GSTL May Teams - no IM - Page 3
Forum Index > SC2 General |
ElusoryX
Singapore2047 Posts
| ||
Rokk
United States425 Posts
On May 10 2011 14:05 I)etox wrote: Begin the hype!! oGs vs. ST so early... that should be interesting. Edit: Sigh. IM losing to fOu by .4 points... MVP being in Code A basically lost IM their seat :\ oGs has consistently shown poor performances in the GSTL. While I think they should do well, I'm not optimistic. | ||
Seun
United States1 Post
| ||
MechKing
United States3004 Posts
| ||
Mise
Finland580 Posts
On May 10 2011 14:29 Rokk wrote: oGs has consistently shown poor performances in the GSTL. While I think they should do well, I'm not optimistic. oGs has consistently lost to the eventual champion in the first round of GSTL. That really hurts their record. | ||
hmunkey
United Kingdom1973 Posts
| ||
Antoine
United States7481 Posts
On May 10 2011 14:24 Truefire wrote: Some of you say IM doesn't have the results to compete but you do remember that they won the first GSTL and placed 2nd in second GSTL. They should give some rank points for placing 1st or 2nd in GSTL and that would solve this problem. Yes, it's true that they did well in the tournament itself. However, what I think Gom is trying to do is counterbalance some of the issues the Winner's League Format has with their system. There are 2 major formats for team competition - all kill, and standard. All kill is obviously favored towards the teams that have that 1 (or 2) stars, and maybe snipers, where the standard system is more beneficial to balanced teams with well-rounded players. You can't really do a mixture of the two systems within a tournament. But with GOM's format, they take care of the "needing a balanced team" requirement via their qualification procedure, then give the really strong players a chance to show their stuff in the actual tournament. It seems pretty fair to me, although I'lll agree it hurts to not see the stars in this tournament. On May 10 2011 14:30 MechKing wrote: Will the team leagues be played the week after the finals? yes, this GSTL is the 16th-19th. | ||
Azzur
Australia6202 Posts
| ||
slicknav
1409 Posts
On May 10 2011 14:16 ReachTheSky wrote: Top teams get decided by results. Surely you can't be considered a top team if you don't have the current results to back it up. The other teams that are ahead of IM have proven, by showing results, that they are indeed a top team. I do agree that IM is a very good team, but if they aren't proving it consistantly then where is the credibility? Would you really consider teams like Zenex and fou to be better than IM? Both have 5 players in the GSL, while IM has 4, just 1 less. Yet IM players have consistently performed better. | ||
RezChi
Canada2368 Posts
| ||
Kantutan
Canada1319 Posts
| ||
Jumbled
1543 Posts
| ||
red4ce
United States7313 Posts
| ||
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10149 Posts
Yes, it's true that they did well in the tournament itself. However, what I think Gom is trying to do is counterbalance some of the issues the Winner's League Format has with their system. There are 2 major formats for team competition - all kill, and standard. All kill is obviously favored towards the teams that have that 1 (or 2) stars, and maybe snipers, where the standard system is more beneficial to balanced teams with well-rounded players. You can't really do a mixture of the two systems within a tournament. But with GOM's format, they take care of the "needing a balanced team" requirement via their qualification procedure, then give the really strong players a chance to show their stuff in the actual tournament. It seems pretty fair to me, although I'lll agree it hurts to not see the stars in this tournament. Nice insight there, didn't think of it that way | ||
Mephyss
Brazil128 Posts
| ||
shizi
United States210 Posts
| ||
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
| ||
Irave
United States9965 Posts
| ||
Mephyss
Brazil128 Posts
| ||
Paradice
New Zealand431 Posts
These are professional players, and playing this game is their livelihood. The rules may not be perfect, and by all means consider changing them for future tournaments, but not this one. You can't arbitrarily change the scoring system after the game is over. p.s. prediction: MVP wins the tournament. A brand new team with some strong players and a hell of a lot to prove. | ||
| ||