is a proud mod:
On August 19 2017 13:00 KwarK wrote:
Pence, turning fruits into vegetables.


Dark jokes about how the VP electrocutes gay people, too far! VP electrocuting gay people, that's cool?

Yeah, it's fine. Humour is how we deal with this incredibly fucked up scenario where half the country decided that people like Mike Pence were their model leaders. Fuck your phony concern.

-The VP doesn't electrocute gay people or want to, try Snopes
-Gay people aren't fruits
-You aren't on 4chan, post better

The US has been electing Republicans for over a century, it's only you who didn't notice it and now thinks the sky is falling, if you need a personal way to cope then maybe look into therapy, which has had booming demand after the election so might help.

Anyone but a mod would get warned for this. When it's a red hammer shitting up the thread, what's there to do but follow suit?
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 14:19:26
August 20 2017 14:17 GMT
#1416
On August 20 2017 14:47 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2017 14:30 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2017 12:07 KwarK wrote:
At least he didn't attempt to explain why the 14 words were nothing to with white supremacism and that anyone who disagrees is a retard.

So honest question for the people on the right (Danglars, oBlade, Introvert, etc), because I really do have trouble making up my mind on this issue: Do you think that Kwark misrepresents stuff like this intentionally because of some pathology that prevents him from debating in good faith or unintentionally because he really doesn't understand the issues?

And for those who are confused, the argument made was not why the 14 words have nothing to do with white supremacism. The argument made was why Vox Day's use of them had nothing to do with white supremacism. Pretty important distinction, the kind of which Kwark habitually glosses over. I just want to know whether people think it's intentional or unintentional.

I think the people you listed are pretty much the only people you'll be able to find who will believe that you weren't defending the 14 words when you wrote that long rant defending the 14 words. And only because they're highly skilled in selective facts.

You can't use them in a non white supremacist way.


.... but you can use "fruits" to refer to gays in your posts and not be homophobic. Got it.
ChristianS
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States3304 Posts
August 20 2017 15:25 GMT
#1417
Jesus, I actually typed up a response to this last night and then thought "what's the point, it's just oBlade trying to make a fuss about it, and he'll probably drop it anyway."

You guys are literally getting salty over a pun. That's it. That's the whole thing. It's just a word association joke, gays -> fruits, Pence -> conversion therapy -> electroshock therapy -> comatose people -> vegetables, fruits -> vegetables. What exactly is the outrage here?

In other contexts the term "fruits" being used for gays might be considered a little offensive, but it's obviously not used as a pejorative here, it's just to make the joke. If it becomes clear that Kwark regularly uses the term fruits for gays in other discussions we can talk with him about how that's not the preferred term, but when we're in a discussion about the literal physical and psychological torture of gay people, it's patently absurd to get more offended by Kwark's joke than by the practice itself.

If you don't give a shit about gays, maybe you think using the word "vegetable" for comatose people is a little insensitive, but let's drop the act for a minute. oBlade, xDaunt, and Danglars are banding together to try to get everyone to use the right PC labels? I don't buy it for a second. If your quest to prove the moderation is biased, latching onto petty shit like this only makes it more likely no one ever takes your quest seriously.

Danglars, imo the attitude of "I think the other side is shitty so I have a right—no, obligation—to be shitty" seems to describe your posting better and better lately, and if anything ever gets you banned, that will be it. I hope that doesn't happen, because when you aren't acting like that I think you bring a lot of value to the thread. Just my opinion, obviously, so take it or leave it.
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." -Robert J. Hanlon
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44216 Posts
August 20 2017 15:38 GMT
#1418
On August 20 2017 23:17 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2017 14:47 KwarK wrote:
On August 20 2017 14:30 xDaunt wrote:
On August 20 2017 12:07 KwarK wrote:
At least he didn't attempt to explain why the 14 words were nothing to with white supremacism and that anyone who disagrees is a retard.

So honest question for the people on the right (Danglars, oBlade, Introvert, etc), because I really do have trouble making up my mind on this issue: Do you think that Kwark misrepresents stuff like this intentionally because of some pathology that prevents him from debating in good faith or unintentionally because he really doesn't understand the issues?

And for those who are confused, the argument made was not why the 14 words have nothing to do with white supremacism. The argument made was why Vox Day's use of them had nothing to do with white supremacism. Pretty important distinction, the kind of which Kwark habitually glosses over. I just want to know whether people think it's intentional or unintentional.

I think the people you listed are pretty much the only people you'll be able to find who will believe that you weren't defending the 14 words when you wrote that long rant defending the 14 words. And only because they're highly skilled in selective facts.

You can't use them in a non white supremacist way.


.... but you can use "fruits" to refer to gays in your posts and not be homophobic. Got it.

Are you equating the very contextual use of the word fruits in a post attacking gay conversion therapy with defending the 14 words right now?
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-20 16:02:19
August 20 2017 15:57 GMT
#1419
An off-hand joke that would probably get someone else a warning is by far one of the least relevant things to focus on wrt Kwark. I guess that's meaningful but no one is going to do anything about it, so what can we really do?

I'd say the pettiness of continuing to bitch on and on about his interpretation of xDaunt's post, including bringing it here, is more significant. One of the few times an admin told him to shut the fuck up was in a similar scenario. And he definitely cries foul whenever someone apparently takes him out of context, so there's an added element of hypocrisy there for sure.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14176 Posts
August 20 2017 16:04 GMT
#1420
I think xdaunt forgets that Kwark is British and has the Humor and insults of a British person.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Prev 1 69 70 71 72 73 344 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Ladder Legends
20:00
Saturday Open #1
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 468
ViBE85
ProTech74
Dota 2
LuMiX0
League of Legends
Doublelift5870
JimRising 192
Counter-Strike
summit1g9091
minikerr38
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang01122
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor171
Other Games
tarik_tv8280
gofns871
shahzam515
ToD265
ROOTCatZ156
XaKoH 135
Mew2King49
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1164
BasetradeTV172
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 98
• davetesta52
• Response 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 33
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22106
League of Legends
• imaqtpie2790
• Shiphtur468
Other Games
• Scarra1485
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
8h 52m
OSC
12h 52m
OSC
23h 52m
WardiTV Weekly
1d 10h
The Patches Monday
1d 15h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
PiG Sty Festival
2 days
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S3: W6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
Acropolis #5
RSL Revival: Season 6
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W7
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
Escore Tournament S3: W8
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSA
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
Thunderpick World Champ.
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.