Catching Hackers 2 - Page 3
Blogs > flag |
mikeymoo
Canada7170 Posts
| ||
paper
13196 Posts
| ||
Artosis
United States2138 Posts
| ||
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
On June 24 2008 08:03 paper wrote: piqued*? been piqued*? | ||
Boblion
France8043 Posts
On June 24 2008 08:03 Artosis wrote: flag u rule. pls start naming names that is the exciting part. yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesss | ||
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
| ||
clazziquai
6685 Posts
| ||
Ilikestarcraft
Korea (South)17717 Posts
| ||
Nitrogen
United States5345 Posts
| ||
flag
United States228 Posts
On June 24 2008 06:04 Eatme wrote: Looking forward to when the catch is brought home. I have not caught anyone except a couple people I already knew cheated. But I haven't looked at many new replays yet either. That photon cannon is really cool. On June 24 2008 06:47 Phoned wrote: Flag, congratulations on discovering a new method. You should get some people who are familiar with server-side coding (ASP, PHP, JSP, .NET, etc) to help you write a web-based application to check for the hacks. I'm assuming that your new method can be determined mathematically? By setting up a web page where a user can upload the replay, you can keep the source safe, while allowing everyone in the community to use your findings. If any part of this does not make sense, let me know. That is a good idea, but it should be done after release of the method because it could just be used to narrow down which hacks it catches, and with more trial and error possibly what it catches. | ||
zatic
Zurich15306 Posts
But please everyone, don't wait too long to release this method. It will only result in accusations and flaming excesses and at some point the hack creaters will find out anyway. | ||
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
On June 24 2008 04:34 Chill wrote: WAIT WAIT WAIT How about he picks a date to release the source for the hack detection? But until that date he just releases who he caught, not how they were caught. It's brilliant. LOL | ||
| ||