On September 12 2010 04:30 Spazer wrote:
Splitting up the mod ban graph works wonders. Well, sort of.

The graph of everyone over 100 bans works great.
+ Show Spoiler +

The graph of everyone under 100 bans... not so much.
+ Show Spoiler +

Gee, I wonder when the banlings got introduced?

Fortunately, splitting that graph up kinda fixes the problem.
+ Show Spoiler [Mods under 100] +

+ Show Spoiler [Banlings] +

Excel sure likes to pick shitty colors.

Show nested quote +

OSL finals will do that to a man.

Show nested quote +

That's not too hard to figure out. It's everyone except those listed in Hot Bid's results.

Yeah but I wanted to see all the pretty red!

Spazer

Canada8028 Posts

November 03 2010 23:54 GMT

#144

On October 12 2010 03:01 BrownBear wrote:
Woah. I believe that's Jinro who jumped 60 bans in one day in 2007, what's the story behind that?

That's Meat banning malicious users, I think.

On October 12 2010 03:06 FabledIntegral wrote:
Can someone explain to me how people have multiple accounts? I thought it wasn't allowed. Why are you allowed to even have multiple accounts?

Proxies? I dunno. I think you're allowed to remake your account if you get permabanned and you're relatively unknown. Don't quote me on that though.

+ Show Spoiler [Leaderboard] +

Mods/Staff =red
Banlings = Yellow

I don't know what to classify JWD as so he gets a special color.

+ Show Spoiler [<100] +

+ Show Spoiler [>100] +

+ Show Spoiler [Banlings] +

+ Show Spoiler [Bans per day] +

+ Show Spoiler [Total bans over time] +

+ Show Spoiler [Bans each hour KST] +

+ Show Spoiler [Ban types] +

2 day       2038
1 week      1321
2 weeks     818
30 days     192
90 day      67
Perma bans  3504
Unknown     4

+ Show Spoiler [Bonus chart] +

Mani has like 14.2% of all bans.

Anyone know how to do derivatives or calculate slope in Excel? Preferably without using a regression because that'd take forever to set up for every chart. I figure the easiest way would be to just use data from every ten points or something and calculate slope using that.

GGTeMpLaR

United States7226 Posts

November 04 2010 00:03 GMT

#145

I love how the slope has basically been at max ever since SC2 released lol

seRapH

United States9706 Posts

November 04 2010 00:06 GMT

#146

On October 12 2010 03:06 FabledIntegral wrote:
Can someone explain to me how people have multiple accounts? I thought it wasn't allowed. Why are you allowed to even have multiple accounts?

some people are allowed multis for comedic purposes. some people are allowed multis because they're smurfing mafia. some people remake accounts when permabanned as a second chance, but mods don't want you to advertise that its your 2nd account.

]343[

United States10328 Posts

November 04 2010 00:14 GMT

#147

lolol mani is so good at banhammer

thanks for the graphs! excel does pick bad colors though -__- i appreciate the dotting + stuff

aidnai

United States1159 Posts

November 04 2010 00:17 GMT

#148

If you have points and you want the slope, i don't see a need for calculus at all. slope is just (y2-y1)/(x2-x1). Unless I misread the question somehow?

Thanks for the updates! Mani is like the Yankees of banning...

emperorchampion

Canada9496 Posts

November 04 2010 00:21 GMT

#149

the bans over time graph is so good
:DD

mgj

191 Posts

November 04 2010 00:34 GMT

#150

I like how almost all rekruls bans are perm. Not really surprising, but interesting at least

FabledIntegral

United States9232 Posts

November 04 2010 01:15 GMT

#151

On November 04 2010 08:54 Spazer wrote:

Show nested quote +

Proxies? I dunno. I think you're allowed to remake your account if you get permabanned and you're relatively unknown. Don't quote me on that though.

Doesn't that completely defeat the purpose of a permaban? I figured permaban meant "we don't want you on this site." So it's just "this account is permanently banned, simply make a new one"? And to continue, they said "iD.twisted" was once permabanned but now posts on that account. How does that work?!

Spazer

Canada8028 Posts

November 04 2010 01:56 GMT

#152

On November 04 2010 09:34 mgj wrote:
I like how almost all rekruls bans are perm. Not really surprising, but interesting at least

Probably has something to do with the fact that temp bans didn't exist before. Dunno how much of an effect it had though.

On November 04 2010 10:15 FabledIntegral wrote:

Show nested quote +

Well I assume if they really hate you then you'd just get banned again.

FabledIntegral

United States9232 Posts

November 04 2010 03:52 GMT

#153

On November 04 2010 10:56 Spazer wrote:

Show nested quote +

Probably has something to do with the fact that temp bans didn't exist before. Dunno how much of an effect it had though.

Show nested quote +

Well I assume if they really hate you then you'd just get banned again.

Ha I guess, I just figured they'd have to hate you enough in the first place to get permabanned... and you see "previously banned user" all the time!

Bub

United States3518 Posts

November 04 2010 04:24 GMT

#154

hah at it being that high after the release of SC2 hah

EvilTeletubby

Baltimore, USA22245 Posts

November 04 2010 04:47 GMT

#155

Haha, very nice Spazer. I'd be curious if one of the wizards could drum up some accurate statistics for you to include info prior to the creation of the ABL or any silent bans.

For example, there are currently as of this posting 4,919 accounts currently in a "banned" status. The vast majority of them are perms, but it includes anyone who is currently temp banned.

Spazer

Canada8028 Posts

December 19 2010 02:03 GMT

#156

Exams are finally over for me, so I figured I'd screw around with this stuff some more. It's been about a month and a half since my last update, and roughly 60 new pages in the Automated Ban List have appeared since then. There's gotta be a better way to gather that data than by copy pasting all the text. -_-

4 new mods have bans: Zelniq, Excalibur_Z, TL.net Bot, and Saracen

There are 88 active temp bans as of 10:14 KST December 19, 2010, assuming the algorithm I just added actually works properly.

+ Show Spoiler [Leaderboard] +

+ Show Spoiler [Banlings] +

+ Show Spoiler [Mods, part 1] +

+ Show Spoiler [Mods, part 2] +

+ Show Spoiler [Bans per day] +

+ Show Spoiler [Total bans over time] +

It's not over 9000. But it's damn close.

+ Show Spoiler [Bans each hour KST] +

The height of the bars change with each iteration of this graph, but the general shape of the graph always seems to be the same.

Ban types:

Type        Number     Mani's contribution
2 day       2526       343     13.58%
1 week      1502       290     19.31%
2 weeks     879        121     13.77%
30 days     223        53      23.77%
90 day      72         23      31.51%
Perma bans  3839       442     11.51%
Unknown     4          0        0.00%

8965 total

Edit: Apparently I screwed something up hardcore so there's actually 9045 bans total.