EPTThis is DANGEROUS!
Good thing we have Louder between them to stop the fight!
Gonna read this! Thanks for the content!
Edit: *Was going to read this*... Links broken. Guess I'll have a to wait a little.
Interviews: Louder, Chill, PsyonicReaver - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
XsebT
Denmark2980 Posts
This is DANGEROUS! Good thing we have Louder between them to stop the fight! Gonna read this! Thanks for the content! Edit: *Was going to read this*... Links broken. Guess I'll have a to wait a little. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
| ||
|
Disarray
United States1164 Posts
On February 25 2010 11:21 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: At the same time I have some doubts Blizzard will do anything about it because they have very consciously made the choice that they wanted noobs to be competent at it so that 99.9% of the non-pro population buys the game. this is an argument i don't understand. Honestly you really think that 99.9% of the non-pro population WOULDN'T buy the game because of this ? SC2 could come out and inside the box is fucking popcorn, and its still going to sell xxxmillion copies. not only that, but its something that most, wouldn't even understand or notice anyways. | ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
On February 25 2010 11:43 Disarray wrote: this is an argument i don't understand. Honestly you really think that 99.9% of the non-pro population WOULDN'T buy the game because of this ? SC2 could come out and inside the box is fucking popcorn, and its still going to sell xxxmillion copies. not only that, but its something that most, wouldn't even understand or notice anyways. Doesn't matter what we think. Blizzard thinks making the game easier is better for them and I assume it is something they have done a lot of research for, unlike you or me. | ||
|
Augury
United States758 Posts
| ||
|
Spawkuring
United States755 Posts
On February 25 2010 11:46 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: Doesn't matter what we think. Blizzard thinks making the game easier is better for them and I assume it is something they have done a lot of research for, unlike you or me. Blizzard has made it very clear that they want to support e-sports and take it very seriously. I mean they even went so far as to add in macro mechanics just so there could be something for the hardcore. I really don't see how you can think that Blizzard isn't concerned with how the hardcore fans think. | ||
|
tec27
United States3682 Posts
 | ||
Xxio
Canada5565 Posts
 thanks for doing this! | ||
|
caution.slip
United States775 Posts
| ||
|
EleanorRIgby
Canada3923 Posts
| ||
|
yariza
United States28 Posts
EDIT: nvm its back up! XD | ||
|
Vasoline73
United States7697 Posts
On February 25 2010 11:53 Spawkuring wrote: Blizzard has made it very clear that they want to support e-sports and take it very seriously. I mean they even went so far as to add in macro mechanics just so there could be something for the hardcore. I really don't see how you can think that Blizzard isn't concerned with how the hardcore fans think. The macro mechanics were only thrown in because they were too concerned about the casual audience and magazine reviews that would butcher them if they didn't include MBS and automine. Part of me feels bad for Blizzard because they are so concerned about casual players that they refuse to stick their necks out and try to make a "hardcore" product. People are going to buy SC2 no matter what.. it shouldn't have to be dumbed down | ||
|
0neder
United States3733 Posts
| ||
|
Try
United States1293 Posts
| ||
|
keepITup
251 Posts
| ||
|
251
United States1401 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
| ||
|
Irrelevant
United States2364 Posts
| ||
|
Mastermind
Canada7096 Posts
| ||
|
BlackYoshi
United States84 Posts
How long did it take us to discover all the intricacies of Starcraft 1? Have some faith. Its a new game with new rules, and its going to take more than week to master everything. I think it's pretty silly to talk about how "the game is already in trouble" when its in the first waves of a beta and still months away from release (and probably years from a true, final balance) | ||
| ||
