|
On September 01 2009 11:56 ghermination wrote:Show nested quote +On September 01 2009 11:53 Jayme wrote: No it's called being angsty and thinking about how stupid everyone else is. Teenagers as a whole are more diverse then that. When i first read that, i checked your profile to see if you were 13-16, and instead found a picture which i will be staring at the next time i trip on acid.
It is quite an amazing cat picture.
21 for the record.
|
Nice blog ghermination, I'm surprised at how little people know about drugs yet don't hesitate to judge.
imo the drugs that you talked about can help to expand a persons consciousness and give them a different outlook on life.
People seem confused by media, thinking that the only time people use or try drugs is to "escape reality" or feel good. In fact me and plenty of others are genuinely curious and want to be educated and expand our consciousness.
Of course drugs can be abused, but so can everything else.
I think perception altering drugs can be great for personality development. Often when somebody uses them he realizes that what he sees is not necessarily what is and that his life (or humanity in general) Is meaningful only to humanity(that everything is based off of perspective). They might become less spiteful/arrogant and focus on what's important in their universe and not the universe itself.
edit: for spelling
|
On September 01 2009 11:53 ghermination wrote:Show nested quote +On September 01 2009 11:47 Kiarip wrote:ignoring this paragraph: There seems to be some sort of... repression of psychoactives in our modern culture. Mushrooms wrote the Bible. Marijuana and LSD created the 70's in America. DXM is becoming an outlet for expression for thousands of people all over the world. For some reason we've come to this belief that "Psychoactives are bad." And propaganda distributed by governments all over the world continues to drive that belief home in millions (if not billions) or perfectly intelligent people. However, as in the examples i explained earlier, when a psychoactive becomes an important part of a culture, it always changes things in (relatively arguably) good ways.
Your defense for using drugs is that if you didn't use them your life would be different O_o? I would agree with this statement, but I don't see how it serves as a defense (not to imply that you necessarily need a defense.) I don't really have anything against these types of drug users, because I, myself am a believer in the clause "Reality is what's in your head," but I would assume that any drug that affects your way of thinking in this way has at least some chronic side-effects (obviously insignificant without overuse, but still existent.) So I personally probably won't take them ever. Plus you never know which way these things are gonna swing your personality, so it seems like a serious risk if you take them for this purpose. I would trust myself to turn my life/personality/views when I'm sober a lot more so than when I'm under the effect of one of these things, and to be honest I just don't see a plausible explanation for someone wanting to do it the other way around. Yes, its probably a very personal thing. However i definitely know how much these things have changed my life. Also a lot of the negative side effects are greatly exaggerated. For example, remember that whole "one joint = 20 cigarettes" bullshit, when now its being shown that marijuana is an effective preventative to cancer? Admittedly PCP would be a bad example to use because people DO go crazy on it and HAVE done things (such as eating their sons eyes) but i've done pcp myself at least 7-10 times, and with a good amount of other people, and most of the time we just kind of sat there and tripped balls. I think it takes a certain degree of mental instability to snap and enter psychosis on PCP, just as i think it would take a certain amount of instability for any drug to trigger latent psychological disorders within you.
Ok, but doesn't it trigger a relatively drastic change in chemical balance in your brain during the reaction, which isn't something that it was originally designed (evolved) for, and so although it's quite possible that the risks aren't extremely high and probably much lower than advertised, since our current understanding of the nervous system is still pretty vague, these changes in chemical balance are probably dangerous (admittedly also possibly beneficial) for a lot more reasons than what is actually known about.
I just don't understand the logic behind taking some drug, the literal effect of which despite your claims you probably understand mostly/only in a non-quantifiable manner for a reason such as having a "life-changing experience," when the human mind is more than capable of this in it's default state without foreign substances.
|
I find the idea of surgeon general warnings/laws being 'propaganda' pretty drat absurd. To what end? I understand some lobby groups exaggerate the effects of drugs (on both sides), but that is not government.
I will say that human culture is rarely without drug culture. Just look how rampant and acceptable alcohol is. It's really hard to contain. Many people take caffeine (a psychoactive drug), nearly every day. Our laws are a reflection of our culture, not some little man in a suit's selfish ambitions. Most people with a vote believe (at least some) drugs are harmful overall to society. So that's what you get.
