I have done things, so stop trying to make me look scummy because I don't fit into the mold you want.
[M][N]The Void Mafia - Page 66
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Damdred
15669 Posts
I have done things, so stop trying to make me look scummy because I don't fit into the mold you want. | ||
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 22 2015 03:06 Koshi wrote: Nha, Kels has a good point. You should have looked it up. This was lazy from you. I would lynch you over it as well on a blue Sunday. Or how does that saying go? Anyway. It's lazy play. Could be town lazy though. But you got to educate the lazy townies. The only post in lian his filter that makes me hesitate lynching him. But tbh. Why not get rid of him? We are going to lynch him somewhere on the way. This liancourt needs more education than HTS. And we educate through lynching. When did you become a firm believer in policy lynches? | ||
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:30 Wile E. Coyote wrote: The question is not if it is a good mentality. The question is if there is a scum motivation to do so. In general I feel people tend to doublecheck what they say way more frequently when they are scum for example. of course there is scum motivation The thread is going against SL , if SL is town, she wants to fit in and try to bury him. | ||
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On December 14 2014 06:06 Trfel wrote: Ok, I'm pretty suspicious of KelsierSC. The first real thing he does in the game are these posts, which I'm sure everyone is familiar with: This feels really weak to me, especially now that KelsierSC linked the game that he refers to. I don't understand how he can possibly find Fecalfeast the slightest bit scummy for this. It feels like he is really forcing this read from nothing, while potentially identifying a stupid Scrooge (which happened...) and appearing towny. Same with his early townread on Holyflare. Even Holyflare says that it is weak, and I agree. We've already established that Holyflare is really good at playing Mafia, and that makes it really hard to identify him. So no, a meta case that early into the game isn't very good. This post again lacks substance, and feels like he is making a read for the purpose of making a read. This post seems to take even more force out of his meta case on Fecalfeast. Is it really a good argument, if he isn't sure himself what Fecalfeast's day 1 play is like? KelsierSC and I seem to be the only two people who read batsnacks as town for the post he made on Half the Sky. (Since then, batsnacks' play has made me much more suspicious, but that isn't the point of this post). The weird thing is, KelsierSC read batsnacks as town because he agreed with batsnacks' post. The validity of batsnacks' post has since been shown to be very questionable, but KelsierSC hasn't changed his stance. KelsierSC then spends several posts focusing on Alakaslam. Here is his explanation. Later, he goes back on this and says that this didn't end up working out. More words, less analysis. His scum list seems to be changing without that much explanation. He says that he would happily vote 27nb, but doesn't include her in his lynch list. And his inclusion of Vivax in the lynch list for bad reads seems strange. Bad reads don't necessarily make someone scum, it is the intent behind them. And these reads are seeming forced. Later, he comes back with a new post, and Vivax isn't mentioned in his scum reads at all. The point about his changing stance on ritoky is also interesting. He puts ritoky into his town circle, then adds him to his lynch list, saying he has done absolutely nothing. His explanation of this is that he forgot he had him in his town circle. Shouldn't his reads be the same every time, even if he forgot all of his previous reads? If he was trying hard to make real reads, they would. If his read changed due to new information, that would be good, but the only new information he provided is that a few people scumread him. "I forgot" and "others are scumreading him" are not good reasons to change a read like that, he should at least investigate the case himself. In conclusion, I would be happy to lynch KelsierSC. Moreso than Fecalfeast, anyway. Obviously it's not certain, but it seems better than anything else. Now I will take a look at GlowingBear's complete case on Holyflare. | ||
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:30 Damdred wrote: See you are asking the exact same question and I will tell you read my filter if you want to know who I think is scum, and don't even try to trap me. I have done things, so stop trying to make me look scummy because I don't fit into the mold you want. I'm not trying to trap you. I want you to actually push somebody or make a good case on somebody. | ||
Vivax
21691 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:05 Vivax wrote: This post. This post is a post mafia asks when he sees his scumbuddy getting townread for weak reasons. Now looking for followup on what Kelsier said here, cause he should be scumreading him for this right? Next post: Doesn't say why he doesn't like lian or Dam. But JUST NOW, right before I started searching, he said he would lynch Damdred or HTS. Imo Kelsier and lian are scum and Kelsier is trying to move the lynch away from lian in some way. On January 22 2015 05:07 Vivax wrote: And by in some way I mean he's trying to get Damdred or HTS lynched instead of lian. So Kelsier, give me one good reason for you suddenly townreading lian or you're scum. On January 22 2015 05:18 KelsierSC wrote: I /squelch vivax a while ago so if he actually has something decent you will have to ask me about it On January 22 2015 05:21 KelsierSC wrote: i'm not townreading lian THEN WHY THE FUCK AREN'T YOU ON HIS WAGON AND INSTEAD TRY TO PUSH DAM AND HTS WHEN YOUR SCUMREAD HAS THE HIGHEST CHANCE OF GETTING FLIPPED? | ||
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:31 KelsierSC wrote: of course there is scum motivation The thread is going against SL , if SL is town, she wants to fit in and try to bury him. That wasn't my point. She said something that is obviously untrue/agreed with you saying something about something that didn't happen. Yes? That is your trap. Well, we can all agree that this is stupid and suicidal as either alignment I think, right? | ||
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
Vivax
21691 Posts
| ||
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:20 KelsierSC wrote: ok Dam but i'm telling you we aren't lynching oats so I want to know where you stand on someone who is up for consideration Far as I'm concerned we should lynch between you and hts but some people are scum reading SL and I want to know where you would vote in that list Why are you so sure that we aren't lynching oats? | ||
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:34 Wile E. Coyote wrote: That wasn't my point. She said something that is obviously untrue/agreed with you saying something about something that didn't happen. Yes? That is your trap. Well, we can all agree that this is stupid and suicidal as either alignment I think, right? I think it is mafia orientated to just agree with someone that most people are town reading and continue to throw scum on someone rather than actually check the facts. | ||
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
| ||
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:36 Wile E. Coyote wrote: Why are you so sure that we aren't lynching oats? because we're not. I haven't seen a single good case yet. | ||
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:36 KelsierSC wrote: I think it is mafia orientated to just agree with someone that most people are town reading and continue to throw scum on someone rather than actually check the facts. Only if you are particularly lazy and suicidal as mafia. Most people are really afraid to say something wrong as scum so they doublecheck everything they post. | ||
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:36 Half the Sky wrote: Vivax, based on the above case, I'd focus on his scum list changing - which it appears you already are - and see if it matches the same jumps in logic. so you scum read vivax and townread me but now you decide to softly throw scum on me once I start calling you out. can we lynch hts already. | ||
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:37 KelsierSC wrote: because we're not. I haven't seen a single good case yet. That alone might be a good reason to kill him actually. | ||
Damdred
15669 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:37 KelsierSC wrote: because we're not. I haven't seen a single good case yet. My points against oats are actually good, you are town reading him for really crappy reasons honestly. | ||
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:38 Wile E. Coyote wrote: That alone might be a good reason to kill him actually. yeh let's kill koshi,hf,you,slam,bats,me and oats aswell. | ||
Wile E. Coyote
Mexico790 Posts
On January 22 2015 05:39 KelsierSC wrote: yeh let's kill koshi,hf,you,slam,bats,me and oats aswell. How often did you play with oats? | ||
| ||