|
|
Looks pretty pro, music is very fitting imo
|
|
Wow, the video has some really good sound and editing, but I am not sure about the font. It seems really good at points, but other times it seems to take away from the professionalism of the rest of the piece.
|
Too boring for my taste. But it wasn't bad.
|
On May 15 2010 00:00 mcgriddle wrote: Wow, the video has some really good sound and editing, but I am not sure about the font. It seems really good at points, but other times it seems to take away from the professionalism of the rest of the piece.
Lol thanks. We were debating between a clean font for professionalism or a "gritty" font to emphsize the Earth dying / decaying (the teacher picked up on it lol) plz post a comment on youtube on youtube though, thanks
|
Very well done. Except the whole nuclear bomb part, that seemed kind of misplaced... I mean yes, nukes are bad but do they fit in a "Save the environment" campaign?
|
On May 15 2010 02:47 Chrispy wrote: Very well done. Except the whole nuclear bomb part, that seemed kind of misplaced... I mean yes, nukes are bad but do they fit in a "Save the environment" campaign?
Its actually something greenpeace is campaigning for lol. And besides, they stared as a group protesting nuclear experiments in the pacific...we had to have it in there
|
Okay 2things actually three first: You did great about you´re topic beeing propaganda second: I am not realy concerned with anything stated in the video(except the CO2 emissions) because there way more things going wrong than that. I mean yeah we are fishing our oceans empty but that would´nt be a big probleme because we are eventually going to stop doing that.What´s more concerning to me is the huge amounts of plastic we are putting in the oceans because that´s something that we can´t do shit about. third: I disagree that we have to change our habbits.We just have to find a way to get our energy without producing co2. It´s really nicely explained here: http://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates.html
|
On May 15 2010 04:07 Clamev wrote:Okay 2things actually three first: You did great about you´re topic beeing propaganda second: I am not realy concerned with anything stated in the video(except the CO2 emissions) because there way more things going wrong than that. I mean yeah we are fishing our oceans empty but that would´nt be a big probleme because we are eventually going to stop doing that.What´s more concerning to me is the huge amounts of plastic we are putting in the oceans because that´s something that we can´t do shit about. third: I disagree that we have to change our habbits.We just have to find a way to get our energy without producing co2. It´s really nicely explained here: http://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates.html
If you actually read the thread carefully you'd see this doesn't reflect our beliefs, its just a propaganda video for our presentation. Why the fuck are u trying to turn it into a debate. I want critique / feedback on the video itself
|
Nice video, although imo the beginning dragged a bit with that small TV graphic. I can see you were trying to go for the whole feel that these are the kind of things that get reported on TV, but it could've been just as effective showing that whole sequence full screen as the static does a good enough job getting that feel across. Or maybe do the small TV graphic for the first ~20 seconds and segue into full screen while still using the static to keep that idea.
And yeah, about the font. If you wanted a gritty feel, there are some grungy fonts that still maintain the professionalness (or whatever the word is) of some of the more classic fonts, the font you used seemed slightly more satirical than serious imo. Still a good video, you just asked for feedback/critique so I felt like nitpicking
|
On May 15 2010 03:03 SubtleArt wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2010 02:47 Chrispy wrote: Very well done. Except the whole nuclear bomb part, that seemed kind of misplaced... I mean yes, nukes are bad but do they fit in a "Save the environment" campaign? Its actually something greenpeace is campaigning for lol. And besides, they stared as a group protesting nuclear experiments in the pacific...we had to have it in there
Ahem.. well then. I... er.. well I'll just be going now.
Good day.
|
Im sorry got a little overboard *^^* The video is actually quiet good i think.I mean the topic was propaganda so i thought it was good. no offense^^
|
On May 15 2010 02:37 SubtleArt wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2010 00:00 mcgriddle wrote: Wow, the video has some really good sound and editing, but I am not sure about the font. It seems really good at points, but other times it seems to take away from the professionalism of the rest of the piece. Lol thanks. We were debating between a clean font for professionalism or a "gritty" font to emphsize the Earth dying / decaying (the teacher picked up on it lol) plz post a comment on youtube on youtube though, thanks I'd say put in font when necessary. So when the audio is not very clear.
|
This is totally outrageous! I dont get why they are teaching students at school to make propaganda? i mean WTF!!! I simply hate propaganda being it for my pro or con stuff. The message doesnt matter, if its propaganda its on my hatelist. Dont you see propaganda is evil? Forexample Its the thing that is causing so many problems for the IPCC (climatescientists)? They could easily have had a much stronger message without reducing themselves to propagandanoobs. Propaganda is lies and exaggeration. Not good when you give the power to the masses. Because through propaganda the masses are gonna have false beleives and thus make stupid decisions and they wont be able to see what is right and wrong, and suddenly its not the masses who has the power, but the people who controls the propaganda. So we are so proud to have democracy? Come on! with propaganda being taught in schools we could easily just have fascism ez ez ez.
|
|
|
|