EPTNever mind.
US Politics Feedback Thread - Page 69
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
Never mind. | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On July 20 2017 00:56 farvacola wrote: I'm pretty sure when he wrote "name the races," he meant like a race for governor, city councilman, or state rep, something like that, not race as in skin color. this is either a great joke by you or a great joke on LL | ||
KwarK
United States43722 Posts
On July 20 2017 00:44 LegalLord wrote: Tell me that that isn't the kind of bait that really gets to the core of why Kwark's usage of his mod status as a license to shitpost is seen as problematic. Here's the thing Legal. You have this idea of yourself as being politically informed and of having highly complex and nuanced opinions. And you like to talk about it a lot while going on about the problems with both parties and how you can see better than everyone else. Personally, I think you're full of shit. So, when you mention these down ballot races where you closely examined the candidates from each side, their policies, their past experience, their corporate support and so forth and made a judgement against party lines, that's interesting to me. Because to me you seem a lot like the kind of person who would never actually do any of that but deeply cares about other people thinking you're the kind of person who would. So I thought I'd ask you to name the races and your reasons. Which, if you actually cared, would have taken all of a few seconds. Because you'd already done the work, right? You'd already looked into these things before you voted, right? And these are the races that really tortured you before making you cross the aisle, right? You're so very informed on these issues and made such a complex and educated choice that it should be absolutely no effort for you to just tell us, in a few words, why you did what you did. But no, instead you're here in website feedback complaining that me asking for details is somehow oppressing you. Because responding to "in a few races I made this decision" with "which races and why?" is apparently abuse of my mod status. Honestly you immediately running to website feedback is far better than any result I actually expected to get. I figured there was like a 5% chance of you going to wikipedia and looking up a few candidates from the last race, 95% chance of you ignoring it completely and hoping nobody else noticed. I didn't imagine calling you out would go this well. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18855 Posts
On July 20 2017 00:58 IgnE wrote: this is either a great joke by you or a great joke on LL there's no way to be sure given KwarK's sneaky across-the-pond-turned-American-Southwest ways | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On July 20 2017 00:58 IgnE wrote: this is either a great joke by you or a great joke on LL I will admit that I just fucked up and mistook his content for something a fair bit more trollish than it actually was. My mistake on the original. | ||
|
KwarK
United States43722 Posts
| ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On July 20 2017 01:07 LegalLord wrote: See Kwark, I was willing to admit that I was wrong about it all, that I mistook a post of yours, and in your usual manner you go and seek to start a bitch fight with a pointless follow-up. Take of that what you will. I will admit that I just fucked up and mistook his content for something a fair bit more trollish than it actually was. My mistake on the original. fair enough we all make mistakes but i must admit that i am curious about these races where you voted republican because the democrat was so shitty | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On July 20 2017 01:38 IgnE wrote: fair enough we all make mistakes but i must admit that i am curious about these races where you voted republican because the democrat was so shitty Made a post. Look in the thread itself. | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
 | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On July 20 2017 06:40 opisska wrote: If kwark keeps this "making a fool of ll" business up, I might start to like him You need a hobby. | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
I think it's quite obvious that I already have one. You should know, it involves you | ||
|
Sermokala
United States14104 Posts
On July 20 2017 09:12 opisska wrote: I think it's quite obvious that I already have one. You should know, it involves you I think you vastly underestimate how creepy that reads. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On July 20 2017 23:34 Sermokala wrote: I think you vastly underestimate how creepy that reads. He's a physicist, he doesn't know any better. | ||
|
oBlade
United States5952 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On July 20 2017 23:44 oBlade wrote: We can make our own Twitter accounts if we want to see Doodsmack's Twitter feed, right? MSNBC producer and DailyKos social media editor as part of the three tweets on a single page? Standards are fucking low. | ||
|
Reaps
United Kingdom1280 Posts
On July 21 2017 00:18 Danglars wrote: MSNBC producer and DailyKos social media editor as part of the three tweets on a single page? Standards are fucking low. I don't know how you guys can even handle that kind of shit in the US thread, i take one look and immediately need to take a break from it. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On July 20 2017 23:37 LegalLord wrote: He's a physicist, he doesn't know any better. I don't really understand the nuances of human communication, in particular in English, but I think it really would be creepy only if you were a 13-yo girl. Admittedly, we don't have any solid evidence that it is not the case, but presuming that you are 30-something guy, I don't really see the creepiness in it. But again, you really do have a point, I am in some aspects the archetypal student of my faculty (in Czech a shorthand for it is commonly used as an insult to indicate that someone is socially inept). Sadly, I only really fit the stereotype in the "bad with people" part and not in the "great with maths and physics" part. | ||
|
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On July 21 2017 01:02 Reaps wrote: I don't know how you guys can even handle that kind of shit in the US thread, i take one look and immediately need to take a break from it. It's about the story, not the tweeter. All three were newsworthy. | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
i dont mind if you feel you have something new to contribute but posting w/out commentary should have some level of obvious novelty | ||
| ||
