|
I thought, what if the 3 middle bridges of destination could become a one supersized bridge like paranoid android one? would it affect balance in a positive way or in a negative one? i tried to modify the map but seems my scmdraft wont work i hope i'll add a pic soon so i want to just know your opinion
Poll: is a megabridge on destination good for all match ups? (Vote): Yes its quite a nice idea (Vote): No at all (Vote): TvZ seems imba (Vote): TvP seems imba (Vote): PvZ seems imba (Vote): PvT seems imba (Vote): ZvT seems imba (Vote): ZvP seems imba
|
i'm not sure i'd like it would make destination less unique imo
|
It cuts down on the ability to flank, removes the ability of the bridge to be a chokepoint, and looks ugly.
|
It seems like the thin bridges in destination are kind of what make it destination. This is like if they made blue storm without ramps
|
eh-- i don't think it'd add anything of value. the map already seems to be okay. adjusting it like that would make it more like all the other maps (with an open middle) and take away from its uniqueness
|
those bridges are needed when playing vs Z and on PvT.
|
The bridges should stay as they are now.
|
Sarah Palin, we do NOT want your mega bridge
On a more serious note, the 3 bridges are what give the map its character.
|
why is this even a thread
it's like OP took some random idea with basically no thought behind it and made a poll?
edit: oh, blogs. my bad
|
konadora
Singapore66064 Posts
Whatever the imbalance the map may have, you should just leave it.
Or else, how would that be Destination anymore? Destination is Destination because of all the bridges.
Do you remove the 2x mineral/gas layout for Baekmagoji because it's imba? No.
Do you remove the assimilators on Troy because they cause imbalance? No.
They all give the maps that unique characteristic. Nothing should ever be changed once the final version is out.
|
|
|
|