|
On May 05 2016 01:27 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: wahtever i dont want to argue about this with you. I do want to consolidate on someone sensible so we can maximize our chances to get a claim. wat
|
the sooner we consolidate, the sooner we can ask for a claim. the sooner we ask for a claim, the greater the chance the person will see it and claim.
|
In this setup claims are always going to be cc-able, eventually. So if someone claims a PR we pick someone else, and lynch that person down the line if they are CCed.
|
Then why would you ever ever ever lynch someone who is afk if that is your way to proceed? Are you dense?
|
United States4714 Posts
My bad guys I havent read anything yet. I will get caught up real quick and should be here pretty much until deadline.
|
On May 05 2016 01:33 justanothertownie wrote: Then why would you ever ever ever lynch someone who is afk if that is your way to proceed? Are you dense? well that's separate matter. ideally we lynch someone afk who shows up before eod to claim.
|
o here's mig. maybe his content will look super scummy and we can lynch him. hurry up and write some scumy stuff, mig.
|
Kush what's difference with somebody getting replaced in D2 and Palmar becoming active N1/D2 considering you think he's telling the truth. Wouldn't it be better to keep Palmar?
I mean I see your point, maybe Palmar never becomes active, so we've lynched Dr.P and that's basically russian roulette given how many people haven't said anything and then we still have to deal with an inactive Palmar.
I guess it's just a difference in opinions I'd rather keep the guy who gave a reason for being away vs the one that hasn't.
|
Kush... What if they claim VT?
|
On May 05 2016 01:36 Shapelog wrote: Kush... What if they claim VT? then we lynch.
|
On May 05 2016 01:34 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2016 01:33 justanothertownie wrote: Then why would you ever ever ever lynch someone who is afk if that is your way to proceed? Are you dense? well that's separate matter. ideally we lynch someone afk who shows up before eod to claim. No, no it is not a separate matter at all. We are in the real world remember? There is only one lynch and getting someone to claim and lynching an afk are mutually exclusive.
|
On May 05 2016 01:37 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2016 01:34 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On May 05 2016 01:33 justanothertownie wrote: Then why would you ever ever ever lynch someone who is afk if that is your way to proceed? Are you dense? well that's separate matter. ideally we lynch someone afk who shows up before eod to claim. No, no it is not a separate matter at all. We are in the real world remember? There is only one lynch and getting someone to claim and lynching an afk are mutually exclusive. lynching someone who is going to be a potential mislynch down the line is more important than getting a claim. so I see it as just one priority outweighing the other.
|
On May 05 2016 01:38 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2016 01:37 justanothertownie wrote:On May 05 2016 01:34 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:On May 05 2016 01:33 justanothertownie wrote: Then why would you ever ever ever lynch someone who is afk if that is your way to proceed? Are you dense? well that's separate matter. ideally we lynch someone afk who shows up before eod to claim. No, no it is not a separate matter at all. We are in the real world remember? There is only one lynch and getting someone to claim and lynching an afk are mutually exclusive. lynching someone who is going to be a potential mislynch down the line is more important than getting a claim. so I see it as just one priority outweighing the other. You are just pulling shit out of your ass. Your argumentation for the last minutes was the dumbest shit I had to read in ages.
|
can people put down their votes already instead of arguing with me?
|
On May 05 2016 01:37 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:then we lynch. So you are blue hunting basically.
|
In game really isn't the place to discuss strategy.
|
I mean, all you want is a claim. A blue claim.
In the case that they are blue, they die that night. 2v0 (assuming that a ML happens and no doc) In the case that they are mafia, it is 1v1 with a CC. (no doc)
This really only helps mafia.
|
On May 05 2016 01:41 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: In game really isn't the place to discuss strategy. Where Am I suppose to talk to you about it then?
|
On May 05 2016 01:43 Shapelog wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2016 01:41 nnn_thekushmountains wrote: In game really isn't the place to discuss strategy. Where Am I suppose to talk to you about it then? in the qt
|
|
|
|
|