EPT
He was called Leenock on iccup too, you could just check.
[GSL] Ro16 Day 1 - Page 99
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Wonders
Australia753 Posts
He was called Leenock on iccup too, you could just check. | ||
|
HwangjaeTerran
Finland5967 Posts
On October 28 2010 21:16 Ladde wrote: I'm getting tierd of all this "NaDa" talk. Just like when Slayer_Boxer plays. Its Boxer this, Boxer that. I know they are good, legendary players but still, everything they do is not unique for just them right? Could be fun sometimes but when they use thier name infront of every thing (NaDa macro/micro/drop/X) it gets annoying. Anyone agree? Or am I totaly off here? Totally off, no one agrees. you really don´t even have to ask | ||
|
Sniffy
Australia290 Posts
Losing to 6 pool... even more skill. | ||
|
nam nam
Sweden4672 Posts
It does not equates to not having skill either... | ||
|
KingRajesh
United States927 Posts
| ||
|
Teeny
Austria885 Posts
On October 28 2010 21:16 G.s)NarutO wrote: Did NaDa just lift the port and land it again to make Leenock think it has just landed? At least looked like that. y but the banshee flew already into the tower so i think it was useless | ||
|
Entropic
Canada2837 Posts
On October 28 2010 21:16 Ladde wrote: I'm getting tierd of all this "NaDa" talk. Just like when Slayer_Boxer plays. Its Boxer this, Boxer that. I know they are good, legendary players but still, everything they do is not unique for just them right? Could be fun sometimes but when they use thier name infront of every thing (NaDa macro/micro/drop/X) it gets annoying. Anyone agree? Or am I totaly off here? Rofl. Yes youre totally off there bud, quit while youre ahead. | ||
|
Moonwrath
United States9568 Posts
| ||
|
Holgerius
Sweden16951 Posts
Ya, that's exactly what I thought.  | ||
|
Lucius2
Germany548 Posts
| ||
|
TedJustice
Canada1324 Posts
Artosis just randomly interchanges those second words. | ||
|
gerundium
Netherlands786 Posts
| ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
On October 28 2010 21:17 Fa1nT wrote: Defending 6 pool takes LESS skill than making it work. Why didn't nada hold it off? In Broodwar thats right, in Starcraft 2 its completely wrong. | ||
|
me_viet
Australia1350 Posts
On October 28 2010 21:16 Ladde wrote: I'm getting tierd of all this "NaDa" talk. Just like when Slayer_Boxer plays. Its Boxer this, Boxer that. I know they are good, legendary players but still, everything they do is not unique for just them right? Could be fun sometimes but when they use thier name infront of every thing (NaDa macro/micro/drop/X) it gets annoying. Anyone agree? Or am I totaly off here? Ur totally off. NaDa and Boxer are their own class. I have yet to see a T with better macro than NaDa. | ||
|
Speight
Australia152 Posts
Sometimes I think Artosis trolls us on purpose. | ||
|
xBillehx
United States1289 Posts
| ||
|
Ettzerg
Serbia99 Posts
| ||
|
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
On October 28 2010 21:18 TedJustice wrote: "infestor mound"? "baneling den?" Artosis just randomly interchanges those second words. You suggesting it should be baneling mound? | ||
|
arb
Noobville17918 Posts
| ||
|
Cel.erity
United States4890 Posts
| ||
| ||