Honestly, I don't like drugs. I think messing with your brain chemistry is risky and unnecessary. But it's a personal choice I make for myself. I can't decide for anyone else, and neither can the government.
Enjoy your birthday. Don't get too wrapped up in what your dumbass ex has to say (honestly who calls someone just to get in an argument with them hahahaa)
|
Belgium6753 Posts
On September 01 2009 11:34 Koiru wrote:I don't Really have a problem with people and their drugs but suggesting psychoactive drugs are going to change cultures in good ways if everyone started taking them is a bit ridiculous. Your post kinda makes me angry because its so full of negative assumptions, but like you said you dont know a thing about drugs so I'll try to share some insights.
The reason I think this is because if people start taking them en masse just to escape from any of their problems or stress, they really won't grow as human beings since I would say it usually takes conflict to grow. A land of stagnant minds caught up in pretty colors and altered perceptions won't be productive or efficient.
Not every drug has the same effect of putting you in some fairytale land. There's a reason why some people try LSD but wont ever go near heroin, etc. Look at it this way: the world around us is completely processed through our mind. Everything you see, hear, feel, etc is filtered through your gray mass. So why isnt it interesting to induce a difference in how you perceive things? Hormones do it to us all the time. The weather does it to us. Food does it to us. Why not with a drug-experience? Assuming that everyone would constantly be taking drugs is also complete bogus. The fear of addiction is something that people have been putting in your mind since you've been little. If you know what you are getting into, have self control and make sure you do not abuse or do it too much, addiction is basically impossible. Every drug is of course different in this effect (I wouldnt take meth because of how addicting this is). But its not like everyone who enjoys a beer from time to time is a goddamn alcoholic.
Also, if something became so widespread and popular don't even try to bullshit anyone saying "Well people wouldn't take them during work hours, they'd be serious then." because we all know that wouldn't be true. I don't need my construction workers and crane operators tripping on LSD while they're supposed to be working.
Read my previous statement. The LSD statement was probably kind of a joke. But still. All you're saying shows how you know absolutely nothing about what these things do and how people handle them. And again, do you see people boozing all day during work or what?
I also have a question. Why/what is the appeal of changing your personality, living in a different world, not being you, etc.? I do not take or use any drugs whatsoever so I'm obviously not an expert and take whatever I say with a grain of salt, but I just don't see what the point is other than to escape from how you're currently feeling or your life situation that you're in. Yes, many people have fucked up lives and serious problems, but not the majority of drug users. It just seems like pussying out to me. I don't need to get high just to live with myself.
Actually many drugs can induce strong spiritual trips and insights into one's psyche. Saying people who use drugs must have fucked up lives that they're trying to escape is like saying people who play sc are all total douchebag nerds who live in their basement because they have no friends. Why can you not understand that these experiences can have very profound and interesting results for yourself? They're not about escaping at all, they're about shedding new light on reality and yourself.
Yes people do it for fun or whatever but it still seems like a waste of time and money.
Again, over generalizing. Taking drugs does not mean you do it every day or every week for that matter. And not every drugdealer is some 'shady guy who gives you some good stuff for free and then robs you of all your lifesavings!!!!'
|
On September 01 2009 12:06 Kiarip wrote:Show nested quote +On September 01 2009 11:53 ghermination wrote:On September 01 2009 11:47 Kiarip wrote:ignoring this paragraph: There seems to be some sort of... repression of psychoactives in our modern culture. Mushrooms wrote the Bible. Marijuana and LSD created the 70's in America. DXM is becoming an outlet for expression for thousands of people all over the world. For some reason we've come to this belief that "Psychoactives are bad." And propaganda distributed by governments all over the world continues to drive that belief home in millions (if not billions) or perfectly intelligent people. However, as in the examples i explained earlier, when a psychoactive becomes an important part of a culture, it always changes things in (relatively arguably) good ways.
