This is what starcraft 1 looked like in beta. People didn't like it and they did a complete graphics overhaul and we have what we have now. I fully trust blizzard to act if the current version of starcraft II isn't accepted in the community.

no that was the alpha, the beta was much much closer to the actual game

cept tanks cost 200 gas 0 min, mutalisks had an acid spray, queens had glaive wurm, defilers had blood boil...

good times

chobopeon

United States7342 Posts

February 26 2010 03:37 GMT

#363

Also, I'd like to address people who asked for the interviews to be copy and pasted in here.
+ Show Spoiler +

I understand you want to read them - I obviously want you to read them, you know? - but I pay for hosting with the views I get. I'm able to interview and write about StarCraft because of the (meager) advertisement money that I get. I'm not being greedy - it doesn't even come close to covering costs - but it is at least a little bit and I need what I can get.

Please, in the future if anything does go down, do not copy and paste it onto other sites. I was working all day today to get it back up for you guys. Again, I'm paying for it, so imagine how frustrating this bad hosting is for me :[

Thanks for the reads and pray to your respective gods that it doesn't go down. Atheists? Shake your fists threateningly in the vague direction of the hosting company.

Thanks. Hope you like 'em now that you actually get to read them!

Vasoline73

United States8069 Posts

February 26 2010 03:39 GMT

#364

On February 26 2010 12:12 Beachac wrote:

Stop posting this picture and calling it the beta. That's the prealpha/alpha like 2 years before the game came out... this is beta like 4-7 months before it's supposed to come out. Big difference

the real sc1 beta didnt have many huge changes and looked pretty much the same as the final game

T.O.P.

Hong Kong4685 Posts

February 26 2010 03:41 GMT

#365

On February 26 2010 12:37 choboPEon wrote:
Also, I'd like to address people who asked for the interviews to be copy and pasted in here.

I understand you want to read them - I obviously want you to read them, you know? - but I pay for hosting with the views I get. I'm able to interview and write about StarCraft because of the (meager) advertisement money that I get. I'm not being greedy - it doesn't even come close to covering costs - but it is at least a little bit and I need what I can get.

Please, in the future if anything does go down, do not copy and paste it onto other sites. I was working all day today to get it back up for you guys. Again, I'm paying for it, so imagine how frustrating this bad hosting is for me :[

Thanks for the reads and pray to your respective gods that it doesn't go down. Atheists? Shake your fists threateningly in the vague direction of the hosting company.

Thanks. Hope you like 'em now that you actually get to read them!

I doubt that TL members click on ads.

chobopeon

United States7342 Posts

February 26 2010 03:42 GMT

#366

On February 26 2010 12:41 T.O.P. wrote:

Show nested quote +

I doubt that TL members click on ads.

No one needs to click on ads, just view them. :D

chobopeon

United States7342 Posts

February 26 2010 04:10 GMT

#367

I'm interested to see what people really have to say now that they've actually read them, eh?

Zapdos_Smithh

Canada2620 Posts

February 26 2010 04:20 GMT

#368

nice interviews.

but ya seriously so many of you guys are getting trolled by these noobies. I have no idea why you guys are even responding to these retards, they obv have no idea what they are talking about and no amount of convincing will help.

chobopeon

United States7342 Posts

February 26 2010 05:05 GMT

#369

On February 26 2010 13:20 Zapdos_Smithh wrote:
nice interviews.

but ya seriously so many of you guys are getting trolled by these noobies. I have no idea why you guys are even responding to these retards, they obv have no idea what they are talking about and no amount of convincing will help.

i'm just wondering how all of this spiraled out of control when 99% of the 30k views didnt read the actual quotes. strange.

intrudor

Canada446 Posts

February 26 2010 05:20 GMT

#370

its always humorous when n00bsters from other RTS games come on TL.net and act like they know more than senior members of the Starcraft community about how SC2 needs to be in order to be a worthy successor of the greatest (or only?) RTS game ever made. The aforementioned n00blets tend to be more eager to voice their opinions whenever issues like MBS, automining, auto-surround, pathfinding,intrusively high unit AI and other automations are discussed.

Guys, we like your fancy analogies and fine debating skills. But please, most of us have been playing Starcraft since 1998. so here's a tip; Shut the fuck up?

it's that simple. you don't need to complicate it. You don't need to be an intuitive genius to know that all these things will dangerously degrade Starcraft 2's gameplay both at a casual and professional level. And since in Starcrafting terms, gameplay is King, all the cool looking features like amazing graphics and being able to add your grandmother on B.net 2.0 won't salvage SC2's capacity to potentially become one of the greatest hobbies of this decade.

EleanorRIgby

Canada3923 Posts

February 26 2010 05:22 GMT

#371

finally this terrible site works

Misrah

United States1695 Posts

February 26 2010 05:42 GMT

#372

Haters Gunna Hate.
Haters Gunna Hate.
But sometimes you just have to skate.
sometimes you have to take the debate.
And put it on a plate.
And let the rest be fate.
Sit back and take some Pillz.

Haters Gunna Hate.
Haters Gunna Hate.
I hate to underestimate.
Your Starcraft great.
But you can't relate.
To me- the starcraft great.
I want to make it straight.
That you over estimate.
Your skillz.

Haters gunna Hate.
Haters gunna Hate.
You desecrate.
TL's growth rate.
With your debate.
So just fucking leave.

Brett

Australia3822 Posts

February 26 2010 06:13 GMT

#373

Intrudor, you joined in Dec 09.......... Seriously?

And Misrah, that's pretty useless.

Thanks for the effort and interviews Chobo.

Chairman Ray

United States11903 Posts

February 26 2010 06:26 GMT

#374

Hey I didn't know Louder was a dad, that's awesome

Squallcloud

France466 Posts

February 26 2010 08:06 GMT

#375

Cool interviews! There's some good points in both Louder and Chill views. Although i tend to think like Chill that micro is not created but come out of necessity.

Boonbag

France3318 Posts

February 26 2010 08:09 GMT

#376

Who are all these new people ? Do they have the slighest idea of what is this site they are posting on ?

chobopeon

United States7342 Posts

February 26 2010 08:20 GMT

#377

I'll repost the next time I have a batch of interviews for you but here is an interview with InkA for you guys.

Thanks for bearing with me over a shitty day of being down :D

nard

Germany124 Posts

February 26 2010 08:21 GMT

#378

great interviews, especially the Chill/Louder ones.
Although i think that Louder is overrating the PvP proxy gates - every game i watched that strategy so far, the dude who went for proxy gates got totally stomped.

chobopeon

United States7342 Posts

February 26 2010 08:38 GMT

#379

suggestions for other interviews, anyone? list as many as you want. make them as outlandish as you want.

Zamiel

United States211 Posts

February 26 2010 08:47 GMT

#380

Wow, choboPEon you are a very excellent writer!!! Reading your interviews makes me feel like I am reading a magazine along the lines of Sports Illustrated. Keep up the good work, I look forward to your future articles.