Newbie Student Mafia IX - Page 17

On May 03 2015 11:34 -Celestial- wrote:
Hey guys. Sorry for the late entry. I've been somewhat distracted playing KanColle recently; there's an event on and I'm desperate to clear it, first event I've been in. Anyway there's probably just about enough to write something on most people now so...off we go.

Unfortunately in the time I've been away I've NOT been keeping an eye on games going on. Then again I tend to prefer any meta reading from games people have actually been in together. On with the show:


Reads:

Tictock has posted nothing. So I got nothing. Neutral.

y0su hasn't really posted very much but I think this is their first game? None of the posts so far come across as being scared, on the other hand ALL of their posts since the game started have been basically off-topic with no real attempt to push anyone or draw any reads. Neutral, want to see some actual worthwhile stuff pretty fast though or that'll start drifting red.

disformation starting post I REALLY don't like. However he IS making an attempt to start producing reads. Earnest newbie with a weak entry I think. Weakly town.

scott31337 was REALLY quick to jump on a HtS vote after Superbia claimed that HtS saying she was away wasn't in her filter. And he didn't take the time to check it himself. That's either incredibly sloppy play or he's scum.

ritoky's sole post of note is an easy push on disformation. Other than that he's just posting nonsense and off-topic stuff. Coming across as pretty scummy to me; complete misdirection plays.

The Shining decent filter length (not many people on two pages), asking for opinions, pressuring people. Not exactly opening strong on his reads but I seem to remember him playing the same game last time around with "I can't do day 1" so I'm almost inclined to believe it. Also picked up on the HtS thing. Probably town.

Half the Sky already said she wouldn't be here until tomorrow evening. Not giving her a free pass for the whole of "Daytime 1" but for now I can't really say anything here.

Superbia early vote on HtS, then either misses her post in the filter dives or flat out lies about it (I'm thinking the former because it's a REALLY easy lie to prove wrong). Also went for the easy pressure on disinformation (like ritoky) and since the HtS thing fell apart hasn't done much.

FecalFeast appears to be both engaging people, picking at things that don't fit and also supremely relaxed. Town.

prplhz hasn't done much except making vague comments about how he doesn't like The Shining's initial post. Can't really say more without seeing more.

sicklucker posted nothing. Withholding judgement.

Stutters695 again posted nothing. However he stated "going to catch up real quick." and then didn't follow up on it. Neutral until he does something worth having.


Initial thoughts:

I could place Superbia and scott in a mafia team together here. HtS is inactive, Superbia puts up a pressure vote and then posts that she didn't say she was going to be away (although it's a pretty easy lie to prove false, so it's more likely he just missed it). Him missing it in and of itself isn't necessarily alignment indicative; but scott's reaction and total trust that Superbia is telling the truth is a gigantic red flag for me, since mafia team members would inherently trust each other's comments like that. scott votes as well in order to start getting pressure on HtS and maybe start a vote train because people are fairly easily swayed on day 1 and in the meantime the two of them can feed off free town credit as being people who were leading a vote train.

Although scott would have really weird luck to roll mafia so often.

Other than that I'm going to point my final finger at ritoky from the simple lack of anything useful despite a fair few posts in here; plus the circumstantial evidence of both him and Superbia pressuring the same guy. Also was recently making excuses for Superbia who I've got a bad feeling about.


Queries:

Stutters - care to follow up on your "catching up" comment? Some reads, if you please.

Would also like to see something from prplhz and ritoky. Both have been in the thread since the start here but neither have posted much of anything.

On May 03 2015 12:05 scott31337 wrote:

Never checked voting thread-Celestial

Never voted for HtS-Me

On May 03 2015 09:34 scott31337 wrote:
EBWOP
##Unvote
##Vote: Half the Sky

On May 03 2015 09:38 Superbia wrote:
Vote here boys:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/484531-newbie-student-mafia-ix-voting-thread

On May 03 2015 09:40 scott31337 wrote:
Oh we do have a thread - last one didn't.. ty

On May 03 2015 12:06 ritoky wrote:
@scott, why did you follow up on superbia's read without checking it out for yourself?

On May 03 2015 12:07 Fecalfeast wrote:
Are you implying that you intentionally voted in-thread but not in voting thread?

On May 03 2015 12:14 -Celestial- wrote:


Don't play dumb. You voted HtS in-thread before Superbia posted a link to the voting thread and before you realised there was a voting thread. Proof:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/483492-newbie-student-mafia-ix?page=11#210
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/483492-newbie-student-mafia-ix?page=11#211
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/483492-newbie-student-mafia-ix?page=11#215
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/483492-newbie-student-mafia-ix?page=11#217








Now you're misrepresenting what happened in an attempt to make me look bad and yourself look good. Keep an eye on me all you like but you're looking scummier by the minute and its certainly enough for me to put a vote on you.

##Vote: scott31337

On May 03 2015 12:14 scott31337 wrote:
I actually meant to vote. + Show Spoiler + I need to read another game of his if he has any (He said he took a couple month break, so it may not even exist) Cel's got me worried a little bit.

On May 03 2015 12:16 scott31337 wrote:

So why are you reacting on the HtS vote so much when I did vote for sicklucker? He had his two posts? Is he your scumbuddy and not wanting to draw attention to? But HtS is free reign, eh?

On May 03 2015 12:21 Fecalfeast wrote:

Is this a read robik would approve of? I think I see what you're saying