Your defense for using drugs is that if you didn't use them your life would be different O_o? I would agree with this statement, but I don't see how it serves as a defense (not to imply that you necessarily need a defense.) I don't really have anything against these types of drug users, because I, myself am a believer in the clause "Reality is what's in your head," but I would assume that any drug that affects your way of thinking in this way has at least some chronic side-effects (obviously insignificant without overuse, but still existent.) So I personally probably won't take them ever. Plus you never know which way these things are gonna swing your personality, so it seems like a serious risk if you take them for this purpose. I would trust myself to turn my life/personality/views when I'm sober a lot more so than when I'm under the effect of one of these things, and to be honest I just don't see a plausible explanation for someone wanting to do it the other way around. Yes, its probably a very personal thing. However i definitely know how much these things have changed my life. Also a lot of the negative side effects are greatly exaggerated. For example, remember that whole "one joint = 20 cigarettes" bullshit, when now its being shown that marijuana is an effective preventative to cancer? Admittedly PCP would be a bad example to use because people DO go crazy on it and HAVE done things (such as eating their sons eyes) but i've done pcp myself at least 7-10 times, and with a good amount of other people, and most of the time we just kind of sat there and tripped balls. I think it takes a certain degree of mental instability to snap and enter psychosis on PCP, just as i think it would take a certain amount of instability for any drug to trigger latent psychological disorders within you. Ok, but doesn't it trigger a relatively drastic change in chemical balance in your brain during the reaction, which isn't something that it was originally designed (evolved) for, and so although it's quite possible that the risks aren't extremely high and probably much lower than advertised, since our current understanding of the nervous system is still pretty vague, these changes in chemical balance are probably dangerous (admittedly also possibly beneficial) for a lot more reasons than what is actually known about. I just don't understand the logic behind taking some drug, the literal effect of which despite your claims you probably understand mostly/only in a non-quantifiable manner for a reason such as having a "life-changing experience," when the human mind is more than capable of this in it's default state without foreign substances.
The brain indeed evolved to have sudden massive changes in brain chemistry, which are, at least for a vast majority of your life, not normal. For example, in a fight or flight situation, adrenaline and other chemicals flood your body (and brain) in mass quantities. When you dream, and when you die, huge amounts of DMT are released into your brain as well. Also, i believe that the fact that we SPECIFIC opiate and cannabinoid receptors in our brains proves something. Maybe its not because of some overarching design, but i think that there is no way that those chemicals could be harmful if our brains are designed to handle them. I believe that this post responds to both your and Chef's posts.
Also, Chef, its your personal choice whether or not you choose to use psychoactives, because some people are uncomfortable with a change in their perspective. However i really do wish you would try something weak - like marijuana - at least once.
Edit: Also, i've taken those drugs that they warn about. I've literally done nearly everything you can think of and i am in perfect health, even according to my doctor. Obviously if i was a junkie it wouldn't be the case but its quite hard to become addicted to anything except meth, although even with meth you need to binge on it a couple times pretty close together before you start to become physically addicted.
|
Belgium6753 Posts
Also ghermination do you know Minilogue? They have amazing music accompanied by videos that are terrific to look at when taking acid. Just turn on a playlist on youtube and you'll see.
|
Thank you XEO!
I was thinking that I should talk about that but I wanted to focus more about some positive affects and explain why some people might take drugs.
Plus you wrote that very well and I am lazy
|
Drug use a victimless crime. As far as I'm concerned virtually all drugs should be legal. You don't hurt anyone but yourself.
|
Also, for no reason, i've just decided to make a list of everything i've done, in case people have any question about specifics.
Stimulants: Most of them, honestly all those chemical names are hard to remember. (MDMA is one of these)
Benzo's: Same with these a lot of the names are wierd, but i've done nearly all of them including the NBD's such as ambien.
Opiates: I've done: Opium Codeine Suboxone Oxycodone Hydrocodone Hydromorphone Oxymorphone Methadone Tramadol Heroin + Show Spoiler +that pyramid was on purpose ;D
Psychadelics: Cannabis :D JWH-017 (i think thats what it was called?) Marinol Shrooms LSD Luudes DMT AMT most of the 2c family except for 2c-i and some random others. LSA and a lot of others that i can't think of at this moment.
Dissociatives: DXM Ketamine PCP Nitrous Salvia (are there any other dissociatives? I don't really know, but i love them all except ketamine)
Deleriants: Diphenhydramine Dimenhydrinate
|
Drugs, or anything else, if you hurt yourself, you hurt everyone who depends on you. Unless you're a hermit living the middle of no where. Whether you care about that or not is your own look out, but 'no one gets hurt but me' is a bad excuse for anything.
|
On September 01 2009 12:15 ghermination wrote:Show nested quote +On September 01 2009 12:06 Kiarip wrote:On September 01 2009 11:53 ghermination wrote:On September 01 2009 11:47 Kiarip wrote:ignoring this paragraph: There seems to be some sort of... repression of psychoactives in our modern culture. Mushrooms wrote the Bible. Marijuana and LSD created the 70's in America. DXM is becoming an outlet for expression for thousands of people all over the world. For some reason we've come to this belief that "Psychoactives are bad." And propaganda distributed by governments all over the world continues to drive that belief home in millions (if not billions) or perfectly intelligent people. However, as in the examples i explained earlier, when a psychoactive becomes an important part of a culture, it always changes things in (relatively arguably) good ways.
Your defense for using drugs is that if you didn't use them your life would be different O_o? I would agree with this statement, but I don't see how it serves as a defense (not to imply that you necessarily need a defense.) I don't really have anything against these types of drug users, because I, myself am a believer in the clause "Reality is what's in your head," but I would assume that any drug that affects your way of thinking in this way has at least some chronic side-effects (obviously insignificant without overuse, but still existent.) So I personally probably won't take them ever. Plus you never know which way these things are gonna swing your personality, so it seems like a serious risk if you take them for this purpose. I would trust myself to turn my life/personality/views when I'm sober a lot more so than when I'm under the effect of one of these things, and to be honest I just don't see a plausible explanation for someone wanting to do it the other way around. Yes, its probably a very personal thing. However i definitely know how much these things have changed my life. Also a lot of the negative side effects are greatly exaggerated. For example, remember that whole "one joint = 20 cigarettes" bullshit, when now its being shown that marijuana is an effective preventative to cancer? Admittedly PCP would be a bad example to use because people DO go crazy on it and HAVE done things (such as eating their sons eyes) but i've done pcp myself at least 7-10 times, and with a good amount of other people, and most of the time we just kind of sat there and tripped balls. I think it takes a certain degree of mental instability to snap and enter psychosis on PCP, just as i think it would take a certain amount of instability for any drug to trigger latent psychological disorders within you. Ok, but doesn't it trigger a relatively drastic change in chemical balance in your brain during the reaction, which isn't something that it was originally designed (evolved) for, and so although it's quite possible that the risks aren't extremely high and probably much lower than advertised, since our current understanding of the nervous system is still pretty vague, these changes in chemical balance are probably dangerous (admittedly also possibly beneficial) for a lot more reasons than what is actually known about. I just don't understand the logic behind taking some drug, the literal effect of which despite your claims you probably understand mostly/only in a non-quantifiable manner for a reason such as having a "life-changing experience," when the human mind is more than capable of this in it's default state without foreign substances. The brain indeed evolved to have sudden massive changes in brain chemistry, which are, at least for a vast majority of your life, not normal. For example, in a fight or flight situation, adrenaline and other chemicals flood your body (and brain) in mass quantities. When you dream, and when you die, huge amounts of DMT are released into your brain as well. Also, i believe that the fact that we SPECIFIC opiate and cannabinoid receptors in our brains proves something. Maybe its not because of some overarching design, but i think that there is no way that those chemicals could be harmful if our brains are designed to handle them. I believe that this post responds to both your and Chef's posts. Also, Chef, its your personal choice whether or not you choose to use psychoactives, because some people are uncomfortable with a change in their perspective. However i really do wish you would try something weak - like marijuana - at least once.
Well all the chemical balance changes that are naturally induced (the ones that we are evolved to have.) are triggered by hormones, and chemicals produced in our bodies.
I don't think having the sensors is proof that we were designed to handle the chemicals. There is tons of stuff that nervous system can react to which pretty obviously isn't healthy for it. Any person can be driven mad by stimuluses that we are supposed to be able to "handle", and encounter constantly, just because of the hormones that get created, I don't see how chemicals which result in such ridiculously different responses amongst different users can be harmless.
|
i thought you went to jail for drug dealing or something like that? i remember i thread on it a while back. anyways, i never went beyond weed in high school so im not as knowledgeable as you, but I knew plenty of people who screwed themselves after getting into hard drugs..sure you might not, but society as a whole is probably better off with them illegal
On September 01 2009 11:03 ghermination wrote:
There seems to be some sort of... repression of psychoactives in our modern culture. Mushrooms wrote the Bible. Marijuana and LSD created the 70's in America. DXM is becoming an outlet for expression for thousands of people all over the world. For some reason we've come to this belief that "Psychoactives are bad." And propaganda distributed by governments all over the world continues to drive that belief home in millions (if not billions) or perfectly intelligent people. However, as in the examples i explained earlier, when a psychoactive becomes an important part of a culture, it always changes things in (relatively arguably) good ways.
the vast majority of people don't use drugs, you are way overstating their influence.
|
On September 01 2009 12:26 Chef wrote: Drugs, or anything else, if you hurt yourself, you hurt everyone who depends on you. Unless you're a hermit living the middle of no where, you really are hurting more than just yourself. Whether your care about that or not is your own look out, but 'no one gets hurt but me' is a bad excuse for anything.
I'm sorry but that seems like a completely rediculous statement. Me doing any drug isn't going to cause my family to spontaneously burst into flames. Personally, my entire family is aware of my drug use and they are fine with it.
Obviously, if an addict ends up out on the streets, performing oral sex on a well endowed african american gentleman for an underweight balloon of black tar laced with acetone, then yes, that would probably cause heartache for the family. However hopeless addicts like that are the exception, many MANY people use all sorts of addictive drugs without getting addicted.
|
On September 01 2009 12:28 iamho wrote:i thought you went to jail for drug dealing or something like that? i remember i thread on it a while back. anyways, i never went beyond weed in high school so im not as knowledgeable as you, but I knew plenty of people who screwed themselves after getting into hard drugs..sure you might not, but society as a whole is probably better off with them illegal Show nested quote +On September 01 2009 11:03 ghermination wrote:
There seems to be some sort of... repression of psychoactives in our modern culture. Mushrooms wrote the Bible. Marijuana and LSD created the 70's in America. DXM is becoming an outlet for expression for thousands of people all over the world. For some reason we've come to this belief that "Psychoactives are bad." And propaganda distributed by governments all over the world continues to drive that belief home in millions (if not billions) or perfectly intelligent people. However, as in the examples i explained earlier, when a psychoactive becomes an important part of a culture, it always changes things in (relatively arguably) good ways.
the vast majority of people don't use drugs, you are way overstating their influence.
You obviously weren't alive during the 70's if you can say that with a straight face. Woodstock, Grassroots movements, the whole "Peace and Love" things? Most of these were fueled both by a new generation shocked by the crimes of the past, and by a new wave of freshly discovered psychoactives. (Esp. marijuana and LSD)
Edit: also i got off completely scott-free on the Ketamine thing, however the guy that robbed the veterinary clinic is probably going to end up in jail for quite a while. They didn't see any reason for pursuing me in court considering i never did anything wrong and they were convinced that the transaction never took place.
|
On September 01 2009 12:10 Xeofreestyler wrote: Your post kinda makes me angry because its so full of negative assumptions, but like you said you dont know a thing about drugs so I'll try to share some insights.
The reason I'm so obviously biased is from personal experiences that have to do with the people I know who do drugs on an "occasional" to "often" basis. The majority (NOT ALL) of these people exemplify qualities and characteristics that I find completely aggravating and irresponsible. Again, not all of them, but the majority.
Not every drug has the same effect of putting you in some fairytale land. There's a reason why some people try LSD but wont ever go near heroin, etc. Look at it this way: the world around us is completely processed through our mind. Everything you see, hear, feel, etc is filtered through your gray mass. So why isnt it interesting to induce a difference in how you perceive things? Hormones do it to us all the time. The weather does it to us. Food does it to us. Why not with a drug-experience? Assuming that everyone would constantly be taking drugs is also complete bogus. The fear of addiction is something that people have been putting in your mind since you've been little. If you know what you are getting into, have self control and make sure you do not abuse or do it too much, addiction is basically impossible. Every drug is of course different in this effect (I wouldnt take meth because of how addicting this is). But its not like everyone who enjoys a beer from time to time is a goddamn alcoholic.
Having never done them I could use a bit more detail :o. What's the difference in feeling people get between LSD/Heroin/PCP/Cocaine?
Hah, I don't have a fear of addiction, my personality isn't addictive at all, I just don't see any appeal in altering my state of mind. I like myself
Read my previous statement. The LSD statement was probably kind of a joke. But still. All you're saying shows how you know absolutely nothing about what these things do and how people handle them. And again, do you see people boozing all day during work or what?
People don't booze at work because it's against the law. I'm sure plenty of people would booze during the day if they could . I was operating under the assumption that his "culturally advancing" drugs would be legal at all times of the day, where not just those limited only by their creativity (artists, musicians, etc.) do it during working hours.
Actually many drugs can induce strong spiritual trips and insights into one's psyche. Saying people who use drugs must have fucked up lives that they're trying to escape is like saying people who play sc are all total douchebag nerds who live in their basement because they have no friends. Why can you not understand that these experiences can have very profound and interesting results for yourself? They're not about escaping at all, they're about shedding new light on reality and yourself.
Wait, not every person who plays SC is like that? . On a serious note though, I've never viewed drugs like that before. And the reason for my perspective is not because of some bullshit theory that I suck up every media message and parental view like a fat girl on cookies, my perspective comes from my own experiences with the people who associate themselves with drugs/alcohol.
Again, over generalizing. Taking drugs does not mean you do it every day or every week for that matter. And not every drugdealer is some 'shady guy who gives you some good stuff for free and then robs you of all your lifesavings!!!!' Yes I know but enough people die from drunk drivers who AREN'T alcoholics for me to think of it as so much better when you aren't a frequent user.
Another question: If drugs are so culturally advancing and have positive effects, why are they never mentioned in connection with world-changing individuals? I'm talking Albert Einstein/Mahatma Gandhi/Adolf Hitler/Galileo Galilei/William Shakespeare/Plato/Aristotle/Isaac Newton/Karl Marx/Thomas Jefferson/Benjamin Franklin/Alexander the Great/Mao/Stalin/Abraham Lincoln/Napoleon/Genghis Khan/on and on and on
|
On September 01 2009 12:28 ghermination wrote:Show nested quote +On September 01 2009 12:26 Chef wrote: Drugs, or anything else, if you hurt yourself, you hurt everyone who depends on you. Unless you're a hermit living the middle of no where, you really are hurting more than just yourself. Whether your care about that or not is your own look out, but 'no one gets hurt but me' is a bad excuse for anything. I'm sorry but that seems like a completely rediculous statement. Me doing any drug isn't going to cause my family to spontaneously burst into flames. Personally, my entire family is aware of my drug use and they are fine with it. Obviously, if an addict ends up out on the streets, performing oral sex on a well endowed african american gentleman for an underweight balloon of black tar laced with acetone, then yes, that would probably cause heartache for the family. However hopeless addicts like that are the exception, many MANY people use all sorts of addictive drugs without getting addicted. Note the qualification "If you hurt yourself." I wasn't saying drugs automatically hurt you, I was saying if you hurt yourself using drugs, or anything else for that matter, you are in fact hurting more than just yourself.
|
Happy birthday druggie :D
|
On September 01 2009 12:36 Koiru wrote: Having never done them I could use a bit more detail :o. What's the difference in feeling people get between LSD/Heroin/PCP/Cocaine?
Those are quite different drugs.
LSD is a psychadelic, so it causes your brain to process the information it recieves differently, which causes the classical psychadelic colors, patterns, and in higher doses introspective "trips" where you imagine yourself as an egg or something like that. However, it never really makes you see things that aren't there.
Heroin is an Opiate, so it basically makes you "feel good man". It makes you sit there and "nod", which is basically slipping in and out of a sleeplike state and thinking wierd but not necessarily trippy things.
PCP is a Dissociative, so it makes your mind dissociate itself from your body, basically your awareness becomes seperated from what you view as your "self", it causes ego death, so that you may become the grain in the fibers of the carpet, or the light reflected on the window blinds, with no way of knowing what you originally were. It can be quite disorienting and scary, and is definitely VERY intense.
Cocaine is a stimulant, which means that it increases your heart rate and metabolism. It fills you with new energy and euphoria, and makes you feel invincible and on top of the world. You could run 20 miles and then bring 9001 women to climax without breaking a sweat, and you are the single greatest human being in the world. However it doesn't really effect your mind, it just gives you this vague emotional FEELING that is nonetheless powerful.
|
9001 women
obligatory: THAT'S OVER 9000!!!!
on-topic: thank you!
|
|
|
|